In veiled attack at Rahul Gandhi in Rajya Sabha, Jaishankar dubs him 'China-guru'
S Jaishankar on Wednesday launched a veiled attack at Congress leader
Rahul Gandhi
in the
Rajya Sabha
, dubbing him as "
China-guru
" and alleging that such people got their knowledge on China by attending Olympics in Beijing and by taking special tuitions from the Chinese Ambassador.
Jaishankar asserted that he, unlike the "China-Gurus", did not hold any secret meetings or deals during his recent visit to China, where he discussed terrorism, de-escalation and trade, besides issues of mutual interest between the two countries.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Data Analytics
Technology
Data Science
Healthcare
others
Cybersecurity
Management
Digital Marketing
Public Policy
Others
CXO
Finance
Leadership
Design Thinking
Project Management
Data Science
PGDM
MBA
Product Management
Degree
Operations Management
Skills you'll gain:
Data Analysis & Visualization
Predictive Analytics & Machine Learning
Business Intelligence & Data-Driven Decision Making
Analytics Strategy & Implementation
Data Analysis & Visualization
Predictive Analytics & Machine Learning
Business Intelligence & Data-Driven Decision Making
Analytics Strategy & Implementation
Duration:
12 Weeks
Indian School of Business
Applied Business Analytics
Starts on
Jun 13, 2024
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Data Analysis & Visualization
Predictive Analytics & Machine Learning
Business Intelligence & Data-Driven Decision Making
Analytics Strategy & Implementation
Duration:
12 Weeks
Indian School of Business
Applied Business Analytics
Starts on
Jun 13, 2024
Get Details
Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi had attended the 2008
Beijing Olympics
as a special invitee.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Gold Is Surging in 2025 — Smart Traders Are Already In
IC Markets
Learn More
He said that the cooperation between Pakistan and China started in the 1960s, but the previous governments in India did not deal with the neighbour properly.
The minister said there has been talk of a
China-Pakistan connection
by some, who have alleged that he was not doing enough on China, even though he has spent 41 years in foreign service and has been the longest-serving Indian Ambassador in China.
Live Events
"But there are 'China-gurus' now and one sir is sitting across from me, whose affection for China is so great that he made a deal between India and China - 'Chindia'. They had so much love for China.
"Besides him, there is another 'China Guru'. There may have been some shortcomings on my part on China, as I did not get China teaching by going to the China Olympics, as I was not invited and was not a special person. Some people got their China knowledge by going to the Olympics there. But, whom did they meet there? They did not just meet the Chinese, but also others," the minister said.
His reference to 'Chindia' was to a phrase coined by Congress leader Jairam Ramesh, who said "Chindia is still a vibrant idea".
"But, when you take the Olympics classroom, some things are left out and then one has to take private tuitions from the Chinese Ambassador after inviting them at home.
"This 'China guru' says that China and Pakistan have come very close, which is the reality. They came together as we left PoK," Jaishankar noted.
"By saying that he is giving a warning... were you sleeping in the history class. This cooperation and strategic partnership grew during the UPA regime, as Chinese companies were invited to invest in India," he said.
Referring to talk by the opposition about
national security
, Jaishankar said the biggest damage for India in the last 20 years in sea was the Chinese occupation of Hambantota port in Sri Lanka, but the then government did not act on it.
"The China-guru gives us lectures on China, they should understand that this happened during their era," he asserted.
Referring to his recent visit to China, he said, "during my visit to China, whatever I did and discussed was publicly open. It was clear, I discussed terrorism, I discussed de-escalation and I discussed restrictions on trade which China has put."
"I made it clear that relations with China will develop only on three mutuals -- mutual interest, mutual sensitivity, mutual respect.
"Unlike some other people, I made no secret meetings, I did no secret deals. That only Olympic people did, only China-gurus do such things and not normal people," the external affairs minister said.
