
Brazil hosts BRICS summit, eager to avoid provoking Trump's ire
Analysts and diplomats said the lack of cohesion in an enlarged BRICS, which doubled in size last year, may affect its ability to become another pole in world affairs. They also see the summit's moderate agenda as an attempt by member countries to stay off Trump's radar.
Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva will have some of his priorities, such as debates on artificial intelligence and climate change, front and center for the talks with key leaders not in attendance.
China's President Xi Jinping won't attend a BRICS summit for the first time since he became his country's leader in 2012. Russian President Vladimir Putin, who will make an appearance via videoconference, continues to mostly avoid traveling abroad due to an international arrest warrant issued after Russia invaded Ukraine.
Debate over language on hot-button topics
The restraint expected in Rio de Janeiro marks a departure from last year's summit hosted by Russia in Kazan, when the Kremlin sought to develop alternatives to U.S.-dominated payment systems which would allow it to dodge Western sanctions imposed after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
A source involved in the negotiations told journalists Friday that some members of the group want more aggressive language on the situation in Gaza and Israel's attack on Iran. The source spoke under the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak about the matter publicly.
'Brazil wants to keep the summit as technical as possible,' said Oliver Stuenkel, a professor at the Getulio Vargas Foundation think tank and university.
Consequently, observers expect a vague final declaration regarding Russia's war in Ukraine and conflicts in the Middle East.
As well as suiting Brazil, a watered-down and non-controversial statement may be made easier by the absences of Putin and Xi, Stuenkel said. Those two countries have pushed for a stronger anti-Western stance, as opposed to Brazil and India that prefer non-alignment.
A Brazilian government official told The Associated Press Thursday that the group is expected to produce three joint statements and a final declaration, 'all of which less bounded by current geopolitical tensions.' The official spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the summit's preparations.
João Alfredo Nyegray, an international business and geopolitics professor at the Pontifical Catholic University in Parana, said the summit could have played a role in showing an alternative to an unstable world, but won't do so.
'The withdrawal of Egypt's President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi and the uncertainty about the level of representation for countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia and the UAE are confirming the difficulty for the BRICS to establish themselves as a cohesive pole of global leadership,' Nyegray said. 'This moment demands high level articulation, but we are actually seeing dispersion.'
Brazil skittish in light of Trump tariffs
Brazil, the country that chairs the bloc, has picked six strategic priorities for the summit: global cooperation in healthcare; trade, investment and finance; climate change; governance for artificial intelligence; peace-making and security; and institutional development.
It has decided to focus on less controversial issues, such as promoting trade relations between members and global health, after Trump returned to the White House, said Ana Garcia, a professor at the Rio de Janeiro Federal Rural University.
'Brazil wants the least amount of damage possible and to avoid drawing the attention of the Trump administration to prevent any type of risk to the Brazilian economy,' Garcia said.
While Brazil will continue to advocate for the reform of Western-led global institutions, a cornerstone policy of the group, the country wants to avoid becoming the target of tariffs — a predicament it has so far largely escaped.
Trump has threatened to impose 100% tariffs against the bloc if they take any moves to undermine the dollar.
Other leaders shun the summit
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Egypt's Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi will also be absent. Those two countries joined the BRICS in 2024, alongside Ethiopia, Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates. Saudi Arabia has been invited and is participating in member discussions, but it has yet to send its confirmation letter.
As well as new members, the bloc has 10 strategic partner countries, a category created at last year's summit that includes Belarus, Cuba and Vietnam.
That rapid expansion led Brazil to put housekeeping issues — officially termed institutional development — on the agenda to better integrate new members and boost internal cohesion.
Despite notable absences, the summit is important for attendees, especially in the context of instability provoked by Trump's tariff wars, said Bruce Scheidl, a researcher at the University of Sao Paulo's BRICS study group.
'The summit offers the best opportunity for emerging countries to respond, in the sense of seeking alternatives and diversifying their economic partnerships,' Scheidl said.
For Lula, the summit will be a welcome pause from a difficult domestic scenario, marked by a drop in popularity and conflict with Congress.
The meeting also represents an opportunity to advance climate negotiations and commitments on protecting the environment before November's COP 30 climate talks in the Amazonian city of Belem.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Japan Forward
44 minutes ago
- Japan Forward
Why is Ishiba Letting Trump Call the Shots in Tariff Talks?
