logo
The best thing the PS6 can do is be less powerful than PS5 - Reader's Feature

The best thing the PS6 can do is be less powerful than PS5 - Reader's Feature

Metro3 days ago
A reader argues that rising costs in the games industry means Sony would be wise to make the PS6 less powerful than current gen consoles.
In two years' time we're going to be drowning in news, rumours and leaks about the PlayStation 6. Everything seems to point towards it coming out in 2027 and I have not met a single person that's excited about it. Everybody thinks it's too soon, everyone thinks the PlayStation 5 has barely started, and everyone thinks Sony has dropped the ball in terms of games.
Or maybe everyone doesn't think that. Maybe I'm just living in a bubble with my video game savvy friends, but it doesn't matter because dread it, run from it, the PlayStation 6 will arrive all the same.
We haven't got any details yet, that I'm aware of, but the few hints we've had are of a new console (and a portable) that is even more powerful than the last one and no doubt even more expensive. Considering the PS5 Pro is already the most expensive console I don't even want to think about how much the PlayStation 6 is going to cost.
As we all know by now, more powerful means it'll take even longer to make games and need more money and people. This will mean less games, less often, and absolutely no risks of any kind – including probably any new IP at all. We've already seen this in this generation, where everything's slowed to a crawl, but a new console is only going to make things worse.
What makes the whole situation all the sadder is that there is no way on Earth the extra power is going to make any difference. There's barely any difference between PlayStation 4 and 5 games as it is, so the difference between 5 and 6 is going to be miniscule and certainly nothing a normal person will ever notice.
Remember that PlayStation 5 tech demo that looked a bit like Tomb Raider? We haven't seen anything like that so far in an actual game, so that was all just a lie. They always are, I know, but whatever excuse they try to give for the PlayStation 6 needing to exist is going to be a con.
Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning.
Considering everything going on in gaming at the moment the only decision that makes any sense to me is making the PlayStation 6 less powerful than the PlayStation 5. If that sounds silly to you, I guarantee the vast majority of people wouldn't even notice. If you told them it was more powerful (which I'm not suggesting Sony do) they'd probably believe it, just because nothing in terms of graphics has looked any different in years.
Sony should explain that in order for the portable and console machines to be running the same games they had to lower the overall power, since a portable can never be as powerful as a home console.
There are better reasons to decrease the power though and not just because it'll make the console cheaper. We've known about the problem that games cost too much to make for years now and nobody has done a thing about it. Not Sony and not anyone else.
If the PlayStation 6 is more powerful – if it is just another box under the TV- then the problem is only going to continue to get worse until something snaps and suddenly video games just aren't viable anymore.
I don't want to see a future where the only video games are indies, mobile games, and free to play, but that is where we're headed, and very quickly. The future should be AA games like Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 and Eriksholm: The Stolen Dream (which I haven't played yet but was fascinated to hear about this week).
But none of the big publishers care about that, they think it's small beans and not worth bothering with. If they carry on their current course, games will end up costing £100+ (there's already rumours of that for GTA 6), they'll take 10 years to make, and they'll only be the safest of safe franchises and ideas.
It's not just publishers I worry aren't doing anything about this ticking time bomb, it's gamers who just hope the problem is going to magically go away. If games become unprofitable publishers will simply stop making them. They won't start making cheaper games because then their graphs won't go up, they'll just find something else to make money from. More Trending
Something has to change. It's not enough even to draw the line here, they have to go back to before the PlayStation 5, when companies could still afford to make games and we could still afford to pay for them.
By reader Captone
The reader's features do not necessarily represent the views of GameCentral or Metro.
You can submit your own 500 to 600-word reader feature at any time, which if used will be published in the next appropriate weekend slot. Just contact us at gamecentral@metro.co.uk or use our Submit Stuff page and you won't need to send an email.
MORE: The standards for video game reviews need to be higher - Reader's Feature
MORE: Zelda: The Wind Waker is still an amazing game that can inspire future sequels – Reader's Feature
MORE: I wish Bethesda didn't make Fallout and The Elder Scrolls - Reader's Feature
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The 15 Nintendo Switch games that should get a Switch 2 upgrade
The 15 Nintendo Switch games that should get a Switch 2 upgrade

