BJP, Congress in pictorial war, trade charges over Pahalgam terror attack response
The Congress posted an image of a headless figure with the caption 'Jimedari ke Samay-Gayab,' indirectly criticising Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his perceived delay in taking action against the attack.
The BJP responded swiftly and sharply, stating, 'Congress flaunts a headless kurta to echo the extremist's 'Tan Se Sar Juda' slogan, exposing its continuous slide into Muslim League 2.0 — divisive, desperate, and directionless.' The party equated the Congress post with the extremist slogan 'Sar Tan Se Juda,' accusing the opposition of aligning with extremist sentiments. The Congress subsequently deleted the controversial post from the social media platform.
The BJP also described Congress leaders as fellow- travellers of Pakistan, asserting in its response post: 'Let Pakistan and its fellow-travellers in @INCIndia threaten all they wish; New India will neither bend nor break. Terror will be met with bullets, not biryani. This is the era of decisive leadership.'
Launching a scathing attack on the Congress, BJP national spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia claimed the post was designed to signal to Pakistan that the Congress stood with them amid the crisis.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
28 minutes ago
- Business Standard
NDA V-P candidate Radhakrishnan files nomination in presence of PM Modi
NDA candidate C P Radhakrishnan on Wednesday filed his nomination papers for the vice presidential election in the presence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, Home Minister Amit Shah and other senior leaders. Modi, flanked by Radhakrishnan and senior NDA leaders, handed over four sets of nomination papers to Rajya Sabha Secretary General P C Mody, who is the returning officer for the vice presidential election. The four sets of nomination papers have Modi, Singh, Shah and JD(U) leader Rajiv Ranjan Singh as lead proposers. A prospective vice-presidential candidate is required to get his nomination paper subscribed to by at least 20 electors as proposers and at least another 20 electors as seconders. The NDA has ensured representation of all its constituents as proposers and seconders in the four sets of nomination papers that were filed. The returning officer examined the nomination papers following which Radhakrishnan signed a register. The returning officer then handed over an acknowledgement slip of the nomination papers to the prime minister. Modi, Shah, senior ministers Pralhad Joshi, Dharmendra Pradhan and other NDA leaders, including TDP leader and Union Minister K Ram Mohan Naidu, Shiv Sena leader Shrikant Shinde, LJSP (RV) leader Chirag Paswan escorted Radhakrishnan to the office of the returning officer in Parliament. Earlier, Radhakrishan paid tributes to Mahatma Gandhi and other national leaders at Prerna Sthal, which houses statues of iconic personalities, in Parliament complex. Radhakrishnan, whose election as vice president is a certainty, was accompanied by Union ministers and other leaders from the BJP-led alliance. The electoral college for the vice presidential elections comprises members of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. Nominated members of the Rajya Sabha are also eligible to cast their votes. The effective strength of the electoral college is 781 and the majority mark is 391. The ruling NDA enjoys the support of at least 422 members and non-INDIA bloc parties such as YSRCP have already announced support to Radhakrishnan. Described as a "Pachai Tamizhan" (true-blue Tamil) by well wishers, Maharashtra Governor Radhakrishnan (67) is a senior Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader who served as a two-term member of the Lok Sabha from Coimbatore during the tenure of Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee and later, went on to lead the party in Tamil Nadu. The NDA is projecting Radhakrishnan as an untainted leader with rich political and administrative experience for the vice-president's office and maintaining that this would also prove useful as the chairman of the Rajya Sabha. Radhakrishnan was the chairman of the All India Coir Board from 2016 to 2020, a period when coir exports witnessed a significant jump. BJP president J P Nadda described Radhakrishnan as a "statesman" who commands respect across party lines. He belongs to the influential Gounder caste, an Other Backward Classes (OBC) community in Tamil Nadu.
Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Amit Shah tables Bills seeking removal of PM, CMs facing serious criminal charges in LS, to be referred to joint panel
Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday tabled in Lok Sabha the Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025, Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025, Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025. Home Minister Amit Shah said the three big-ticket anti-corruption draft laws, which also include provisions for the removal of a prime minister and chief ministers arrested on serious criminal charges, will be sent to the joint committee of the Lok Sabha amid protests by the opposition. According to the proposed laws, if any one of them is arrested and detained in custody for consecutive 30 days for offences that attract a jail term of at least five years, they will lose their job on the 31st day. Soon after the introduction of the Bills, Congress leader Manish Tewari said these draft laws undermine the law of the land and called these bills 'unconstitutional.' Tewari demanded that the bills be withdrawn immediately. Shah later informed the house that the three bills would be sent to the joint panel for further scrutiny. This means bills won't be taken up in this Monsoon Session of Parliament as it ends on 21 July, Thursday. (i) The Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025; (ii) The Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025; (iii) The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025; "A minister, who for any period of 30 consecutive days during holding the office as such, is arrested and detained in custody, on allegation of committing an offence under any law for the time being in force, which is punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years or more, shall be removed from his officeby the Presidenton the advice of the Prime Minister to be tendered by the thirty-first day, after being taken in such custody," one of the bill reads. "Provided that if the advice of theprime minister, for the removal of such minister is not tendered to the President by the thirty-first day, he shall cease to be a minister, with effect from the day falling thereafter". "Provided further that in case of the prime minister, who for any period of 30 consecutive days during holding the office as such, is arrested and detained in custody, on allegation of committing an offence under any law for the time being in force, which ispunishable with imprisonmentfor a term which may extend to five years or more, shall tender his resignation by the thirty-first day after such arrest and detention, and if he does not tender his resignation, he shall cease to be the Prime Minister with effect from the day falling thereafter," reads the proposed law. As of now, there is no bar on ministers holding on to their offices after their arrests. Former Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and Tamil Nadu minister V Senthil Balaji did not resigned from their posts since their arrests on different charges. According to the statement of objects and reasons of the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill 2025, there is no provision under the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 (20 of 1963) for the removal of the chief minister or a minister arrested and detained in custody on account of serious criminal charges. The objectives of theConstitution(One Hundred And Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025, say there is no provision under the Constitution for the removal of a minister who is arrested and detained in custody on account of serious criminal charges. The objectives of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025, say there is no provision under the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 (34 of 2019) for the removal of the chief minister or a minister arrested and detained in custody on account of serious criminal charges. Hence, section 54 of theJammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, needs to be amended to provide a legal framework for the removal of the Chief Minister or a Minister in such cases. The Bill seeks to achieve the above objectives. The bills' introduction two days before the end of Parliament's Monsoon session and their implications surprised political circles. (This is a developing story. Check back for updates)
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tharoor calls for regulation and taxation instead of banning online gaming, supports Constitution Amendment bills
Congress leader Shashi Tharoor has criticised the government's ban on online money gaming, suggesting it will only fuel criminal networks. He advocates for regulation and taxation, drawing on international examples where this approach generates revenue for social causes. Tharoor also expressed reservations about the Constitution amendment bills regarding ministers facing criminal charges, urging careful consideration. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Congress leader Shashi Tharoor on Wednesday criticised the government's move to ban online money gaming , warning that such a step would only push the industry underground and strengthen criminal also said he had not studied the three Constitution amendment bills seeking to provide a framework for the removal of prime ministers, Union ministers, chief ministers and state ministers detained on serious criminal charges in any detail."On the face of it, it is difficult to say it has any problem, but obviously if anyone does something wrong they should not be a minister anyway. I don't know if there is any other motive," he the bill seeking to prohibit and regulate online gaming introduced in the Lok Sabha , he said, "I had written a very long article on the argument that by banning online gaming we are simply driving it underground, whereas it could be a useful source of revenue for the government if we legalise it, regulate it and tax it."He added that many countries have studied the issue in detail and concluded that regulation and taxation can generate funds for social causes, while bans merely enrich "criminal mafias".In a post on X, Tharoor recalled that he had "gone on record in 2018 urging the government to legalise, regulate and tax online gaming, rather than drive it underground by banning it, which will merely enhance the profits of the mafia"."It's a pity that the government seems to have derived no lessons from the experience of other countries that have considered this issue," he added that the bill should at least have been referred to a parliamentary committee "to consider all the pros and cons before rushing it into law".The proposed bill prohibits online money gaming and its advertisements, prescribing imprisonment or fines, or both, for violators. It differentiates such games from eSports and online social games, while calling for their promotion.
