logo
Naidu to complete one year in office, faces balancing act

Naidu to complete one year in office, faces balancing act

Hindustan Times3 days ago

The Telugu Desam Party-led government in Andhra Pradesh, which completes one year in office next week (June 12), has its task cut out to revive the economy of the state without compromising on the implementation of the welfare agenda. Chief minister N Chandrababu Naidu, a seasoned politician, sounded confident of bringing the state's financial prudence back on track.
'Brick by brick, we are rebuilding the devastated state. In just one year, we've shown what good governance looks like,' Naidu, who is also the TDP president, said while addressing his party's conclave, Mahanadu, in Kadapa on May 29.
His government was working to enhance the image of the Telugu state by attracting the attention of global investors.
The Opposition YSR Congress Party (YSRCP), however, described the one-year regime as a big failure and a betrayal of the people's mandate. 'The government has gone back on its poll promises. In a span of one year, the people are vexed with the coalition government,' YSRCP chief Jagan Mohan Reddy said on Tuesday, calling upon the people to observe the 'Betrayal Day' on June 4.
Having secured a landslide mandate a year ago on June 4, sweeping the assembly polls by winning 164 out of the 175 seats, the TDP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA), also comprising the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the JanaSena Party, has generated high expectations among the people. The coalition also swept the Lok Sabha polls, winning 21 out of 25 seats, dealing a massive blow to the former CM YS Jagan Mohan Reddy-led YSR Congress Party, which could get only 11 assembly and four Lok Sabha seats.
Priorities drawn
Returning to CM position for the fourth time, Naidu began his latest tenure on a positive note by substantially increasing pensions, as promised before the polls, and also revoking the controversial land titling law introduced by his predecessor. He also revived Anna Canteens and fulfilled the promise of supplying three free gas cylinders annually to poor women.
However, financial constraints posed challenges to fulfilling other promises, such as free bus travel for women, payments of ₹20,000 to farmers under the Annadata Sukhibhava scheme, ₹15,000 to women under the Thalliki Vandanam scheme, ₹1,500 under the Adabidda Nidhi scheme, and an unemployment allowance of ₹3,000 for jobless youth.
Last week, Naidu announced he would implement Annadata scheme from this Kharif season, Thalliki Vandanama from the coming academic year and free bus travel for women from August 15.
Unlike his predecessor Reddy, who focussed mainly on implementing direct benefit transfer (DBT) schemes, Naidu has his own priorities — reviving the abandoned Amaravati capital city project and completion of Polavaram major irrigation project.
'Fortunately for Naidu, his timely alliance with the BJP before the last elections has helped him gain substantially from the Centre. Since the TDP is the largest partner (after BJP) in the ruling NDA with 16 Lok Sabha seats, the Centre was liberal in extending financial assistance to the state – not only for Amaravati capital city and Polavaram, but also to national highways, ring roads, metro rail etc,' political analyst Ramakrishna Sangem said.
Naidu kickstarted the constructions in Amaravati and got the works relaunched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on May 2 this year, following the approval of ₹15,000-crore loan from World Bank and ADB, besides securing another ₹11,000 crore loan from HUDCO and other financial institutions.
He also got the works on Polavaram project expedited and hopes to complete the project by December 2027.
'The financial package of over ₹11,000 crore for Vizag Steel Plant, approval for the establishment of BPCL refinery project and industrial corridors at Orvakal etc are some of the major achievements of Naidu, thanks to his lobbying power with the Centre,' Sangem added.
Yet, Naidu continues to struggle with the financial crisis. According to the CAG report, the TDP-led government had resorted to budgetary and off-budget borrowings to the extent of ₹1,37,546 crore in the last one year.
Hitting at the Naidu government, former CM Reddy in a post on X said: 'The fiscal deficit went up from 4.08% of the GSDP to 5.12% in a span of one year and the revenue deficit jumped from 2.65% to 3.61%.'
Revenge politics
Naidu's one-year rule so far also exhibited his revenge politics, a full brunt of which has been faced by the YSRCP. State's CID, the special investigation team (SIT) and the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACP) of the state police have been targeting the YSRCP leaders by digging out one scam after another.
Some of the cases under investigation include alleged forcible acquisition of shares in Kakinada SeaPorts Ltd and Kakinada Special Economic Zone by YSRCP leaders like YV Subba Reddy and V Vijay Sai Reddy; land encroachments and illegal mining in several parts of the state allegedly by former ministers Kakani Goverdhan Reddy and Peddireddy Ramachandra Reddy; and illegal liquor scam worth ₹3,200 crore allegedly involving Peddireddy Mithun Reddy, Jagan's secretary K Dhanujay Reddy, OSD P Krishnamohan Reddy and former IT advisor Raj Kesireddy.
The government also cracked down on some key YSRCP leaders like former Macherla MLA Pinnelli Ramakrishna Reddy, former Bapatla MP Nandigam Suresh, former minister Jogi Ramesh and former MLA Vallabhaneni Vamsi, all of whom have been arrested in various criminal cases. He also launched a massive crackdown on social media activists affiliated with the YSRCP, for allegedly posting derogatory content against the ruling coalition on social media.
Naidu also made every attempt to malign the image of former CM Reddy by highlighting the issues like alleged adulteration of cow ghee used for making Tirumala laddu during the YSRCP regime, an accusation that created massive uproar.
The government did not spare even IAS and IPS officers who had targeted Naidu during the YSRCP regime. Several officers were shifted from their posts and were kept in waiting without any further postings for a long time. Three of them — IPS officers PSR Anjaneyulu, Kranti Rana Tata, and Vishal Gunni — were suspended in September for their alleged involvement in the improper arrest and alleged harassment of Mumbai-based actress Kadambari Jethwani.
Shrewd politicking
On the political front, CM Naidu has been able to manage the alliance partners well, by offering key portfolios to allies JanaSena Party and the BJP. Besides appointing Pawan Kalyan as deputy chief minister and BJP leader Satya Kumar as health minister, he allotted a large chunk of nominated posts to the alliance partners. So far, the three parties have been able to work in tandem.
At the same time, Naidu also appears to be grooming his son Nara Lokesh as his heir apparent. At the recent Mahanadu, TDP leaders raised the pitch for making Lokesh the working president of the party.
Pawan Kalyan, who is presently considered No 2 in the state cabinet, is lying low. Though his Jana Sena Party had 100% strike rate in the last elections by winning 21 out of 21 assembly seats and both the Lok Sabha seats it contested, the actor-turned-politician is not asserting himself.
'Pawan Kalyan knows his limitations, but at the same time, he is able to get the things done for his party by bringing pressure on Naidu,' political analyst Sangem added.
Bumpy road for Jagan
After facing humiliating defeat in the assembly elections, several key leaders of the YSRCP resigned, including Jagan's once trusted lieutenant Vijay Sai Reddy. Four Rajya Sabha members and six MLCs also resigned from their posts.
The road ahead for Jagan Mohan Reddy is bumpy and challenging. And yet, his fighting spirit remains intact.
At a recent party meeting, Reddy asserted: 'When in opposition, challenges are inevitable. But we must remain steadfast in our values. Hardships don't last forever. I assure you — our party will return to power and rule the state for the next 30 years.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congress names four nominees for legislative council; eyes Lakhan Jarkiholi's crucial vote
Congress names four nominees for legislative council; eyes Lakhan Jarkiholi's crucial vote

