
Bangladesh army chief seems to be cosying upto to Yunus. Did 5 people have to die for it?
It is no easy task for an army chief appointed by the ousted Bangladesh prime minister, Sheikh Hasina, to survive in Bangladesh's chaotic political environment. Especially when General Waker is related to Hasina through his wife's family, and many of those related to Hasina or her party, Awami League, are either in exile or in jail. Waker's relationship with the caretaker to the interim government of Bangladesh, Muhammad Yunus, has reportedly been strained. General Waker has survived so far, but not too long ago, there were speculations of a coup against him.
It will soon be one year since Sheikh Hasina's forced exit from Bangladesh and the Muhammad Yunus government's first anniversary. And political alignments in Dhaka are only getting harder to read. Case in point, Bangladesh's chief of army staff, General Waker-Uz-Zaman.
Also read: Don't just blame Yunus for Tagore house destruction. Bangladesh radicalism goes way back
What happened in Gopalganj?
On 16 July, leaders of the National Citizen Party (NCP) had to return to Dhaka from Gopalganj district under the protection of the Army after a series of violent attacks from political protesters. An armoured personnel carrier of the Bangladesh Army guarded them on the way back to Dhaka. Local reports say supporters of the banned Chhatra League and Awami League began pelting stones at the NCP leaders. In response, the police, paramilitary and the army took on the protestors. Five people were killed, and over a hundred were injured.
Human rights organisation Ain o Salish Kendra visited Gopalganj on 21–22 July. Witnesses told them that NCP leaders delivered speeches that included inflammatory remarks directed at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and the Awami League. The remarks sparked immediate tension and escalated into violent clashes lasting nearly three hours, during which 'local residents' took to the streets in response. Among the five people killed in the violence, only Ramzan Munshi, who died during treatment in Dhaka, underwent a confirmed post-mortem. According to Ain o Salish Kendra, his autopsy report noted gunshot wounds.
What happened in Gopalganj raises serious questions about the presence of the army at a political venue inside Bangladesh. A deteriorating law and order situation over inflammatory political speeches should have been dealt with by the local police. But five Bangladeshi civilians shot dead by their own army and over a hundred injured in clashes point to a country at war with itself. It also shows how political equations in Dhaka might be shifting.
Also read: Yunus is struggling to remain relevant in Bangladesh
Waker then and now
On 27 May, I had written a column saying the Bangladesh Army Chief wants elections, and Muhammad Yunus wants to get rid of him. I quoted a report from Bangladesh's highest-selling English newspaper, The Daily Star, that said Waker wanted a national election by December this year. 'Bangladesh needs political stability. This is only possible through an elected government, not by unelected decision-makers,' a source had quoted the army chief as saying in an Officers' Address. Soon after, the news came that Yunus was mulling resignation. NCP leader Nahid Islam had confirmed this. 'He (Yunus) said he is thinking about it (resignation). He feels that the situation is such that he cannot work,' Islam had said. On 24 May, it was clarified that Yunus would remain as the head of Bangladesh's interim government.
This is not all. On 21 March, the local press had reported that top leaders of the NCP had publicly blamed Waker for trying to bring the Awami League back into Bangladesh's political arena. They also alleged Waker did not want Yunus as the caretaker to the interim government.
This public outrage by the NCP, often referred to as the King's Party in Bangladesh for its close ties to Yunus, set the tone for the next government action. On 10 May, Yunus' government banned all activities of the Awami League, practically barring it from the next round of elections.
With this being the relationship between these three entities, the million Bangladeshi-taka question is: Why would the army chief send his troops to defend NCP leaders who had not too long ago publicly attacked him?
Kolkata-based political journalist Jaydeep Majumdar, who covers Bangladesh, told me it is one of two things. 'One theory is that the Army platoon that reached Gopalganj on that day did not take prior permission from Waker. The Bangladesh Army is now divided into factions. Or, perhaps what seems more feasible is that Waker is now simply saving himself,' Majumdar said. Majumdar said Waker is scheduled to retire from service in September this year, and that would mean the immunity he gets as Army chief would be gone.
The second theory would make sense because it seems highly unlikely that Yunus is going anywhere before the elections scheduled for next year, dates for which are still not clear. My sources in the BNP have told me most political parties want polls as soon as possible, but it is in the interest of Yunus, the NCP, aka the King's party, and the Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh to delay it. Waker may simply have read the room.
