logo

Meta begins testing its first in-house AI training chip

Zawya11-03-2025

Facebook owner Meta is testing its first in-house chip for training artificial intelligence systems, a key milestone as it moves to design more of its own custom silicon and reduce reliance on external suppliers like Nvidia, two sources told Reuters.
The world's biggest social media company has begun a small deployment of the chip and plans to ramp up production for wide-scale use if the test goes well, the sources said.
The push to develop in-house chips is part of a long-term plan at Meta to bring down its mammoth infrastructure costs as the company places expensive bets on AI tools to drive growth.
Meta, which also owns Instagram and WhatsApp, has forecast total 2025 expenses of $114 billion to $119 billion, including up to $65 billion in capital expenditure largely driven by spending on AI infrastructure.
One of the sources said Meta's new training chip is a dedicated accelerator, meaning it is designed to handle only AI-specific tasks. This can make it more power-efficient than the integrated graphics processing units (GPUs) generally used for AI workloads.
Meta is working with Taiwan-based chip manufacturer TSMC to produce the chip, this person said.
The test deployment began after Meta finished its first "tape-out" of the chip, a significant marker of success in silicon development work that involves sending an initial design through a chip factory, the other source said.
A typical tape-out costs tens of millions of dollars and takes roughly three to six months to complete, with no guarantee the test will succeed. A failure would require Meta to diagnose the problem and repeat the tape-out step.
Meta and TSMC declined to comment.
The chip is the latest in the company's Meta Training and Inference Accelerator (MTIA) series. The program has had a wobbly start for years and at one point scrapped a chip at a similar phase of development.
However, Meta last year started using an MTIA chip to perform inference, or the process involved in running an AI system as users interact with it, for the recommendation systems that determine which content shows up on Facebook and Instagram news feeds.
Meta executives have said they want to start using their own chips by 2026 for training, or the compute-intensive process of feeding the AI system reams of data to "teach" it how to perform.
As with the inference chip, the goal for the training chip is to start with recommendation systems and later use it for generative AI products like chatbot Meta AI, the executives said.
"We're working on how would we do training for recommender systems and then eventually how do we think about training and inference for gen AI," Meta's Chief Product Officer Chris Cox said at the Morgan Stanley technology, media and telecom conference last week.
Cox described Meta's chip development efforts as "kind of a walk, crawl, run situation" so far, but said executives considered the first-generation inference chip for recommendations to be a "big success."
Meta previously pulled the plug on an in-house custom inference chip after it flopped in a small-scale test deployment similar to the one it is doing now for the training chip, instead reversing course and placing orders for billions of dollars worth of Nvidia GPUs in 2022.
The social media company has remained one of Nvidia's biggest customers since then, amassing an arsenal of GPUs to train its models, including for recommendations and ads systems and its Llama foundation model series. The units also perform inference for the more than 3 billion people who use its apps each day.
The value of those GPUs has been thrown into question this year as AI researchers increasingly express doubts about how much more progress can be made by continuing to "scale up" large language models by adding ever more data and computing power.
Those doubts were reinforced with the late-January launch of new low-cost models from Chinese startup DeepSeek, which optimize computational efficiency by relying more heavily on inference than most incumbent models.
In a DeepSeek-induced global rout in AI stocks, Nvidia shares lost as much as a fifth of their value at one point. They subsequently regained most of that ground, with investors wagering the company's chips will remain the industry standard for training and inference, although they have dropped again on broader trade concerns.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PumpFun's Revenue Redistribution Plan Sparks Debate Amid $4bn Valuation
PumpFun's Revenue Redistribution Plan Sparks Debate Amid $4bn Valuation

