Rogan & Rodgers Unleash Big Pharma's Worst Nightmare...
Rogan opened the door with a brutally simple observation.
'You're not even supposed to eat sushi while you're breastfeeding,' he said.
'Because you could get some sort of a parasite. And yet, you're going to take pregnant women and dose them up with this experimental vaccine.'
He didn't stop there.
'There was no studies on whether or not women were getting damaged by this.'
Rodgers chimed in to confirm what many already suspected:
'No studies got released.'
That silence, wasn't due to a lack of data—but a refusal to release it. And now, as Rogan pointed out, the consequences are finally starting to come into view.
'Now there's some study that it's destroying their eggs.'
Rodgers added, 'That, the cancers, turbo cancers, people dropping, kids dropping.'
Rogan let it sit for a beat before saying what many are thinking:
'Yeah, it's all very dark, dude.'
They quickly shifted to the broader vaccine schedule for children—and what they see as a runaway system with no brakes and no accountability.
Today, American kids receive 72 doses of 17 vaccines between birth and age 18.
Just to enroll in kindergarten, they're hit with 29 doses of 9 different vaccines. Daycare kids face multiple rounds of 13.
And few parents even realize this.
Rogan questioned the logic behind that kind of medical regimen, especially when it comes to the very first days of life.
'Why would you give a baby a Hep B shot on DAY ONE for a sexually transmitted disease? Totally unnecessary and crazy.'
He also took aim at the fear-driven messaging around diseases like tetanus.
'Tetanus is not dangerous. If you have an open wound with tetanus, you just wash it out and you won't get tetanus. The number of cases? ZERO.'
Rodgers, echoing a frustration felt by many parents, said the entire system has moved far from informed consent—and deep into financial conflicts of interest.
Doctors aren't just recommending vaccines, he argued—they're being paid to.
Behind it all, they pointed to a turning point in 1986, when the federal government passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.
That legislation gave vaccine manufacturers blanket immunity from lawsuits, effectively removing the last guardrail.
Since then, chronic illness among children has skyrocketed.
Coincidence? They don't think so.
But it was what came next that was truly disturbing.
This was a bombshell and there is no denying it anymore.
Rogan brought up a recent study he had just sent to his producer, Jamie.
The analysis drew from adjusted VAERS data, MIT research, and findings from the Florida Department of Health—and the numbers were staggering.
'I just sent Jamie this study. VAERS adjusted data, and other derived from the MIT, Florida Department of Health study findings that yield a conservative range of 470,000 to 600,000 American deaths from the Covid-19 mRNA shots.'
Rodgers, almost in disbelief, responded, 'That's it?'
Rogan nodded. 'Well, just that alone. That's a lot of people, man.'
And then he dropped a jaw-dropping comparison:
'More than World War I, World War II and Vietnam combined.'
He clarified that the estimate referred to Pfizer alone—not even counting Moderna.
'Pfizer alone likely killed over 470,000 Americans.'
'They found a 36% increase in all cause mortality among Pfizer recipients versus Moderna.'
Rodgers, deadpan and sarcastic, delivered the line that said it all:
'Yeah, but they saved MILLIONS!'
They wrapped the conversation taking aim at the narrative itself—the one that turned vaccine skeptics into public enemies.
Not because they were wrong.
Because they were inconvenient.
Rogan called it out.
'You start talking to them about the possibilities that these things caused all these problems, and their eyes glaze over.'
'They're like, Oh! Where are you hearing this?'
His response flipped the script:
'Where are you hearing that it's not the case?'
'And why are you so confident to say that this is what happened?'
Then he questioned the sacred cow of COVID rhetoric:
''The Covid vaccine saved millions of lives.' How do you know that?'
But when it comes to the damage?
'How many do you think got fucked up by it? I know a lot of people that got fucked up by it—and most people do too. They just don't want to admit it.'
Rodgers hit back at the fear machine:
'Why were they trying so hard to scare the shit out of everybody? Tell me that.'
'Why did they have fucking death tolls on the news stations?'
Then he followed the money.
'There's a ton of money.'
'Doctors get huge bonuses for fully vaccinated kids. That's the truth.'
