Peace Offering To RSS, A Shot At Tamil Nadu: What BJP's Veep Pick In CP Radhakrishnan Signals
The choice is replete with signals. It comes amid a standoff with the RSS over the next BJP president. The three-year term of the present incumbent, JP Nadda, ended in January 2024. He continued on extensions because of a lack of consensus on his successor.
Traditionally, the BJP appoints its president after extensive consultations with the RSS. It is no longer secret that the conventional route has led to a dead end, explaining the inordinate (and unusual) delay in choosing a replacement for Nadda.
Also Read | 10 Facts About CP Radhakrishnan, BJP's Pick For Vice President
The Tensions With RSS
Modi's consecutive electoral successes in 2014 and 2019 elevated him to an unassailable position, with the RSS giving him a free hand to appoint the BJP president. However, tensions between the mentor and mentee surfaced during the 2024 Lok Sabha election, with Nadda taking a swipe at the RSS in a newspaper interview to declare that the BJP no longer needed the Sangh and was capable of standing on its own.
The extent to which relations had frayed was evident in the poll results. For the first time in 10 years, the BJP failed to win a majority on its own and suffered heavy losses in two vital states: Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra. Internal assessments attributed these losses to a lack of support from RSS workers during the election process. Some of the damage was indeed repaired in subsequent assembly elections, in which RSS cadres fanned out in large numbers to campaign for the BJP - particularly in Haryana and Maharashtra, where the party won thumping majorities. The relationship, however, remains fraught.
The Question Of The BJP President
At the heart of the discord is the choice of the next BJP president. Party circles candidly but privately acknowledge that the RSS is unhappy with the turn the BJP has taken in recent years. From being a cadre-based, ideologically-rooted organisation that nurtured younger mass leaders for the future, the BJP was increasingly turning into a flabby replica of Indira Gandhi's Congress. The RSS feels that the BJP is far too dependent on one man's charisma to win elections. Worse, it had become a parking space for rebels from other parties who were rewarded with ministerial posts, Rajya Sabha berths and tickets to contest elections, frequently at the cost of long-time loyalists waiting in the wings.
Also Read | Why Opposition's Veep Choice Places Key BJP Ally In A Tricky Spot
Strong prime ministers like Indira Gandhi have traditionally wanted their parties to be subservient to them to make the process of governance and policy formulation smoother. BJP sources point to previous Prime Ministers like Narasimha Rao, Atal Behari Vajpayee and Manmohan Singh, who often found themselves circumscribed by party chiefs with conflicting priorities and loyalties.
Modi's recent dual moves are seen as peace offerings to the RSS to facilitate a compromise and ease the process of selecting a new party president who can balance the interests of both. The appointment of a BJP chief is long overdue, and the uncertainty is disturbing the equilibrium between the party and the government.
Two Reasons For The Pick
Radhakrishnan's nomination should be seen in this light. Although it was widely known that the government would opt for someone from the ranks after it burnt its fingers with 'outsider' Jagdeep Dhankhar, the choice of Radhakrishnan has surprised many in the party.
There are two reasons for this. Radhakrishnan is first and foremost an RSS loyalist with deep roots in the organisation, with which he has been associated since the age of 16. He also doesn't quite fit into the mould of the current BJP. Although relatively young at 68, he comes from the Vajpayee-Advani era of the party, when politics was more consensual and less confrontational.
Coimbatore Days
In fact, when the BJP was born out of the Jan Sangh in 1980, Radhakrishnan was appointed an aide to Vajpayee. He must have imbibed some lessons from the former Prime Minister - in fact, political circles in his home state of Tamil Nadu would jokingly refer to him as the Vajpayee of the state BJP.
Radhakrishan was elected from Coimbatore twice to the Lok Sabha, first in 1998 and then in 1999. His margin of victory in 1998 was the highest in Tamil Nadu as he rode on a wave of Hindu consolidation following the Coimbatore riots, which killed 85 persons.
He lost all the elections fought after that, but, nevertheless, remained the BJP's face in Tamil Nadu, largely because of his rapport with the Dravidian parties. He had a good relationship with the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) when it was part of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA). When the DMK exited the NDA in 2003, Radhakrishnan played a leading role in stitching up an alternative alliance with the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK).
The Rise And Fall Of Annamalai
He was put out to grass following two successive defeats in the Lok Sabha polls of 2014 and 2019. With the BJP deciding to adopt a hardline in Tamil Nadu, Radhakrishnan's talent for making friends and allies was no longer needed. He was replaced as Tamil Nadu BJP chief by the younger and more energetic K Annamalai, who gleefully plunged into confrontational politics in an effort to expand his party's base.
