Most Americans say this financial milestone makes you an adult
About three-quarters, or 76%, of Americans say that coming off a parent's cell phone plan is one of the "ultimate signs" of adulthood, according to a recent survey of over 2,000 adults by AT&T.
Roughly two-thirds, or 66%, of those polled also say they believe adult children should aim to reach this financial milestone by age 21. However, of those who pay their own cell phone bill, most waited until age 27 — and 18% didn't start paying for their plan until age 40 or later, AT&T found.
Here's a look at other stories affecting the financial advisor business.
It makes sense that paying for a cell phone plan would be a telling sign of financial freedom for many young adults, according to Carolyn McClanahan, a certified financial planner and founder of Life Planning Partners in Jacksonville, Florida.
"Eventually they have to get their own car insurance because they can't stay on their parent's plan once they are no longer living them after they've finished school," said McClanahan, a member of the CNBC Financial Advisor Council. "At 26, they have to get their own health insurance. So it is not surprising that they stayed on the family phone plan as the last break for independence."
Many experts argue it's harder today for young adults to make it on their own.
"Separating from a parent's cell phone plan might seem minor, but it symbolizes something much bigger: financial independence and personal responsibility," said Douglas Boneparth, an CFP and the president of Bone Fide Wealth in New York.
"In today's world, where young adults are often burdened by high living costs, student loans and delayed milestones like homeownership, even small acts of autonomy feel like major wins," said Boneparth, who also is a member of CNBC's Financial Advisor Council.
According to J.D. Power, the average monthly cell phone bill is $144.
In addition to soaring everyday expenses and housing costs, millennials and Generation Z face other financial challenges their parents did not at that age, other studies also show.
Not only are their wages lower than their parents' earnings when they were in their 20s and 30s, after adjusting for inflation, but they are also carrying larger student loan balances.
"'Adulting' isn't always about hitting big life events," Boneparth said. "Sometimes it's about taking ownership of the basics, like paying your own phone bill. These micro-milestones offer a sense of progress and control when other financial goals feel out of reach."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Money over love? How finances are affecting romantic relationships
Although the median U.S. annual salary is about $62,192, Americans on average expect their ideal partner to earn six figures, a new survey found. On average, women want their ideal partner to earn $110,000 while men expect theirs to earn $90,000, according to a Tawkify survey of 1,000 Americans. A quarter of respondents want more, saying their ideal partner should earn over $150,000. That's still not enough for 1 in 10 who are holding out for $250,000 and 1 in 20 who want $500,000 or more. Some responses were contradictory. More than 6 in 10 Americans (63%) surveyed said they would marry for love, even if it meant a lifelong financial struggle. But if forced to decide between love and money, 46% said they would pick the latter. In fact, nearly 1 in 3 said they'd consider getting back with an ex if that person became wealthy. Those unemployed in a rough job market may find more trouble in their love life. Nearly half of Americans are taking the lyrics to TLC's 1999 hit 'No Scrubs' to heart, with 48% reporting they would not date someone without a job, even if they were attracted to them. Brie Temple, Tawkify's chief commercial officer and chief matchmaker, said the matchmaking company's clients want to date someone who adds to their life and not someone who is financially dependent on them. More: Uncomfortable Conversations: What is financial infidelity and how can you come clean? 'Women, in particular, are saying things like 'I'm not interested in being a nurse or a purse,' particularly if they're dealing with an older demographic,' Temple said. More: Can you afford your friends? That active social life can come at a steep price Deal breakers While not the leading cause, money issues are one of the reasons couples get divorced. But conversely, in some cases, money is the reason people stay together. Some 69% of those Tawkify surveyed said they remained in a relationship longer than they wanted due to shared finances. Single people might be quicker to cut someone off over bad money habits. A separate survey of 2,000 Americans conducted by Talker Research on behalf of Chime, found 26% said a date being ungenerous or stingy gives them a 'financial ick.' At the same time, a third said they would be put off by a partner who lives beyond their means. Jason Tartick, a banker and host of the podcast 'Trading Secrets,' said overspending is no longer 'cool' because it represents a lack of authenticity. 'It's beyond refreshing in this dating environment because it's allowing for a bit more openness,' said Tartick, who was also a contestant on season 14 of The Bachelorette. 'I think the openness is what will actually create connection, not a facade of something that is just an illusion.' For Tartick and Dr. Traci Williams, a certified financial therapist, a romantic partner not willing to talk about finances is a red flag in a relationship, if not a deal breaker. Williams added that a partner having lots of debt without a repayment plan or being reckless with money could also be cause for concern. More: Gen Z is getting serious about their finances. What's in the way? 'It is possible for couples to be together if they don't have exactly the same values. But can you agree, and can you work together?' Williams said. 'If one person likes to save, and one person likes to spend, yes, you can spend, but are we also saving for our future?' Generational shifts Financial responsibility is particularly appealing to members of Generation Z – 78% of whom consider it an important attribute when choosing a partner, according to a separate survey of 1,069 adults by Bank of America. Most Gen Zers are finding ways to date without spending money, with 53% of men and 54% of women reporting they spend $0 per month on romance. A quarter of Gen Z men and 30% of Gen Z women said they spend less than $100 a month on dating. When Gen Z does spend money on dates, they're more open to splitting the bill than older generations. The Talker Research/Chime survey found while 45% of Gen Xers and 42% of baby boomers believe men should pick up the tab, only 36% of Gen Zers agreed. Overall, 39% of men said they feel pressured to appear more financially stable than they are. At 47%, nearly half believe men should cover all the costs of a date, compared to only about a third of women. 