UP Congress in-charge: ‘Alliance with SP in place but we are prepared for all 403 seats … nobody should take us for granted'
On June 14, the Opposition party launched a one-month campaign to this end. The All India Congress Committee (AICC) general secretary in charge of UP, Avinash Pande, flagged off the 'Bhagidari Nyaya Campaign' that will include awareness campaigns in villages and urban areas, and outreach to students and the youth. The party plans to reach out to the OBC youth between July 1 and 14, timing it with the college admission period.
In an interview, Pande discusses what the party wishes to achieve through this one-month initiative, its efforts to rebuild in UP, the alliance with Samajwadi Party (SP), and why the Congress is preparing for all 403 Assembly seats.
The aim is to dedicate this year to rebuilding the party before moving ahead. Several experiments are taking place, with the idea to rebuild in a proper, structured manner by fixing the responsibility of each and every member. The first phase of 100 days is currently ongoing, and we are confident it will be completed by August 15.
Once this process is over, we will have identified and connected with 23 lakh office bearers and workers, who will be given party posts right from the booth level and panchayats to the Assembly level.
Through this exercise, we are identifying faces who can be probable candidates for the future, even at the panchayat ward, Nagar Parishad ward member level. The idea is to have a panel of names ready at all levels, who can be considered for contesting polls at different levels. Once completed, our teams will have two segments, one an elected force that will be considered for elections and another for organisational posts. There may be about 20% overlap as well.
Yes, panchayat, Nagar Parishad, Nagar Palika, we have decided to contest all these elections alone. By August 15, we will be able to have a panel of potential candidates, who will not just be probable candidates but also responsible office-bearers.
We are prepared for all 403 (Assembly seats). Keeping the interest of the state, its people, and party workers in mind, the Congress decides at the time of the election. But nobody should take us for granted. If the Congress does not get respect and the desire of its workers is not respected, we want to be prepared for all 403 seats.
The alliance (with SP) is definitely in place. It is normally monitored and nurtured by the national leadership, and we follow their instructions. But depending on the views of the state unit, we take decisions, like in the case of the panchayat elections. However, it is our moral responsibility and duty to prepare for the 403 Assembly seats. We want to make it clear that if we are making sacrifices and leaving seats, it is only to defeat the BJP and for the welfare of the state.
Since the Congress was born, its sole motto has been to work for OBCs, the most backward, Dalits, Adivasis, and minorities. Rahul Gandhi went on an all-India yatra for social justice and he is of the opinion that communities should get representation as per their number. The SP came to this later, but the OBCs have always been on the agenda of the Congress.
We are working on the formula of 'paanch tatva (five elements)' while rebuilding the state unit. That is why it is taking time, and such long deliberations are going on. This means I will not give clearance to any committee unless 60% of the office-bearers and rank-holders are either Dalit, tribal, minority, OBC, or women. Along with this, we are also ensuring that 50% of the office-bearers are below 50 years.
After August 15. We are working on a new format in which office-bearers will not be decided first. They will first be given tasks and their activities will be monitored. Based on their performances, they will be given posts and responsibilities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
8 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Congress flags 'serious questions' over impact of India-UK FTA on domestic industry
NEW DELHI: With an India-UK free trade agreement likely to be signed during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Britain, the Congress on Wednesday claimed that serious questions have emerged on its impact on India's domestic industry. The opposition party's attack came after Prime Minister Modi on Wednesday left on a four-day visit to the UK and the Maldives, expressing confidence that this would boost India's ties with the two countries. Congress general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh said, "The Super Premium Frequent Flier jets out of India again today -- this time to the UK and the Maldives. The London trip is for the signing of the India-UK Free Trade Agreement (FTA), which will in fact have pernicious consequences for numerous stakeholders." The FTA's significant consequences would be on the micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), which are the backbone of India's economy, the largest employers of India's workers, the object of neglect and the subject of distress in the last 11 years of the Modi government's policy of favouring a couple of big business groups, Ramesh claimed in a post on X.