Arabian Post

time17 hours ago

  • Arabian Post

PumpFun's Revenue Redistribution Plan Sparks Debate Amid $4bn Valuation

PumpFun, a Solana-based memecoin launchpad, has announced plans to distribute protocol revenue to $PUMP token holders through a buyback mechanism. This move marks a significant shift from the typical speculative nature of memecoins, aiming to provide tangible value to its community. However, the platform's ambitious $4 billion valuation and a targeted $1 billion raise have raised questions about the feasibility and sustainability of its revenue model. Since its inception in January 2024, PumpFun has facilitated the creation of over 6 million memecoins, positioning itself as a central player in the Solana ecosystem's resurgence following the FTX collapse. The platform's user-friendly interface allows individuals to launch tokens with minimal effort, contributing to a surge in activity that saw Solana's Total Value Locked surpass $5 billion by mid-2025. The proposed buyback strategy involves using a portion of the platform's revenue to repurchase $PUMP tokens from the open market, thereby reducing supply and potentially increasing token value. This approach is intended to reward long-term holders and align the interests of the community with the platform's growth. However, the lack of clarity regarding the specific revenue streams and the proportion allocated for buybacks has led to skepticism among investors and analysts. ADVERTISEMENT PumpFun's revenue primarily stems from a 1% swap fee on all token trades and a 1.5 SOL fee when a token 'graduates' by reaching a market cap of $90,000. While these mechanisms have generated substantial income—estimated at over $380 million—the sustainability of such revenue in the volatile memecoin market remains uncertain. The platform's reliance on continuous user engagement and token creation raises concerns about the long-term viability of its financial model. The announcement of the $1 billion raise at a $4 billion valuation has further intensified scrutiny. Critics argue that the valuation may be inflated, given the speculative nature of the memecoin market and the platform's nascent stage. Comparisons have been drawn to other DeFi projects that have faced challenges in maintaining high valuations without robust and diversified revenue streams. Community members have expressed mixed reactions to the buyback plan. Some view it as a positive step towards creating a more sustainable and value-driven ecosystem, while others question the timing and transparency of the initiative. The absence of detailed information about the buyback schedule, funding sources, and governance mechanisms has fueled debates about the platform's commitment to accountability and investor protection. PumpFun's leadership, including founders Noah Tweedale, Alon Cohen, and Dylan Kerler, has yet to provide comprehensive details addressing these concerns. The platform's history of rapid growth and controversial features, such as the now-suspended livestreaming service that allowed for unmoderated content, adds to the apprehension surrounding its governance and operational practices. The broader context of the DeFi and memecoin markets also plays a role in shaping perceptions of PumpFun's strategy. The memecoin sector has experienced explosive growth, with market capitalizations reaching unprecedented levels. However, this growth has often been accompanied by high volatility, regulatory scrutiny, and instances of market manipulation, leading to caution among institutional investors and regulators.

How badly could Donald Trump hurt Elon Musk?
How badly could Donald Trump hurt Elon Musk?

Gulf Today

time18 hours ago

  • Gulf Today

How badly could Donald Trump hurt Elon Musk?

Io Dodds, The Independent Even for Elon Musk, this is — to use the precise technical term — bonkers. Barely one week after leaving the Trump administration with every semblance of amity, the world's richest person is going scorched earth against the leader of the world's richest nation. Insults and threats. Calls for impeachment. Sinister references to Jeffrey Epstein. Somehow, Kanye West is also involved. It's like the messiest online influencer drama you've ever seen, except the parties are two of the most powerful people on Earth. But when it comes down to brass tacks, what exactly does Musk stand to lose in this titanic celebrity divorce? If Trump were to follow through on all his threats, and use every available weapon against Musk's business empire, how badly could it hurt him? The short answer is: pretty badly. In fact, with some admittedly quick and dirty math, we can put a price tag on some of it. SpaceX and the $68bn black hole. Elon Musk's estimated $388bn fortune — already $26.6bn smaller than it was before this frank exchange of thermonuclear warheads — depends on the success of two companies which are both intertwined with the US political system. One is Tesla, which makes electric vehicles; the other is SpaceX, which builds rockets, spacecraft, and satellites. X, formerly Twitter, can be left aside for now; having bought the social network 2022 for $44bn, Musk is still struggling to recoup his investment and has almost certainly lost money overall. Let's start with Space Exploration Technologies Corp., aka SpaceX. Not many people can afford to rent a rocket, so a lot of its business comes from government contracts, and U.S. government contracts most of all. As of writing, according to federal data, the Texas-based company has been paid or promised just under $21bn by Uncle Sam since 2008. The total potential value of all SpaceX's existing contracts, however, is much higher: $89.2bn. If Trump cancelled every contract tomorrow, that would mean a theoretical maximum of $68bn in lost potential income. For context, that's more than four times SpaceX's entire forecasted revenue for 2025, and nearly 15 times its revenue from 2022. Of course, there's no way to know if those maximum payments would ever actually have been made. So we could also get a rough sense of what SpaceX stands to lose by looking at the actual cash it received from federal coffers every year. In 2022 that was $2.8bn; in 2023, $3.1bn; and in 2024, $3.8bn. On the plus side for Musk, the US government is so dependent on SpaceX that some critics have called it a monopoly in the making. SpaceX ferries our astronauts to and from the International Space Station, is heavily involved in Nasa's moon landing program, and manages an increasing share of government satellite communications as well. Still, that does not guarantee safety. Would you really, in all soberness, bet against Donald Trump doing something that hurts the country merely to punish his personal enemies? In fact, as Talking Points Memo editor-in-chief Josh Marshall argues, SpaceX's critical role might actually put it in greater danger, because it leaves the feds with few options except "expropriation or nationalisation". Tesla in regulators' crosshairs?Like SpaceX, Tesla has benefited greatly from taxpayer money, mostly in the form of emission trading payments from non-electric carmakers and tax credits or consumers buying electric vehicles. An analysis by The Washington Post put Tesla's total income from emission credits since 2007 at $11.4bn as of this February. Its gain from tax credits, which allow more people to buy its cars at higher prices, has been estimated at $3.4bn. Those emission credit schemes are run by US states, not by the federal government. Nevertheless, Trump and the Republican Party have tried to undermine such schemes by contesting states' ability to set their own emissions rules. The wider impact is difficult to calculate. In contrast to SpaceX, Tesla sells to ordinary people, who tend to have their own opinions independent of government. In reputational terms, splitting noisily with Trump could reverse some of its recent sales losses; on the other hand, it might just make Tesla hated on both sides of politics. The biggest risk may be regulatory. At the time of Trump's second inauguration, Tesla was being investigated by numerous federal agencies including the Justice Department, the National Labor Relations Board, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration — which by itself had six pending probes. During his time at DOGE, Democrats feared Musk could use his power to influence or cancel these cases. But Trump's unabashed willingness to wield state power to punish those who displease him while rewarding loyalists cuts both ways. Live by the chainsaw, die by the chainsaw. How much that costs Tesla would depend on how far Trump is willing to go, and on the outcome of any ensuing court battle. But when U.S. stock exchanges closed on Thursday its share price had crashed by nearly 12 percent, wiping $122bn off its market value. Potential deportation — or worseSo far we've only addressed Elon Musk's finances. Yet there are other, more personal ways that Trump could hurt him if the former reality TV star truly isn't here to make friends. For example, Trump's old advisor Stephen Bannon — who has previously branded Musk a "parasitic illegal immigrant" — urged the administration to investigate Musk's immigration history, and potentially deport him. Unlike some of the feverish allegations that emanate from the extended Trump-o-sphere, this one actually has some substance. An investigation by The Washington Post last year alleged that Musk had worked illegally in the US while launching his Silicon Valley career in the mid-90s. Musk has denied this, and in any case he has been a US citizen since 2002. Still, legal experts have said his citizenship could technically be revoked if he were proven to have lied to immigration authorities. And while those laws have only rarely been enforced in the past 25 years, some Trump aides and allies have said they want that to change. Nor is that anywhere close to the only alleged skeleton in Musk's closet. What is his relationship with ecstasy, Adderall, ketamine, or magic mushrooms? Has he ever been in regular contact with Vladimir Putin? Did his colleagues at DOGE rigorously follow information security laws when extracting sensitive data from federal systems? What happened to all that data after it was obtained? At least we can probably can rule out plain old assassination by government special forces. Although, to be fair, that is literally something that Trump and his lawyers have argued should be protected by presidential immunity.