And finally, he hit the core issue:
'Instead of attacking the person that says that, isn't it something you should look into?'
'Is that a conflict of interest? Should be.'
Also read: $67 In France And $798 In US – Why Prescription Drug Prices Are So High In America
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Insider
4 days ago
- Gulf Insider
Americans Reject Fall COVID Shot, Don't Trust CDC Or FDA
A new KFF (formerly known as the Kaiser Family Foundation) poll reveals that the majority of Americans do not intend to get the COVID-19 vaccine this fall, and less than half trust the CDC or FDA to ensure vaccine safety. The nationwide erosion of confidence in federal health agencies and their pharmaceutical partnerships is welcomed by those who have long called for accountability, transparency, and the restoration of informed consent in American Say 'No' to COVID Vaccine According to the KFF Health Tracking Poll on Health Information and Trust, conducted July 8–14, 2025: 59% of U.S. adults say they will either 'definitely not' or 'probably not' receive a COVID-19 vaccine this fall. Only 21% say they will 'definitely get' the shot. Republicans are the least likely to receive the vaccine, with 59% stating they will 'definitely not' take it. Among White adults, 42% say they will 'definitely not' get the shot. These findings follow a growing body of evidence discrediting the effectiveness and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines. 📊 Americans Say 'No' to COVID Shot as Trust in CDC, FDA Crumbles🚨 59% of Americans refuse the fall COVID jab📉 Fewer than half trust CDC/FDA on vaccine safety🧠 Even The Hill is admitting it—kind ofIn this report, I break down the KFF poll, the media spin, RFK Jr.'s… — Jon Fleetwood (@JonMFleetwood) August 5, 2025 A recent JAMA Health Forum study admitted that the shots 'saved far fewer lives than first thought,' especially in younger shots have been linked to 38,709 deaths, 221,030 hospitalizations, and a total of 1,665,264 injuries—though these numbers represent less than 1% of actual adverse events, according to a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services-commissioned report by Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare. These staggering figures may help explain why a clear majority of Americans are now refusing the shot. Just 49% of U.S. adults say they have confidence in federal health agencies like the CDC and FDA to ensure the safety and effectiveness of vaccines approved for use in the U.S. Only 42% believe these agencies make decisions based on science rather than the personal views of agency officials. Just 37% believe the CDC and FDA act independently, without influence from outside interests. These numbers reflect the ongoing fallout from the COVID-19 response, which congressional investigators recently confirmed involved the CDC and White House using 'deeply flawed' messaging and 'overpromising' vaccine safety 'without evidence.' This collapse in public trust is unsurprising given the government's admitted reliance on arbitrary '6-feet' distancing rules, unproven mask mandates, and harmful lockdowns—none of which were grounded in transparent science, but all of which inflicted lasting damage on public health, the economy, and institutional credibility, according to a two-year investigation by the Congressional Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. Public awareness of recent changes to U.S. vaccine policy remains limited, despite multiple headlines since the appointment of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—likely due to mainstream media blackout, institutional resistance, and a legacy press unwilling to cover reforms that threaten the pharmaceutical establishment. (This is why independent media is so important.) 52% say RFK Jr. has made changes to U.S. vaccine policy. Only 26% describe those changes as 'major.' 40% say they don't know enough to characterize the changes. Among parents, confusion is also evident: In fact, the CDC's updated guidance does not formally recommend the shot for healthy children, stating the decision should be made between the provider and the family. 48% are unsure whether federal agencies are currently recommending the COVID-19 vaccine for healthy children this fall. When asked whether RFK Jr.'s changes will make Americans safer: 36% said the changes will make people less safe. 20% said they will make people safer. 