このページを 日本語 で読む There seems to be no end in sight for the Japan-United States tariff negotiations. With such slow progress, President Donald Trump has been stepping up his criticism of Japan. Trump has said that it is "unfair" that US auto exports to Japan are at such a low level and has rebuffed Japan's requests to scrap or reconsider the 25% additional tariffs his administration has slapped on Japanese cars. The President has also complained that the Japanese imports of US rice are insufficient. Trump has been pointing to both of these issues for quite some time. Nevertheless, the reason why he has recently intensified his criticism of Japan by name is likely a desire to shake up Tokyo. He wants to force major concessions from Japan in order to start eliminating the bilateral trade deficit. Of course, the self-righteous US criticism regarding motor vehicle imports is unacceptable. Additionally, Japan imported 346,000 tons of American rice in 2024, more than twice the amount from the next largest external source, Thailand. At the same time, rice production constitutes the foundation of Japan's food security. So there is no need for our nation to blindly comply with US demands for increased imports of American rice. Japan should remain undeterred by Trump's provocative words and actions and continue to negotiate tenaciously. What is worrisome is the fact that Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has been out of the picture. Minister Ryosei Akazawa leaves the meeting with Commerce Secretary Robert Lutnick on June 27 in Washington. (©Kyodo) Trump personally calls the shots as to whether the US will revise its tariff measures. The only person who can directly influence this impasse is the Prime Minister. So why is there no sign of Ishiba becoming proactively involved in the negotiations? After agreement could not be reached at the June summit, the parties decided to continue negotiations at the Cabinet minister level. However, leaving the negotiations to Ryosei Akazawa, Minister of State for Economic Revitalization, does not solve the problem. Akazawa is not in a position to negotiate directly with the President. Ishiba has a responsibility as prime minister to protect the national interest. If he just allows Trump to dictate the pace of negotiations, he will be unable to fulfill that responsibility. Currently, the Japan-US tariff talks remain stymied over the additional tariffs on Japanese motor vehicles imported into the United States. That sector is a priority for Japan. Akazawa visited the US at the end of June for the seventh ministerial meeting. However, he was unable to even meet with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who is overseeing the US side in the talks. Trump's moratorium on the imposition of additional "reciprocal tariffs" is due to expire on July 9. Yet, no progress has been made in the negotiations, including regarding the possibility of extending the deadline. Prime Minister Ishiba answers reporters' questions on June 22. (©Sankei) Trump unilaterally established that deadline. The US President also mentioned that he might send a letter to Japan ending the negotiations and setting the tariff level. It is problematic that Trump continues to unilaterally impose his will without fairly considering the ministerial-level talks and other input. However, it is also questionable whether the Ishiba administration is capable of managing such Trump-style dealmaking. The Prime Minister must demonstrate the leadership necessary to break the impasse. That, of course, includes arranging a telephone summit with Trump, as well as writing him directly. The time has come for Prime Minister Ishiba to prove his ability. Author: Editorial Board, The Sankei Shimbun このページを 日本語 で読む


Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
BRICS leaders condemn Gaza and Iran attacks, urge global reforms
Leaders of the BRICS group of developing nations on Sunday condemned attacks on Gaza and Iran, called for reforms of global institutions and presented the bloc as a haven for multilateral diplomacy amid violent conflicts and trade wars. With forums such as the G7 and G20 groups of major economies hamstrung by divisions and the disruptive 'America First' approach of U.S. President Donald Trump, expansion of the BRICS has opened new space for diplomatic co-ordination. In opening remarks to the summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva drew a parallel with the Cold War's Non-Aligned Movement, a group of developing nations that resisted joining either side of a polarized global order. More from BRICS summit: Russia's Putin says liberal globalization model is 'obsolete' 'BRICS is the heir to the Non-Aligned Movement,' Lula told leaders. 'With multilateralism under attack, our autonomy is in check once again.' BRICS nations now represent more than half the world's population and 40 per cent of its economic output, Lula noted in remarks on Saturday to business leaders warning of rising protectionism. The original BRICS group gathered leaders from Brazil, Russia, India and China at its first summit in 2009. The bloc later added South Africa and last year included Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates as members. This is the first summit of leaders to include Indonesia. 