Jaishankar has been accused by the Opposition by not talking about China enough and being soft on it despite the border transgressions by the Chinese Army.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India doesn't need more linguistic nationalism — it needs scalable AI-powered classrooms
Sridhar Vembu, co-founder of Zoho, has been calling for Indians to work in native languages, claiming India's talent, including in tech, is held back by linguistic barriers. '95 per cent of Indians are not fluent in English,' he states. The case for linguistic confidence has merit, but Vembu's myopic argument stems from nationalistic sentiment rather than the path to opportunity. An innovator is gate-keeping AI's capacity to immediately and affordably overcome all language challenges. When leaders with the means to effect on-ground change tell students they don't need to learn English or gain foreign degrees, they omit to mention that both are what got them a seat at the negotiating table of the $4.9 trillion global tech industry. It is not that our students have an inherent inability to learn, but that our techno-educational pipeline cannot teach them. They have not been provided with credible, available, and meritorious learning opportunities. In the 2009 Programme for International Student Assessment (which tests & ranks global education systems), India ranked 72nd out of 73. By boycotting subsequent assessments, we abdicated accountability that undermines showy calls for AI-driven reform. Claiming students don't need the positioning resurrects feudal structures that keep the oppressed reliant on those who do have the currency and negotiability of a global lingua franca. India faces a staggering teacher shortage of approximately 1.5 million educators, leading to overcrowded classrooms; 1.2 lakh schools operate with a single teacher, 89 per cent located in rural areas. Tech leaders citing China's linguistic nationalism forget it has a single script with idiomatic dialect variations. Government-funded scholarships enable their students to conduct research overseas and repatriate their learnings. India has 780 languages and 68 scripts. China has over $1 billion invested in AI education, with 99 per cent of Chinese university faculty and students now using AI tools, 60 per cent frequently. Through the USA's robust public library system, internet access, laptops, sometimes even MacBooks, are made accessible. Instead of enabling such innovations, our techbros are caught in nationalistic debates rich with excuses. Today, what matters more than anything is how we leverage AI immediately. India's Sarvam AI models process code-mixed content in 10 languages with 97 per cent accuracy, including the open-source Shuka v1 audio model. Its content can reflect real-world Indian language usage, handle complex educational terminology, and run efficiently on edge devices, including smartphones. Sarvam is already tasked with building India's sovereign foundational model under the IndiaAI Mission. Organisations like Rocket Learning are already using AI in childhood education, with 75 per cent of children becoming school-ready, while the AICTE's 'Anuvadini' tool supports 22 regional languages. Such progress removes needless linguistic divisiveness. Integrating multiple emergent open-access agentic technologies can transform our education systems overnight with political will and industry focus. There is no longer any excuse for not implementing widespread education reform. From public information messaging to highly specialised technical education, it is possible to customise lessons, automate recursive testing, standardise grading and disseminate it widely. All any village in India needs is electricity, wifi and a smartphone. Regionality is a cocoon of caste and class divisions. AI disrupts this. Real-time translation capabilities offer learners multilingual capacity, and the artificial scarcity of access disappears. Just as English historically offered a neutral modality, thousands of Indians took to the binary coding language precisely because it enabled them to adopt a vocabulary that was mathematically impersonal and logically freeing. Such neutrality is what enables unprecedented social mobility. India needs hypermobility, not hyperregionality. We need to eliminate the false choice between cultural authenticity and educational advancement. AI-powered Intelligent Interactive Teaching Systems (IITS) can personalise learning, generate educational content, and eliminate knowledge gaps dynamically. UNICEF India's research confirms that AI-powered tools can adapt to each child's pace regardless of linguistic background. Unlike human teachers, AI systems can also work 24/7 and reach remote villages with a consistent quality for India's 1.5 million schools. While 60 per cent of school children in India cannot access online learning, mobile penetration is fast-paced: 58 per cent of higher-class students have smartphone access. This creates the opportunity for leapfrogging traditional educational infrastructure. The National Education Policy 2020 explicitly calls for AI integration at all educational levels. What we lack is the urgency to deploy at scale, and what we are getting are excuses galore. India can chuck the outdated Government-school model and switch to a digital library model. Equipped with internet and wifi, students of all ages can teach themselves with pre-loaded modules. An 80-year-old housewife, a 40-year-old farmer or a 20-year-old mechanic can go back to 'school' at any time of day and grab opportunities they never had. AI can provide feedback in real-time, freeing limited human teachers to mentor. India's youth don't need to be told what they don't need to learn or be advised to stay in their villages by those who had the choices to learn, leave, grow, and return. The power brokers who gained influence through access to knowledge don't get to construct barriers to prevent others from following suit. Critics cite infrastructure, data privacy, and implementation challenges. These are the problems to solve while deploying, not reasons to delay deployment. The question is no longer whether AI will transform Indian education, but whether we will act swiftly enough to push enough of our populace through on the momentum of this age, before they get left behind. Das is a Mysuru-based author, therapist, independent AI researcher & co-founder of Project Shunyata, a group that examines AI through the lens of Buddhist Philosophy