31% said they don't know enough to say. 13% believe the changes will not make a difference. The response is largely partisan: 62% of Democrats say RFK Jr.'s changes make people less safe. 41% of Republicans say the changes will make people safer. This split comes despite Kennedy's sweeping reforms—including pulling the CDC's COVID shot recommendation for children and pregnant women, banning mercury in flu vaccines, blocking the WHO's pandemic treaty, defunding Gates-linked GAVI, ending coercive hospital vaccine incentives, and firing all 17 members of the CDC's vaccine advisory panel—each a bold move to restore public health integrity and medical freedom. However, health realists are still waiting for Kennedy to pull the deadly COVID shots from the market. The most trusted source for vaccine information remains personal healthcare providers: 83% of Americans say they trust their doctor 'a great deal' or 'a fair amount.' Trust in government entities is notably lower: CDC: 57% Local public health departments: 62% State government officials: 43% HHS Secretary RFK Jr.: 37% However, RFK Jr. holds strong support among Republicans: 70% of Republicans trust RFK Jr. for vaccine information. Among MAGA-aligned Republicans, that figure rises to 77%. By contrast, only 11% of Democrats say they trust RFK Jr. Among adults who do plan to get the COVID-19 vaccine this fall, concerns about access are more common. But for the general population: Only 33% are concerned the vaccine might not be available. Only 34% of insured adults are concerned their insurance might not cover it. Among those unlikely to get the shot, concerns about access are negligible: Just 11% worry about vaccine availability. Only 14% are concerned about insurance coverage. This poll comes as the FDA expands its fast-track drug approval pipeline, clearing drugs for use in as little as 30 days. The agency has also confirmed plans to bypass normal clinical trial requirements for a new bird flu vaccine, using the same Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) pathway as it did with the COVID shots. In this regulatory environment, the KFF data reflects what many have long warned: Americans are rejecting medical coercion, questioning agency integrity, and demanding informed consent. The message from the American people is clear: we're done being lied to, we're done being experimented on, and we're done trusting captured agencies to protect us—this is the beginning of a public health reckoning, and it's long overdue. Also read: Kremlin Confirms Trump-Putin Meeting 'In Coming Days', Possibly In UAE
Gulf Insider
5 days ago
- Gulf Insider
The American Academy Of Pediatrics: Mining Children
American healthcare is currently providing us with an excellent lesson in what capitalism looks like in the absence of a moral framework. The biggest losers are America's children… The Union Profiting from Childhood Sickness The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the major professional association of North American pediatricians, has overseen the rising rates of chronic illness and medicating of American children over recent decades. With 67,000 members in the United States, Canada, and Mexico, AAP distinguished itself during Covid-19 for its strident insistence that children's faces should be covered and they should be injected with modified RNA vaccines, despite knowing from early 2020 that severe Covid-19 was very rare in healthy children. Funded by sources including Moderna, Merck, Sanofi, GSK, Eli Lilly, and other pharmaceutical companies, the AAP's members are the cornerstone of the rapidly increasing pediatric pharma market in North America – by far greater than any other region. As a professional organization dedicated to ensuring income for its members, the AAP is like any similar professional association or union and acts in this manner. The loss of trust in the medical profession since 2020 is fortunately removing the misconception that AAP-like medical societies were primarily altruistic, dedicated to the welfare of others rather than their members. The recent publication of AAP priorities, developed by its membership, should reinforce this loss of trust and so, despite its unusual callousness of approach, serve ultimately to strengthen public health by exposing more clearly the motivations of those profiting from rising illness. The AAP's first stated priority is to remove parents from any authority when it comes to decisions on whether to inject their children with various substances produced commercially by its sponsors. While this should be ridiculous, it has some chance of succeeding as the ultimate beneficiaries, apart from pediatricians, are the same pharmaceutical manufacturers who heavily sponsor the election campaigns of most members of the US Congress. Of relevance, promoting or abetting chronic disease in children ensures almost certain chronic disease through adulthood. The AAP is therefore helping to set up lifelong pharmaceutical consumers. Pharma companies are purely for-profit entities, and this is exactly what their CEOs and executives are charged by their shareholders with promoting. The AAP is simply acting as a very willing enabler. The AAP considers that bodily autonomy is subservient to State-imposed requirements and that the post-World War II human rights of non-coercion and informed consent are subservient to the opinion of someone receiving money to perform an injection. Its approach coincides with the pre-War technocracy movement or medical fascism (in which a declared 'expert' decides on imposing healthcare measures rather than the patient themselves choosing it). However, before discussing bodily autonomy and coerced medicine further, it is worth commenting on the priority list of the AAP overall, as it is fascinating, coming from a group that insists publicly on prioritizing the health of children. Firstly, what is not there. Among