
Kendrick Lamar's Super Bowl Halftime Show was more concerned with Drake than Politics
Fresh off a summer-long beef with Drake that birthed the Grammy-winning diss track 'Not Like Us,' Lamar had the opportunity to put on the pettiest Halftime Show in the telecast's history. By January, he had also been caught up in a defamation lawsuit over 'Not Like Us,' making it unclear whether he'd even be able to perform the song. (He did.) There was also the big question that looms over any televised Lamar performance: what will the socially-conscious rapper have to say, if anything, about the current political climate?
In the past, Lamar has taken opportunities on big stages to address hot-button issues and telegraph his own political anxieties. He's invoked police brutality at the BET Awards, and mass incarceration — not to mention his general disillusionment with America — at the Grammys. Out of all the hip-hop acts that could have graced the Halftime Show stage, it seemed like Lamar had been chosen for his combination of showmanship and ability to generate conversation. That said, Donald Trump's recent re-election — and shocking attendance at the Super Bowl; a first for a sitting president — seemed like the ideal backdrop for Lamar's signature provocative imagery and the political side of his catalog, like his 2015 song 'Alright,' which was an anthem of the Black Lives Matter movement. And yet, Lamar had a different objective for the night.
After the opening song, 'GNX (Teaser),' Lamar gave the audience a frank memo of what not to expect over the next 12 minutes. 'The revolution 'bout to be televised,' Lamar said while the music cut out. 'You picked the right time but the wrong guy.'
It's not exactly a new sentiment if you've been paying attention to Lamar's more recent musical output. On his fifth album, Mr. Morale and The Big Steppers , released in 2022, Lamar tackled society's ills and his own position as a socially conscious rapper, but had more questions and contradictions than answers. Meanwhile, it was hard to find the same political angst that drove 2015's To Pimp A Butterfly on his latest album, GNX , a radio-friendly victory lap following his highly publicized beef with Drake. On the 2021 Baby Keem song, 'Family Ties,' he made his reservations about being seen as a political symbol clear. 'I been ducking the social gimmicks,' he rapped. 'I been ducking the overnight activists / I'm not a trending topic.'
Likewise, during Super Bowl LIX, Lamar avoided songs like 'Alright' and 'The Blacker The Berry.' He skipped the sort of anti-establishment messaging that got him lambasted by Fox News anchors in the past. Instead, he opted mostly for songs off of GNX , which he'll tour around the country in April, including 'squabble up,' 'peekaboo,' 'tv off,' and 'luther,' featuring his future tourmate SZA. The pair also performed their 2018 collaboration 'All the Stars' from the Black Panther soundtrack. Inevitably, he performed both of his most popular diss tracks from last summer, 'euphoria' and, after much teasing, 'Not Like Us.' The crowd sang along as he came to the song's most famous and quotable line — 'tryna strike a chord and it's probably a minorrrr.' Lamar also sported a very visible lower-cased 'a' necklace. And Serena Williams, the subject of many a Drake lyric, danced on the field during the performance. In short, the evening's biggest act of daring was aimed at Drake's lawyers, not some larger injustice.
Still, the Halftime Show did gesture towards politics. During the opening number, numerous backup dancers emerged from a Buick GNX wearing solid red, white and blue hoodies. The show featured actor Samuel L. Jackson dressed as 'Uncle Sam' in a patriotic suit and top hat. However, it didn't seem like Lamar was trying to articulate a rebuke of our current government or even any sort of message about the climate. Rather, we watched the rapper play, as Jackson called it, 'the American game.' As Lamar maneuvered around the stage, designed as a game of tic-tac-toe, it felt like watching him navigate the social responsibility placed upon him as a Black entertainer and his own desires to sell out a little bit.
He also demonstrated what happens when someone in his position falls outside of the lines of respectability and is seen by the wrong audience. Likewise, Jackson showed up several times throughout the medley, acting as both an emcee and Lamar's corporate conscience. The songs he played, while less explicitly political than some in his repertoire, weren't exactly network television-friendly or, better yet, fit for an NFL audience. After Lamar finished performing 'squabble up,' Jackson derided the song as 'too loud, too reckless, too ghetto.'
'Mr. Lamar, do you really know how to play the game?' Jackson asked. 'Then you have got to tighten up!' Lamar then moved into a performance of 'HUMBLE,' his first radio hit following the To Pimp A Butterfly . His dancers, moving like robots, quickly assembled to create an American flag.
The internet quickly underscored Lamar's dilemma. Despite the relatively muted political commentary, right-wing pundits, like Eric Daughtery of Florida's Voice and former representative Matt Gaetz, ran to X to decry the performance as containing some sort of extremist, pro-Black agenda. Alt-right commentator Jack Posobiec called Lamar's performance the 'DEI Halftime Show.' Presumably, more offensive soundbites and comments from angry, white MAGA dudes will roll in throughout the week.