'It's just fascinating for me to watch people's conversations online,' Williams said. 'People are regularly saying, 'I want a man who will pay for everything and take me on trips and here, there, and everywhere,' but in reality, when people are actually dating, they tend to be a bit more flexible.' When the love versus money question is asked in a different way, 58% of women are more likely to pick a 'broke and magical' relationship over financial security, compared to 51% of men, the Tawkify survey found. When broken down by age group, Gen Z is the generation second most likely to choose love over money, second only to millennials. More than half of both groups said they'd pick the 'broke and magical' relationship. Only 46% of Gen Xers and 48% of baby boomers reported the same. When and how to talk about money Half of Gen Zers and millennials said it's attractive when someone is upfront about their income, compared to only 23% of baby boomers, according to the Talker Research/Chime survey. It also found, however, that money remains one of the largest sources of stress in dating. To alleviate some of that anxiety, Temple recommends couples talk about money early and often in their relationship. Williams suggests setting up a specific time to chat about it once a week or every couple of weeks, if a couple is living together or in a serious relationship. For those struggling to broach the subject, Williams said even talking to your partner about egg prices is a place to start. More: What a viral TikTok teaches us about ghosting 'The reality is that it's relatable that life's so expensive,' he said. 'As opposed to creating tension with finances by not willing to have the conversations, you can actually create vulnerability by connecting via relatability.' If your partner shares financial information, Tartick said make sure not to use it against them. 'When we say money, everyone becomes very guarded... We are afraid of being shamed and blamed,' he said. 'You hear people joking around at the dinner table, 'Oh, my wife or husband has Amazon packages everyday' and we're constantly weaponizing information that has to do with spending.' Financial questions couples should discuss Tartick suggests asking the following questions to learn about someone's financial values while keeping money conversations fun: If you won $1 million and had to spend it in 24 hours, what would you spend it on? What's one thing you know you overspend on, but will keep doing it anyway? What's your dream income? Temple recommends asking: What's the largest splurge purchase you've made for yourself and why? When I say, 'financial freedom,' what does that bring up for you? Growing up, how did your parents or guardians talk about money? Williams also suggests setting clear expectations about who plans and pays for dates early on in a relationship. If money is tight, she recommends budget-friendly ideas including game nights and taking advantage of free museum days. Tartick said it's time to get real about numbers when a couple thinks about moving in together or getting married. He said they should ask about each other's credit score, number of financial accounts, annual expenses, salary, debt to income ratio, net worth, overall risk tolerance, and their target retirement age. 'If these are the numbers the bank is looking at to decide if you can get a mortgage or a loan to start up a company, why aren't these numbers that we're talking about with our partner?' he said. Reach Rachel Barber at rbarber@ and follow her on X @rachelbarber_ This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Money or love? Survey finds Americans divided over which matters more
USA Today
24 minutes ago
- USA Today
Whether tax season starts late or not doesn't matter. It's coming. Prepare now, pros say.
As Americans speculate on whether tax season really could start as much as three weeks later than usual, tax pros are telling them to stop worrying and start preparing. Speculation about tax season has been rife this summer after former IRS Commissioner Billy Long hinted last month in an interview that the open could begin around President's Day which is on Monday, Feb. 16 next year and would give taxpayers about two months to file. Traditionally, the filing season begins the last week of January. Taxpayers eager for their refunds who normally file immediately may have to wait a little longer to get them this season, but for most Americans, a later start may go unnoticed. Less than 13.2 million taxpayers filed right away in 2025 and it was down 14% from the prior year, IRS data showed. And nearly a third of 1,011 Americans surveyed by IPX1031 last year said they procrastinate when it comes to filing taxes, with 21% not even knowing when the tax deadline is. Regardless of which camp you're in, tax season is coming and now's the time to begin preparing to save yourself money and maybe a lot of angst later, tax pros say. 'With just over four months left in 2025, there is still time for all taxpayers to make final decisions that will impact their 2025 tax return when they file early next year," said Mark Steber, chief tax officer at tax preparer Jackson Hewitt. "Now is the perfect time to review last year's tax return and current finances for the year – especially taxpayers who were unhappy with their refund amount or balance due to the are typically everyone's largest single financial transaction each and every year and a solid plan can help reduce stress, save valuable tax dollars, and avoid mistakes and missteps." How should Americans begin to prepare their taxes? Since 2025 isn't over yet, Americans have time to make adjustments now that can lower their tax bills or boost their refunds. Some of these steps include: If you owed money, look to see if there was a penalty for underpayment of estimated tax. If you ended up paying a penalty, think about increasing withholding or paying quarterly estimated tax payments to avoid the penalty, said Richard Pon, a certified public accountant in San Francisco. If you had a large refund, consider reducing withholding. A refund basically is an interest free loan to the government, he said. "However, some taxpayers like large refunds or else they will have higher paychecks and are tempted to spend more throughout the year." Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@ and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday.