Bangladeshi political commentator Faiyaz Hossain told me it is a matter of international shame that the Bangladeshi army used lethal weapons and fired live ammunition on a civilian population that didn't fire a single bullet. 'The Army acted as bodyguards of the leaders of the King's party and by extension leaned toward the Yunus administration,' he said.
With no clarity over poll dates, perhaps Waker has no option left than to side with Yunus. One wishes he hadn't killed civilians to seal the deal.
Deep Halder is an author and journalist. He tweets @deepscribble. Views are personal.
(Edited by Theres Sudeep)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump administration revokes thousands of student visas, citing criminal activity, terrorism support and Gaza war protests
The administration of President Donald Trump has revoked more than 6,000 student visas in recent months, according to a State Department official. The cancellations were linked to a range of factors including overstaying, violations of law, and, in a smaller number of cases, support for terrorism. The decision reflects a broader tightening of student visa policies under the administration's immigration and national security agenda. Visa cancellations for legal violations Out of the total cancellations, around 4,000 visas were revoked due to students breaking US laws. According to the State Department official, the majority of these offenses involved assault. Other cases included driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs and burglary. Officials said the move was in line with existing rules that make students ineligible to continue under US visas after engaging in criminal activity. Terrorism-related revocations Between 200 and 300 visas were canceled on grounds related to terrorism. The State Department's Foreign Affairs Manual outlines ineligibility for individuals 'engaging in terrorist activities' or having 'links to terrorist organizations.' The official did not provide details on which groups were allegedly supported by the affected students. Directives issued this year instructed US diplomats abroad to closely screen applicants who could be viewed as hostile to American interests or who had a record of political activism. This reflects the administration's expanded vetting approach, including reviews of applicants' social media activity. Tensions with universities and political fallout The visa actions come amid growing clashes between President Trump and leading US universities. Trump has accused campuses of fostering antisemitism following widespread student protests supporting Palestinian rights during the Gaza war. In one high-profile dispute, he froze funding for investigations at Harvard and warned that the university's tax-exempt status could be withdrawn. Some European governments have since offered increased research grants to attract international scholars. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed that 'hundreds, perhaps thousands' of visas, including those of students, have been revoked due to activities considered inconsistent with US foreign policy. Administration officials have said that support for Palestinians or criticism of Israel's conduct in Gaza may lead to deportation, framing such actions as threats to US policy and labeling them as pro-Hamas. Legal challenges and criticism One notable case involved a Turkish student at Tufts University who was detained for over six weeks in Louisiana after co-authoring an article critical of her university's response to Israel's war in Gaza. She was released after a federal judge granted bail. Critics of the administration argue that the visa revocations amount to a challenge to free speech rights protected under the First Amendment. They say that the policy unfairly targets students for political views, raising broader debates about the balance between immigration controls and constitutional protections. To stay updated on the stories that are going viral follow Indiatimes Trending.


Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why did Bhosari MLA Mahesh Landge take a stand against Deputy CM Ajit Pawar?
Maharashtra BJP MLA Mahesh Landge's recent statement on gaurakshaks (self-styled cow vigilantes) has pitted him against Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar, setting the stage for a likely political duel in Bhosari constituency, with local body polls around the corner. Last week, Landge, who had switched sides from the undivided Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) to the BJP in 2014, issued a statement supporting gaurakshaks, assuring them of protection from being implicated in false cases. His remarks came in the backdrop of Pawar earlier this month asking authorities to direct district police heads not to allow private individuals to inspect vehicles transporting animals. Following Pawar's intervention, the Maharashtra Police had issued a circular stating that only the police should act against those involved in illegal cattle transport. One of Landge's aides said that his statement was only a reflection of the BJP's stance. 'Cow protection and action against 'love jihad' are at the core of our Hindutva policy. The MLA's statement is a reflection of the same,' he said. With butchers in the state on a strike for more than a month, Pawar's stance diverges from that of alliance partner BJP—though BJP MLC Sadabhau Khot spoke out against cow vigilantes recently. Meanwhile, Landge's statement is being seen as a strategic bid to ensure his party gets the upper hand in Bhosari constituency, a seat that Pawar and the NCP have set sights on. Batte for Bhosari Located in the Pimpri Chinchwad area of Pune district, the Bhosari Assembly seat has a cosmopolitan population, with a large migrant population due to the presence of industries. Earlier, the undivided NCP had the upper hand in the area, with the BJP having a minimal or almost no presence. But in 2014, Landge won the seat as an Independent and then joined the BJP, ensuring the saffron party got a foothold in the area. Now in his third term, Landge also served as the BJP city president, calling the shots in Bhosari. Pimpri Chinchwad was once seen as Pawar's pet project, with the deputy chief minister and the undivided NCP holding the reins of the municipal corporation. The BJP is hoping to wrest power back in the upcoming civic polls. Landge's statement is being seen in political circles as a bid to ensure that his dominance in Bhosari—where many from the undivided NCP have joined Ajit Pawar—and Pimpri Chinchwad remains unchallenged. This is the second time this year that Landge and Pawar have been at loggerheads publicly. In February, Pawar had openly lashed out at Landge for not crediting him for the development of Pimpri Chinchwad. With Landge known to be close to Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, in the run-up to the civic polls, there is speculation that there may be more to his statement than meets the eye.