the ten priorities of the AAP of which the elimination of parental rights or religious or cultural exemptions over vaccination of children is the highest, there is not a single mention of what are perhaps the three most prominent issues facing children today, and widely discussed publicly; increasing obesity and the epidemic of autism that the CDC heralds as of extraordinary proportions. While the AAP notes this problem elsewhere, it concentrates on identification and management rather than cause identification. Nowhere among its ten priorities is there any expression of interest in identifying and addressing the causes of rising chronic illness. The closest is a mention of lower costs for childhood insulin injections. The AAP's priority list ignores diet and reducing levels of physical activity while actively promoting medicalization, seemingly oblivious to the quite catastrophic reduction in health status of the very populations they claim to be serving. Unsurprisingly for a purely marketing organization, but inconsistent with a science-based healthcare body, the priorities include nothing regarding very obvious concerns of the impact of over 70 vaccinations, with their associated adjuvants and preservatives, now given to children by ten years of age. This number has grown from just a few 40 years ago in association with the deterioration in child health outcomes. The only interest expressed in vaccines is to remove choice from those concerned about such things, and force compliance. For a society of thinking, truth-seeking people this would be extraordinary. The justification reported from AAP President Kyle E. Yasuda, M.D., FAAP for removing any remaining personal choice regarding prophylactic medical treatment (vaccination) is 'the measles outbreaks' in North America in recent years. Jesse Hackell, MD, chair of the AAP's Committee on Pediatric Workforce, notes that they were associated with the deaths of two children, the first in 'many years.' The AAP simply states, regarding safety, that vaccines are 'safe,' a stupid claim in medicine and biology in that adverse events do occur to injected organic substances and metal salts, and they vary from person to person (if rare events occur, then 'safe' is a relative term). Associations with recent DTP injection and sudden infant death are, for example, fairly well documented. Regarding measles, it is likely that many AAP members mean well, but are genuinely misinformed regarding the impact of mass vaccination. In wealthy countries including the United States, nearly all measles mortality ceased before mass vaccination was commenced. This is not controversial – it was once stressed in medical school and is well established in national health statistics. An underlying improvement in nutrition, particularly in micronutrient deficiencies, was a likely reason. Mass vaccination then greatly reduced circulation of the measles virus, but could have only a limited impact on overall mortality. Therefore, weighing costs of vaccination (adverse events) against a very low likelihood of averting early death or disability is a real issue, and to ignore it by just reiterating 'safe and effective' is ignorant and foolish. Measles vaccination is good at stopping transmission because it is very effective at preventing infections from being established. This efficacy is significant to the argument that having many vaccinated is a public good. Nearly all vaccinated people will be protected, and at no risk from the unvaccinated. Thus, mass measles vaccination really only makes sense if it is accepted that people should not have freedom to choose over their own bodies and healthcare, or that of their children. The very low measles mortality, far lower than drowning even before mass vaccination commenced in the United States, effectively removed an argument for overriding parental rights. Unless, of course, we are also going to ban children from swimming or walking near rivers or on a beach. Lastly, regarding concerns over vaccination, many parents are uncomfortable with the role of cells harvested from induced aborted fetuses, often still alive at the time of harvesting. Again, many AAP members may believe the rhetoric that this is untrue, but nonetheless it is factual. It is how we derive cell cultures to develop many vaccines, so the DNA of these dead unborn humans can still contaminate the injection. The AAP, as an institution, officially holds that cultural and religious concerns arising from this should be overridden. So, in the end, the AAP's argument seems to come down to one of two possible drivers. Either (1) they have an ideological belief that they should simply be the authority or decision-makers on children's healthcare rather than parents (a medical-fascist approach), or (2) they see their role as promoting an extremely lucrative market for their sponsors, from which they also directly benefit, and setting children up for an entire lifetime of chronic illness and pharmaceutical consumption. It is challenging to decide which is less noble. A third possibility is also possible. Most AAP members are simply going with the flow and have not actually