New Indian Express

time41 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Congress names four nominees for legislative council; eyes Lakhan Jarkiholi's crucial vote

BENGALURU: The Congress has announced the party's four nominees for the State Legislative Council. They are: Dinesh Amin Mattu, media advisor to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah; Arathi Krishna, deputy chairperson, Karnataka NRI Forum; Ramesh Babu, chairman, the party media cell; and Sagar, Dalit leader. The names were cleared by the party high command. They would be sworn-in after getting the assent of governor. With their swearing-in, Congress will have 37 members in the 75-member House, the same as the BJP-JDS combine. All eyes are now on the independent, Lakhan Jarkiholi, brother of minister Satish Jarkiholi. Lakhan's vote could shatter or solidify the balance of power in the House. If the Congress wins him over, the party will seize both the chairman and deputy chairman posts, currently held by the BJP. It was Lakhan's brother, Ramesh Jarkiholi, who toppled the Congress coalition by defecting to the BJP. Ramesh might yet convince Lakhan to back the BJP-JDS alliance, ensuring status quo. There has been a precedent of having a person from another party as chairman of the Upper House. When Ramakrishna Hegde was the CM, Congress member Rehman Khan was chairman for about two years. If the Congress does get Lakhan's vote, the question is who will become chairman and deputy chairman. Veteran BK Hariprasad was once seen as a frontrunner. Now he has been elevated as the party general secretary for Haryana. There is no clarity on what his next role could be. Minister Bose Raju, Chief Whip Saleem Ahmed and former minister Nasir Ahmed could emerge as choices, as sources say the party would assign roles according to its priorities.

