
Don't Trust The Demo: 5 Keys To Successful Sales AI Implementation
Boosting go-to-market (GTM) productivity has become a top priority—and a growing headache—for B2B companies. My company's analysis of 44 public SaaS company financials shows that many large SaaS businesses are now spending $277 for every $100 earned in net-new revenue, down from $168 just three years ago. That's a 67% drop in efficiency, and 85% of that spend is going to people, not technology. But this isn't a people problem. It's a performance system failure.
The reality is that sales teams are working harder than ever, but without demonstrable outcomes for their efforts. And leaders lack visibility into where and why GTM motions are breaking down, so they're left grasping for solutions that will appease boards and investors who are hungry for ROI.
Many are turning to AI, hoping for a magic bullet. But in a market saturated with flashy demos that all promise impressive outputs, pipeline growth or bigger deals, it's become difficult to tell which solutions are really capable of solving complex enterprise problems.
Sales leaders don't need another dressed-up LLM, chatbot or content generator. They need AI solutions that truly work "customer-backwards" (i.e., starting from each customer's unique needs) to improve sales performance.
One promising approach is the use of AI agents—autonomous systems that can reason, act and drive outcomes across the sales cycle. This digital workforce promises to enhance and support every role within the GTM ecosystem, eliminating inefficiencies and uncovering revenue opportunities in the GTM strategy.
For example, agents can help sales teams quickly pinpoint the most promising areas to focus their efforts. These agents can instantly surface and prioritize existing and whitespace opportunities based on internal go-to-market strategies. They can then generate a tailored executive-level analysis, incorporating strategic priorities, industry trends and financial data—all sourced from verified, reliable content. The result is not a productivity hack, but an elimination of bad sales habits and a complete rebuild of the sales process itself.
But agents are only as effective as the intelligence layer that connects to the context of the customer. Making them work well requires a strategy grounded in enterprise GTM context and built for systemic transformation. That starts with understanding customers' needs, using agents to augment the work sellers do and then providing sales coaching on the go with a closed-loop learning system.
Built and deployed correctly, agents can and will change all aspects of how sales work is done—from prospecting and customer engagement to forecasting, closing and retention—boosting performance and achieving additional ROI by embedding a digital GTM assistant within every aspect of the workflow.
5 Considerations For Implementing AI Agents In Sales
Enterprise transformation, and sales transformation in particular, requires careful consideration due to heightened scrutiny and complex workflows. Here are five key factors to keep in mind when evaluating and implementing sales agents:
• Customize for your organization. Enterprise sales processes vary widely; there is no one-size-fits-all solution. Ensure that your AI-driven implementation is fully customizable at the individual, team and organizational level to align with your specific sales structure, workflows and strategic priorities.
• Don't rely solely on CRM data. Leverage first- and third-party data to provide a 360-degree view, and fuel workflows with actionable insights that incorporate market intelligence, intent and more. Rather than reengineering outdated systems, use APIs to integrate key workflows right now while maintaining architectural flexibility for future advancements.
• Embed AI where your sales teams work. Sales professionals juggle multiple tools and platforms, leading to inefficiencies and slower deal cycles. To maximize adoption and impact, AI should be embedded into the existing tools sales teams already use, eliminating friction and enhancing execution quality and speed.
• Consider outcome- or consumption-based pricing for measurable ROI. CROs and CIOs expect measurable returns and seek improvements in pipeline growth, conversion rates and profit margins. Many solutions fail to meet these expectations. Consider flexible pricing models designed to minimize risk, ensuring that you only pay when measurable ROI is achieved.
• Prioritize domain expertise. Enterprises are well aware of the large gap between the raw power of many AI systems and their actual performance in enterprise settings. To fully harness the potential of an AI system, sales agents must be equipped to navigate the complexities of real-world strategic sales. This requires advanced reasoning, algorithms and models that link a company's business health, its propensity to buy and sellers' immediate needs to the solutions they are offering.
With AI agents, every sales professional can be equipped to answer the critical questions of: Why now? Why change? Why us? In a high-pressure GTM environment, AI agents act as force multipliers that enhance strategy, execution and ROI across the sales cycle. By prioritizing customization, trusted data, advanced reasoning and measurable impact, companies can finally unlock the ROI from AI—and their teams—that they've been seeking.
