
BMW catches fire in rain at Bukit Batok East Avenue 3
Stomper Ben shared a video of the stationary vehicle with flames coming out of the front in the middle of the road as raindrops pelted the ground.
A Traffic Police officer can be seen some distance behind the smoking car directing traffic and a fire engine was parked in front. A firefighter then approached the BMW to put out the fire.
In response to a Stomp query, the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) said it was alerted to the fire near the junction of Bukit Batok East Avenue 3 and Bukit Batok Street 21.
The fire, which involved the engine compartment, was extinguished using a hosereel.
There were no reported injuries, added SCDF.
The cause of the fire is under investigation.
Click here to contribute a story or submit it to our WhatsApp
Get more of Stomp's latest updates by following us on:

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Paper
2 hours ago
- New Paper
Medics treat 7 after Chai Chee block lift lobby blaze
Seven people were given medical attention after a fire broke out at the 13th floor lift lobby of a Housing Board block in Chai Chee early on July 13. In response to The Straits Times' queries, the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) said firefighters from Paya Lebar and Changi fire stations were alerted to the blaze at 52 Chai Chee Street at about 8am. The fire was "well-alight" upon the firefighters' arrival and involved household items placed at the lift lobby, said SCDF. The fire was extinguished using one water jet. Two units above the affected lift lobby had heat and soot damage, and 35 residents from the block were evacuated by the police and SCDF as a precautionary measure. The seven people who were attended to declined to be taken to the hospital, said SCDF. According to Chinese daily Lianhe Zaobao, the fire involved the burning of incense paper near some "miscellaneous" items. Lianhe Zaobao added that the fire affected power supply to the entire block. In photos of the aftermath of the incident, a large amount of debris can be seen piled up in the lobby where the fire broke out, along with blackened pots, pans and charred wooden cabinets and chairs. The home owner of the affected unit, a 66-year-old man who declined to be named, told Lianhe Zaobao that he was inside when his wife was burning incense paper outside their flat. "She usually burns paper downstairs, but today, she ran to the corridor to burn it for some reason. I wanted to stop her, but it was too late," he reportedly said. The cause of the fire is under investigation. SCDF advised the public to help maintain a safe living environment by keeping common corridors, lift lobbies and staircases free of clutter. A cluttered corridor can increase the risk of fire spread, hinder evacuation efforts, and delay SCDF's response during an emergency, it added.


Independent Singapore
a day ago
- Independent Singapore
PMD bursts into flames along Woodlands Avenue 3
Photo: LTA FB SINGAPORE: A personal mobility device (PMD) caught fire along Woodlands Avenue 3 on Wednesday night (9 July), at approximately 8:25pm. An eyewitness told Stomp that he was returning home after completing a food delivery when spotted the burning device on the road opposite Marsiling MRT station. 'I spotted the PMD on the road opposite towards Marsiling MRT station engulfed in fire, but the rider wasn't there,' he recounted. Photos and videos shared with Stomp show the PMD tipped over on its side and completely on fire. In one of the videos, a police officer can be seen dousing the fire with a portable extinguisher before firefighters arrived on the scene. They eyewitness said, 'The police arrived, followed by the fire engine. No one was hurt.' SCDF has since confirmed the fire involved a PMD and that it was successfully extinguished by a police officer prior to their arrival. No injuries were reported. PMD-related fires have been a recurring safety concern in Singapore, with authorities regularly reminding owners to use only approved devices and batteries and to charge them responsibly. The cause of this latest fire is under investigation. See also Another PMD catches fire inside Sembawang flat () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });


Independent Singapore
a day ago
- Independent Singapore
McDonald's apologises after customer waits 48 mins order and faces "frightening" manager
SINGAPORE: McDonald's Singapore has issued an apology after a customer complained about an unusually long wait time and an unpleasant exchange with a manager at its Hougang 1 outlet. Mr Tay, who shared his experience with citizen journalism platform Stomp, said he had placed a takeaway order at the restaurant at 10.28pm on June 7. Despite initially waiting patiently, he only received his food at 11.16pm—48 minutes later. According to Mr Tay, the store was busy when he arrived, so he did not mind waiting at first. However, by 10.55pm, he noticed that other customers who had ordered around the same time were already leaving. 'I asked an auntie at the counter about it. She told me to wait for my order as it was still being prepared,' Mr Tay told Stomp, 'After 10 minutes, I asked her again. She told me to wait.' When his order was eventually ready close to 11.16pm, Mr Tay requested to speak to the duty manager to understand the delay. What followed, he said, was an unpleasant encounter. 'The auntie told him about it, but he turned his head, ignored me and carried on doing his things,' Mr Tay wrote in his feedback to McDonald's, 'After that, the auntie called him again, and he unwillingly came to the counter.' Mr Tay alleged that the manager's demeanour quickly turned confrontational when he asked why the food had taken so long. 'He immediately started with a rude attitude, opening his eyes wide and talking like a gangster,' Mr Tay claimed, 'He challenged me and asked why I couldn't see that the store was busy—are the kitchen staff dancing? He also asked if I wanted to refund my order.' Mr Tay, who said he had ordered the meal for a family birthday, declined the refund. He also expressed shock when the manager suggested he was being disrespectful. 'I asked him why he was so rude. He told me that I did not give him 'face' in front of other customers and staff. I was so surprised as I just wanted to know why it took so long,' Mr Tay said. When Mr Tay asked for the manager's name to file a complaint, the situation escalated further. 'He threw his name tag on the desk. When I wanted to take a picture of it, he timidly snatched it back and asked me to take a photo of the 'shift manager on duty',' Mr Tay recounted, 'It was definitely a forgotten order and the manager was not apologetic at all.' In his feedback, Mr Tay described the manager's behaviour as 'frightening' and said the entire episode left him 'a very disappointed customer'. McDonald's Singapore has since apologised over the episode. A spokesperson told Stomp, 'We're sorry to hear about what happened and have since reached out to make things right. Consistent service matters to us, and we've taken steps—including reinforcing training with our team—to help prevent this from happening again.' Mr Tay later confirmed that McDonald's had contacted him, apologised, and refunded the cost of the meal. Reflecting on the outcome, he said: 'Social media power is very fantastic.'