Now that the BJP has decided to shake hands again with the AIADMK following its failure to make inroads into Tamil Nadu on its own, Annamalai has been discarded. In fact, Radhakrishnan's old connections may prove useful in the coming days as the BJP changes course in the state. Known for his moderation and sobriety, he is not a 'yes man' and BJP circles believe he will strike an independent tone in the functioning of the Rajya Sabha.
A Smooth Road
Although the Opposition has chosen to field a joint candidate in Justice B Sudershan Reddy, the election will be a mere formality given that the NDA has sufficient numbers in Parliament to ensure a smooth victory for Radhakrishnan.
It will be interesting to see how the relationship between the new Vice-President and the Modi government evolves in the coming months. If Radhakrishnan's tweet thanking Modi and the BJP for choosing him as the candidate is any indication of his strong commitment to conventions and traditions, he looks set to be a constitutional vice president rather than a party man. He signed off his tweet with the words "Jai Hind".
(The author is a senior Delhi-based journalist)
Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
11 minutes ago
- Business Standard
GST reforms could help India's fiscal revenues, says S&P Global Ratings
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) rationalisation reforms announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Independence Day could boost fiscal revenues over the longer term due to easier implementation and clearer accounting processes through the proposed two-rate system, S&P Global Ratings analysts said on Tuesday. 'The current GST regime is quite complex, with four different rates, which makes accounting and implementation sometimes quite difficult,' an S&P analyst said during a webinar on the agency's recent upgrade to India's sovereign credit rating. Answering a question on whether a lower GST slab could impact fiscal revenue, S&P analysts said it was still early days to assess the fiscal impact. 'If the rates come down, it could impact fiscal revenue, but it might not... It's still very early days to see the actual fiscal impact, but we don't think the government will reform this system to the point that it will hit fiscal revenues,' YeeFarn Phua, Director, Sovereign & International Public Finance Rating at S&P Global Ratings, said. In the past five to six years, S&P analysts noted that the GST reform had proven to be a successful anchor driver of a major component for the government's fiscal revenue. Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced the much-awaited GST rate rationalisation reform, which corporate India believes could alter the trajectory of uneven consumption demand trends, from the ramparts of the Red Fort in his Independence Day speech. 'This Diwali, I am going to make it a double Diwali for you,' he said. 'We have discussed with states, and we are bringing next-generation GST reforms that will reduce the tax burden across the country. Tax on items for the common man will be reduced substantially. Our MSMEs [micro, small and medium enterprises], our small entrepreneurs, will get a huge benefit. Everyday items will become much cheaper, giving a new boost to the economy,' Modi said. S&P Global Ratings, on 14 August, lifted India's long-term sovereign credit rating by a notch to 'BBB' from the lowest investment grade of 'BBB-', with a stable outlook. The rating upgrade came after a gap of 18 years, citing the country's economic resilience, sustained fiscal consolidation, and improved quality of public spending. This places India in the same rating category as countries like Mexico, Indonesia, and Greece. S&P Global Ratings expects private capital expenditure to double over the next five years compared to the previous five-year period, driven by a significant focus on infrastructure from government policy and newer areas such as aviation. The rating agency also noted that AI in the near term would be a swing factor, as there will be less demand for certain types of jobs. Over the medium term, however, S&P said that given India's tendency for technology adoption, it is likely to improve productivity. S&P said that India's rating upgrade was not due to any single event but rather the result of observing economic factors over the last decade.