Metro

time6 hours ago

  • Metro

The 15 Nintendo Switch games that should get a Switch 2 upgrade

Many games run better on Switch 2 than on the original Nintendo Switch, so why haven't games including Astral Chain and Luigi's Mansion 3 had the same treatment? While the Nintendo Switch 2 currently only has a few exclusives to call its own, it has become the new best place for experiencing Switch 1 games. Aside from the new (paid-for) upgrades for the likes of The Legend Of Zelda: Breath Of The Wild, a range of free updates mean other games, including Pokémon Scarlet & Violet, run much better than they did on the original Switch. Some even have boosted frame rates, just through backwards compatibility and without any need for an update, paid or otherwise. However, not every game benefits from running on the newer hardware, as we discovered when testing a handful of them. There's no obvious pattern as to what games run better or not, so here's a here's a list of the Switch 1 games that would benefit the most from a free upgrade. When it comes to PlatinumGames' gameography, it feels like Astral Chain often gets overlooked, which is a crying shame as it's a fantastic action game that revels in its absurd futuristic cop aesthetic. Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning. While we're always happy to revisit it, we're still disappointed that, unlike Bayonetta 3, its choppy frame rate doesn't automatically bump up to 60 frames per second when running on Switch 2. If the rumoured Astral Chain 2 is never going to arrive, the least Nintendo could do is imbue the original game with some new life. As the best-selling entry in Nintendo's medieval tactical role-playing series, we're a little surprised Fire Emblem: Three Houses hasn't even seen a simple update that touches up its visuals on the Switch 2. There is a notable improvement to the overall performance, but it's still locked to 30fps and while a smoother frame rate isn't entirely necessary for a game with turn-based combat, it could stand to offset Three Houses' low-tech graphics. The same thing goes for Fire Emblem Engage, which we actually preferred to Three Houses but which only gets faster loading times as a result of being played on the Switch 2. Weirdly, it's the Three Hopes Musou spin-off that benefits the most on Switch 2 with a vastly superior frame rate. Luigi's Mansion 3 is probably the best-looking game on the original Switch, so much so that it doesn't really need a Switch 2 update. And yet we can't help but want it to look and run even better. While the graphics certainly don't need touching up, we wouldn't say no to seeing the visuals optimised for the Switch 2's new display, as well as support for HDR and 60fps. If not, then Nintendo better at least let Next Level Games make a Luigi's Mansion 4 for the new console, which, to be fair, is probably exactly what they are doing, as the developer has not been heard from for a while now. You may not remember this, but back in 2023, long before the Switch 2 even had an official name, Ubisoft expressed regret about not waiting till Nintendo's next console to launch strategy game sequel Mario + Rabbids Sparks Of Hope. It even indicated it wanted to update the game once the Switch 2 was out. Whether it meant with a full re-release or a single upgrade, Ubisoft seems to have either forgotten or abandoned those plans, because the strategy sequel runs no better on Switch 2 than it did on Switch 1 – and yet weirdly the first Mario + Rabbids game does, boasting a new frame rate of 60fps. We certainly hope Ubisoft revisits the idea because Sparks Of Hope is genuinely one of the best strategy games out there and its excellent graphics would benefit from an improved frame rate. Monster Hunter Wilds is the current hotness, but as it's only available on PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X/S, and PC, Nintendo Switch owners have to make do with the previous entry, Monster Hunter Rise. That's not necessarily a bad thing since Monster Hunter Rise is still an excellent game on Switch, but it remains locked to 30fps whereas other versions can reach upwards of 120fps. On Switch 2, the frame rate is certainly more stable and load times are faster, but a dedicated patch to boost the frame rate wouldn't go a miss, until Capcom releases a new Monster Hunter for the console. Thanks to the 2022 Switch port of NieR:Automata, Nintendo fans finally got to experience not only one of PlatinumGames' best action games, but one of the best modern action role-players. Unfortunately, it came with an obvious caveat: a frame rate of 30fps. It was