stopped to think through the implications of their union's policies. However, the motivation for willfully ignoring rational thought probably does come down to a mixture of money and ego, which goes back to the two potential drivers mentioned above. The AAP will almost certainly continue its path of child polypharmacy, blind adherence to protocols based on the products of their sponsors, and denigration and exclusion of the opinions of parents who recognize the stark reality of deteriorating health in North American children. Parents reading the AAP's list of priorities would be foolhardy to then entrust their children to such care. Providing that politicians retain integrity and respect freedoms that most assumed were guaranteed in the US Constitution and through basic human rights norms, the AAP will fail in its endeavors and become increasingly irrelevant to public discourse. If they get their way, we will return further toward an approach we thought we had fought wars to overcome. Fundamental rights of each human to make their own way in life, and protect and oversee their children, underpin any decent societal model. In fascist societies, such decisions are removed and taken into the hands of experts and authoritarian institutions. The people must simply comply as slaves. Medical professions and their academies have a long history of supporting such approaches, and the AAP seems increasingly determined to replicate that path. It should receive all the respect that such an indecent approach deserves. Also read: Most Americans Won't Get COVID-19 Booster This Fall, Survey Says
Gulf Insider
01-08-2025
- Gulf Insider
RFK Jr. Drops Stunning New Vaccine Announcement
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. just took aim at a system that has failed Americans for nearly 40 years, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). This program was created under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which shielded vaccine manufacturers from lawsuits over injury claims. Before becoming HHS Secretary, Kennedy exposed how vaccine manufacturers were being hammered with lawsuits due to injuries. One of the largest manufacturers at the time, Wyeth (now part of Pfizer), reportedly told President Reagan: give us legal protection or we'll stop making vaccines. Reagan's response? Why not just make safer vaccines? Wyeth's answer: Vaccines are 'unavoidably unsafe.' That phrase— ' unavoidably unsafe ' —would later appear in a Supreme Court decision and reflects the legal premise that some vaccine injuries are inevitable. 'And so, anybody who tells you vaccines are safe and effective, the industry itself got immunity from liability by convincing the President and Congress that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe,' Kennedy previously stated. Before becoming HHS Secretary, Kennedy exposed how vaccine manufacturers were being hammered with lawsuits due to of the largest manufacturers at the time, Wyeth (now part of Pfizer), reportedly told President Reagan: give us legal protection or we'll stop making… — The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) July 28, 2025 Senator Edward Kennedy, a key sponsor of the law, wrote at the time: 'When … children are the victims of an appropriate and rational national policy, a compassionate government will assist them in their hour of need.' That compassionate government never showed up. Over 39 years, the VICP has awarded just $5.4 billion to 12,000 victims. That comes out to about '1.2 awards per million doses administered.' In a brand-new statement on X, Secretary Kennedy said he intends to FIX the broken system. He explained that the court was meant to resolve claims 'quickly and fairly,' with 'doubts about causation resolved in favor of the victim.' But that hasn't happened. 'The structure itself hobbles claimants,' Kennedy wrote. 'The defendant is HHS, not the vaccine makers; and claimants are therefore facing the monumental power and bottomless pockets of the U.S. government represented by the Department of Justice.' He explained how Special Masters, who decide the cases, often come from government or political backgrounds and typically show a strong pro-government bias. 'There is no discovery, and the rules of evidence do not apply,' Kennedy lamented. He added that petitioners' attorneys report retaliation, fee suppression, and even denied access to the Vaccine Safety Datalink, a taxpayer-funded CDC database containing the best data on vaccine injuries. Worse, expert witnesses for injured children have reported intimidation and threats to their careers, including the loss of NIH funding if they testify. But Kennedy says that era is over. 'The VICP is broken, and I intend to fix it,' he wrote on X. 'I will not allow the VICP to continue to ignore its mandate and fail its mission of quickly and fairly compensating vaccine-injured individuals.' Kennedy added that he is working closely with AG Pam Bondi and HHS staff to restore the court's original mission and pledges to 'steer the Vaccine Court back to its original Congressional intent.' Also read: Survey Reveals 'Seismic Shift' As More Parents Reject Vaccine Schedule
