logo
Donald Trump's biggest NFL blunder? Passing on the Cowboys before Jerry Jones turned them into a $12.8B empire

Donald Trump's biggest NFL blunder? Passing on the Cowboys before Jerry Jones turned them into a $12.8B empire

Time of India21 hours ago
Donald Trump once declined to buy the Dallas Cowboys. Jerry Jones bought the team in 1989 (Getty Images)
President Donald Trump once waved off the chance to buy the Dallas Cowboys. Four decades later, that shrug reads like one of sports business's most expensive what-ifs. In 1984, when the franchise could be had for roughly $50 million, Donald Trump reportedly scoffed, saying he felt 'sorry for the poor guy who is going to buy' the team.
Today, the Cowboys sit atop the NFL's value rankings at an estimated $12.8 billion—proof that the 'poor guy' turned into the richest brand in American sports.
How a dismissed opportunity became a masterclass in brand building and media leverage
The Cowboys haven't lifted a Lombardi in more than 25 years, but their business has boomed under Jerry
Jones
, who purchased the franchise in 1989 and rewrote the NFL's revenue playbook. From premium stadium experiences and relentless merchandising to global licensing and omnipresent media exposure, Dallas maximized every touchpoint.
'America's Team' became a 365-day content machine, drawing audiences well beyond wins and losses.
The valuation gap tells the story. With the Cowboys at $12.8 billion and the next-closest NFL team—the Los Angeles Rams—far behind, Dallas's edge is rooted in cultural ubiquity as much as football results. In other words: championships are great; distribution, storytelling, and star power are scalable.
The Jerry Jones era's paradox: commercial dominance amid on-field frustration
Jerry Jones' stewardship hasn't been without friction.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Wonosari: Unsold Sofas Prices May Surprise You (Prices May Surprise You)
Sofas | Search Ads
Search Now
Undo
Contract standoffs and the perception that some stars weren't rewarded quickly enough have fueled periodic unrest, most recently around headline names in Dallas. Yet the franchise's financial arc kept climbing, showing how a powerhouse brand can thrive even when playoff exits sting.
Donald Trump's 1984 quip doubles as a timeless business lesson. Sports franchises are media companies wrapped in uniforms; their upside compounds with smart timing, infrastructure bets, and an owner willing to sell the vision daily. Jones did all three. The result: a team worth roughly 240 times that old price tag—and a cautionary tale about passing on undervalued cultural assets.
Also Read:
NFL's 2025 shake-up: 12 teams add male cheerleaders, sparking fierce debate over tradition and inclusivity
In the end, Dallas's trajectory underscores a truth the market keeps rewarding: in modern sports, the scoreboard matters, but the brand scoreboard often matters more.
Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'This is the worst proposal ever': Los Angeles Chargers fan goes viral after girlfriend rejects live proposal and gets covered in nachos in front of thousands
'This is the worst proposal ever': Los Angeles Chargers fan goes viral after girlfriend rejects live proposal and gets covered in nachos in front of thousands

Time of India

time29 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'This is the worst proposal ever': Los Angeles Chargers fan goes viral after girlfriend rejects live proposal and gets covered in nachos in front of thousands

Los Angeles Chargers fan goes viral after girlfriend rejects live proposal and gets covered in nachos in front of thousands (Image via X) The Los Angeles Chargers gained national attention after a fan went viral during their home game at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, California, on Saturday, August 16. The Chargers supporter was in the seats next to his girlfriend when, out of nowhere, he kissed the cam. As the pair surfaced on the Jumbotron, hundreds of people were yelling. The man, wearing a Los Angeles Chargers jersey, surprised the thousands present when he fell on one knee and presented a ring box. Frozen with shock, the girlfriend shook her head quickly; she was neither smiling nor saying yes. The girlfriend just left the man alone in front of the kiss cam in an unexpected instant that stunned everyone. Los Angeles Chargers fan gets rejected and covered in nachos during kiss cam proposal The kiss cam clip was shown live on the big screen inside SoFi Stadium during the game on Saturday, August 16, 2025. As the man kneeled down with the ring in his hand, the girlfriend appeared upset and immediately stood up to leave. According to multiple videos shared on X (formerly Twitter) from people inside the stadium, another fan sitting behind the couple accidentally spilt a full tray of nachos on the man's head while trying to stand up and move aside. One fan who recorded the full moment wrote, 'This is the worst proposal ever. Rejected and covered in nachos.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Claim Premium Rewards with Every Trade Vantage Markets IN Register Undo Also Read: Dillon Gabriel ready to lead Cleveland Browns after injury setback against Philadelphia Eagles in crucial preseason test Los Angeles Chargers fans react online as proposal clip goes viral Videos from the failed proposal began trending on social media shortly after the incident. By Sunday morning, August 17, 2025, the clip had been viewed more than 5 million times. Local news outlet FOX Los Angeles also confirmed the incident on their official website late Saturday evening and called it 'one of the most painful public rejections in sports history.' As of now, the identity of the fan and his girlfriend has not been revealed by the Los Angeles Chargers or the stadium officials. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!

