Ishiba Should Resign First Before Commenting on History
August 2025 marks the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. Especially now, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba should avoid expressing views that could encourage anti-Japan propaganda in China and other countries.
The Prime Minister should, however, visit Yasukuni Shrine. There, he can pay tribute to and honor the souls of those who gave their lives to protect Japan.
Then, he should announce his resignation, respecting the verdict delivered by the public in the recent Upper House election.
During the August 4 Lower House Budget Committee session, Ishiba indicated his desire to offer his views on the Pacific War. At one point, he stated, "Regardless of the form it takes, it is absolutely necessary to issue some statement in order to prevent it (history) from being forgotten." He thereby signaled his interest in presenting his views on the last war.
During his January 6 press conference, Ishiba also referred to then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's statement marking the 70th anniversary of the war's end.
He then added, "I would like to present a statement in which I consider how we can create a system to ensure that war never occurs again." Entrance to the Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo.
China is ruled by a dictatorship of the Chinese Communist Party. As the war's end anniversary approaches, anti-Japan sentiment is on the rise. A mammoth military parade is planned in central Beijing on September 3. It would commemorate the 80th anniversary of the Allied victory in what China calls the "War of Resistance against Japan."
Prime Minister Ishiba has a one-sided, masochistic view of history, viewing Japan as the aggressor in the conflict. If the Prime Minister goes ahead and expresses such views, regardless of the timing or format, it could lend momentum to anti-Japan propaganda by China, South Korea, and North Korea and risk injury to Japanese citizens. Japanese Woman Attacked in China While Walking with Child
It would also encourage left-wing forces both at home and abroad.
PM Abe's postwar 70th anniversary speech had some shortcomings. For example, it failed to mention that one of Japan's aims in the war was to eliminate racial discrimination.
Even though that was the case, Abe did stress that Japan must continue on the path of a proactive contributor to peace. But at the same time, he showed strong awareness of the need to reject never-ending self-abuse, saying: "We must not let our children, grandchildren, and even further generations to come, who have nothing to do with that war, be predestined to apologize."
If Prime Minister Ishiba goes ahead and presents his own "views," it will trample on all the hard work Abe put into the 70th anniversary statement. That, in turn, could cause significant harm to Japan's reputation and national interest.
Furthermore, there has been no tradition of issuing new statements every 10 years among prime ministers in the postwar era. Half a century after the end of the war, then-Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama of the Japan Socialist Party issued a speech marking the 50th anniversary of the war's end. That speech then became a significant political problem.
Our current prime minister cannot escape criticism for his irresponsibility after expressing his intention not to resign despite failing to win public support in two national elections. What weight would such a prime minister's words carry after all?
If Mr Ishiba is really determined to express his views on this matter, he should do so to his heart's content after he resigns. Then, he can air his personal, masochistic perspective on history without restraint.
Whether the Japanese public accepts his views is another matter entirely.
Author: Editorial Board, The Sankei Shimbun
このページを 日本語 で読む
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
a day ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Singer's upcoming performance controversial
As of this writing, Sean Feucht — the controversial right-wing and pro-Trump evangelical Christian worship leader — is still slated to perform in Winnipeg on Aug. 20. Originally, he was scheduled to play and preach in Central Park. But the city refused to issue him a permit after determining it was not feasible due to the large number of people (2,000) Feucht claimed would be there. In denying him a permit, Winnipeg joined other cities across Canada that either refused him a permit or cancelled previously-issued permissions to play in public parks and other settings due to his anti-COCID lockdown, anti-Black Lives Matter and anti-LGBTTQ+ rhetoric. Jose Luis Magana / The Associated Press files Christian musician Sean Feucht sings during a rally at the National Mall in Washington, Oct. 25, 2020. In those other locations, Feucht found private places to play and preach — which is his right, just as people in this country have a right to invite him to perform. He might do the same in Winnipeg, too. While his visit has prompted a lot of media attention, this is not the first time the controversial singer has been to Canada. He sang and preached in Edmonton in 2022 and Calgary, Vancouver and Ottawa in 2023. But his presence back then didn't generate much in the way of media attention. There are a number of worrisome aspects to Feucht's visit, including how some might be tempted to lump Canadian evangelicals together with his brand of evangelical Christianity. In fact, he is quite unlike the majority of evangelical Christians in this country. Although it's true that most Canadian evangelicals lean towards the Conservative Party, many others vote Liberal and NDP. They are not at all like their co-religionists in the U.S., where about 80 per cent of evangelicals voted for Donald Trump. In fact, I suspect most Canadian evangelicals would be very uncomfortable with Feucht's in-your-face style. That's not how the vast majority would conduct themselves in public. It's also worth noting that, as far I can tell, Feucht was not invited to Canada by any Canadian group. He says he was 'sent' to Canada to bring his message, although he doesn't say who sent him. He seems to have decided to come here all on his own. Before deciding to come, it might have helped if Feucht had done some homework about Canada. If he had, he would have discovered that Canada's culture and context is not at all like the U.S. While his Fox News style views may be acceptable to many in the U.S., they are not welcome by most people here — just like Trump's talk of Canada being the 51st state is off-putting to the vast majority of Canadians. What Feucht also gets wrong is assuming what's true for him as a Christian in the U.S. must be true all over the world. It's the worst