
Devil Wears Prada 2 to Spider-Man 4: is the Hollywood hype machine starting too early?
The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more.
For example: is there a teaser trailer for next summer's Spider-Man: Brand New Day? It's the next Marvel movie after this July's Fantastic Four reboot, and plenty of summer blockbusters-to-be have called their shots with a teaser a year in advance, so it would make sense to get a little something out there. A teaser is kinda-sorta what Sony posted a few weeks ago, only it was hyped up as a 'suit reveal', which seems like an attempt to redress a 20-second teaser in literal new clothes. It also seems like a backfire if the strategy involves anyone beyond the most diehard 5% of movie-watchers realizing or caring that Tom Holland walks up to the camera wearing a Spider-Man costume that is slightly different than the six other Spider-Man costumes he's donned in other appearances. There is also a behind-the-scenes video of a movie that's barely started filming. It recalls the absurdly lengthy 'chair reveal' of cast members from Avengers: Doomsday parceled out over five hours, which is getting its own sequel soon. (Not everyone was announced, of course. Not least because the movie's screenplay was not finished at the time of that announcement and filming commencement.)
Even Christopher Nolan, who has generally mastered the art of keeping his highly anticipated movies to the realm of teasers and trailers – a teaser for his Imax-shot version of The Odyssey emerged just about a year before its planned July 2026 release – succumbed to the hype machine when that Odyssey teaser was accompanied by tickets for select showtimes going on sale. That's right, if you want to plan a movie outing 50 weeks from now, you can see about booking an Odyssey ticket at your local Imax (if applicable). Or rather, you could have if your AMC app didn't crash; most of those showings sold out quickly.
To some extent, this is business as usual. There's been year-out hype for movies for literal decades at this point; Alien 3 had a teaser trailer that infamously teased a movie with a completely different premise (Aliens on Earth?!). Some of it is also just the studios attempting to compete with the speed and ferocity of digital-era hype, to be heard above the constant buzz of phone notifications over virtually nothing (as well as the semi-regular global calamity). After all, the days of getting by on trailers, posters and TV ads alone are long gone, right?
Maybe not. The biggest global opening of the past weekend was the horror movie Weapons, which exceeded expectations for its launch based largely off of ... trailers that explained the premise of the movie. Obviously there's more to a marketing campaign than that. In the spring, the film launched a website mocked up to look like news postings about Maybrook, the fictional town in the movie, with shades of The Blair Witch Project from 1999. But the baseline of the movie's marketing was a couple of trailers that showed a lot of creepy imagery but said little about the multi-character plot beyond what the movie reveals in its first two minutes: one night, a group of third-graders from the same class mysteriously rise from their beds, run outside, and disappear into the night. The movie is about figuring out what happened to them; no casting announcements, announcement videos, or greetings from the set needed. For well over a year, about the only thing anyone repeated about this movie in the Hollywood trade publications was that it was a 'horror epic' with some elements in common with another 1999 classic, Paul Thomas Anderson's Magnolia.
Of course, Weapons operated with the luxury of less attention from both its studio and the outside press. It's not the kind of superhero movie or high-profile sequel that gets clicks a year before it comes out. But this strategy isn't only employed for smaller films. Disney's Lilo & Stitch remake, the second-biggest global hit of the year so far, certainly had plenty of promotion, tie-ins, brand activations and so on. But it successfully waited until much closer to its release date, putting out a couple of traditional low-footage teasers at the end of 2024, and a full trailer a few months before the movie's release in 2025. Sinners, an ambitious movie with an audience more in line with Weapons, also managed to avoid selling much-hyped nothingburgers, and was able to take audiences by surprise.