NDTV
11 minutes ago
- NDTV
Rahul Gandhi's Car Hits Cop During Bihar Yatra, BJP's "Crush Janta" Jibe
Nawada: A policeman was injured during a freak incident involving a car carrying the Leader of Opposition, Rahul Gandhi, during the 'Voter Adhikar Yatra' in Bihar this morning. The open-top jeep had run over the cop's feet on the crowded street dotted with the politician's supporters and security personnel in Nawada. Fellow policemen and the politician's supporters immediately pushed the vehicle backwards and rescued the policeman. The cop was seen limping away after being freed from under the car's wheels. Mr Gandhi, who was seen standing in the open-top jeep, immediately took a water bottle and gave it to his supporters to assist the injured policeman. He later met the policeman and inquired about his injury. The BJP targeted the Congress over the incident and claimed the police constable was "crushed" under Mr Gandhi's car. Mocking the Congress march as "Crush Janta Yatra", party spokesperson Shehzad Poonawala said, "Rahul Gandhi's car crushed a police constable, who was critically injured. Dynast did not even get down to check on him." Voter Adhikar Yatra ❎ Crush Janta Yatra ✅✅ Rahul Gandhi's car crushed a police constable who was critically injured. Dynast did not even get down to check on him — Shehzad Jai Hind (Modi Ka Parivar) (@Shehzad_Ind) August 19, 2025 The Congress leader had launched the 'Voter Adhikar Yatra' in Sasaram last Sunday in a campaign strategy ahead of the Bihar elections, expected to be held this year-end. Flanked by top Opposition leaders, including the RJD's Lalu Yadav and his son Tejashwi Yadav, the Congress had billed it as a moral crusade to safeguard democracy, pushing Mr Gandhi's claim that a conspiracy is being hatched to "steal votes" in Bihar. The 16-day-long march will end in Patna on September 1, covering over 20 districts and 1,300 km. Among the prominent places it will pass through are Nalanda, Munger, Bhagalpur, Katihar, Purnea, Darbhanga, Siwan, Chapra, and Ara. The political march follows the north-south Bharat Jodo Yatra and east-west Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra that the Congress claims led to major electoral gains for the party.
News18
20 minutes ago
- News18
Trump's Tariffs, Modi's Red Fort Defiance, Yi's Delhi Visit: As Sovereign As They Come
Last Updated: In an increasingly multipolar world, Modi showcased India's position as a truly sovereign power, one that will not break with threats of economic coercion Prime Minister Narendra Modi turned the tables on American economic coercion. He transformed pressure into power. When Donald Trump unleashed punitive 50% tariffs designed to force India into abandoning its strategic partnerships, Modi struck back. He delivered a defiant Red Fort address that rejected Trump's bullying. Hosting Wang Yi on August 18 was just the cherry on the cake, showcasing India's diplomatic alternatives in the face of American bullying. The response sends an unequivocal message: India will not compromise its sovereignty under any external pressure, and will not sacrifice its strategic autonomy for American approval. In an increasingly multipolar world, Modi showcased India's position as a truly sovereign power, one that will not break with threats of economic coercion. The Anatomy of Economic Coercion Trump's decision to impose 50% tariffs on Indian goods, among the highest levied on any nation, was never merely about trade deficits or Russian oil purchases. The tariff structure, combining a 25% baseline duty with an additional 25% penalty, deliberately targeted $87 billion worth of Indian exports to the United States. This move was calculated economic warfare designed to extract maximum political concessions from New Delhi. The coercive nature of these tariffs becomes evident when examining their selective application. While China remains the largest purchaser of Russian oil globally, Trump has extended deadlines for Chinese tariffs by 90 days, hoping for a favourable deal with Xi Jinping. India, conversely, faced immediate punishment despite importing significantly less Russian energy than China. This disparity reveals the true strategic intent: to pressure a democratic ally into abandoning its sovereign decision-making whilst appeasing a strategic rival. Former US National Security Advisor John Bolton characterised this approach as producing the 'worst outcome" for America, noting the irony that tariffs intended to hurt Russia could instead push India closer to both Russia and China. The selective targeting of India while sparing China exposes the fundamental strategic miscalculation underlying Trump's coercive diplomacy. A Defiant Declaration of Sovereignty On August 15, Modi delivered one of his longest-ever Independence Day speeches, running for 103 minutes. He systematically dismantled the premises of any external coercion whilst reinforcing India's commitment to strategic autonomy. His declaration that India 'will not tolerate nuclear blackmail" and his emphasis on Atmanirbhar Bharat served as direct responses to American pressure tactics and Pakistan's unhinged declarations from US soil. He explicitly stated that 'Operation Sindoor would not have succeeded if India were not atmanirbhar (self-reliant)," directly linking India's military capabilities to its economic independence. This connection between self-reliance and security reframed the tariff debate from economic vulnerability to national strength, moving the narrative back in India's favour. Modi's assertion that India would 'never compromise on the interests of its farmers, livestock rearers and fisherfolk" delivered more than agricultural protectionism. Modi directly rejected US demands for market access to genetically modified crops and dairy products, key American negotiating objectives that had dominated trade discussions. The Prime Minister elevated the stakes by framing the trade negotiations as a sovereignty issue rather than a trade dispute. His reference to the Indus Waters Treaty, declaring that 'blood and water cannot flow