No clarity yet on BC quota as Cong postpones PAC meet
No clarity yet on BC quota as Cong postpones PAC meet

Time of India

time34 minutes ago

  • Time of India

No clarity yet on BC quota as Cong postpones PAC meet

Hyderabad: The crucial political affairs committee (PAC) meeting of the Telangana Congress , originally scheduled for Aug 17, has been postponed and is now likely to be held between Aug 22 and Aug 24. The PAC, which comprises the chief minister, deputy chief minister, TPCC chief, AICC leader Meenakshi Natarajan, ministers, govt advisors, and senior leaders of the party, was expected to decide on the schedule for panchayat elections and the way forward for extending the 42% quota to the BCs in local bodies. According to party sources, the postponement of the PAC meeting was due to the absence of Telangana AICC in charge Meenakshi Natarajan from the city, among other factors. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad | Gold Rates Today in Hyderabad | Silver Rates Today in Hyderabad Chief minister A Revanth Reddy has also sought legal opinion on the proposed extension of enhanced BC quota in local bodies, an issue that was to be taken up in the PAC meeting. "It was proposed that the chief minister, along with Meenakshi and Telangana Congress president B Mahesh Kumar Goud, will take a final call on panchayat polls and the BC quota based on the majority opinion in the PAC meeting," said a senior Congress leader. With the high court setting Sept 30 deadline to complete the panchayat election process, and limited time available to legally extend the 42% quota to the BCs, there is speculation that the chief minister may decide on the matter without waiting for the PAC meeting. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The possibility of the chief minister consulting key party leaders over the phone or in person with those available in the city is also not being ruled out. A senior leader of the Telangana Congress said, "Revanth Reddy has to convene a cabinet meeting to seek approval for whatever course of action the govt adopts to extend the 42% BC quota, as well as to decide the dates and number of phases for the local body polls." "The chief minister, in a day or two, will take a call on whether to hold the cabinet meeting before the PAC, keeping in view the paucity of time to complete local bodies election process," the leader further said. The options before the state govt include issuing a GO or an ordinance to implement the 42% BC quota in local bodies after assessing whether such a move will survive legal scrutiny, given that the 50% cap has not been removed from the Panchayat Raj Act of 2018; approaching the Supreme Court with a writ of mandamus, or extending the enhanced BC quota on behalf of the party. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.

Trump targets racial preferences in college admissions but leaves legacy and donor advantages untouched
Trump targets racial preferences in college admissions but leaves legacy and donor advantages untouched

Time of India

time44 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump targets racial preferences in college admissions but leaves legacy and donor advantages untouched

President Donald Trump has launched an assertive campaign to reform college admissions, presenting it as a win for meritocracy. His policies focus on standardized test scores, academic achievement, and the elimination of racial considerations, portraying a vision of higher education driven solely by measurable performance. Yet, while race is under intense scrutiny, legacy admissions and donor-based advantages remain untouched, preserving a system that favors wealth and inherited privilege. Legacy admissions: The hidden advantage Legacy preferences, sometimes described as 'affirmative action for the wealthy,' grant children of alumni or major donors a significant edge in admissions. Despite efforts to remove racial factors from evaluations, hereditary advantages continue to disproportionately benefit affluent and predominantly white students, leaving meritocracy incomplete. Political and legislative momentum Lawmakers argue that focusing solely on race does not fully address inequities in higher education. Several states, including Virginia, Colorado, and California, have banned legacy admissions at public institutions. Yet elite private universities, including all Ivy League schools, continue to uphold the practice. Stanford University recently announced it would maintain legacy preferences, even withdrawing from California's state financial aid program rather than abandoning the policy. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Merit over race, wealth intact Trump's executive actions and Justice Department guidance aim to enforce compliance with the Supreme Court's 2023 ruling against affirmative action, requiring universities to provide detailed admissions data. While the policies prohibit racial consideration, they make no mention of legacy or donor advantages. Critics argue this selective focus undermines the notion of merit, allowing inherited privilege to continue shaping opportunity. Public opinion and university practices Most Americans oppose legacy and donor preferences, according to a 2023 AP-NORC poll. Universities defend the practice as a means of building community and securing donations. Transparency, however, remains limited. While institutions report whether they consider legacy status, few disclose its impact on admissions. Among the nation's most selective universities, very few reveal how many students are admitted under legacy or donor preference policies. Meritocracy under scrutiny Trump positions his actions as essential to maintaining meritocracy and ensuring colleges recruit capable future professionals. However, experts caution that targeting race alone may have unintended consequences, potentially prompting institutions to limit minority enrollment to avoid government scrutiny. The reform campaign raises fundamental questions about fairness in admissions when wealth and ancestry continue to hold sway. The road ahead Trump's admissions initiative exposes the tension between merit, diversity, and tradition in higher education. By addressing racial considerations while leaving legacy privileges untouched, the policies challenge universities to reconcile fairness with entrenched advantages. Whether true meritocracy can flourish amid enduring wealth-based benefits remains uncertain, highlighting the complexity of reforming an institution long shaped by privilege. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store