
Iran is losing its stranglehold over Iraq
The posters are testament to Iran's long-standing influence in Iraq. Yet they also mask a growing dissatisfaction among Iraqis about their country's alignment with its bigger neighbour, particularly among the young. Many dreaded being dragged into Iran's war with Israel and America, and were relieved that their government stayed out of it. The response to calls by the militias to march on the American embassy during the war in June, which ended with a ceasefire after just 12 days, was lacklustre. As its influence wanes across the region, Iran cannot rely on Iraq the way it used to.
The relationship between the neighbours, which share a 1,600km-long border, has waxed and waned. Their religious leaders compete for influence among Shia Muslims around the world. In the 1980s they fought a war in which hundreds of thousands of people died.
Yet in the years since America toppled the regime of Saddam Hussein in 2003 Iraq has been a staging ground for Iran to project power across the region. With extensive Western sanctions in place to stymie Iran's nuclear programme, Iraq's economy has been one of the few lifelines for its beleaguered neighbour. For years the regime in Tehran manipulated the Iraqi central bank's daily dollar auctions to secure hard currency to pay for imports, circumventing sanctions. Only America's blacklisting of Iraqi banks in 2023 slowed the practice. Iraq is also a crucial market for Iranian exports. Iran presses Iraqi government departments and ministries to prioritise Iranian goods over those from elsewhere, according to businesspeople in Baghdad. 'If the Americans occupied Iraq militarily,' says one banker from the region, 'then Iran has done so economically.'
Even more important has been Iran's exertion of military influence through militias backed by its Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). The rise in Iraq of Islamic State (IS), a Sunni extremist group, in 2014 triggered a call to arms from Shia religious authorities in both Iraq and Iran. Iran supported the establishment of a number of Shia armed groups in Iraq. They battled IS and eventually helped to degrade it significantly. But they also provided Iran with a way to control much of Iraq's politics and economy.
The militias' unmarked pickup trucks still roam the streets of the capital. Their members have vast business interests and control important ministries, including those in charge of oil and metals exports. Until recently they exerted significant influence over the supreme court.
Much of that control was exerted by Qassem Suleimani, who as head of the Quds force, the IRGC's elite arm, helped co-ordinate Iran's foreign-influence activities. But Iran's hold over the militias has diminished since an American drone strike killed Suleimani in 2020. Even as some joined Iran's 'axis of resistance', others turned inward, focusing on domestic affairs.
One reason is that Esmail Qaani, Suleimani's successor, lacks his predecessor's deft touch in managing the factions' competing interests, says a veteran Iraqi lawmaker. 'The requests became demands,' he says. Another is that Iran's allies in Iraq have grown rich and now have much to lose from getting dragged into a conflict with America or Israel. Some still believe in Iran's Islamic revolution and the need to fight Israel. But others are increasingly resentful of their country's status as its neighbour's satrap.
Perhaps most important, a younger political class that grew out of anti-government protests in 2020 has become increasingly vocal about its opposition to the militias. The armed groups are 'corrupted and have built economic empires', says Muhi Ansari, who heads the Iraqi House foundation, a new civil-society group. 'The concept of resistance [to Israel] is hollow in Iraq,' he says.
That sentiment was on full display during Iran's brief war against Israel and America last month. Even Iran's closest allies in Iraq were too wary of retaliation by America or Israel to offer much help. As Abu Meethaq al-Amsari, a political analyst close to Badr, one of the biggest Iran-backed factions, explained on national television on June 21st: 'The brothers in the factions are practising a high degree of self-restraint and rationality.'