together," showed India's refusal to compartmentalise policy under external pressure. Modi linked water rights with counter-terrorism policy, signalling that India would reject American definitions of acceptable behaviour in its regional relationships. Diplomatic Realignment with China Wang Yi's visit marked the first high-level Chinese diplomatic engagement with India in three years, following the 2020 Galwan Valley tensions. The decision to resume such engagement precisely when US-India relations faced their greatest strain since Trump's return to office sent unmistakable signals about India's strategic alternatives. Chinese media outlets immediately recognised the significance, with the Global Times referring to a potential 'ballet dance between dragon and elephant" as both nations faced American tariff pressure. The substance of the Wang Yi meetings further reinforced India's strategic messaging. During discussions with External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, Wang criticised 'unilateral bullying practices" in apparent reference to American tariff policies, whilst emphasising that 'free trade and the international order face severe challenges". This alignment of messaging between Beijing and New Delhi demonstrated the unintended consequences of Trump's coercive approach. Most significantly, the meetings established groundwork for Modi's planned visit to China for the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit in late August. This diplomatic engagement, occurring whilst under American economic pressure, perfectly illustrated Modi's multi-alignment strategy and refusal to accept binary geopolitical choices. Atmanirbhar Bharat In Full Effect The emphasis on Atmanirbhar Bharat during Modi's Red Fort address elevated the self-reliance initiative from economic policy to strategic doctrine. By explicitly linking indigenous capabilities to national security, the Prime Minister reframed economic independence as fundamental to strategic autonomy. The Atmanirbhar Bharat framework provides India with conceptual tools to resist external pressure whilst maintaining growth momentum. The initiative's focus on domestic manufacturing, technological sovereignty, and supply chain resilience directly addresses vulnerabilities that economic coercion seeks to exploit. And it is not just in the defence sector that Atmanirbhar is supposed to work. Modi's call for indigenous semiconductor manufacturing, jet engine development, and expanded nuclear energy capabilities represents more. These priorities constitute strategic responses to technological dependencies that could be weaponised by external actors. By pursuing technological sovereignty across critical sectors, India reduces exposure to supply chain disruptions and economic blackmail, as was imposed by Trump. The Broader Implications For Global Order India's successful resistance to American economic coercion carries implications far beyond bilateral relationships, contributing to broader shifts towards a multipolar international order. By demonstrating that even significant economic pressure cannot force major powers into policy subordination, India's response weakens coercive diplomacy as a tool of international statecraft. The timing of India's resistance coincides with similar challenges to American hegemony from other quarters. China's continued growth despite trade wars, Russia's resilience under sanctions, and European resistance to extraterritorial sanctions all contribute to perceptions of declining American coercive capacity. India's successful resistance adds democratic legitimacy to this broader pattern of pushback against hegemonic pressure. India's approach also strengthens multilateral alternatives to American-dominated institutions. The deepening of BRICS cooperation, enhanced SCO engagement, and continued commitment to G20 leadership demonstrate that India sees institutional diversification as essential for maintaining strategic autonomy. These platforms provide India with alternative venues for pursuing national interests without American oversight. The broader message resonates across the Global South, where many nations face similar pressures to align with great power preferences. India's demonstration that democratic governance and strategic autonomy can coexist provides encouragement for other middle powers seeking to maintain policy independence, while also further cementing India's position as a leader of the Global South. The beauty of Modi's approach lies in its demonstration that sovereignty and partnership can coexist. By refusing to accept binary choices between American alignment and Chinese engagement, India has shown that strategic autonomy remains viable in an era of great power competition. top videos View all The economic costs of American tariffs, whilst significant, pale in comparison to the strategic benefits of demonstrated autonomy. India's successful resistance enhances its credibility with all partners, showing that it cannot be pressured into abandoning its principles or interests. This reputation for reliability under pressure increases India's value as a partner across all relationships, from American security cooperation to Chinese economic engagement. Most importantly, Modi's response reinforces India's trajectory to the higher echelons of world power structures by demonstrating the strategic autonomy that defines truly sovereign states. By refusing to be bullied whilst maintaining productive relationships across the international system, India has shown that it possesses the strategic sophistication required for global leadership. About the Author Sohil Sinha Sohil Sinha is a Sub Editor at News18. He writes on foreign affairs, geopolitics along with domestic policy and infrastructure projects. Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google. view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 19, 2025, 18:11 IST News opinion Opinion | Trump's Tariffs, Modi's Red Fort Defiance, Yi's Delhi Visit: As Sovereign As They Come Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...