AAP's Jain appears before ACB in classroom scam case
AAP's Jain appears before ACB in classroom scam case

New Indian Express

time41 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

AAP's Jain appears before ACB in classroom scam case

NEW DELHI: Former Delhi minister Satyendar Jain on Friday appeared before the Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) for questioning in connection with an alleged corruption case concerning the construction of classrooms in government schools. Jain had been summoned by the ACB to appear for questioning. Before heading to the ACB office, he maintained that the previous AAP government had prioritised education in the city, unlike the present BJP-led administration. 'The previous AAP government in the national capital worked towards improving the city's education, while the current BJP government is only doing politics,' Jain said. The ACB had earlier summoned AAP leaders, former deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia and former PWD minister Satyendar Jain in connection with the case. Jain was asked to appear on June 6, and Sisodia has been summoned for June 9, according to officials. In April, the ACB registered a case against AAP leaders, alleging corruption in the construction of classrooms at inflated costs. The agency claimed that a scam worth Rs 2,000 crore had been uncovered in the construction of 12,748 classrooms and buildings during the tenure of the AAP government. The complaints were filed by Delhi BJP spokesperson Harish Khurana, BJP MLA Kapil Mishra, and Neelkanth Bakshi of the BJP's media relations department. They alleged corruption in the construction of approximately 12,748 school classrooms at an expenditure of Rs 2,892 crore. According to the ACB, the awarded tender cost for building a classroom was around Rs 24.86 lakh, while such a room could have been constructed for Rs 5 lakh. It was further alleged that the project was awarded to 34 contractors, many of whom are reportedly linked to the AAP. Joint Commissioner of Police (ACB) Madhur Verma said, 'It was decided in meetings of the expenditure finance committee for 2015-16 that the project would be completed by June 2016 at the sanctioned cost without any scope for future cost escalations. But not even a single work was completed within the prescribed time and significant cost escalations were observed.'

Justice, Speech and Selective Outrage: The Supreme Court's Contempt Dilemma
Justice, Speech and Selective Outrage: The Supreme Court's Contempt Dilemma