The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Trump begins arranging Zelenskyy-Putin meet, commits to coordinating security guarantees for Ukraine
Worried over Trump's potential return to supporting the Russian president's stance on the war, especially on territorial concessions to be made by Kyiv to end the three-and-a-half year long conflict, the European leaders were able to convince Trump to coordinate the 'security guarantees' demanded by Zelenskyy for peace in Eastern Europe. New Delhi: US President Donald Trump Monday said that he has begun preparations for a meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, following the latter's visit to the White House accompanied by a raft of European leaders. 'During the meeting, we discussed Security Guarantees for Ukraine, which Guarantees would be provided by the various European Countries, with coordination with the United States of America. Everyone is very happy about the possibility of PEACE for Russia/Ukraine. At the conclusion of the meetings, I called President Putin, and began the arrangements for a meeting, at a location to be determined, between President Putin and President Zelenskyy,' Trump posted on Truth Social. The American president added: 'After that meeting takes place, we will have a Trilat, which would be the two Presidents, plus myself. Again, this was a very good, early step for a War that has been going on for almost four years.' Trump appointed US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, along with special envoy Steve Witkoff, to coordinate with Moscow and Kyiv for these meetings. Trump's weekend of diplomacy has been perceived as a victory for Putin, who had been isolated by the Western leaders following the start of the current phase of the Russia-Ukraine war in February 2022. Trump had promised to end the war within 24 hours of assuming power at the White House, while on the campaign trail last year. However, any deal, including a partial ceasefire between Moscow and Kyiv has remained elusive. In the early months of his current presidency, Trump had applied pressure on Zelenskyy to accept his demands for peace negotiations, but in the last few weeks, he has taken aim at Putin for failure to end the war. Besides training his sights on the Russian president, Trump has also taken aim at India for funding Russia's war machine through New Delhi's continued purchases of oil from Moscow. The US president imposed additional tariffs of 25 percent on India on 6 August, raising the total tariff burden placed on imports from New Delhi to 50 percent, which is set to begin at the end of this month. Also Read: Amid Trump's tariff bombs, India's business with America surged while imports from Russia dipped 10% US tilts towards security guarantees for Ukraine French President Macron told reporters after the hours-long meeting between the leaders that the 'most important' outcome was Trump's commitment to work on security guarantees for Ukraine with his European counterparts. The US president in the past has ruled out any guarantees to defend Ukraine, in case any peace deal with Russia breaks down in the future, while also making it clear that Washington DC does not support Kyiv's accession to NATO. 'We discussed security guarantees. This is a key issue, a starting point towards ending the war. We appreciate the important signal from the United States regarding its readiness to support and be part of these guarantees…The US President also supported a meeting at the level of leaders. Such a meeting is necessary to resolve sensitive issues,' Zelenskyy wrote in a post on X Monday. The Ukrainian president added: 'Today was an important step, a demonstration of genuine unity between Europe and the United States. The leaders personally came to support Ukraine and to discuss everything that will bring us closer to real peace, to a reliable security architecture that will protect Ukraine and all of Europe.' Zelenskyy was dressed in a suit during the current visit to the White House, after the falling out he had with Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance during his last visit to Washington earlier this year. Russian spokesperson Maria Zakhorova, before the meeting of the European leaders, rejected any potential peacekeeping force from NATO in Ukraine, asserting that such a situation could potentially lead to unpredictable consequences, according to media reports. Moscow has been pushing for Ukraine to concede territory, especially the Donbas—provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk—a demand Zelenskyy has ruled out. Moscow has also laid claim to two other provinces of Ukraine—Zaporizhzhia and Kherson. (Edited by Mannat Chugh) Also Read: 'Dialogue & diplomacy' only way forward, says MEA as it welcomes Trump-Putin's Alaska summit