logo
INDIA alliance ended in 2024, kept fighting against each other: Adhikari

INDIA alliance ended in 2024, kept fighting against each other: Adhikari

Reacting to the Aam Aadmi Party's (AAP) decision to withdraw from the INDIA alliance, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader and West Bengal Leader of the Opposition, Suvendu Adhikari, stated that the bloc ceased to exist after the 2024 Lok Sabha elections and that its constituent parties continued to contest against each other in every state during the elections.
"The INDI alliance was finished in 2024. After they lost in the Lok Sabha elections and PM Modi became the Prime Minister for the third term, that very day, the INDI alliance was finished. They have been fighting against each other in every state during elections..." Adhikari said, speaking to ANI.
His remarks came after AAP leader Saurabh Bharadwaj clarified that while the party continues to support and raise key Opposition issues, it is no longer formally a part of the INDIA bloc.
Speaking to ANI, Bharadwaj emphasised that even though the party coordinates with other Opposition outfits, it is no longer part of the INDIA alliance.
He said, "We raise all issues of the Opposition. But we are not in the INDIA Alliance. When we contested the Lok Sabha elections, we did seat-sharing. After that, the Delhi elections took place, wherein we did not do any seat-sharing. As of now, we raise all issues of the Opposition. We coordinate with all Opposition parties, including the TMC, SP, and other parties. But we are not in the INDIA Alliance."
AAP and Congress contested the 2024 Lok Sabha elections together in Delhi under the INDIA alliance banner. However, the two parties fought separately in the Haryana and Delhi Assembly elections.
On July 16, AAP MP Sanjay Singh also stated that the INDIA bloc was relevant only until the Lok Sabha elections.
"We have clarified our position that the INDIA alliance was there till the Lok Sabha elections. As far as the Parliament is concerned, we have always been opposing all the wrong policies of the government. Currently, the issue for us is the way the homes and shops of people of Bihar, UP and Purvanchal are being bulldozed and destroyed. This is the issue we will raise in Parliament in the context of Delhi," Singh told ANI.
"We said that officially, the Aam Aadmi Party is not with the INDIA alliance as of today. Our alliance was for the Lok Sabha elections..." he added.
The AAP MP further stated that the party will raise the issue of the alleged demolition of jhuggis in Delhi during the Monsoon Session of Parliament.
The Monsoon Session of Parliament will be conducted from July 21 to August 21.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Eminent economist, House of Lords member Meghnad Desai passes away at 85
Eminent economist, House of Lords member Meghnad Desai passes away at 85

Indian Express

time10 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Eminent economist, House of Lords member Meghnad Desai passes away at 85