Next year's crop of much-hyped sequels will still probably draw crowds. Streep, Hathaway, Nolan, Spider-Man and whoever is in the Avengers these days all have plenty of fans. But the rush to blow up what would normally be lines in a press release to an epic and ceremonious scale still feels sweaty – maybe sweatier, even, as if companies including Disney are desperate to project the image of day-stopping news when another name of an old X-Men cast member turns up on a chair. As recently as the release of Deadpool & Wolverine, the company prized spoiler protection, with almost none of the movie's various in-joke cameos signaled ahead of time. That seemed like good marketing, but maybe it was just fear of the fact that many of those cameos were intentionally expectations-undermining jokes, rather than mega-applause moments. It's harder to tell in retrospect because the hype machine has spent so much time accidentally eliminating the difference between teasers, spoilers and piles of random crumbs.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Taylor Swift obliterates Donald Trump and Joe Rogan's podcast ratings... but president could have the last laugh
The most anticipated sports podcast episode in history ended up giving the world's biggest pop star bragging rights over the President of the United States. Wednesday night saw a special release of the 'New Heights' podcast where co-host and Kansas City Chiefs star Travis Kelce brought on his pop superstar girlfriend, Taylor Swift. Teasers leading up to the episode revealed that Swift would be unveiling the cover and release date for her highly-anticipated 12th album, 'The Life of a Showgirl'. Swifties flocked in droves to listen to the episode live - breaking the record for the most-watched live-streamed podcast in YouTube 's history at 1.3million viewers. It shattered the previous mark - held by 'The Joe Rogan Experience' when the eponymous host brought on then-Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump. The stream was so popular that Swifties e nded up crashing the YouTube stream at the 1 hour, 44 minute mark. 'Shoutout all the 92%ers and Swifties for actually helping us break the internet,' the New Heights X account said after the stream had concluded. Jason Kelce, the former Philadelphia Eagles center and co-host, referenced Swift's love of the number 13 by tweeting, '1.3million views is the epitome of numerology.' Not only that, but the New Heights YouTube channel saw a spike in subscriber numbers. The channel began at 2.85million subs before the episode began. At the time of publishing, the subscriber count sits at 2.97million. While it did break the live-viewership record, it still has some ways to go to catch up to the 24-hour viewer count that the Trump episode of Rogan had. In the first 24-hours of that episode, Rogan's channel had 26million views. At the time of publishing, the YouTube video of the New Heights show has 9.5million in the first 14 hours (with 6million views coming in the first five hours). But breaking one record held by Trump is sure to be a feather in Swift's cap after she endorsed Democrat nominee and former Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. Trump has gone on the offensive against Swift in the past, calling her 'no longer hot' after the endorsement of Harris and mocking her for being booed at Super Bowl LIX. Not only does this two-hour conversation mark a major moment for the show, it also is a perfect full-circle moment for Travis and Taylor. Travis previously mentioned in July 2023 how he'd like to have Swift on the show and how he tried giving her a friendship bracelet at a concert in Kansas City, but that he wasn't able to meet her. Cut to now. Travis and Taylor have been the definitive storyline in the NFL over the last two years, with the sport seeing a massive spike in female audience in that time. On the episode, Swift mentioned how important that July 2023 episode was to their eventual meeting. 'This kind of felt more like I was in an '80s John Hughes movie,' Swift said. 'He was just like standing outside of my window with a boom box just being like, "I want to date you. Do you want to go on a date with me? I made you a friendship bracelet. Do you want to date me?"' She continued, 'This is sort of what I've been writing songs about wanting to happen to me since I was a teenager.' Kelce added, 'And I was sitting there at the Eras tour listening to every single one of those songs, like, I know what she wants me to do!' He continued, 'I'm the luckiest man in the world,' while Swift said her man is 'a vibe booster in everyone's life that he's in. He's like a human exclamation point.' Swift's album announcement was the biggest draw for the show - with the 'Cruel Summer' singer confirming the October 3 release for 'The Life of a Showgirl'. She added that there will not be any extra songs on the album - which is being produced by Swedish hitmaker Max Martin and his collaborator Shellback. The pair helped make some of Swift's biggest hits - including 'Style', 'Shake It Off' and 'Blank Space' of her multi-Grammy winning 2014 album '1989'. Unlike previous albums, Swift said there would not be any hidden tracks for 'Showgirl'. However, fans are sure to be entertained - with the tracklist released and revealing that fellow pop star Sabrina Carpenter will feature on the title track.


Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Travis Kelce posed shirtless for GQ to clap back at body shamers
has graced the cover of GQ's September issue wearing a furry hood. And Law Roach, who styled the NFL star, said both and Travis stepped outside of their comfort zones for the shoot. Throughout the shoot, the Kansas City Chiefs star, 35, posed shirtless, wearing a construction vest, a cowboy hat, and sometimes, shoes. Law said the new look - rawer and more vulnerable - was done deliberately. He said: 'We wanted to make sure that the fashion could accentuate his physicality, not the other way around. 'Usually when you're dressing a model, or even someone who is average size, somebody who is not in the NFL, it's more about the fashion. 'But this time we had to go and reverse it and make it about the physicality and accentuating the physicality and making that just as important to the story.' Law took into consideration some of the recent body-shaming that Travis has received from the public. In December 2024, photos of Travis went viral, with fans pointing out his 'dad bod'. Even sports commentators drew attention to Travis's weight, questioning if this meant any hindrance to his career. Travis lost 25 pounds - but Law said that the GQ cover shoot was meant to be a response to haters who had body-shamed him. 'I think shooting him a little bit more raw and showing the body that he's in is almost like a f***-you to the critics, which I thought was really, really, really powerful,' he said. Law went on to say that Travis took the shoot in stride, getting in the water with alligators, hopping onto a fly board, and spending almost the entire day waist-deep in lake water. 'He was so fun. He was like, "I don't care. I'll do that,"' Law reflected. And while critics have stopped speaking about Travis's body, some were not impressed with the shoot. Many fans took to X to express their dislike of the styling and shoot altogether. 'Nobody wanna see this mess,' one X user said, while another shared: 'I'm sorry but these are awful.' 'Not trying to be a hater but I genuinely don't think I've ever been more turned off,' another said. Some even questioned the thought behind the shoot, hinting at it being reminiscent of a far-right aesthetic. 'I typically LOVE law roach's styling but this whole shoot feels in bad taste for the current political climate,' one user shared. 'I would love to know the creative brief for this and why they went with this concept.' It comes as Travis's girlfriend, Taylor Swift, had a laugh at the expense of his brother Jason during her appearance on their New Heights podcast on Wednesday. Nearly an hour into the podcast, the singer, 35, spoke about how Travis made his on-stage debut with her for her Eras Tour shows at London's iconic Wembley Stadium. 'Wasn't this the week that I got to watch Jason meet the Royal Family?' Taylor recalled, before she and Travis, 35, proceeded to poke fun at Jason, 37, for his neurotic concerns about his demeanor before meeting them. The hitmaker ended up immortalizing the performances with selfies featuring Prince William - who was celebrating his birthday at the concerts - and his son Prince George and daughter Princess Charlotte. 'I knew you were serious when I was like, "Jason, do you want to go meet [them]?"' she continued, and Travis chimed in to narrate his older brother's reaction. 'He was like, "What do I do with my beer?"' the Kansas City Chiefs tight end said. Taylor added: 'I watched him have this moment with his beer where he's just like, "But I want to take it. But I know that I probably should not take it". 'I watched this happen and it was kind of the most amazing [thing],' she said with a laugh. Jason confirmed that Taylor was 'exactly' right about his tortured mental process at the time. 'If I don't have my beer, what do I do with this hand now? Or am I just, like, being authentic by having the beer? I would normally have the beer. Wouldn't they want me to be myself?' Taylor continued as she mocked Jason's mental back-and-forth. 'I'm watching you say that in your head,' she clarified, adding that it was a 'fantastic' show for her. 'I'll always remember that.'