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
26 minutes ago
- Business Standard
'Elections are choreographed': Rahul Gandhi's big claim against EC, BJP
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Thursday alleged that the Election Commission is working with the BJP to manipulate election results. Presenting data from the 2024 Lok Sabha elections in Karnataka, Gandhi claimed that "vote chori" (vote theft) had taken place on a large scale, calling it a "crime against the Constitution". During a media address at the AICC headquarters in New Delhi, Gandhi said the Congress had set up a team to investigate suspected irregularities and gathered 'concrete evidence of vote chori' over six months. He demanded access to machine-readable voter data from the past 10-15 years and CCTV footage from polling stations. "If the EC does not give us machine-readable data for the past 10-15 years and the CCTV footage, they are partaking in the crime," Rahul Gandhi said. Focus on Mahadevapura: Allegations of 100,000 fake votes Rahul Gandhi presented an analysis of voter data from the Bangalore Central Lok Sabha constituency, particularly the Mahadevapura Assembly segment. According to Gandhi, in the Lok Sabha constituency of Bangalore Central, the Congress polled 626,208 votes while BJP got 658,915 votes — a winning margin of 32,707 for the BJP. Despite Congress winning six out of seven Assembly segments in the constituency, Gandhi further pointed to a massive lead of over 114,000 votes for the BJP in Mahadevapura. This, he claimed, turned the seat in BJP's favour. 'Elections are being choreographed': Rahul Gandhi The Congress MP described the entire electoral process as being "staged". "Elections are choreographed... Our internal polling told us we would win 16 seats in Karnataka; we won nine," he said. The Congress focused on seven unexpected losses and zeroed in on Mahadevapura for a detailed analysis, he said. "We found 100,250 votes stolen. Stolen in five different ways. Duplicate voters, fake and invalid addresses, and bulk voters in a single address, on a building with 50-60 people living. But when we go there, there is no record of those people living there. One family living in that house," he added. Rahul Gandhi pointed to invalid photos and misuse of Form 6, which allows new voter registration, as methods used for vote tampering. He alleged that 100,250 votes were fraudulent, citing: • 11,965 duplicate voters • 40,009 voters with fake or invalid addresses • 10,452 bulk voters listed under single addresses • 4,132 voters with invalid photos • 33,692 voters registered using misused Form 6 for new voter applications Concerns over polling schedule and voter turnout Rahul Gandhi raised concerns about how elections are now held in multiple phases, unlike earlier when they were completed in a single day. "There was a time in India with no EVMs; people voted on one day. Now, UP has a different voting day, and Bihar has some other day. Voting goes on for a month. This made us suspicious," he said. He also flagged sudden changes in polling dates for Karnataka and Haryana as suspicious. Referring to the Maharashtra Assembly elections, Gandhi said the number of voters added to the rolls in five months exceeded those added in the last five years. "In Maharashtra and Haryana, we saw it right in front of our faces. We said publicly and told EC, more voters were added in five months than in five years in Maharashtra. More voters than the entire population of Maharashtra. Huge jump in voter turnout after 5 pm," he alleged. The Congress MP claimed there was a discrepancy between Lok Sabha and Assembly results, with 10 million new voters added at the state level, which altered the outcome. (With agency inputs)
The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
U.S. tariffs: ‘We should also raise it to 50%,' says Shashi Tharoor
Congress leader Shashi Tharoor on Thursday (August 7, 2025) said that India should also raise tariffs on American goods to 50% in response to the U.S. imposing an additional 25% tariff on Indian exports. U.S. tariffs on India: Follow LIVE updates on August 7, 2025 Mr. Tharoor questioned why India should stop at the current 17% tariff and emphasised that the country should not be intimidated by such actions. He also said that no country should be allowed to threaten India in this manner. Speaking to the reporters, Mr. Tharoor said, 'It will definitely have an impact because we have a trade of $90 billion with them and if everything becomes 50% more expensive buyers will also think why should they buy Indian things?... If they do this, we should also impose a 50% tariff on American exports... It is not that any country can threaten us like this...' Also Read | Trump non-committal on whether extra India tariffs will go with Russia-Ukraine ceasefire 'Our average tariffs on American goods are 17%. Why should we stop at 17%? We should also raise it to 50%... We need to ask them, do they not value our relationship? If India doesn't matter to them, they should also not matter to us,' he added. Earlier, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order on August 6 imposing an additional 25% tariff on imports from India. Mr. Trump cited matters of national security and foreign policy concerns, as well as other relevant trade laws, for the increase, claiming that India's imports of Russian oil, directly or indirectly, pose an 'unusual and extraordinary threat' to the United States. Also Read | Trump's imposition of 50% tariff is economic blackmail to secure unfair trade deal: Rahul Gandhi Terming the United States' move to impose additional tariffs on India over its oil imports from Russia as 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable,' the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) declared that New Delhi will take 'all actions necessary to protect its national interests. In further development, a senior United States Administration Official told ANI that there is simply 'no comparison' between the hundreds of billions of dollars of growing Indian imports of Russian oil and the modest U.S. imports of Russian goods. In response to a question, the U.S. official told ANI, 'There is simply no comparison between the hundreds of billions of dollars of growing Indian imports of Russian oil, and the modest U.S. imports of Russian goods, which amount to less than 1% of the value of Indian imports'.
