
The Republicans who bucked Trump on his big bill: From the Politics Desk
Happy Tuesday and welcome to the second half of the year. In today's edition, we take a closer look at the three Republican senators who broke ranks and voted against the 'big, beautiful bill.' Plus, with Zohran Mamdani's Democratic primary win now official, Steve Kornacki looks ahead to a unique general election for mayor in New York City.
— Adam Wollner
Breaking down the GOP 'no' votes on Trump's big bill
By the skin of their teeth, Senate Republicans managed to pass President Donald Trump's big domestic policy bill after a whirlwind past few days that featured a 'vote-a-rama' session that stretched on for more than 26 hours.
They had exactly three votes to spare, and ultimately, that's how many Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., lost, with Vice President JD Vance on hand to break the tie. And each of those three Republican senators who voted 'no' found themselves in a unique political position compared to the rest of the conference.
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., has long been opposed to the 'big, beautiful bill' because of the price tag (the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected it would add $3.3 trillion to the national debt over the next 10 years). But unlike his fellow libertarian-minded Kentucky Republican, Rep. Thomas Massie, who has consistently voted against the legislation, Paul has not incurred the full-blown wrath of Trump.
Sure, he's been the target of a Truth Social post or two. But while Trump has threatened Massie with a GOP primary challenge next year, he has invited Paul to join him on the golf course. And unlike Massie, Paul doesn't have to worry about running for re-election until 2028.
Sen. Thom Tillis, R.-N.C., meanwhile, has been on the receiving end of Trump's wrath in recent days — to the extent that after he announced his opposition to the bill over the weekend, he decided to forgo his 2026 re-election race.
Free from the political pressures that would have come with potentially having to fend off a MAGA-inspired primary challenger and navigating a general election in a battleground state, Tillis has since let loose on the legislation, specifically for cutting Medicaid.
'What do I tell 663,000 people in two years or three years when President Trump breaks his promise by pushing them off Medicaid?' Tillis said in a fiery floor speech Sunday evening.
Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, has been known to buck Trump at times. But as the lone Republican senator who represents a state Kamala Harris carried in the 2024 election, Trump has generally avoided giving her a hard time about it.
Facing re-election next year in an environment that will likely favor Democrats, Collins had a difficult decision to make on the bill. Voting for the bill would have given her something concrete to campaign, particularly the extension of Trump's 2017 tax cuts. But ultimately, like Tillis, the cuts to social safety programs were too much for her to overcome.
'My difficulties with the bill go far beyond what they could resolve,' Collins said after spending the past few days negotiating with GOP leaders.
Next steps: The legislation now heads back to the House, where Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., will (again) aim to steer it through his narrow majority before it can go to Trump for his signature.
Mamdani shifts to an unsettled general election contest for NYC mayor
Analysis by Steve Kornacki
The outcome was apparent a week ago, and now the magnitude is known: State Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani has defeated former Gov. Andrew Cuomo by 12 points in the Democratic primary for mayor of New York City.
The margin reflects the reallocation of votes from other candidates through the ranked choice system used by the city, which announced the results this afternoon. The question now is what effect it will have on the general election playing field. Many civic and business leaders have expressed alarm at the rise of Mamdani, a self-described socialist, but they've reached no consensus on a path forward since the initial count last week.
All eyes remain on Cuomo, who has the option of continuing his candidacy on the ballot line of a party he established earlier this year. (In New York City, candidates are permitted to run multiple ballot lines.) But the scale of his defeat has diminished his stature. Opponents of Mamdani have shown little interest in uniting behind Cuomo since he finished second in the initial count last week, and nothing in today's ranked choice results will ease their skepticism.
There has been some notable warming from the 'Stop Mamdani' crowd to current Mayor Eric Adams, who bypassed the Democratic primary to wage his own independent general election bid. In winning the Democratic nomination four years ago, Adams leaned on strong support from Black voters, a group that Mamdani lagged badly with in this year's primary. Theoretically, Adams could combine strong Black support with a broader anti-Mamdani coalition to make the November race competitive.