Forbes Business Development Council is an invitation-only community for sales and biz dev executives. Do I qualify?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Morgan Stanley's client-screening faces deeper FINRA probe, WSJ reports
(Reuters) -The U.S. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) is investigating Morgan Stanley over how the firm screened clients for money-laundering risks, the Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter. The probe examines client vetting, risk rankings and related practices across the Wall Street bank's wealth-management and trading operations from October 2021 through September 2024, the report said. FINRA, a non-governmental self-regulatory organisation that oversees U.S. broker-dealers under federal law, is seeking information on U.S. and international clients across Morgan Stanley's wealth unit, including E*Trade, and its institutional securities division, according to the Journal. The regulator has also requested organisational charts, reporting lines and details on the firm's client risk-scoring tool, the report added. Some employees raised concerns that the initial data sent to FINRA was incomplete or inaccurate, prompting the bank to provide additional information after the regulator flagged gaps, the Journal said. A Morgan Stanley spokesperson told the Wall Street Journal the bank has made significant investments in its anti-money-laundering and client-vetting programmes, adding that such regulatory reviews are not unique to the bank and do not indicate problems with its business or controls. Reuters could not independently verify the report. FINRA declined to comment, while Morgan Stanley did not immediately respond to a request for comment. FINRA fined Morgan Stanley $10 million in December 2018 for anti-money laundering compliance failures over a five-year period. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Bloomberg
18 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Property Tax Hike Likely in 2026 Budget: Chicago CFO
Chicago Chief Financial Officer Jill Jaworski says the city will likely seek to raise property taxes to address next year's budget deficit. She spoke to Bloomberg's Romaine Bostick in a wide-ranging interview at a Bloomberg New Voices event in Chicago. (Source: Bloomberg)


Fox News
20 minutes ago
- Fox News
House hearing examines millions of dollars' worth of improperly documented VA incentive payments
Jen Kiggans, R-Va., led a hearing on Tuesday to discuss millions of dollars' worth of incentive payments distributed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) that were improperly documented. Kiggans, at the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations hearing, said incentive payments for recruitment, relocation and retention have lacked oversight for years, according to a news release from the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs. "They call it the three Rs, which are recruitment, retention, and relocation," Chris Lovell, a retired Marine Corps Major and CEO of veteran-owned Lovell Government Services, described to Fox News Digital. "It gives additional pay to folks… to keep them and retain them, especially if they have specialty vocations that the VA needs." A recent audit found that between 2020 and 2023, VA payments for relocation grew by 85%, retention payments grew by 131%, and recruitment payments increased by 237%. A total of $1.2 billion worth of incentive payments were given to employees during that period, but $341 million of those were not properly documented, according to the committee. The audit discovered that in one instance, the Veterans Health Administration awarded $30,000 in relocation payments to an employee who never moved, the release noted. Lovell, whose Florida-based business provides resources to the VA, said that this has been an ongoing problem. A 2017 report found improper payments from the VA totaled over $158 million in unsupported spending, according to the release. These documentation issues could be mitigated if the agency improved its management and upgraded its outdated system, Lovell said. The Defense Civilian Pay System, used by both the Department of Defense and the VA, was created more than 30 years ago. "It's a two-pronged approach to cleaning up what's perceived as fraud and waste," he said. "If [management says] they want to clean up erroneous payments or payments without documentation, then they need to supervise that. … And the second piece of that improvement process… is the system." However, Lovell said that the VA is doing "great things" for veterans on a daily basis. "We're happy to be a part of that," he said. In an email, a spokesperson for the VA referred Fox News Digital to the agency's testimony at the hearing. The VA currently has around 482,000 employees, the majority of whom work in the Veterans Health Administration, according to its website. Earlier this year, the Department of Government Efficiency found the VA had paid hundreds of thousands of dollars a month for website changes before canceling the contract and having an internal staffer take over. While combing through loads and loads of data, DOGE discovered a previous contract by the VA for its website maintenance. "Good work by @DeptVetAffairs," DOGE said in a post on X. "VA was previously paying ~$380,000/month for minor website modifications. That contract has not been renewed, and the same work is now being executed by 1 internal VA software engineer spending ~10 hours/week."