'Turun Anwar' rally: No notice makes it difficult, but police will facilitate — Saifuddin
Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail said this is to ensure the safety and orderliness of all participants, even though rally organisers are no longer required to submit prior notice to the police, following a Federal Court ruling that declared Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 unconstitutional.
He acknowledged, however, that the court's ruling has made it a little difficult for PDRM to plan appropriate security measures.
'If organisers were still required to inform the police, we would at least know the venue and expected crowd size, allowing us to deploy personnel accordingly, not to obstruct, but to facilitate the gathering.
'But now, without prior notification, the police must fully mobilise all available resources to devise an appropriate strategy,' he told a press conference after the Home Ministry's monthly assembly today.
Despite the challenges, Saifuddin gave assurance that PDRM will manage security professionally.
He also reminded organisers and participants to abide by the existing provisions of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012.
Organisers, he said, are responsible for ensuring that no dangerous weapons are brought to the rally, no speeches undermine the monarchy or religious harmony, and that children are not involved in the gathering.
'If police take action, don't claim your freedom has been violated because the relevant laws still apply.
'I just want to stress that if they want to proceed with the rally, it's their democratic choice because the government has never suppressed the people's freedom of expression,' he said.
On July 1, the Federal Court ruled unanimously that penalising organisers for failing to notify police five days in advance of a peaceful assembly is unconstitutional.
According to the five-judge panel, Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act, which imposes fines for failing to give prior notice, constitutes a form of prohibition, not a permissible restriction under Article 10(1)(b) of the Federal Constitution. — BERNAMA
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Azam pays first courtesy visit to newly appointed IGP
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Chief Commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki paid a courtesy call on the newly appointed Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Datuk Seri Mohd Khalid Mohd Ismail at the Federal Police headquarters today. In a social media post on the Royal Malaysia Police official Facebook page, it was confirmed that this afternoon's visit marked Azam's first official call on Mohd Khalid following his appointment as the country's 15th IGP on June 23. "The meeting aimed to strengthen bilateral cooperation between both enforcement agencies. "Among the key areas discussed were the implementation of the Joint Action Task Force, operational information sharing, and coordinated investigations," the post read. It added that the discussion was aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of law enforcement efforts. "The visit reflects a continued commitment to inter-agency collaboration, particularly in combating corruption and ensuring justice is upheld," the post said. Mohd Khalid, who hails from Manong, Perak, was born on April 8, 1965. He holds a Master's Degree in Comparative Law from the International Islamic University Malaysia. His appointment as IGP was consented to by His Majesty the Yang di-Pertuan Agong in accordance with Clauses (4) and (5) of Article 140 of the Federal Constitution, upon the advice of the Prime Minister and the recommendation of the Police Force Commission.
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Lawyer wants BM version of constitution declared as authoritative text
The suit filed in the Kuala Lumpur High Court names the government as the defendant. PETALING JAYA : A lawyer has filed a suit against the government in the Kuala Lumpur High Court, seeking a declaration that the Bahasa Malaysia version of the Federal Constitution is the authoritative text. Haniff Khatri Abdulla said he filed the writ of summons and statement of claim through the law firm Ahmad Fuad Abi & Aidil. The suit names the government as the defendant and is aimed at getting the High Court to declare that the Bahasa Malaysia version of the constitution should take precedence over the English version. 'This suit is based on Article 160B of the Federal Constitution, which provides that if and when the constitution has been translated into the national language, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong may prescribe the national language text as the authoritative text. 'After that, if there is any conflict or inconsistency between the national language and English text, then the national language text shall prevail,' he said. Although the Agong had launched the BM version of the constitution on Sept 29, 2003, Haniff said, the government has yet to make it the authoritative version. 'Even more than two decades later, the government continues to fail, refuse and/or neglect to enforce the position of the text in the national language as the authoritative version,' he said. He claimed this was a breach of the government's constitutional duty to ensure that it took the necessary steps to uphold and dignify the national language. 'It is highly unreasonable that a sovereign and independent nation like Malaysia still does not have an authoritative constitutional text in its own national language, more than six decades after achieving independence,' he said. In 2023, then attorney-general Idrus Harun said the Attorney-General's Chambers planned to suggest that the government make the Bahasa Malaysia version of the constitution the authoritative text. However, he said, this was subject to the approval of the king. This proposal was met with opposition from an interfaith council, which said relying on the Bahasa Malaysia text would have an effect on the Federal Court ruling on unilateral conversion. An MP also said such a move must first obtain Sabah and Sarawak's approval.
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Unpaid community service clause unconstitutional, says Hassan Karim
Slug: izslave HL: Unpaid community service clause unconstitutional, says Hassan Karim Qistina Sallehuddin, Nor Ain Mohamed Radhi KUALA LUMPUR: Government backbencher Hassan Abdul Karim has warned the government against proceeding with a clause in the proposed Local Government (Amendment) Bill 2025 that would allow unpaid community service orders to be imposed, cautioning that such provisions may amount to slavery and breach the Federal Constitution. The Pasir Gudang member of parliament and PKR veteran said the proposed Section 104A(1), which allows a community service order to be made against individuals convicted of violating local council by-laws, contradicts Article 6 of the Constitution, which prohibits slavery and all forms of forced labour. He also pointed out that the section defines community service as work or service that is not paid. "This act (amendment) should not be rushed into approval. After reviewing it, I find that while the intention behind the proposed amendments is good, the method of implementation may contradict existing laws. "From what I understand, work or service that is unpaid and must be carried out as a punishment could amount to practices resembling slavery, servitude, or forced labour. "Referring to dictionaries, the Oxford Language Dictionary, for example, slavery is defined as a condition in which a person is forced to do hard labour without pay or recognition," he said. Hassan also drew parallels to Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act, which was enforced for more than a decade before being struck down by the Federal Court for being unconstitutional recently. "This is what concerns me. As such, remove the provision for community service that resembles slavery. "Instead, I propose that a fair and reasonable amount of wages or allowance be made mandatory for community service duties," he said. Similarly, he also called for local government elections, which were once part of the country's system until 1965, to be revived. This follows concerns over the legality of allowing unelected local councils to determine and enforce community service orders under the proposed amendments to existing legislation, he said. "I wish to raise a question regarding the legitimacy or legal authority of local councils to create such by-laws, given that across the country there are 20 city councils, 40 municipal councils, and 91 district councils. "Local authorities comprise mayors, municipal presidents, district council presidents, and appointed councillors, all of whom are not elected by the people. "None of these positions were filled through elections, all were appointed. So is it legally valid for a local authority, such as Kuala Lumpur City Hall, to enact a by-law to determine the type of community service to be implemented?"