Israel's decimation of the IRGC's high command during the dozen-day war and America's strike on Iran's nuclear programmes have raised hopes among some Iraqis that Iran's hold over Iraq's politics and economy will diminish. As militias and politicians loyal to Iran find themselves adrift, a space could open up for other, homegrown political forces. 'Whatever they say in public,' says a civil servant, 'we're not sad to see Iran weakened.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
We'll wipe it out faster: Trump again warns Iran over nuclear enrichment
US President Donald Trump has again warned Iran against its nuclear enrichment activities, weeks after launching strikes on three major Iranian nuclear sites. Speaking at a press conference in Scotland alongside UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Trump said Iran was "sending very bad signals, very nasty signals.""They shouldn't be doing that," Trump said. "We wiped out their nuclear possibilities. They can start again. If they do, we'll wipe it out faster than you can wave your finger at it. We will do that gladly, openly and gladly."advertisementTrump's warning comes after Iran's announcement to continue enriching uranium for civilian purposes. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi confirmed the development last week during talks with the UK, France, and Germany. Araghchi said that uranium enrichment is Iran's right, and it is necessary for medical and energy use. After Trump's remarks, Araghchi responded, saying, "Iran will never respond to the language of threat and intimidation," he said, adding that the country "will not hesitate to react in a more decisive manner" if attacked again. Araghchi repeated that Iran's nuclear program is peaceful in nature and meant for civilian and medical use CALLS IRAN 'STUPID'Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz also issued warning on Sunday. "If you continue to threaten Israel, our long arm will reach Tehran again with even greater power – and this time personally to you, too," he said, addressing Iran's Supreme Leader Ali had earlier claimed that the US strikes on Iran's Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear facilities in June had "obliterated" the country's nuclear program. However, intelligence reports suggest that the damage might not have been as extensive as initially claimed. The reports say the program has only been set back by a few the weekend, Trump criticised Iran's ongoing efforts to enrich uranium, calling it "stupid." He also accused Iran of interfering in the ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas in Qatar. "I think they got involved in this negotiation, telling Hamas and giving Hamas signals and orders," he his first term, Trump pulled the US out of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), a nuclear deal involving Iran and world powers. The deal had limited Iran's nuclear activities in return for lifting international sanctions. After Trump's withdrawal from the agreement, Iran resumed enriching uranium beyond the limits set in the JCPOA.- EndsWith inputs from AgenciesMust Watch


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Gideon Levy: 'I want to live in a just state'
Why is it important that Jews such as yourself speak out against Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories? Israeli author and journalist Gideon Levy (Courtesy Jaipur Literature Festival) The reason is quite simple and straightforward. I want to live in a just state! As long as occupation and apartheid go on, I will continue to live in an unjust place. There is injustice on a daily basis towards millions of people. Through my work as a journalist, I try to change this. This is not only my right. It is my duty to do so. Judaism places great emphasis on the concept of Tikkun olam. How can Jews seek inspiration from this principle to do the right thing in this contemporary political environment? Tikkun olam means 'correcting the world'. I don't think that I am capable enough to do that, so I do not even aspire to it. My inspiration is more modest. Let me try to correct my own country, which is going in the wrong direction. I criticise ideas like 'Jewish morality' and 'Jewish values'. Let us follow international law without getting into philosophy. Let us stick to moral principles that are universal. Don't kill innocent people. Don't punish a whole piece of land for the actions of some individuals who did something bad. You do not need any concepts. You only need a conscience to do the right thing. Israelis who have spoken out in solidarity with Palestinians have had to face repercussions such as losing their jobs. With the growing fear of a potential backlash, to what extent is it really possible for Israelis to raise their voice? I am the best example of an Israeli person who has raised his voice in support of Palestinians. I live in Israel and I continue to write for Haaretz, the most respected Israeli newspaper that gives me the freedom to write. I have the privilege of being a Jewish journalist. People like me have more rights than Palestinians. I do not take them for granted. 320pp, ₹1936; Verso Books You have also received death threats, haven't you? Yes, I have. I receive them all the time. But that will not change anything about how I think and what I write. Where do you draw your courage from? Well, I don't think that you need much courage. I cannot keep silent when I see what is happening. People who live in the occupied territories face a lot more danger every day. I am only doing my job as a journalist. Even an electrician who climbs ladders to fix wires faces danger on a daily basis while he is doing his job. I do not like to think that I am a very courageous person. What, according to you, is the role of journalists in seeking accountability after the announcement of the ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas? We have a big responsibility as always. First of all, our job is to give our readers and viewers the whole truth; not opinion and propaganda. Journalists must be professional in their approach. We must free ourselves from the agenda of the government as well as its rivals. How did you end up writing your new book The Killing of Gaza? My publisher thought that my pieces should be published as a book, along the lines of my previous one called The Punishment of Gaza. I liked the idea because compiling the pieces in this form gives readers a concentrated picture of what I have seen in Gaza through the years. I have written a foreword and an epilogue to lay out the context. In India, we don't get to hear many stories of 'conscientious objectors' from Israel who are protesting against apartheid and genocide. Could you tell us about the resistance movements in Israel? Right now, the opposition to Benjamin Netanyahu is very strong, vocal, active, and devoted. There are demonstrations every week. Unfortunately, what's almost totally absent is