logo
Trump and von der Leyen meet in Scotland to try to resolve US tariffs standoff

Trump and von der Leyen meet in Scotland to try to resolve US tariffs standoff

The Journal3 days ago
US PRESIDENT DONALD Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen are meeting today in Scotland in a high-stakes attempt to end a months-long transatlantic trade dispute, with Trump putting the odds of a deal at '50-50″.
Time is running out, with Trump threatening to impose sweeping tariffs on dozens of countries, including EU member states, unless a trade pact is agreed by 1 August.
The EU could face a flat 30 per cent levy if talks fail.
The European Commission, negotiating on behalf of the EU's 27 member states, has been working to salvage a trading relationship worth €1.6 trillion annually in goods and services.
European capitals have been closely involved in the process, and their diplomats are expected to quickly sign off on any agreement reached at the leadership level.
The meeting is set for 4:30 pm local time in Turnberry, on Scotland's southwest coast, where Trump owns a golf resort.
Trump waves to reporters while playing golf at his Turnberry golf course.
Alamy Stock Photo
Alamy Stock Photo
On arriving in the UK on Friday, the 79-year-old president said he hoped to strike 'the biggest deal of them all' with the EU.
He referred to von der Leyen as 'Ursula' and called her 'a highly respected woman', a notable shift from past criticism of the EU.
'I think we've got a good 50-50 chance,' said Trump, acknowledging that about 20 issues still need resolving.
The European Commission said on Thursday it believed a deal was within reach.
Tánaiste Simon Harris said this week he remains 'cautiously optimistic' a deal could be reached for a 'positive future EU-US trading relationship within the coming days'.
'It is now long past time to strike a deal,' Harris said.
Advertisement
Tariff threats
Tariffs pose a serious challenge for export-oriented economies (like us in Ireland), which rely heavily on open access to international markets.
In recent decades, the dismantling of global trade barriers has helped lift millions out of poverty, particularly in developing nations.
However, the most damaging effect of the ongoing trade war may be the uncertainty it has created, freezing investment decisions both in Ireland and across Europe.
According to diplomats, the proposal includes a baseline 15 per cent tariff on EU exports to the US, matching the rate agreed with Japan.
Exceptions would be made for key sectors such as aviation, timber and spirits, excluding wine.
The EU would also commit to increasing imports of US liquefied natural gas and make other investment pledges.
A potential compromise on steel is also being discussed, allowing a set quota to enter tariff-free, with any excess taxed at 50 pe rcent.
Since Trump's return to office, the EU has been hit by successive waves of US tariffs, including 25 per cent on cars, 50 pe rcent on steel and aluminium, and a 10 per cent across-the-board rate, which could rise to 30 per cent without a deal.
The EU is eager to avoid further damage to its already fragile economy. If talks fail, the EU has prepared retaliatory tariffs on $109 billion worth of US goods, including aircraft and cars, to take effect from 7 August.
It is also drawing up measures targeting US services.
France and other member states have urged the Commission not to shy away from using a so-called trade 'bazooka' to restrict American access to European markets and public tenders, though such a move would mark a serious escalation.
Trump, who has promised to strike '90 deals in 90 days', has so far concluded five, including agreements with Britain, Japan and the Philippines.
A deal with the EU would boost his trade credentials ahead of the US election and distract from mounting controversy over the Jeffrey Epstein case, which continues to draw backlash from some of his own supporters.
Additional reporting from Andrew Walsh
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

178,000 products withdrawn, recalled or prevented from reaching market in 2024
178,000 products withdrawn, recalled or prevented from reaching market in 2024