USA Today
24 minutes ago
- USA Today
Do Americans have personal Social Security accounts? Answers here.
American workers pay taxes into a Social Security 'trust fund.' The more you earn now, the more you will reap later in retirement benefits. You can monitor your progress in a government account called 'my Social Security.' Those facts might lead some people to believe that everyone has a personal Social Security fund, money earmarked just for them. Roughly one in four Americans thinks exactly that, according to a new survey from the libertarian Cato Institute. The poll asked respondents how Social Security is funded. Only 45% of respondents chose the correct answer: 'My taxes pay for current retirees, and future workers will pay my benefits.' How does Social Security work? Most of us don't know. Confusion runs rampant on the basic workings of Social Security, according to recent surveys from Cato and AARP. Both polls coincide with Social Security's 90th anniversary, marked on August 15. In the Cato survey, released August 7, only 9% of Americans correctly identified the maximum annual Social Security benefit, which exceeds $60,000, on a multiple-choice list. Only one-quarter correctly guessed the average annual benefit, which falls between $20,000 and $30,000. The AARP survey, released in July, found that three-quarters of Americans believe they are informed about how Social Security works. But are they? In that survey, only 40% of Americans knew the earliest age you can claim Social Security: 62. Only 24% knew the claiming age when your benefit check maxes out: 70. 'When we started asking questions, it was obvious people aren't as knowledgeable as they think they are,' said Bill Sweeney, senior vice president of government affairs at AARP. Pay as you go: How Social Security really operates Here's how Social Security actually works: A portion of your income goes into a pair of Social Security trust funds, one for retirement, the other for disability. Social Security benefits are paid from those funds. Social Security is known as a 'pay as you go' program, which means that benefits paid to today's retirees are mostly collected from current workers. In other words, the Social Security benefit you receive is not money you earned. In that sense, the term 'trust fund' might be a little misleading. 'The terminology, alone, confuses things,' said Robert Brokamp, a senior retirement adviser at The Motley Fool. Relentless messaging on Social Security, from politicians and personal finance websites, might suggest workers are socking away their own money to pay for their eventual retirement. It is true that how much you earn determines the size of your eventual benefit checks. The money in those checks, however, will come mostly from future workers. 'People who don't understand the way it works think that they have been contributing to their Social Security benefits through their paychecks,' said Caleb Silver, editor-in-chief of Investopedia, the financial journalism site. 'It's definitely not sitting in an account with your name on it,' he said. 'It's sitting in an account with everyone's name on it.' Social Security faces a fiscal cliff Through most of its history, the Social Security program collected more money than it paid out, yielding a reserve that totaled $2.7 trillion at the end of 2024. Yet, as America ages, the reserve is dwindling. The latest projections show Social Security will face a shortfall by 2034. When the reserves run out, the federal agency will have sufficient funds to pay only about 81% of full benefits, according to AARP. Most Americans know that. In the Cato poll, 79% of working-age adults said they don't believe they will receive full benefits when they retire. Roughly one in 10 expect no benefits at all. The AARP poll, too, found Americans deeply pessimistic about the future of Social Security. More than one third of respondents said they believe that when the reserves are gone, benefit payments will cease. American workers have been predicting Social Security's demise for years. AARP has polled Americans about the federal program for four decades. Faith has never run high. 'People back in 1985 didn't have confidence Social Security was going to be there for them,' Sweeney said. 'And what's interesting is, that number has been consistent.' Social Security has faced insolvency before Social Security has faced insolvency before. At one point in the early 1980s, amid economic downturns, program trustees predicted a shortfall was months away. In 1983, policymakers fixed Social Security by collecting new taxes and gradually raising the full retirement age, among other changes. Congress will have similar options to shore up Social Security between now and 2034. Policymakers could choose to collect more Social Security taxes. They could again raise the retirement age, asking Americans to wait longer to collect larger benefit checks. Or they could borrow the money. 'I think that Congress will definitely do something to avoid reducing benefits,' said Emily Ekins, vice president and director of polling at Cato. 'I don't think they're just going to allow a quarter in benefits to be cut.' But how might Congress fix the program? Raise taxes, borrow money, or reduce benefits? Cato posed that question in its survey. The largest share of Americans, 37%, said they would favor higher taxes. Slightly fewer, 35%, favored borrowing the funds. Only 28% said they'd prefer reduced benefits. What if every Social Security check was $1,800? There are more radical solutions. Congress could abandon its complex benefit formulas in favor of a flat monthly check, the same amount for everyone: say, around $1,800. In the Cato survey, 38% of respondents said they would support a flat benefit as an alternative to tax hikes or program cuts. Clearly, it's not for everyone. 'A really foundational part of Social Security is, the more you pay in, the more you get out,' said Sweeney of AARP. 'And I think that's really important to the way the program is structured.'