Multiply Group launches MMG
Multiply Group launches MMG

Broadcast Pro

timea day ago

  • Broadcast Pro

Multiply Group launches MMG

Multiply Media Group (MMG) combines BackLite Media, Viola Media and Media 247 to operate one of the UAE's largest premium outdoor portfolios with 3,000 units. Abu Dhabi-based investment holding company Multiply Group has launched Multiply Media Group (MMG), bringing together three of its leading out-of-home (OOH) media companies—BackLite Media, Viola Media, and Media 247—into a single, unified entity. Headquartered in the UAE, MMG is positioned to become a dominant force in tech-driven media, with ambitions to reshape the media landscape both regionally and globally. The announcement was made at the World Out of Home Organisation (WOO) Annual Congress in Mexico City, accompanied by a global digital out-of-home (DOOH) campaign that illuminated major cities across the world. The launch highlights Multiply Group's expanding international footprint, reinforcing its role as a $7.2bn subsidiary of International Holding Company (IHC), the most valuable holding firm in the Middle East with a market cap exceeding $240bn. Samia Bouazza, GCEO and Managing Director of Multiply Group, said: 'The launch of Multiply Media Group represents the most significant media consolidations in the UAE. By bringing together market-leading media assets under a single AI & tech-driven group, we are reinforcing our commitment to long-term value creation and shareholder returns. MMG lays a strong foundation for our global ambitions and forward-looking investment strategy.' MMG will focus on performance, scale, and strategic partnerships to advance innovation in the OOH media space. The group will target high-potential media investments and foster synergy across its holdings to capitalize on emerging trends, especially the transformative role of AI in advertising. Jawad Hassan, Head of Media and Communications Vertical at Multiply Group, added: 'For several years, Multiply Group's ambitious growth strategy for the media sector has taken us from an integrated portfolio of three industry leaders to a media powerhouse with vast potential to redefine the entire regional media landscape in ways that will bring immediate impact and long-term value for clients. Through MMG, we stand ready to embrace the emerging trends in our industry, particularly the transformative role of AI, and we will continually look to invest in technologies that enable us to create dynamic and innovative campaigns.' The scale of MMG includes 3,000 advertising units across the UAE, including 75+ premium assets on Dubai's Sheikh Zayed Road, which are backed by long-term partnership agreements with the Road and Transport Authority (RTA) (Mada Media) in Dubai and The Department of Municipalities & Transport (DMT) in Abu Dhabi. James Bicknell, CEO of Multiply Media Group, stated: 'Multiply Media Group launches as a transformative force in out of home media — a powerhouse that unites some of the region's most strategic media assets under one bold vision. With MMG, we are not simply scaling up — we are scaling intelligently. Our mandate is clear: deliver context at scale, and reach audiences where it truly matters, when it matters most. MMG is engineered to be agile, data-led, and deeply integrated, enabling our clients to engage audiences with greater relevance, responsiveness, and resonance than ever before. This is more than media — it's momentum.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store