RTÉ News​

time36 minutes ago

  • RTÉ News​

178,000 products withdrawn, recalled or prevented from reaching market in 2024

Over 178,000 unsafe products were recalled, withdrawn or prevented from reaching the Irish market last year by the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission. The actions were taken following consumer complaints, referrals from European networks, proactive investigations and work with Revenue Customs. The recalls included almost 10,000 babies sleepsuits and over 2,400 toy construction trucks. The CCPC's annual report for 2024 also showed that it carried out more than 200 consumer protection inspections last year. As a result of the enforcement and legal actions, it issued 47 fixed penalty notices and 23 compliance notices. The report said successful prosecutions were brought against five retailers, including Tesco Ireland. The CCPC said the retailer pleaded guilty to two sample counts of failing to comply with the law in how they displayed the price of products offered on promotion to clubcard holders. The consumer watchdog also undertook five successful prosecutions for breaches of consumer protection law, including action against misleading pricing practices. And it opened an investigation into Ticketmaster Ireland and its handling of the sale of Oasis tickets last August, following almost 100 complaints over dynamic pricing. The commission also carried out dawn raids on two premises as part of an ongoing cartel-related investigation in the home alarm industry. It also assisted the Italian Competition Authority, the Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato, in an unannounced search of Ryanair's headquarters in Dublin as part of an ongoing Italian competition law investigation. The CCPC said its "successful intervention to prevent a potential monopoly in car parking at Dublin Airport" was among its highlights in 2024. The consumer watchdog said it blocked the daa's attempted purchase of the former Quickpark site due to findings that it would lead to "higher prices, less choice and lower service quality for consumers." As a result, it said it facilitated the entry of a new competitor to the car park market at Dublin Airport. There was a 21% increase in merger notifications, with 71% of determinations last year made within 13.3 days under a simplified process. 2024 marked a significant milestone for the CCPC, which celebrated its 10th anniversary, marking what it described as "a decade of work promoting competition and enhancing consumer welfare." The Chairperson of the CCPC, Brian McHugh, said the annual report highlights the "vital role the CCPC plays across all sectors of the economy, from enforcing consumer law on retail pricing, to advocating proactively for reforming the legal sector to better serve the interests of Irish businesses and consumers." "Open, fair markets are the backbone of our economy's success, ensuring that whether consumers are making small everyday purchases or major financial decisions, their interests are protected," he added. "Following a year of notable achievements and a decade of progress, our focus remains on delivering transparent outcomes, empowering consumers with knowledge of their rights, and being a leading voice for competition and consumer welfare across Ireland." The Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment, Peter Burke, said the CCPC "continues to deliver for Irish consumers and businesses by ensuring our markets remain competitive, transparent, and safe." "Their work in 2024, from blocking anti-competitive mergers to removing dangerous products and empowering consumers through education, demonstrates the importance of strong, independent enforcement." Minister Burke said he will continue his close collaboration with the CCPC to ensure it has "sufficient powers and resources to effectively advocate for and enforce competition and consumer protection legislation." The commission said it responded to over 44,000 helpline contacts and received 1.8 million visits to its website throughout last year.

Kamala Harris announces she will not run for governor of California
Kamala Harris announces she will not run for governor of California