'The vacuum left by others ends up being filled almost instantly by the BRICS,' said a Brazilian diplomat who asked not to be named. Although the G7 still concentrates vast power, the diplomat added, 'it doesn't have the predominance it once did.' However, there are questions about the shared goals of an increasingly heterogeneous BRICS group, which has grown to include regional rivals along with major emerging economies. Stealing some thunder from this year's summit, Chinese President Xi Jinping chose to send his premier in his place. Russian President Vladimir Putin is attending online due to an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court. Still, several heads of state were gathered for discussions at Rio's Museum of Modern Art on Sunday and Monday, including Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. More than 30 nations have expressed interest in participating in the BRICS, either as full members or partners. Expansion of the BRICS has added diplomatic weight to the gathering, which aspires to speak for developing nations across the Global South, strengthening calls for reforming global institutions such as the United Nations Security Council and the International Monetary Fund. 'If international governance does not reflect the new multipolar reality of the 21st century, it is up to BRICS to help bring it up to date,' Lula said in his remarks, which highlighted the failure of U.S.-led wars in the Middle East. Urging the BRICS to take the lead on reforms, Lula reflected on the G20 summit hosted in the same locale last November: 'In a short period of time, the international scene has deteriorated to the point that some of the initiatives we approved then would no longer be possible now.' In a joint statement released on Sunday afternoon, the leaders assembled called attacks against Iran's 'civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities' a 'violation of international law.' The group expressed 'grave concern' for the Palestinian people over Israeli attacks on Gaza, and condemned what the joint statement called a 'terrorist attack' in India-administered Kashmir. On trade, the joint statement warned the rise in tariffs threatens global trade, continuing the group's veiled criticism of Trump's U.S. tariff policies. The group voiced its support for Ethiopia and Iran to join the World Trade Organization, while calling to urgently restore its ability to resolve trade disputes. The leaders' joint statement backed plans to pilot a BRICS Multilateral Guarantees initiative within the group's New Development Bank to lower financing costs and boost investment in member states, as first reported by Reuters last week. In a separate statement following a discussion of artificial intelligence, the leaders called for protections against unauthorized use of AI to avoid excessive data collection and allow mechanisms for fair payment. Brazil, which also hosts the United Nations climate summit in November, has seized on both gatherings to highlight how seriously developing nations are tackling climate change, while Trump has slammed the brakes on U.S. climate initiatives. China and the UAE signalled in meetings with Brazilian Finance Minister Fernando Haddad in Rio that they plan to invest in a proposed Tropical Forests Forever Facility, according to two sources with knowledge of the discussions about funding conservation of endangered forests around the world.


Canada News.Net
an hour ago
- Canada News.Net
Trump reassures base after Iran strikes with Ukraine freeze
WASHINGTON, D.C.: President Donald Trump is drawing praise from his core supporters after halting key arms shipments to Ukraine, a move seen as reinforcing his promise to reduce U.S. involvement in foreign wars. The pause affects critical air defense systems, including Patriot missiles and precision artillery. It comes just weeks after Trump ordered strikes on Iranian nuclear sites—actions that had alarmed some in his base. Following the Iran strikes, many "America First" advocates questioned whether Trump was straying from his pledge to avoid "stupid wars." But the Ukraine decision appears designed to reassure them. Trump has repeatedly criticized U.S. aid to Ukraine, calling it a waste of taxpayer money. Dan Caldwell, a former senior defense adviser, said the choice was between equipping American troops or aiding a conflict where U.S. interests are limited. "We chose our own troops," he said. Jack Posobiec, a far-right commentator, echoed that sentiment on X: "America FIRST." The Pentagon insists the pause aligns with Trump's campaign platform. "The president was elected to put America first," said Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell. However, the move has divided Republicans. More hawkish members are alarmed, especially as Russia steps up attacks in Ukraine. Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania wrote to Trump and the Pentagon requesting an emergency briefing, warning that the timing could embolden Russian President Vladimir Putin. Rep. Michael McCaul, a Texas Republican, emphasized continued support for Ukraine: "Now is the time to show Putin we mean business," he posted. "That starts with delivering the weapons Congress approved." On July 3, Trump held a phone call with Putin—their sixth conversation since Trump returned to office. Putin's aide, Yuri Ushakov, confirmed they discussed Ukraine and Iran but did not specifically address the weapons freeze. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said during a visit to Denmark that he hopes to speak with Trump soon. The White House says the pause is part of a broader review of U.S. military readiness, following US$70 billion in arms transfers to Ukraine since 2022. Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon's top policy official, led the review. At his Senate hearing, Colby stressed the U.S. lacks the capacity for multiple wars and should prioritize threats from China. Analysts supporting a more cautious U.S. posture say the arms pause is overdue. "We're reaching a point where continued aid to Ukraine could weaken our ability to respond to future crises," said Jennifer Kavanagh of Defense Priorities. "You have to be cautious."