U.K.'s Southampton University opens campus in Gurugram
The launch coincides with the fifth anniversary of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. The University of Southampton, a QS Top 100 global institution and founding member of the U.K.'s Russell Group, becomes the first foreign university to operationalise a campus in India under the University Grants Commission's (Setting up and Operation of Campuses of Foreign Higher Educational Institutions in India) Regulations, said an official statement.
Speaking at the event, Mr. Pradhan called it a 'momentous milestone' in the internationalisation of education, and a step forward in strengthening the India-UK education partnership envisioned in the India-U.K. Roadmap 2030.
He expressed confidence that the new campus, backed by Southampton's academic legacy and offering a suite of forward-looking courses, would become a distinguished institution shaping the leaders of tomorrow.
Quoting Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Mr. Pradhan said education is a 'living bridge' between the two countries, and the opening of the varsity's India campus would further fortify this bridge.
Chief Minister Saini welcomed the university to Haryana and reaffirmed the State government's commitment to developing the region as a global hub for education and innovation.
Mr. Pradhan invited other top global universities to come to India to co-create ecosystems of innovation, research, and education. 'Together, we must strive to build a bright future and drive innovation and progress,' he said.
The Gurugram campus will offer globally recognised undergraduate and postgraduate programmes aligned with UK academic standards. Students will also have the opportunity to spend up to one year at the university's U.K. or Malaysia campuses.
Programmes starting in 2025 include B.Sc courses in Computer Science, Economics, Accounting & Finance, and Business Management, as well as M.Sc courses in Finance and International Management.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
3 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Calcutta HC asks Centre if there is truth to claims about Bengali-speaking persons being deported
The Calcutta High Court on Wednesday asked the Union government if there was truth to the claims that Bengali-speaking persons were being deported to Bangladesh, The Indian Express reported. 'Why suddenly in June?' the newspaper quoted a division bench of Justices Tapabrata Chakraborty and Reetobroto Kumar Mitra as having asked. 'There is an uproar in the state that Bengali-speaking people are being deported.' Over the past month, Indian authorities have been pursuing a policy to 'push' individuals claimed to be undocumented migrants into Bangladesh. Many of those forced out of the country claim that they are Indian citizens. The bench made the remarks verbally while hearing a habeas corpus petition filed by the relatives of Sunali Khatun, a woman from West Bengal's Birbhum district who was allegedly deported to Bangladesh by the Delhi Police. Her husband, Danish, and their five-year-old son were also allegedly deported. The police had picked up Khatun and her family on June 20 from a settlement of Bengali migrants in Delhi's Rohini. According to two police statements seen by Scroll, the three were held in a detention centre. On June 23, they were produced at the Foreigners' Regional Registration Office in Delhi. Another family was detained along with them. A deportation order against the two families was issued by the FRRO the same day. According to the police, they were tipped off by an informer, who identified Danish as 'a Bangladeshi national'. The police also claimed that Danish had 'confessed' to being a Bangladeshi citizen. On June 26, they were 'pushed' into Bangladesh, according to a statement of the station house officer of the KN Katju Marg police station in Rohini and an order of the FRRO. During the hearing on Wednesday, the counsel for the Delhi Police told the court that Khatun's family was deported to Bangladesh in June, The Indian Express reported. The counsel noted that the matter was pending in the Delhi High Court and sought a dismissal of the habeas corpus petition. The petitioners had 'suppressed the facts in this [West Bengal] court', the counsel claimed. The counsel said that the Delhi High Court had been told that the family was deported on orders from the FRRO. Following this, the petitioners withdrew the habeas corpus application and filed a fresh petition in that court against the FRRO orders, the police said. The bench expressed displeasure at the non-disclosure of the facts by the petitioners, The Indian Express reported. However, it directed the Centre, the Delhi government and the West Bengal government to file affidavits in connection with the arrest of the family. The Union government was asked to file its affidavit by July 28. The court said that the petitioners must file their reply to the government's affidavit by August 4. The matter will be heard next on August 6. Meanwhile, Kalyan Banerjee, the counsel representing the West Bengal government, also sought an affidavit from the Centre on how many Bengalis had been detained and forced into Bangladesh, The Indian Express reported. 'Who will decide [about detention]?' the newspaper quoted him as having asked the court. 'The appropriate authority is not the police or constable. You cannot pick up someone just because they are speaking Bengali. There are procedures. These three-four cases are very alarming.' India has forced more than 2,000 persons, alleged to be undocumented migrants, into Bangladesh since the country launched ' Operation Sindoor ', a military operation against terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The legality of the 'push back' policy has been debated in India and internationally. Experts have told Scroll that the policy violated India's obligations under international law and customary international law. In June, four men from West Bengal, who had been picked up by the Maharashtra Police and forced into Bangladesh, were brought back on June 15. The Murshidabad Police in West Bengal had presented proof of them being Indian citizens.