The Wire

timean hour ago

  • The Wire

Justice, Speech and Selective Outrage: The Supreme Court's Contempt Dilemma

Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now Law Justice, Speech and Selective Outrage: The Supreme Court's Contempt Dilemma Rekha Sharma 4 minutes ago The Supreme Court's swift move to initiate contempt proceedings against journalist Ajay Shukla for a critical YouTube video contrasts sharply with the way BJP MP Nishikant Dubey was handled. Nishikant Dubey (left) and Ajay Shukla in the background. In the foreground is the Supreme Court. Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now On May 30, a Supreme Court bench headed by the Chief Justice of India initiated suo motu criminal contempt proceedings against Ajay Shukla, a Chandigarh-based journalist, for posting a video on YouTube allegedly containing scathing and scandalous remarks against some senior judges of the Supreme Court. The bench observed that though the Constitution guarantees to every citizen the right to freedom of speech and expression, this is subject to reasonable restrictions and that such a right does not permit someone to defame a judge or bring into disrepute the institution of the judiciary. Having said so, the court directed that the offending video be taken down forthwith. It also asked the Attorney General and the Solicitor General to assist the court on the next date of hearing. Though the video is no longer available, it is widely believed that contain some allegedly objectionable remarks against Justice Surya Kant, who is next in line for the Chief Justiceship, and Justice Bela M. Trivedi, who retired mid-May. It may be stated, at the very outset, that the dignity, majesty and honour of the Supreme Court, or for that matter any court of justice must be protected at all cost by every person including by the Supreme Court itself. That said, fair criticism of a judicial decision and the conduct of a judge – provided it is done in good faith and on accurate facts – also needs to be equally protected. In this background, while no one can question the right and the prerogative of the Supreme Court to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against Shukla, the action taken has given rise to certain questions. Not very long ago, highly objectionable and vicious remarks were made by Nishikant Dubey, a Lok Sabha member of the ruling party, against the then CJI, Justice Sanjiv Khanna. Dubey held him singularly responsible for all the alleged 'civil wars' in the country. He also alleged that the Supreme Court was taking the country towards anarchy. These remarks were not only highly toxic and outrageous, they had the potential to rock the very foundation of our judicial system and erode the people's faith in the judiciary and almost bordered on 'blasphemy'. And yet, even though the fountain head of the judiciary was personally targeted, it neither caused any stir nor a ripple. There was a sphinx like silence. No judge deemed it fit to issue any suo motu criminal contempt notice against the errant MP. It was the Supreme Court Bar Association which raised its voice, and urged the Attorney General to grant consent for initiating contempt proceedings against Dubey. The AG neither on his own nor on the request of the Bar Association has till date given or declined to give his consent. This, despite the fact that he as the first law officer of the country, has a duty to uphold the dignity and majesty of the court of which he is an integral part. It ultimately fell on the lot of Justice Khanna himself to give a befitting response to the likes of Dubey. Though the bench headed by him dismissed a petition which sought contempt action against the MP, he gave a very measured and dignified response to him. Holding that the comments were highly irresponsible and reflected a penchant to attract attention by casting aspersions on the Supreme Court and its judges, he wrote that the courts are not so fragile as flowers to wither and wilt under such ludicrous statements. He further observed, 'We do not believe that the confidence and the credibility of the courts in the eyes of the public can be shaken by such statements'. Kudos to Justice Sanjiv Khanna for such a befitting response. Going by media reports, Justice Bela Trivedi has not been given a farewell by the Supreme Court Bar Association. The CJI is reported to have expressed his disapproval over the decision of the Bar Association, and so has Justice A.G. Masih, who said that tradition must be followed. It is for the first time in the history of the Supreme Court that such a tradition has been broken. The bar, it is said, is the judge of the judges. It is not for nothing that Justice Bela Trivedi has been denied the honour of a farewell by the bar. The question is why did things come to such a pass? It should set both bench and bar thinking. Undoubtedly, a long standing tradition has been broken but, then, judgeship is not a blank cheque. It comes with responsibility. The bar not only helps judges make the justice delivery system work, it also acts as a watchdog. The bar has, by its action, sent a loud and clear message. It is time for judges to remember that they too are under watch. They may, in a given case, fail to grasp some suspected hidden meaning of a column written in English by an Oxford educated professor and leave the job of deciphering it to some police officer, and that too not from a particular state. But if they fail to take action against a minister who made a highly objectionable statement in simple and understandable Hindi, it does raise eyebrows. It is in such matters that the bar has to play its role. And, if it does play its role, there should be no protest. Rekha Sharma is a former judge of the Delhi high court. This piece was first published on The India Cable – a premium newsletter from The Wire & Galileo Ideas – and has been updated and republished here. To subscribe to The India Cable, click here. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News Central Hall | Governors Increasingly Acting like Political Agents as Constitutional Morality Erodes 'Same Sex Marriage Not Legalised But Couples Can Very Well Form A Family': Madras HC Indian Astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla-led Mission to International Space Station Pushed to June 10 'Highly Irresponsible': BJP MP Nishikant Dubey Faces Supreme Court Wrath Why the Process of 44 MLAs 'Forming the Government' in Manipur Is Not Straightforward US Supreme Court Rules $1.29 Bn Lawsuit Against ISRO-Owned Antrix to Proceed Modi-Shah Face Dilemma As Their Stormtroopers Cross All Limits of Propriety The Arrest and Trial of Professor Azaan M Free Speech on Eggshells: What the Ali Khan Mahmudabad Case Signals for All of Us About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store