Indian Express
8 minutes ago
- Indian Express
How Dhankhar's exit has landed Oppn in Catch-22, put unity to fresh test
At the start of the Monsoon Session of Parliament, a united Opposition had a clear idea of its floor strategy: It wanted to force the government for a discussion on the Pahalgam terror attack and the alleged US role in cessation of military action between India and Pakistan besides the Election Commission (EC)'s special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar. But the resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar as the Vice-President came out of the blue. While the government has agreed for a discussion on Operation Sindoor next week and will not concede on the Bihar SIR exercise, the Opposition now is faced with two new challenges. Most of the Opposition leaders believe Dhankhar's sudden resignation is shrouded in mystery – there is far more to his 'totally unexpected' resignation than meets the eye, as Congress leader Jairam Ramesh put it – but there seems to be lack of clarity in the Opposition camp about how to capitalise on it to score points over the government, especially since he stepped down citing health concerns. Adding to it is the fact that there had been acrimonious relations between Dhankhar and the Opposition ever since he first presided over the Rajya Sabha in the 2022 Winter Session. The second challenge is to find and field a joint candidate for the Vice-Presidential election, for which the EC has set the ball rolling Wednesday. The Trinamool Congress (TMC), for instance, had abstained in the previous V-P election poll, claiming that the Opposition parties had decided on their nominee, Margaret Alva, without consulting it. Much water has flown down the bridge since then. With West Bengal headed to the Assembly elections next year, the TMC would weigh its options carefully – it may not like to be seen as siding with any camp. The AAP, on the other hand, has already declared that it was not part of the Opposition INDIA bloc. Interestingly, the TMC has so far refrained from commenting on Dhankhar's resignation. As regards the principal Opposition Congress, the initial response articulated by Ramesh surprised his own party. While arguing that Dhankhar's resignation was 'inexplicable' and 'clearly there is far more to his totally unexpected resignation than meets the eye', Ramesh went on to say that 'Dhankhar took both the Government and the Opposition to task in equal measure' and even requested him to reconsider his decision. 'This will be in the nation's interest. The farming community particularly will be greatly relieved,' he said. 'Sometimes he (Ramesh) is on his own. Dhankhar clearly was the most partisan Chairman the Rajya Sabha has seen,' a senior Congress functionary said. Shiv Sena (UBT)'s Priyanka Chaturvedi publicly disagreed with Ramesh. ''Mr Dhankar took both the Government and the Opposition to task in equal measure.' Fact check: Incorrect. Reminder: Opposition was forced to file a no-confidence motion against the Chair because of the partisan manner of conduct. Let's at least not forget that, just because the moment has come as a surprise,' she said. And it was not just Ramesh. Samajwadi Party (SP) chief Akhilesh Yadav Tuesday said, 'Our very popular Vice-President expressed concern about his health and resigned but nobody inquired about his health. Nobody went to ask about his well-being. Lots of BJP members would have been waiting for a message to go and ask about health and well-being. I don't think that any of the BJP members would have reached to ask about his well-being… Today a person occupying top position has to resign by showing concern for his health and nobody from the BJP is going to inquire (about his health), then that means 'kuch daal me kaala hai' which we are not able to guess.' Such reactions marked an interesting change of stance since the Congress and the SP were part of the Opposition group, which has had several run-ins with Dhankhar in the past. They had in December last year even made the unprecedented move of bringing a no-confidence motion against the V-P, accusing him of 'partisan conduct' as the Rajya Sabha Chairman. In their impeachment notice which was later rejected by Deputy Chairman Harivansh, the Opposition had alleged that Dhankhar had taken it upon himself to be an 'impassioned spokesperson' of the government's policies in public forums. They had alleged that he was 'explicitly partisan' and conducted the proceedings of the Upper House in an 'extremely biased manner.' And therein lies the Opposition's dilemma. Most of the Opposition leaders believe that Dhankhar's exit was allegedly 'forced' by the government – which aligns with their larger allegation that the BJP-led government has been undermining the Constitution and institutions – but are wary of going full-throttle over the issue. 'What if we turn it into a big political issue and he then makes a statement tomorrow, saying he was pained by the politicisation of his resignation. So far he has been quiet. We hope he will speak out one day,' a senior Opposition leader said, signalling the Opposition's belief that Dhankhar would follow the Satyapal Malik route. 'To protect the dignity of the second-highest constitutional office and address growing speculation, the government must clarify the circumstances surrounding the resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar. Information from certain quarters suggests a senior minister sought his resignation on behalf of the government. The contrast between the Prime Minister's enthusiastic endorsement of Dhankhar ji as 'Kisan Putra' during his candidacy and the cryptic, delayed statement following his resignation heightens intrigue,' said the CPM's Rajya Sabha MP John Brittas. 'If the government continues to evade questions, it would be fitting for Dhankhar ji to break his silence to uphold the dignity of the the Opposition disagreed with the former Vice-President on many issues, the BJP government's handling of this constitutional position is deeply troubling and warrants concern,' said Brittas. On the other hand, the virtual silences of the TMC and the DMK on the issue show that all the Opposition parties are not on the same page. On its part, the BJP believes that the issue would die down in a few days and the attention would shift to the election of the new Vice-President. And then, the Opposition would face its next challenge. It is not just the TMC and the AAP which do not want to be seen with the Congress, the CPM is also upset with the grand old party, particularly Rahul Gandhi, for having attacked it during his last Kerala visit.