The Wire
3 minutes ago
- The Wire
Meeting of Andhra, Telangana CMs Ends in Stalemate as Key Issue in River Basin Linking Project Sidelined
Government Convened by Union Jal Shakti minister C.R. Patil in Delhi, the meeting was a sequel to Telangana CM A. Revanth Reddy's complaint over the proposal of Andhra Pradesh constructing the Godavari-Banakacherla project. Hyderabad: A meeting of the chief ministers of the sister states Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, N. Chandrababu Naidu and A. Revanth Reddy, respectively, was convened by Union Jal Shakti minister C.R. Patil in New Delhi on Wednesday (July 16), amidst high hopes of addressing a ticklish river basin linking project between the states. However, it ended in a whimper as a discussion on the issue was sidelined. Instead, it was decided to leave it to a committee of engineers and officials to study pending proposals for projects in both states and suggest a way forward in 30 days. The Jal Shakti ministry will constitute the committee with representatives from both states. Wednesday's meeting was a sequel to Reddy's complaint to C.R. Patil when he met him in Delhi on June 19 over the proposal of Andhra Pradesh constructing Godavari-Banakacherla project – which was given national status by Union government – to link the waters of Godavari river from Polavaram to Penna river basin via Krishna basin for irrigating the chronic drought hit Rayalaseema region of the state. Reddy had complained that Telangana would lose considerable share of water in Godavari if the project was sanctioned. He had also expressed anguish that projects of Andhra Pradesh were getting immediate approval while proposals of Telangana were overlooked. He blamed it on the close rapport enjoyed by Chandrababu Naidu with the Union government as a key partner of the Bharatiya Janata Party-led National Democratic Alliance. So, the Union minister promised to invite both the chief ministers to sort out the issue. A day earlier, Revanth Reddy convened an all party meeting in Hyderabad where there was broad consensus authorising the state government to take all steps to stall the Godavari-Banakacherla project. After the meeting was scheduled at the instance of Patil today, the Andhra Pradesh government had written to the ministry to include discussion on the controversial project as the sole item on the agenda. This was protested by Telangana arguing that there could be no discussion as it lacked the statutory clearances from the Central Water Commission, Godavari River Management Board (GRMB), Krishna River Management Board (KRMB) and the Apex Council constituted under the reorganisation Act. Moreover, the expert appraisal committee of the Ministry of Environment and Forest had rejected the pre-feasibility report of the project. The project also violated the Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal Award of 1980 and the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act of 2014 by proposing to alter water allocations and project operations with the consent of co-basin states. A letter written by Telangana chief secretary K. Ramakrishna Rao to the ministry noted that the proposal for diversion of 200 thousand million cubic (TMC) feet of "flood water" from Polavaram was unilateral and fundamentally altered the operation schedule of Polavaram project and impacted the water rights of Telangana. Earlier, the Telangana irrigation minister N. Uttam Kumar Reddy shot off another letter to Patil over the injustice to Telangana by keeping in pendency irrigation projects of the state on Krishna and Godavari rivers. On the other hand, the Andhra Pradesh government was allowed to proceed with a lift-irrigation project for Rayalaseema from the bed of Srisailam reservoir despite a stay given by the National Green Tribunal. He demanded a reservoir on the lines of Polavaram for Telangana at Itchampally with a capacity of 200 TMC ft. The proposal of Andhra Pradesh for Godavari-Banakacherla project received not only political backlash but also stormy debates in civil society of Telangana. It was argued that Andhra Pradesh made a false claim to utilise flood waters which was a fictitious name given for non-existing water availability. What Andhra Pradesh was trying to project was average water over a 40-year timescale. Former advisor to Jal Shakti ministry Sriram Vedire gave a presentation saying the annual runoff of Godavari at Polavaram as per the gauze station of central water commission (CWC) for 57 years from 1966-67 to 2022-23 was about 3,000 TMC ft. The average flow of 