But if Cuomo remains in the race, he would threaten to split the anti-Mamdani vote. The presence of Republican Curtis Sliwa figures to do the same. And another independent candidate, former federal prosecutor Jim Walden, could further slice up the pie.
The problem for all of these non-Mamdani candidates is that none can make a definitive case for the others to drop out and unite. An Emerson College poll in May found that Cuomo was viewed favorably by just 41% of all New York City voters, compared to 47% who view him unfavorably. For Adams, who avoided prosecution on federal corruption charges at the behest of the Trump administration, the numbers were even worse: 19% favorable, 68% unfavorable. Mamdani, who surged in the final month of polling, was not tested.
That leaves Mamdani in an enviable spot at the moment. In a city that is overwhelmingly Democratic, he will run on the party's line in November. He's also expected to be offered the line for the left-wing Working Families Party, which has its own resources to throw into his effort.
In many ways, Mamdani is still an unknown commodity. His past statements and pronouncements are just coming to light now and his agenda is facing more scrutiny than it did during the primary. Whether this stirs a backlash that could actually threaten him in November remains to be seen.
But he can take solace too: Even if he's toting some serious baggage this fall, he won't be the only one.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
19 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Paramount to pay £11m in settlement with Trump over Kamala Harris interview
Paramount said the money will go to Mr Trump's future presidential library, not to the president himself, and added that the settlement did not involve an apology. Mr Trump's lawyer said the president had suffered 'mental anguish' over the editing of the interview which was broadcast in October on the CBS News show 60 Minutes. In a case seen as a challenge to free speech, Paramount and CBS rejected Mr Trump's contention that the interview was edited to enhance how Ms Harris sounded and had sought to get the president's lawsuit dismissed. Under the settlement, reached with help of a mediator, Paramount agreed that 60 Minutes will release transcripts of future interviews with presidential candidates, 'subject to redactions as required for legal and national security concerns', CBS News said. Mr Trump, who did not agree to be interviewed by 60 Minutes during the presidential campaign, protested over editing which showed Ms Harris giving two different answers to a question from interviewer Bill Whitaker in separate clips aired on 60 Minutes and Face The Nation earlier in the day. CBS said both replies came as part of Ms Harris's long answer to Whitaker, but the clip was edited to be more succinct. The president's lawyer, Edward Andrew Paltzik, said that caused confusion and 'mental anguish', misleading voters and causing them to pay less attention to Mr Trump and his Truth Social platform. Paramount and controlling shareholder Shari Redstone were seeking the settlement with Mr Trump, whose administration must approve the company's proposed merger with Skydance Media. CBS News president and chief executive Wendy McMahon and 60 Minutes executive producer Bill Owens, who both opposed a settlement, have resigned in recent weeks. The case has been closely watched by advocates for press freedom and journalists at CBS, whose lawyers called the lawsuit 'completely without merit' and pledged to fight it after it was filed. The Freedom of the Press Foundation, a media advocacy group that says it is a Paramount shareholder, said it would file a lawsuit in protest if a settlement was reached. In December, ABC News settled a defamation lawsuit by the president over statements made by anchor George Stephanopoulos, agreeing to pay 15 million dollars (£11 million) towards Mr Trump's presidential library rather than engage in a public dispute. Meta reportedly paid 25 million dollars (£18 million) to settle another Trump lawsuit over the tech firm's decision to suspend his social media accounts after the riot at the US Capitol on January 6 2021.