The Sun
32 minutes ago
- The Sun
Netflix has Harry & Meghan over a barrel – it's talk about royals & divorce or get NOTHING, claims expert
MEGHAN Markle and Prince Harry have extended their Netflix deal - but bosses are hoping they will have some 'juicy royal tea to spill', according to experts. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have signed a new "multi-year, first look deal for film and television projects" with Netflix, the couple has announced. 5 5 However, speaking on this week's The Sun's Royal Exclusive show, broadcaster and journalist Esther Craichu said the Sussexes' deal is simply a 'retainer'. She claimed: 'It's a retainer in case they [Meghan and Harry] decide to accidentally do something entertaining again. 'That's basically it. So there's no commitment. 'They've put no money behind this. It's basically the right to first refusal. 'So if they come up with something that doesn't have to do with their whole kind of sermonising about how to save the world, then Netflix might be like, yes. 'I mean, to be brutally honest, what they've done is they've said, 'unless you have some juicy tea to spill on the royal family, or you get divorced and want to give us a documentary, probably not.' 'But if they have something juicy to say about the royal family, like the king sent me a potted plant, which turned out to be poison ivy, or that 'H my fox' just didn't hold me the way I wanted to, and so we've had to consciously uncouple, then maybe. 'That's basically it.' Esther claimed that the deal is the 'best of both worlds' and claims Netflix has been "clever in that sense.' She added: 'These people [the Sussexes] are a household name. They're annoying, but they're a household name. Harry & Meghan were 'not in a strong position' & signed Netflix deal for 'much less'… TV giant 'did it for publicity' 'If they do anything interesting, we have to be first in the queue, because it would be a blockbuster. 'Everyone would be covering it. It'd be a huge media storm. But at the moment, given their track record, absolutely not. 'We're not committing five quid to this.' Five years ago, Harry and Meghan secured a lucrative contract, thought to be worth more than 100 million dollars (£74million), with Netflix after quitting as senior working royals in 2020. It is not yet known how much the new extended deal will bring in for the couple, or how long it will last. 5 IDEAL OUTCOME? royal reporter Bronte Coyne said the new deal is the 'ideal outcome for both parties.' She explained: 'We've talked about what was going to be next for Harry and Meghan in their Netflix business arm for a long time now, because we knew that this five-year deal was going to expire this year. 'What was going to be the ideal outcome? 'OK, they're not going to sign a deal anything like the one that was signed in 2020, because they don't really exist anymore. 'The landscape has changed completely for TV, but streaming services in particular. If they [Meghan and Harry] do anything interesting, we [Netflix] have to be first in the queue, because it would be a blockbuster Esther Craichu journalist 'So it did seem likely that there would either be a downgraded deal or an expiration of the deal. 'Now, the fact that both parties can say we've reached a new agreement, it was never going to be what it was before, but it is a new agreement. 'I think that an argument could be made on either side that it's a PR win, because the deal wasn't cancelled, as had been speculated for some time. 'It's a first-look deal.' NEW RELEASES 5 Announcing the deal, Meghan said in a statement: 'We're proud to extend our partnership with Netflix and expand our work together to include the As Ever brand. "My husband and I feel inspired by our partners who work closely with us and our Archewell Productions team to create thoughtful content across genres that resonates globally, and celebrates our shared vision.' On top of Season 2 of With Love, Meghan - which will drop later this month - they will also do a "Holiday Celebration" Christmas special this December. "Join Meghan in Montecito for a magical holiday celebration," the announcement reads. "Together, friends and family deck the halls, create holiday feasts, craft heartfelt gifts, and share lots of laughs – with simple how-tos to follow at home. It's a holiday wonder with warmth, tradition, and a generous dose of joy." There will also be a short film called "Masaka Kids, A Rhythm Within". It was previously thought that the Sussexes' £74million deal with the streamer was not going to be renewed. Harry's Polo series, about the sport, was watched by just 500,000 people. It was also understood that bosses were mildly infuriated by Meghan making her As Ever brand a priority. 5 Lifestyle and cookery show With Love, Meghan only ranked at number 383 in Netflix's six-monthly engagement report this year, with just 5.3million viewers across the globe. It was beaten by reruns of the first four seasons of legal drama Suits, which also starred the Duchess in her pre-royal days. Meghan was filmed for her show making ladybird-shaped canapes from cherry tomatoes and mozzarella balls. The show is a smash hit compared to her husband's docuseries Polo. In the first six months of the year the programme attracted 500,000 views globally, ranking it at number 3,442 out of around 7,000 shows. THE Duchess of Sussex has kept busy since stepping down as a senior working royal in 2020 and relocating to California. Here are some of her business ventures... Archewell Foundation – A nonprofit supporting charitable initiatives. Netflix Deal – Producing content like Harry & Meghan and With Love, Meghan. Archetypes Podcast – Former Spotify show on female stereotypes. Clevr Blends – Investment in a women-owned wellness latte brand. Cesta Collective – Minority stake in a handbag brand supporting Rwandan artisans. As Ever – Previously known as American Riviera Orchard lifestyle brand selling jam. ShopMy Page – Online store featuring her curated fashion and beauty items. New Podcast – Confessions of a Female Founder focusing on entrepreneurship.