3,000 TMC ft into the sea included the unutilised assured waters at 75% dependability allocated to the upstream states of Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha and Telangana. It also included spills from projects of upstream states. The 75% dependability referred to water available for three out of four years for planned utilisation of a project and its success in irrigating the command area for three out of four years. Sriram said that the CWC, in its reports of 2018 and 2023, denied availability of surplus water in Godavari at 75% dependability. The runoff water of 3,000 TMC ft into the sea was frequently highlighted by former chief minister and Bharat Rashtra Samiti supremo K. Chandrasekhar Rao while stressing the need for more projects on Godavari in both Telangana and Andhra Pradesh. This was the butt of criticism by Revanth Reddy saying Rao mortgaged the interests of Telangana with Andhra Pradesh when Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy was its CM. The Congress and BRS traded charges against each other over conception of Godavari-Banakacherla project in the context of Rao's demand to exploit the 3,000 TMC ft for mutual benefit of both states. In the background of raging controversy over the project, Wednesday's meeting of Naidu and Revanth Reddy in the presence of Patil assumed significance. But, the meeting skipped any discussion on the project, Reddy said at a press conference later. He said what was decided was the installation of telemetry stations from all water offtake points in Krishna river to quell doubts of both governments about over usage of water by each other. He said that the Andhra Pradesh government will undertake repairs and restoration of Srisailam dam on Krishna which is under its administrative control. The need for repairs to the dam was also stressed by the National Dam Safety Authority. Reddy added that it was also decided to locate the office of GRMB in Telangana and that of KRMB in Andhra Pradesh. Finally, the committee of engineers and officials will identify the river water issues of both States and suggest a way forward in 30 days. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Mint
3 minutes ago
- Mint
Did Sona BLW bag an order from Chinese EV maker BYD? What company said amid 8.5% spike in shares
Sona BLW Precision Forgings share price witnessed an 8.5 percent rally in intra-day trading on Thursday, July 17, after reports surfaced claiming the company was in advanced talks to supply electric vehicle (EV) components to Chinese automaker BYD. Both the BSE and NSE sought clarification from the company following the surge in investor interest. In a clarification to the exchanges, Sona BLW Precision Forgings said it is in regular discussions with several domestic and global clients as part of its ongoing business strategy. The company emphasized that there is no material information that warrants disclosure under Regulation 30 of SEBI's Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements (LODR) Regulations, 2015. "This is in reference to news articles appeared across various mainstream media on July 17, 2025, in relation to 'the company is in advanced talks to supply electric vehicle components to Chinese EV manufacturer BYD'. In this regard, the company wishes to clarify that it is in discussions with several potential customers in India and globally in the ordinary course, for growth of its business," it said. In the quarter ended March 2025, Sona BLW reported a net profit of ₹ 164 crore, up 11 percent from ₹ 148 crore in the same period last year. Revenue from operations declined 2 percent year-on-year to ₹ 865 crore from ₹ 884 crore. During Q4, the company secured a major order from a North American EV manufacturer for rotor-embedded differential sub-assemblies and epicyclic geartrains, contributing ₹ 1,520 crore to its order book. Notably, 35 percent of Sona BLW's revenue during the quarter came from the EV business, with Tesla continuing as one of its key clients. The stock touched a high of ₹ 494 on July 17, marking an 8.5 percent gain in intra-day trade. However, it remains nearly 36 percent below its 52-week high of ₹ 767.80, hit in September 2024. The stock had slumped to a 52-week low of ₹ 379.80 in April 2025. Despite being down over 36 percent in the past year, the stock has shown signs of recovery. It rose 1.65 percent in July so far, after declining 11.5 percent in June. The previous two months—May and April—saw gains of 13 percent and 4.3 percent, respectively. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