Rhyl Journal
19 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Hamas ‘ready for a ceasefire' but only if a deal ends the war in Gaza
The militant group stopped short of accepting a US-backed proposal announced by Donald Trump hours earlier. The US president said on Tuesday that Israel had agreed on terms for a 60-day ceasefire and urged Hamas to accept the deal before conditions worsen. He has been increasing pressure on the Israeli government and Hamas to broker a ceasefire and hostage agreement and bring about an end to the war. Mr Trump said the 60-day period would be used to work towards ending the war — something Israel says it will not accept until Hamas is defeated. He said a deal might come together as soon as next week. Hamas's response raised questions about whether the latest offer could lead to an actual pause in fighting. Hamas official Taher al-Nunu said the militant group was 'ready and serious regarding reaching an agreement', adding that the group is 'ready to accept any initiative that clearly leads to the complete end to the war'. A Hamas delegation is expected to meet Egyptian and Qatari mediators in Cairo on Wednesday to discuss the proposal, according to an Egyptian official. Throughout the nearly 21-month war, ceasefire talks have repeatedly faltered over whether the war should end as part of a deal. Hamas has said it is willing to free the remaining 50 hostages, less then half of whom are said to be alive, in exchange for a complete Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and an end to the war. Israel says it will only agree to end the war if Hamas surrenders, disarms and exiles itself, something the group refuses to do. An Israeli official said the latest proposal calls for a 60-day deal that would include a partial Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and a surge in humanitarian aid to the territory. The mediators and the US would provide assurances about talks on an end to the war, but Israel is not committing to that as part of the latest proposal, the official said. It was not clear how many hostages would be freed as part of the agreement, but previous proposals have called for the release of about 10. Israel has yet to publicly comment on Mr Trump's announcement. On Monday, he is set to host Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for talks at the White House, days after Ron Dermer, a senior Netanyahu adviser, held discussions with senior US officials about Gaza, Iran and other matters. On Tuesday, Trump wrote on social media that Israel had 'agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the War'. 'I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE.'


The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
House to vote on Trump's big policy bill as Johnson vows to ‘get it over the line'
US House Republicans were set to vote on Donald Trump's signature tax-and-spending bill on Wednesday, a day after it narrowly passed the Senate. But the fate of Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful bill' hangs in the balance as House speaker Mike Johnson seeks to quell an internal revolt over the changes made by the Senate. The Senate passed the bill, with JD Vance, the vice-president, casting the tie-breaking vote, on Tuesday, after a record-setting, all-night session. Now the chambers must reconcile their versions: the sprawling megabill goes back to the House, where Johnson has said the Senate 'went a little further than many of us would have preferred' in its changes, particularly to Medicaid, a program that provides healthcare to low-income and disabled Americans. But the speaker vowed to 'get that bill over the line'. Trump has set a Fourth of July deadline for Congress to send the bill to his desk. Early on Wednesday morning, the House rules committee advanced the measure, sending it to the floor for consideration. In a Tuesday night interview with Fox News's Sean Hannity, Johnson said he expects to hold a House vote on Wednesday but acknowledged that travel disruptions caused by weather delays were a 'wild card' that may impact attendance. In that case, he said the vote would likely take place on Thursday 'at the latest'. The House approved an initial draft of the legislation last month by a single vote, overcoming Democrats' unanimous opposition. But many fiscal conservatives are furious over cost estimates that project the Senate version would add even more to the federal deficit than the House-passed plan. But Johnson's wafer-thin GOP majority risks losing decisive votes from rightwing fiscal hardliners demanding steep spending cuts, moderates wary of dismantling safety-net programs and Republicans from Democratic-led states expected to make a stand on a contentious tax provision. Any one of these groups could potentially derail the bill's passage through a chamber where the GOP can afford to lose no more than three votes. Trump celebrated the Senate's passage of the bill as 'music to my ears'. He has described the bill as crucial to his second-term agenda, and congressional Republicans made it their top priority. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill in its current form would add $3.3tn to the US budget deficit through 2034. It will extend tax cuts enacted during the president's first term in 2017, and includes new provisions to cut taxes on tips, overtime and interest payments for some car loans. It funds Trump's plans for mass deportations by allocating $45bn for Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facilities, $14bn for deportation operations and billions of dollars more to hire an additional 10,000 new agents by 2029. It also includes more than $50bn for the construction of new border fortifications, which will probably include a wall along the border with Mexico. To satisfy demands from fiscal conservatives for cuts to the US's large federal budget deficit, the bill imposes new work requirements on enrollees of Medicaid. It also imposes a limit on the provider tax states use to fund their program, which could lead to reductions in services. Finally, it sunsets some incentives for green-energy technologies created by Congress under Joe Biden.