probably unavoidable, just to get the game running on Nintendo's hardware, but we had hoped this would be addressed when playing the game on Switch 2, since the low frame rate doesn't do its fast-paced combat justice. Even if it never gets a 60fps upgrade though, NieR:Automata is one of several games that suffers from progress-blocking issues and crashes when running on Switch 2. At the time of writing, Square Enix is still looking into it, so hopefully those problems are addressed with a patch. It's still baffling that Nintendo stopped post-launch support for Animal Crossing: New Horizons so quickly, despite it being a prime candidate for the fabled 'forever' game many other companies continue to chase. Unsurprisingly, it's not seen any real updates to coincide with the Switch 2, although load times are faster. It admittedly doesn't need a smoother frame rate given its status as a slower-paced life simulator, but some enhancements to its graphics and resolution would be appreciated. Even so, we doubt this is a priority within Nintendo, as it's far more likely to be planning a brand new Animal Crossing tailor-made for Switch 2. The Switch version of Persona 5 Royal is a perfectly viable way of experiencing one of the best Japanese role-players ever made, but like other ports it came with some graphical compromises. Aside from being locked to 30fps, some pre-rendered backgrounds and textures are notably of low quality, and the resolution is capped to just over 720p when docked, dropping further in handheld mode and making the whole game look unpleasently blurry. It's a real shame since Persona 5 Royal is famous for its striking visuals and art style. With the Switch 2 capable of supporting 1080p resolutions and frame rates of 60fps, it's even more of a shame that Persona 5 Royal looks and runs no different on the new console. Pokémon Scarlet & Violet have benefitted tremendously from running on the Switch 2, thanks to the improved performance, earning it a deserved revaluation for the whole game. If only the same could be said for Pokémon Legends: Arceus… Unfortunately, there's no patch for Arceus, so it runs almost no differently on Switch 2 – with the exception of faster load times. Admittedly, bumping its frame rate to 60fps wouldn't fix its low-tech graphics, but it would help bring it in line with the upcoming Pokémon Legends: Z-A, which looks to have a much smoother performance on Switch 2, based on early teaser footage. It's a genuine miracle that The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt runs as well as it does on Switch, even in handheld mode. But it did come at the cost of a graphical downgrade as well as a capped frame rate of 30fps. On Switch 2, the game loads faster and even looks a little better, but any Witcher fans who only have access to Nintendo hardware would no doubt appreciate a dedicated upgrade for the newer console. More Trending Honestly, a Switch 2 port of The Witcher 3 would make sense considering the game is a top seller for CD Projekt, at over 50 million sales, saw updated re-releases for the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X/S just a few years ago, and the upcoming The Witcher 4 will likely skip Switch 2 (although you probably would've said that about The Witcher 3 for the Switch 1). Although Xenoblade Chronicles 3 was amongst those Switch 1 games that received a free Switch 2 patch, it doesn't address the performance issues in the game, with the patch notes only alluding to vague adjustments made to 'improve gameplay on Nintendo Switch 2.' As Nintendo's premiere Japanese role-playing series, it's surprising that none of the four Xenoblade Chronicles games have received any proper upgrades on Switch 2, only enjoying slightly shorter load times when running on the console. It could be argued that they don't need any enhancements, since all of the games are already impressive technical achievements, but considering fans found evidence of an optional but inaccessible 60fps mode for Xenoblade Chronicles X, we can't help but wish seeing it was activated across the whole series, along with improved resolutions. Email gamecentral@ leave a comment below, follow us on Twitter. To submit Inbox letters and Reader's Features more easily, without the need to send an email, just use our Submit Stuff page here. For more stories like this, check our Gaming page. MORE: Nintendo and Steam crack down on hentai and other 'eSlop' filling up game stores MORE: Nintendo Switch 2 has a secret problem that could cripple third party support MORE: Nintendo is getting rid of another way to save money on Switch games