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

Kamala Harris announces she will not run for governor of California

Kamala Harris , the former vice-president and 2024 Democratic presidential nominee, announced on Wednesday that she will not run for governor of California – a highly anticipated decision that leaves the contest to lead the country's largest blue state wide open. 'For now, my leadership – and public service – will not be in elected office,' Harris said in a statement, ending months of speculation about her political future after losing the 2024 US presidential election to Donald Trump . 'I look forward to getting back out and listening to the American people, helping elect Democrats across the nation who will fight fearlessly, and sharing more details in the months ahead about my own plans,' she added. Harris (60) who previously served as California's attorney general and US senator, had been exploring a run for the state's top job since leaving the White House in January. [ Tariffs: as new regime kicks in, what does it mean for Europe and for Ireland? Opens in new window ] But, she said in the statement, 'after deep reflection, I've decided that I will not run for governor in this election'. The decision does not rule out a future run for public office, including a third bid for the White House, after unsuccessful campaigns in 2020 and 2024. Her looming decision had in effect paralyzed the race to replace the term-limited Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, with early polling suggesting she was Californians' top choice. The Harris-less race to lead California will now take place in a political landscape dramatically reshaped by her loss to Trump in November, which plunged the party into a period of paralysis and soul-searching. In the months since, the Democratic base has grown increasingly furious with its old guard, demanding fresh leadership and a more combative approach to what they view as Trump's increasingly authoritarian agenda. In a nod to the discontent roiling her party, and the country, Harris said: 'We must recognize that our politics, our government, and our institutions have too often failed the American people, culminating in this moment of crisis. As we look ahead, we must be willing to pursue change through new methods and fresh thinking – committed to our same values and principles, but not bound by the same playbook.' While the decision was disappointing to supporters eager to see Harris square off again with Trump during the final years of his term, Harris had given few signals that she was deeply excited by the prospect of leading the state from the governor's perch in Sacramento. The months-long slog to next year's contest would have forced Harris to grapple with her role in Democrats' losses in November, which has already drawn criticism from corners of the party eager for leaders to step aside and make space for a new generation of candidates. The crowded field of Democrats running for governor in California is so far made up of long-serving or well-known political leaders, including Xavier Becerra, the former attorney general of California who served with Harris in Biden's cabinet as the secretary of health and human services; Antonio Villaraigosa, the former Democratic mayor of Los Angeles; the state's lieutenant governor, Eleni Kounalakis, who is close friends with Harris; and the former representative Katie Porter. The most prominent Republicans in the race are Chad Bianco, the sheriff of Riverside county, and Steve Hilton, the former Fox host and former adviser to then UK prime minister David Cameron. Ric Grenell, a longtime Trump ally, has also toyed with the idea of running. In a statement, Villaraigosa commended Harris's leadership and said her decision 'reflects her continued commitment to serving at the highest levels of government'. 'We face critical challenges in California – and we need a proven problem solver to tackle our affordability crisis,' he said. Republicans – some of whom had been eager to elevate Harris as the face of the Democratic party – nevertheless touted her decision as a political victory for the president. 'Kamala Harris's political career is over thanks to President Trump,' said Kollin Crompton, a spokesperson for the Republican Governors Association, adding, perhaps prematurely: 'Americans across the country can sigh in relief that they won't have to see or hear from Kamala Harris any longer.' Harris had maintained a relatively low profile since she returned home to Los Angeles, offering few clues about her political future. She remained most out of view as protests erupted in response to the Trump administration's immigration raids in Los Angeles earlier this summer. In a statement issued after Trump ordered national guard troops deployed Los Angeles, she said that protest was 'a powerful tool' and said she supported the 'millions of Americans who are standing up to protect our most fundamental rights and freedoms'. She has been selective about when to weigh in against the Trump administration's actions. Earlier this year, Harris delivered a sharp speech in which she warned that the US was witnessing a 'wholesale abandonment of America's highest ideals' by the US president. On Wednesday, Harris vowed to remain politically engaged. 'We, the People must use our power to fight for freedom, opportunity, fairness, and the dignity of all,' she said. 'I will remain in that fight.' - The Guardian

The Irish Times view on X's court defeat: the conflict will continue
The Irish Times view on X's court defeat: the conflict will continue

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

The Irish Times view on X's court defeat: the conflict will continue

The High Court's rejection of X's challenge to Ireland's new online safety code may come to be seen as a milestone in the enforcement of Europe's digital rulebook. It is also a reminder that the battle over online content regulation is not simply a matter of legal interpretation or child protection policy. It sits squarely in the middle of a transatlantic struggle over who sets the rules for the digital economy. Ireland's Online Safety Code, enforced by Coimisiún na Meán, requires platforms to shield children from harmful video content, introduce age checks and parental controls, and prevent the sharing of material that promotes self-harm, eating disorders or bullying. The court ruled these measures fall within the EU's Audiovisual Media Services Directive and complement the Digital Services Act, dismissing X's claims of overreach. That finding may seem straightforward from a European perspective. The EU has long sought to assert that technology companies must respect European standards if they wish to operate here. But the US views such measures through a different lens, shaped by its dominance in the tech sector and a political culture that prizes free expression in almost absolute terms. The commercial stakes are immense. The global tech services market is overwhelmingly dominated by American firms: Meta, Google, Apple and Amazon. EU regulation is therefore not just a neutral exercise in public protection but, inevitably, a rebalancing of power between the jurisdictions where these companies are based and the markets in which they operate. That tension is heightened by the fact that Ireland is home to the European headquarters of many of these firms, making it the front line in this conflict. READ MORE In Washington, the issues are often couched in the language of principle. Conservative figures such as JD Vance have been vocal in their defence of unfettered online speech, casting regulation as censorship. Such arguments, while grounded in America's First Amendment tradition, also align neatly with the commercial interests of the companies whose revenues depend on maximising user engagement. The defence of principle and the defence of profit are intertwined. The ruling against X will not end these disputes. The tech industry's legal resources are vast, and its political allies influential. But it confirms that Ireland, acting within the EU framework, has the authority to challenge the ethos of the platforms it hosts. That will not be welcomed in boardrooms in California or on Capitol Hill. As the digital economy becomes a key arena of US-EU competition, Ireland's decisions will be read not only as regulatory acts but as statements about where power lies in the online world. Tuesday's judgment suggests that, at least for now, that power may be shifting.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store