kind of American hubris, the kind that drives the rest of us crazy. If he had done a bit of research, Feucht would realize his not being persecuted for his faith or beliefs. It's because of how he shares them. That's not how Canadians like to talk to each other over difficult and challenging subjects. For proof, consider that many religious groups are also opposed to abortion and have views on LGBTTQ+ that are different from the majority of Canadians. But nobody calls for their services to be cancelled or prevents them from holding public rallies, even though they might attract protestors. And why is that? It's because unlike Feucht, most religious groups in Canada that hold positions contrary to public opinion are respectful in sharing their views (even if a few on the fringe might be shrill in trying to force those minority views on others). So where does this leave us? First, the uproar over Feucht should remind Canadian religious groups about the importance of respectful dialogue and active listening when it comes to difficult and controversial issues. Everyone has a right to our opinions, as long as they don't venture into the area of hate, but we also have an obligation to hear each other and find ways to live together peacefully in this land. Sundays Kevin Rollason's Sunday newsletter honouring and remembering lives well-lived in Manitoba. Second, Feucht may believe he is coming to bring 'revival' to Canada, but the opposite will likely happen. Sure, there may be a few Christians who like what he says. But research consistently shows that one of the main reasons people leave Christianity is due to the harsh, judgemental, anti-LGBTTQ+ and pro-Trump positions taken by many evangelical Christians in the U.S. — the same ones that Feucht touts and represents. His coming, in other words, may cause more people to decide against Christianity than to be interested in it. But maybe Feucht's coming to Canada will end up being a gift to Christians in this country, in a backwards sort of way by causing them to reflect on the best ways to show faith to others. Is it to be loud and brash, or is it best to quietly be of service in their communities? I think most will choose the latter. And his visit could prompt Christians in Canada to ask if Feucht doesn't represent what faith looks like to them, then what does a Canadian version of Christianity looks like? If that happens, then maybe his visit, and all the negative media attention it produced, will be worth it. faith@ The Free Press is committed to covering faith in Manitoba. If you appreciate that coverage, help us do more! Your contribution of $10, $25 or more will allow us to deepen our reporting about faith in the province. Thanks! BECOME A FAITH JOURNALISM SUPPORTER John LonghurstFaith reporter John Longhurst has been writing for Winnipeg's faith pages since 2003. He also writes for Religion News Service in the U.S., and blogs about the media, marketing and communications at Making the News. Read full biography Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Japan Forward
a day ago
- Japan Forward
How Japan's Generals Defended the Homeland Against the Soviet Invasion
August 15 marks the anniversary of the end of World War II. But 80 years ago that day, fighting still raged as the Soviet Union unilaterally declared war against Japan on August 8, 1945, and began its invasion the next day. One of those conflicts was the Battle of Shumshu Island, reported on August 10 in The Sankei Shimbun . Even after Japan accepted the Potsdam Declaration, the Soviet army pressed on with its invasion. In response, Lieutenant General Kiichiro Higuchi, commander of the 5th Army, ordered, "Resolutely counterattack and crush the landing forces." Shumshu Island, located at the northern tip of the Kuril Islands. After a fierce battle on Shumshu Island, located in the northeasternmost of the Kuril Islands, a ceasefire was reached, with Japan maintaining the upper hand. Also facing active aggression from Russia, Lieutenant General Hiroshi Nemoto, then commander of the army stationed in Mongolia, refused to disarm in the face of the Soviet army's continued advancement through Manchuria and China. General Nemoto's gravesite in Sukagawa, Fukushima Prefecture. (©Robert D Eldridge) While holding back their attacks, Nemoto protected Japanese civilians until the last group fled by train. It is said that the Soviet Union had plans to occupy the northern half of Hokkaido. Without such acts of self-defense, the very map of Japan might have been altered. This is a piece of history worth remembering on the 80th anniversary of the war's end. Author: The Sankei Shimbun (Read this in Japanese )
Canada News.Net
a day ago
- Canada News.Net
Qatar sends Baha'i leader to jail for 5 years over social media posts
DOHA, Qatar: The head of Qatar's small Baha'i community has been sentenced to five years in prison for social media posts authorities claim "cast doubt on the foundations of the Islamic religion," according to court documents obtained by the Baha'i International Community (BIC). A three-judge panel of Qatar's Supreme Judiciary Council delivered the verdict on August 13 against Remy Rowhani, 71, who has been in detention since April. The documents show that the court rejected a defense plea for leniency, citing Rowhani's heart condition. Saba Haddad, the BIC's representative to the United Nations in Geneva, condemned the ruling as "a serious breach and grave violation of the right to freedom of religion or belief" and "an attack on Remy Rowhani and the Baha'i community in Qatar." In a statement on X, the organization urged the international community to press Qatar to release Rowhani immediately and comply with international law. The Baha'i faith, founded in the 1860s by Persian nobleman Baha'u'llah, teaches that all religions are progressive revelations of God's will, culminating in the unity of all people and faiths. While accepted in many countries, Baha'is in parts of the Middle East face persistent repression. Human rights advocates say persecution is most severe in Iran, where the faith is banned. They accuse Tehran of promoting anti-Baha'i policies beyond its borders, including in Yemen, where Iran supports the Houthis, and in Qatar, which shares the world's largest natural gas field with Iran. "The sheer arsenal the Iranian government has expended to crush the Baha'is in every avenue of life has been astronomical," said Nazila Ghanea, a University of Oxford law professor and U.N. Special Rapporteur on religious freedom. "It has also extended its reach, time and again, beyond the border of Iran." Advocates say anti-Baha'i discrimination in the region includes deportations, family separations, denial of marriage licenses, exclusion from public schools, and restrictions on burial rights.