Eminent India-born British economist, former Labour party politician, and House of Lords member Meghnad Desai passed away on Tuesday. He was 85. A prominent and well-regarded voice in economics in the UK, India, and beyond, Desai was a widely respected academic who wrote over 200 articles published in academic journals and authored over 25 books. A Professor Emeritus of the London School of Economics (LSE), where he had a long and distinguished career, Desai also wrote scores of columns in newspapers in the UK and India, including in The Indian Express. In 2008, he was awarded India's third-highest civilian honour—the Padma Bhushan. Although a celebrated economist, Desai's writings and commentary spanned varied subjects—economics, politics, political and social economy, history, sociology, international affairs, and even cinema. In fact, Desai reportedly counted his biography of the legendary actor Dilip Kumar—Nehru's Hero: Dilip Kumar in the life of India—as his 'greatest achievement'. Desai was an avid watcher of old Hindi films, and also had a passion for cooking. After learning of Desai's passing, Prime Minister Narendra Modi took to social media platform X to express his condolences. 'Anguished by the passing away of Shri Meghnad Desai Ji, a distinguished thinker, writer and economist. He always remained connected to India and Indian culture. He also played a role in deepening India-UK ties. Will fondly recall our discussions, where he shared his valuable insights. Condolences to his family and friends. Om Shanti,' Modi posted on X. Sanjeev Sanyal, Member of Prime Minister Economic Advisory Council, wrote on X, 'Very sorry to hear that eminent economist Meghnad Desai has passed away. I had known him for over two decades. He was always cheerful and open to new ideas. I will cherish the many long discussions and debates that we had over the years. Om Shanti.' Born on July 10, 1940 in Vadodara to Jagdish Chandra, a civil servant, and Mandakini Desai a homemaker, Desai grew up with three siblings. He earned his BA in 1958 and MA in economics in 1960 from the University of Bombay, after which he bagged a scholarship to the University of Pennsylvania, where he completed his PhD in Economics in 1963. Desai, also well-known as Lord Desai due to his membership of the upper house of the British parliament, taught economics from 1965 to 2003 at the LSE. He was appointed as a lecturer at the LSE in 1965, and became a Professor of Economics there in 1983. Desai went on to head LSE's Development Studies Institute from 1990 to 1995, and established and led the LSE Centre for the Study of Global Governance. During his time at the LSE, Desai researched and lectured on a variety of subjects—Marxian analysis, applied econometrics, Indian development and reform, poverty, globalisation, and the role of private markets. In 1971, Desai joined the British Labour Party and was elevated to the House of Lords in June 1991. He was Chairman of the Gandhi Memorial Statue Trust which helped erect the statue of Mahatma Gandhi in London's Parliament Square. In 1991, he was created a life peer as Baron Desai St Clement Danes in the City of Westminster. In 2020, Desai resigned as a member of the UK's Opposition Labour Party over its failure to effectively tackle antisemitic racism within its ranks. He authored numerous books, the most recent being The Poverty of Political Economy: How Economics Abandoned the Poor (2022). His other notable books are Marx's Revenge: The Resurgence of Capitalism and the Death of Statist Socialism, Rethinking Islamism: Ideology of the New Terror, The Route to All Evil: The Political Economy of Ezra Pound, a novel Dead on Time, and The Rediscovery of India.

From Busting Trump's Ceasefire Claim To Bursting Cong's Pak 'Sympathy'- PM Modi's Full Speech in LS
From Busting Trump's Ceasefire Claim To Bursting Cong's Pak 'Sympathy'- PM Modi's Full Speech in LS

Time of India

time12 minutes ago

  • Time of India

From Busting Trump's Ceasefire Claim To Bursting Cong's Pak 'Sympathy'- PM Modi's Full Speech in LS

In a thunderous rebuttal in Parliament, PM Modi finally broke his silence on Donald Trump's ceasefire claims during Operation Sindoor. Modi made it clear that no world leader, not even the US President, told India to stop. He revealed that when the US Vice President tried to warn him about a Pakistani retaliation, he didn't even take the call immediately, because he was in a war room with Indian military commanders. Modi also hit back at the Congress party, accusing them of importing Pakistan's narratives, questioning the armed forces, and undermining India's victory. He called Operation Sindoor India's boldest strike, crippling terror HQs deep inside Pakistan, proving that nuclear threats and blackmail no longer work against India. From airbases in ICU to terror masterminds losing sleep, Modi said Pakistan begged for mercy. Watch the full breakdown of the biggest military and political expose from PM Modi.

India's imperatives for a national security strategy
India's imperatives for a national security strategy