Lamar's Halftime Show may not have been the direct middle finger to Trump that his fans may have expected or wanted, but he did offer something other artists of his caliber would maybe refrain from doing on such a mainstream stage — examine his own place in American culture. Lamar proved that he can still be an agitator without standing on a cop car or performing in chains. Even at his most palatable, his art will ultimately never be safe. See More: Culture
Music
Sports
Super Bowl
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Could Taylor Swift be playing the 2026 Super Bowl halftime show? Here are all the possible clues she dropped on the 'New Heights' podcast.
If Swift were to perform at the Super Bowl — as some fans are speculating — it would be her first time appearing on the halftime stage. Swifties think their favorite artist is dropping hints about a major upcoming gig — but is Taylor Swift really performing at the Super Bowl halftime show next year? Fans think it's very likely, as long as you read between the lines of her New Heights podcast interview with boyfriend Travis Kelce. Swift appeared on the podcast that Kelce hosts with his brother, Jason, on Aug. 13 to talk about her upcoming album The Life of a Showgirl. As Swift typically does, she dropped oodles of Easter eggs — or clues to her upcoming work — prior to the album reveal. But now, some fans think that she also teased clues during the interview that point toward the Super Bowl. Nothing has been officially announced, and all of these fan theories are pure speculation. However, if Swift does perform at the Super Bowl, it would be her first time gracing the halftime show at the sporting event — a gig she allegedly turned down before. But with an NFL player boyfriend who has won three Super Bowl titles in the past, it's possible that now is a great time for her to take the stage. Here's what we know. Swift may have dropped these numbers on purpose If you speak Swiftie, the reasons are compelling. For one thing, Swift spoke explicitly about Easter eggs on the podcast — including mentioning how she loves using 'numerology' to leave a trail of breadcrumbs. Fans who have tracked Swift's hints over the years saw it as a sign to look toward the numbers mentioned on the podcast — and one specific number stood out. As multiple people on social media pointed out, Swift referenced the number '47' twice in the podcast — once, when she joked that she performed in '47,000 countries' for the Eras Tour, and again when she thanked Jason for screaming for '47 seconds' when she revealed her new album on the pod. Why is 47 significant? Well, as some on social media pointed out, the 47th show at the Eras Tour was in Santa Clara, Calif., at Levi's Stadium. Where is the next Super Bowl being held? Levi's Stadium. But that isn't all. As TikToker @SamKochman pointed out in a video, there are more signs that seem to be pointing to this particular stadium. 'The mascot for the 49ers is Sourdough Sam, and she spent a whole lot of time talking about sourdough,' the TikToker noted, referencing how Swift gushed over her current baking obsession, even sending Kelce some bread during training camp. And she also said she's thinking about sourdough '60%' of the time — potentially a reference to the upcoming 60th Super Bowl. Oh, and here's some advanced Swiftie math: And what's 47 plus 13, Swift's favorite number? Why, it's 60. The hints go beyond numerology Another possible clue that Swift might be performing at the halftime show? She referenced her passion for those performances directly on the podcast, saying that she knew 'every halftime show from the Super Bowls' even when she 'didn't watch sports.' And though Swift has since become a football fan, thanks to boyfriend Kelce, the 'Blank Space' singer teased that she has also seen some of the negative discourse around her at the games, another possible hint at what's to come. 'As we all know, you know, you guys have a lot of male sports fans that listen to your podcast,' Swift said. 'I think we all know that if there's one thing that male sports fans want to see in their spaces and on their screens, it's more of me.' So, will we see Swift come Super Bowl Sunday, 2026? We'll have to wait and see, but it's worth noting that if an announcement is made, it will likely be soon: The choice of Kendrick Lamar to headline the 2025 Super Bowl halftime show was revealed on Sept. 8, 2024, and Usher's 2024 performance was announced on Sept. 24, 2023. Solve the daily Crossword


Los Angeles Times
2 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
UMG chief Lucian Grainge calls Drake's ‘Not Like Us' lawsuit ‘ridiculous'