an opposition to the war and crimes of war. Only a handful of people in Israel are raising their voices against apartheid and genocide. In my view, this is very unfortunate. After the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, it has become harder to talk about what is Israel is doing in the occupied territories. The conversation is more focused on what Hamas did to Israelis. What kind of impact do anti-Zionist organizations in the United States, such as Jewish Voice of Peace, have on the actual situation for Palestinians? You cannot measure the impact of their work but you can see a process that is the outcome of a long-standing activity. Even in Israel, there are small organizations that are devoted to their work. We cannot seek immediate results. Everyone is doing whatever they can. We will see some changes gradually and eventually. Your father fled the Nazi regime to protect himself from persecution. Would you say that this family history helped you empathize with Palestinians who have been forced to abandon their homes? My father was trying to get to Palestine from the Czech Republic with other Jewish people. They were on a ship for months because they were not allowed to disembark in any port. They ran out of food. I cannot even imagine how they survived. Finally, the British sent them to a detention camp in Lebanon. After that, they were sent to Israel. My father felt like a refugee all his life. He belonged to Europe because that's where he was brought up. He did not even speak Hebrew. How do you view the idea of a two-state solution in West Asia? Are we moving closer to that or does it seem far away? In my opinion, it is not far away; it is dead. I don't see it being implemented. There are several hundred thousand Jewish settlers in the West Bank. The two-state solution will never happen. I wish it would have happened. There is no room for it. That train has left the station. There could be a Palestinian Bantustan like independent states in South Africa that were created for black people. Israel promotes itself as a very liberal destination for LGBTQ people around the world. Is this a way of whitewashing its human rights violations? Israel is very liberal. I have no doubt about it. But being liberal about one thing does not give you the right to be so cruel and immoral in other matters. Israel is using its liberal image for propaganda. It is constantly reminding everyone how Hamas treats gay people. Yes, what they do is horrible. But that does not mean that Palestinian people don't have rights. Chintan Girish Modi is a journalist, educator and literary critic. He is @chintanwriting on Instagram and X.


NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
"No Alternative" To Two-State Solution For Israel, Palestinians: France
There is no alternative to a two-state solution between Israelis and the Palestinians, France told a UN conference co-chaired with Saudi Arabia Monday that was boycotted by Israel and branded a stunt by Washington. "Only a political, two-state solution will help respond to the legitimate aspirations of Israelis and Palestinians to live in peace and security. There is no alternative," French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said at the start of the three-day meeting. Days before the conference, French President Emmanuel Macron announced he would formally recognize Palestinian statehood in September, provoking strong opposition from Israel and the United States. Barrot said that other Western countries will confirm their intention to recognize the state of Palestine during the conference, without confirming which. "All states have a responsibility to act now," said Palestinian prime minister Mohammad Mustafa at the start of the meeting, calling for an international force to help underwrite Palestinian statehood. He called for the world to recognize Palestinian statehood, while later demanding that Hamas surrender control of the Gaza Strip and its arms as part of a deal to end fighting in the territory. France is hoping Britain will follow its lead. More than 200 British members of parliament on Friday voiced support for the idea, but Prime Minister Keir Starmer said that recognition of a Palestinian state "must be part of a wider plan." United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said at the meeting "the two-state solution is farther than ever before." According to an AFP database, at least 142 of the 193 UN member states now recognize the Palestinian state proclaimed by the Palestinian leadership in exile in 1988. In 1947, in a resolution approved by the General Assembly, the United Nations decided to partition Palestine, then under a British mandate, into Jewish and Arab states. Israel was proclaimed in 1948. For decades, most UN members have supported a two-state solution with Israel and a Palestinian state existing side-by-side. But after more than 21 months of war in Gaza, the ongoing expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and Israeli officials declaring designs to annex occupied territory, it is feared a Palestinian state could become geographically impossible. The current war in Gaza started following a deadly attack by Hamas on Israel, which responded with a large-scale military response that has claimed tens of thousands of Palestinian lives and destroyed most infrastructure in the enclave. Barrot said it would be an "illusion to think that you can get to a lasting ceasefire without having an outline of what's going to happen in Gaza after the end of the war and having a political horizon." - 'Israeli unilateral actions' - Beyond facilitating conditions for recognizing Palestine, the meeting will focus on three other issues: reform of the Palestinian Authority, disarmament of Hamas and its exclusion from Palestinian public life, and normalization of relations with Israel by Arab states. However, no new normalization deals are expected to be announced at the meeting, according to a French diplomatic source. Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al-Saud said US President Donald Trump could be a "catalyst" to ending the war in Gaza and jump-starting the two-state solution, stressing Riyadh had no plans to normalize relations with Israel. Following his plea to Trump, the US State Department labeled the three-day event "unproductive and ill-timed," as well as a "publicity stunt" that would make finding peace harder. Jordan's Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi said action was needed to counter Israeli "settlements, land confiscation (and) encroachments on the holy sites." Israel and the United States were not taking part in the meeting, amid growing international pressure on Israel to end nearly two years of war in Gaza. Despite "tactical pauses" announced by Israel, the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza will dominate speeches. Israeli Ambassador to the UN Danny Danon said "this conference does not promote a solution."