Hindustan Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

India's imperatives for a national security strategy

As we watch, with justifiable pride, the steady march of India's GDP towards Olympian heights, we must also take note of some issues of concern, lest harsh reality be overtaken by euphoria. First, a very large proportion of the GDP is contributed by the so-called informal or unorganised sector. Second, India's per-capita GDP is $2,487, against the world average of $13,710, placing it at the 136th position among 188 countries, as listed by a UN survey. The last and most serious issue of concern is growing inequality, with one study claiming the top 1% of India's population has cornered about 40% of its wealth. Two oft-heard statements, in this context, are: 'A rising tide will lift all boats' and 'The trickle-down effect will take care of everything'. This author is no economist, and, therefore, unable to comment on the validity of these prophesies, but there is no gainsaying that steady economic growth is the only panacea for most of India's ills. It would, however, be delusionary to assume that India's rise is guaranteed, and that it is pre-destined to attain 'great power' status by 2047. The reality is that to achieve its full potential, India requires a strategic approach that integrates prudent economic policies with a robust security framework, anchored in inclusive and empathetic politics. Above all, we must face the fact that India needs peace and tranquillity, since not only are wars expensive, they divert national resources away from development. Today, India's complex security environment is shaped not only by China's hostility, manifest in its territorial claims and transgressions, but also by its trade stronghold. China's military modernisation, nuclear expansion, and growing naval presence in the Indian Ocean, coupled with its anti-India nexus with Pakistan, heighten India's threat perceptions. Operation Sindoor marked India's hardened stance against cross-border terrorism, emanating from Pakistan, and conveyed a message of 'no tolerance for nuclear blackmail'. But only time will tell how this signalling has been perceived and interpreted by the Pakistani deep State. India's immediate neighbourhood is unfortunately plagued by numerous contentious bilateral issues. Despite abjuring any thought of an Indian Monroe Doctrine, New Delhi is still perceived as a regional Big Brother or even a big bully, a crucial failure for Indian diplomats to reflect upon. Internally, India faces a complex web of security challenges. Cross-border terrorism in J&K, sporadic insurgencies in the North East, Left-wing extremism in central and eastern India, and sustained ethnic strife in Manipur continue to pose significant threats to domestic harmony. Although India seeks to play a leading role in the international order, it has not invested sufficient intellectual capital in assessing and mitigating potential threats. After 78 years of Independence, the nation still lacks a clearly defined statement of its national aims, objectives and security doctrines. This strategic void has seen India being repeatedly caught by surprise, often leading to knee-jerk responses to crises. Given India's volatile security landscape and the imperative for sustained economic growth, there is an urgent need to envision the nation's long-term future and chart a deliberate course to steer. Naysayers in India insist that since our decision-makers know what is to be done, a formal national security strategy is unnecessary. Other nations, however, have shown greater clarity of vision, and in the Indo-Pacific region alone, the past five years have seen 14 countries issuing national security strategies, policies, or defence white papers (DWP). Amongst them is China, which released its 12th successive DWP, in May 2025, dwelling on geopolitical objectives, external and internal security issues, force structures, and defence modernisation. It is, therefore, time for India to craft a long-term national strategy document that integrates security with economic policy. Once a vision of India's place in the world order, and its intended role as a regional/global power are clearly spelt out, it will illuminate the path ahead for many who have, so far, been groping in the dark. Such a document will provide clear signposts for India's diplomatic, intelligence, military, and economic institutions to craft policies and strategies that could shape the badly needed whole-of-government approach. In the military sphere, it will serve to sharpen focus on evolution of doctrines, design of force-architecture, acquisition of hardware, and mobilisation of the public and private sectors in defence R&D and production. Without going into minutiae, three major courses of action deserve urgent attention at this stage. India's primary emphasis should be upon restoring/acquiring conventional deterrence, both against our northern and western adversaries, by building up our long-neglected arsenal to sustain intense hostilities for a reasonable duration. Focusing sharply on robotics, beyond visual range aerial and ground attack weaponry, networking of platforms, electronic and cyber warfare, and exploitation of the space segment, we should be ready to incur whatever expenditure is necessary for acquiring these capabilities at the earliest. In the nuclear domain, while India's 2003 doctrine may have served us well so far, both the Chinese and Pakistani nuclear arsenals have seen growth in number and types of warheads. There have also been subtle but profound doctrinal shifts that call for reflection on India's part to ensure that our nuclear deterrence remains relevant and effective. Finally, we must consider the unfortunate fact that fate has entrapped India in two of the world's longest-lasting territorial disputes, and if not resolved within a reasonable timeframe, this will hold the country's future to ransom. Given political will and perspicacity, diplomacy can be a powerful tool for conflict avoidance and finding a modus vivendi. A bold leadership would consider taking a leap of faith and looking beyond the current state of historical rancour, political hostility and military confrontation, and engage adversaries in diplomatic dialogue and negotiations. Arun Prakash is a former chief of naval staff. The views expressed are personal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store