Universal Music Group Chief Executive Lucian Grainge called Drake's lawsuit over Kendrick Lamar's hit diss track 'Not Like Us' a 'farcical' effort that's 'groundless and indeed ridiculous.' In a declaration letter filed Thursday night in the Southern District of New York, Grainge said that Drake's accusation that UMG (the parent label firm to both Drake and Lamar) defamed him and damaged his career 'makes no sense due to the fact that the company that I run, Universal Music Group N.V., has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in Drake, including longstanding and critical financial support for his recording career, the purchase and ownership of the bulk of his recording catalog, and the purchase of his music publishing rights.' Drake signed a new deal with UMG label Republic in 2022 for a reported $400 million, and he's one of the bestselling artists of the last 20 years. Yet Interscope artist Lamar's scathing 'Not Like Us' famously capped a venomous battle between the two artists, which resulted in a pair of Grammy wins for Lamar, who performed the song at the Super Bowl halftime show. Drake's attorneys, in discovery, have recently tried to obtain UMG's contract with Lamar and information about his personal life (Drake accused Lamar of beating his partner in the song 'Family Matters'). Drake has accused UMG of both defamation and running a clandestine campaign to boost 'Not Like Us' at the expense of his own reputation and career. A notably exasperated Grainge wrote to the court that 'Given my role, I am accustomed (and unfortunately largely resigned) to personal attacks, and I further recognize that a frequent strategy of UMG's litigation opponents is to attempt to waste my and UMG's time and resources with discovery of the sort that Drake is seeking here — either in an attempt to gain media attention or in an effort to force some kind of commercial renegotiation or financial concessions.' Grainge also denied having any personal involvement in the rollout or marketing for 'Not Like Us.' 'Whilst, as part of my role, I certainly have financial oversight of and responsibility for UMG's global businesses,' he said, 'the proposition that I was involved in, much less responsible for, reviewing and approving the content of 'Not Like Us,' its cover art or music video, or for determining or directing the promotion of those materials, is groundless and indeed ridiculous.' In a separate letter to the court, UMG said that 'The premise of Drake's motion — that he could not have lost a rap battle unless it was the product of some imagined secret conspiracy going to the top of UMG's corporate structure — is absurd.'


Black America Web
3 hours ago
- Black America Web
Drake's Latest Legal Filing Digs Into Kendrick Lamar's Domestic Violence Allegations & Dave Free's Relationship To His Kids
As Kendrick Lamar embarks on his Grand National tour and Drake appears scorned on every stage he steps on during his tour with PARTYNEXTDOOR, it is clear that the battle isn't over. Plus, there's that glaring lawsuit Drake filed against UMG that fans continue to analyze. Now, Drake's legal team has filed two new motions against the record company, taking direct aim at CEO Sir Lucian Grainge and 'Not Like Us,' which, we remind you, included cover art that depicted Drake's Toronto mansion with sex offender markings. 'UMG is improperly shielding its CEO, Sir Lucian Grainge, from scrutiny in this litigation, despite his direct involvement in the publication and promotion of the defamatory recording, cover image, and video at issue,' the suit states. We care about your data. See our privacy policy. They argue that UMG can hold itself accountable since it altered the language of its filings, adjusting the level of Grainge's involvement from 'no involvement' to 'no meaningful involvement.' But the OVO boss' legal team isn't buying it, saying he's actively involved because he was at the Grammys and was pretty hyped when Lamar took home several awards. The suit reads, 'Lucian Grainge is highly likely to have relevant documents about the Recording and the 2025 Grammy Awards, as he was recorded at the Grammy Awards celebrating Kendrick Lamar's wins and high-fiving Lamar's producer and mentor as the Recording played in the background.' Drake also argues that the defamation against him is profitable for UMG because they own both—his label, Republic Records, and Lamar's Interscope. They believe this also led to a significant payout for Interscope CEO John Janick, prompting a request to review his pay structure for the past five years, including his 2024 incentives, and Lamar's catalogue valuation over the same period. 'These records will demonstrate the financial motives underlying UMG's decision to promote the defamatory recording rather than suppress it,' the filing reads. Plus, as with any court case, the lawyers are digging into past lyric censorship, as recent as his beef with Pusha T, proving they do have the power to intervene, whether it benefits the artist or to their detriment. The lawyers continue, 'Def Jam, a UMG label, intervened to remove certain verses from Pusha T's 'The Story of Adidon' that were perceived as damaging to other artists. This selective enforcement is probative of UMG's intent and actual malice here.' But it's not just Lamar's lyrics influencing the lawsuit; many of Drake's claims are being added too, as he's now formally inquiring about all allegations he's made on 'Family Matters,' like calling him a domestic abuser, and claiming that one of his kids is biologically Dave Free's. They're asking for info 'relating to allegations of domestic violence, violence against women, and/or other forms of violence committed by Kendrick Lamar Duckworth' and information about 'David Isaac Friley (a/k/a Dave Free) and his relationship with Kendrick Lamar Duckworth and Kendrick Lamar Duckworth's children.' See how social media is reacting to the latest in the Drake vs UMG case below. Drake's Latest Legal Filing Digs Into Kendrick Lamar's Domestic Violence Allegations & Dave Free's Relationship To His Kids was originally published on