The Hindu
8 minutes ago
- The Hindu
U.S. House ending session early as Republicans clash over Epstein vote
U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson is rebuffing pressure to act on the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, instead sending members home early for a month-long break from Washington after the week's legislative agenda was upended by Republican members who are clamouring for a vote. Mr. Johnson, a Republican from Louisiana, said Tuesday (July 22, 2025) morning that he wants to give the White House 'space' to release the Epstein information on its own, despite the bipartisan push for legislation that aims to force the release of more documents. Editorial | Republican rumblings: on Trump and the Epstein files 'There's no purpose for the Congress to push an administration to do something they're already doing,' Johnson said at his weekly press conference, his last before lawmakers depart Washington on Wednesday for their traditional August recess. The Speaker's stance did little to alleviate the intra-party turmoil unfolding on Capitol Hill as many of President Donald Trump's supporters demand that the administration meet its promises to publicly release a full accounting of the sex trafficking investigation into Epstein, who killed himself in his New York jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial. Under pressure from right-wing online influencers, as well as voters back home, rank-and-file Republicans are demanding that the House intervene in the matter. 'The public's not going to let this die, and rightfully so,' said Rep Ralph Norman, a South Carolina Republican. Johnson's control of the House is under threat The dynamic left Johnson with slipping control of his Republican conference and several crucial committees. Even before Mr. Johnson spoke Tuesday morning, a Republican-controlled subcommittee of the House Committee on Oversight was advancing a resolution to subpoena Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, for a deposition. Mr. Johnson decided to end the House's legislative business early this week after he essentially lost control of the powerful House Rules Committee, which sends bills to the floor for debates and votes. Late Monday evening, business on that panel ground to a halt when the Republicans on the committee abruptly recessed proceedings rather than risk more proposals from Democrats pushing them to release Epstein files. Republicans had teed up votes on legislation to increase penalties for migrants who enter the country illegally, to ease permitting for water infrastructure and to rollback several Biden-era regulations. But all of those bills were put on hold at least until after the August recess. Frustration in the House has been running high since last week, when Republican leaders signaled possible support for a vote on the Epstein files as they raced to pass a $9 billion package of spending cuts. GOP leader unveiled a resolution that has no legal weight but would urge the Justice Department to produce more documentation. Mr. Trump, meanwhile, has asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek the release of testimony from secret grand jury proceedings in the case, though that effort is unlikely to produce new revelations. Echoing Mr. Trump's position, Mr. Johnson insisted he, too, wants the files released, but only those that are 'credible'. Mr. Johnson, who has relied heavily on Mr. Trump to hold onto leadership in the House, cast the President's reticence to release information as out of concern for the victims of Epstein. 'We have a moral responsibility to expose the evil of Epstein and everybody who was involved in that — absolutely — and we're resolved to do it,' Mr. Johnson said. 'But we also have an equal moral responsibility to protect the innocent, and that is a fine needle to thread.' A political wedge Even with the month-long break, the pressure on Mr. Johnson is unlikely to end. Rep. Thomas Massie, a Republican whose contrarian stances are often a thorn in the side to leadership, is gathering support for a legislative maneuver to force the bipartisan bill to a House vote, even without leadership's consent. 'Now, there are a lot of people here in the swamp who think that, Oh, well, if we spend five weeks on vacation, the pressure for this will dissipate. I don't think it's going to dissipate',' Mr. Massie told reporters Monday evening. Democrats have watched it all unfold with glee and worked to inflame the conflict among Republicans by making their own calls for transparency on the Epstein investigation. They have repeatedly tried to force votes on the matter, casting it as an issue of trust in the government. 'It's about transparency in government. It's about whose side are you on? Are you on the side of the rich and powerful, protecting men? Or are you on the side of young girls and America's children?' said Rep Ro Khanna, the California Democrat who put forward the legislation alongside Massie. Epstein sexually abused children hundreds of times over more than a decade, exploiting vulnerable girls as young as 14, authorities say. He couldn't have done so without the help of Maxwell, his longtime companion, prosecutors contend. Mr. Massie said the case is palpable enough to carry significant political consequences. 'This will be an issue that does follow Republicans through the midterms, and it will follow each individual Republican through the midterms. It will follow people into their primaries. Did you support transparency and justice, or did you come up here, get elected and fall into the swamp?' he told reporters. He added, 'I think it is a watershed moment for the speaker of the House and the president."