Donkey Kong Bananza timeline explained: is it a prequel to Super Mario Odyssey?
Donkey Kong Bananza timeline explained: is it a prequel to Super Mario Odyssey?

Metro

time13 hours ago

  • Metro

Donkey Kong Bananza timeline explained: is it a prequel to Super Mario Odyssey?

The storyline of Donkey Kong Bananza has sparked numerous fan theories but what is the truth of the DK timeline and is Pauline the same one from Super Mario Odyssey? Nintendo has always played fast and loose when it comes to story connections between games, but that hasn't stopped fans from trying to apply logic to the increasingly nonsensical. The most notorious example is the The Legend Of Zelda, which encompasses multiple timelines and obscure multiplayer spin-offs. Nintendo has admitted it only considers this timeline 'to an extent' during development, as it doesn't want to restrain creativity based on whether or not a version of Link triumphed over Ganon in 1998. Donkey Kong first appeared in the 1981 arcade game of the same name, alongside Pauline (no, it wasn't Princess Peach) and 'Jumpman' (later renamed as Mario). You might think an ape who throws barrels at a plumber doesn't have much complex lore to stew over, and you'd be very correct, but the latest entry Donkey Kong Bananza has thrown up some curveballs for anyone who loses sleep over the origins of Cranky Kong. Before we dive in, here's a warning that there will be significant spoilers for the ending of Donkey Kong Bananza below. Very significant spoilers, in fact, so please don't ruin the (excellent) ending for yourself by mistake. While Donkey Kong Bananza isn't heavy on narrative, there's one major twist towards the end of the game. Void Kong may have been sold as the game's big baddie, but King K. Rool is the true final boss. The classic DK nemesis, who was last featured in 2007's Donkey Kong: Jungle Climber on the Nintendo DS, is found trapped underground, before inevitably escaping. Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning. King K. Rool steals the Banandium Root and after Donkey Kong and Pauline defeat him, he steals it once again and uses it to corrupt a human city on the surface (aka New Donk City from Super Mario Odyssey). When you beat him again, he is sent flying away. After completing the post-game content, Donkey Kong and Pauline use the Banandium Root to ascend to the surface, as the latter wishes to sing onstage at City Hall. 'Grandmother will be so proud,' she remarks. The final shot shows artwork of Pauline performing onstage in New Donk City. While the game features a 13-year-old Pauline, it's not clear if it's the same Pauline who is the mayor of New Donk City in Super Mario Odyssey. In fact, there's some evidence (albeit, tenuous) to suggest Donkey Kong Bananza is actually a sequel to Mario's adventure, and not an origin story for the singing mayor, as many originally assumed. Throughout Donkey Kong Bananza, teenage Pauline makes various references to her grandmother, who we never see. In one key scene, where the pair encounter Diddy and Dixie Kong in the Racing Layer, Pauline tells DK, 'I'm glad you got to see your friends again! But if I don't get home, Grandma will worry.' The identity of Pauline's grandma is never confirmed but there are several convincing theories. However, to understand the madness, some context is required on the history of Cranky Kong, aka Donkey Kong's alleged grandfather. While there has been conflicting details over the years, the prevailing theory is that the Donkey Kong who kidnapped Pauline in the original arcade game is actually Cranky Kong. In Donkey Kong Bananza, there's even some evidence to support this, as the elder ape makes a reference to an old rival who wore overalls. 'In my day, rivals had charisma… even in overalls!' he remarks. This is a reference to Mario, or Jumpman as he was known in the arcade version of Donkey Kong. The sequel was 1982's Donkey Kong Jr., which (if we're following the Cranky theory) features Cranky and Wrinkly Kong's son, as he tries to save his kidnapped father from Mario – in a reverse spin on the original premise. A bone of contention is whether the Donkey Kong depicted in 1994's Donkey Kong Country is actually Donkey Kong Jr. or Donkey Kong Jr.'s son. However, according to the Donkey Kong Country manual, Donkey Kong is referred to as Cranky's grandson. Essentially, this means the Donkey Kong depicted in Rare's Donkey Kong Country and onwards is actually the third generation of Donkey Kong, aka the son of Donkey Kong Jr. and another unknown Kong. With this context in mind, it's easier to imagine that there are also multiple generations of Pauline at play. In the arcade game, Pauline is only referred to as 'the Lady' or 'Beautiful Girl' and is seen with blonde hair. This is a different look from the mayor Pauline in Super Mario Odyssey, who has brown hair. While this might be a simple character redesign, or a flight of fancy with some hair dye, references to the original blonde Pauline can be seen on billboards within New Donk City. Again, it might be a nod disconnected from any narrative cohesion, but the New Donk City Festival in Super Mario Odyssey – where Mario replicates the arcade Donkey Kong game under spectacular fireworks – is referred to as the 'story of our city's beginnings'. As such, this implies New Donk City was established after the original arcade game. By extension it's possible Mayor Pauline is a descendant of the blonde Pauline, i.e. Pauline in Bananza is the daughter of Mayor Pauline and the granddaughter of the original arcade Pauline. The evidence for this is super thin but it could mean both Bananza protagonists are third generation offspring of parents with very limited imagination when it comes to naming their children. This is certainly the most satisfying theory, but there's also a strong chance the teenage Pauline is a younger version of the mayor in Super Mario Odyssey, which would place Donkey Kong Bananza as a prequel. That would mean Pauline in Super Mario Odyssey is possibly the granddaughter of Arcade Pauline, and Nintendo just skipped a generation for some reason. More Trending A question in Super Mario Odyssey supports this theory somewhat. During a quiz for a power moon, Pauline asks Mario 'which of these things did I actually do a long time ago?' where the correct answer is 'captured by ape'. While many assumed this was a reference to the events of the original arcade game and Cranky Kong, it's possible this refers to Void Kong and Donkey Kong Bananza's events – which is a nice bit of recontexualisation. Perhaps the most disturbing ramification of all this is, if you buy into the theory of multiple generations, is where does this leave Mario? Is Jumpman the grandfather of the Mario seen in Super Mario Odyssey? Is he an immortal being untethered to time itself? Perhaps thankfully, these are not questions which Bananza concerns itself with. Based on the inclusion of King K. Rool, Donkey Kong Bananza is set after the events of all three Donkey Kong Country games, and 1999's Donkey Kong 64. Redditor Espurreyes, who subscribes to the theory that Donkey Kong Bananza is a prequel to Super Mario Odyssey, has laid out a convenient timeline of the main Donkey Kong games above. Of course, there's not enough evidence from Nintendo to roll out a definitive chronology of Donkey Kong's lineage, or exactly when all the games are set, but if you enjoy pondering the family tree of a fictional ape dressed in a tie, consider your needs served. Email gamecentral@ leave a comment below, follow us on Twitter. To submit Inbox letters and Reader's Features more easily, without the need to send an email, just use our Submit Stuff page here. For more stories like this, check our Gaming page. MORE: The average Nintendo fan is around 30 years old according to new data MORE: New Fire Emblem for Nintendo Switch 2 teased on LinkedIn claim fans MORE: Ubisoft confirms new Ghost Recon as it responds to Stop Killing Games petition

The average Nintendo fan is around 30 years old according to new data
The average Nintendo fan is around 30 years old according to new data

Metro

time14 hours ago

  • Metro

The average Nintendo fan is around 30 years old according to new data

A new survey breaks down the average age and gender of fans of popular gaming franchises like Pokémon and Final Fantasy. Compared to Sony and Microsoft, whose priorities lie in appealing primarily to adult gamers, Nintendo has long benefited from catering to the whole family. The Nintendo Switch 2's initial line-up perfectly demonstrates this, with Mario Kart World and Donkey Kong Bananza being simple, easy to understand experiences for kids yet offering enough depth to appeal to adults. And yet according to new research on average age and gender ratios for popular video games, it appears the average Nintendo fan is in their 30s, while online live service games are where theyounger audiences are. The research was conducted by GEM Partners and Nikkei Entertainment, which surveyed 30,000 people across the ages of 15 to 69, and has been handily compiled and translated over on the ResetEra forums. While it focuses solely on the Japanese market, there are still some interesting takeaways regarding the more globally recognised gaming franchises. Nintendo franchises appear to skew more towards older audiences. The average age of players of the Super Mario, Kirby, and Pokémon games falls between 30 and 32, with The Legend Of Zelda and Animal Crossing sharing an average player age of 35. Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning. The one exception is the Splatoon series, where the average player is aged 27. Perhaps this is a result of Splatoon being much newer, with the first game only coming out in 2015, whereas the other franchises are over 20 or 30 years old and thus more appealing to older, nostalgic fans who grew up playing the original games. Japanese outlet Kultur reports that the average age of gamers is around 30 years old, so Nintendo does appear to have cracked the code of ensuring its most popular franchises are appealing to the most common demographic. Intriguingly, these Nintendo franchises have a near even split in terms of gender ratio. Pokémon and Zelda have a male to female ratio of 60:40, while Splatoon's is 65:35. Super Mario's audience is mostly male at 70:30 but Kirby, and especially Animal Crossing, are more popular with female players, with ratios of 45:55 and 25:75, respectively. Elsewhere, the data shows that the average age of players of live service shooters such as Valorant, Apex Legends, and Fortnite are in their 20s. All three examples also have the same gender ratio of 85:15, with very male dominated player-bases. On the opposite end, you have Square Enix's Final Fantasy and Dragon Quest franchises, which still skew heavily towards male players but have an average player age of 42. Both franchises are long-running role-players that have been around since the 80s, so it makes sense for their core audiences to be older people who've been playing them since the early days. More Trending However, it also shows that both franchises have struggled to make themselves appealing to younger audiences. In Final Fantasy's case, this could be a contributing factor as to why both Final Fantasy 16 and Final Fantasy 7 Rebirth underperformed in terms of sales. Of course, this doesn't necessarily reflect the gaming habits of the Western market. Mobile gaming, for instance, is even more popular in Japan than it is here, as evidenced by how prominent mobile games are in the collected data. It also demonstrates how console gaming is being predominantly held up by the older generations, with console franchises like Resident Evil and Like A Dragon having average player ages in the late 30s while mobile games like Brawl Stars and Project Sekai have average player ages of 18 and 22, respectively. This can be attributed to how mobile games are typically free-to-play and thus there's less of a barrier of entry for kids, teenagers, and unemployed or underpaid young adults. Email gamecentral@ leave a comment below, follow us on Twitter. To submit Inbox letters and Reader's Features more easily, without the need to send an email, just use our Submit Stuff page here. For more stories like this, check our Gaming page. MORE: PS6 and next gen Xbox could cost over £1,000 based on AMD chip leak MORE: Nintendo and Steam crack down on hentai and other 'eSlop' filling up game stores MORE: Video game spending has dropped almost 25% amongst young people

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store