logo
Trump pushes for release of Epstein, Maxwell grand jury testimony

Trump pushes for release of Epstein, Maxwell grand jury testimony

TimesLIVE31-07-2025
The DOJ first sought court permission on July 18 to make public transcripts of the confidential testimony given by witnesses years ago in the two cases, but Manhattan-based US district judges Richard Berman and Paul Engelmayer asked the government to flesh out the legal bases for the requests.
Trump has faced pressure to make public documents from the federal investigations into Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, and his longtime girlfriend Maxwell, who was convicted of sex trafficking in 2021.
Even if one or both of the judges allow the transcripts to be made public, it is unclear whether the public would learn anything new or noteworthy.
In the filings, prosecutors said the only witness at Epstein's grand jury was an FBI agent. That same agent and a New York City Police Department detective were the only witnesses at Maxwell's grand jury, prosecutors said.
Maxwell's four-week trial in 2021 included public testimony from alleged sex trafficking victims, associates of Epstein and Maxwell, and law enforcement officers.
She is serving a 20-year prison sentence in Florida and is asking the US Supreme Court to overturn her conviction. She had pleaded not guilty.
TRUMP SUPPORTERS ANGERED
The unsealing requests came after Trump this month asked Bondi to seek the release of grand jury transcripts. The president did so after the justice department said it concluded that Epstein died by suicide and that there was no incriminating list of his clients.
The justice department's announcement angered some of Trump's conservative supporters who believe the government is covering up Epstein's ties to the rich and powerful and that the financier was murdered in jail.
Grand juries are convened by prosecutors and meet in secret to hear witness testimony and decide whether to indict people suspected of crimes. Records of their proceedings usually remain sealed. There are only limited circumstances under which such transcripts can be disclosed.
The transcripts would not represent all previously unreleased material in the government's possession. Investigators and prosecutors may pursue leads that they cannot substantiate or interview potential witnesses whom they do not ultimately call to testify before a grand jury.
US district judge Robin Rosenberg in Florida last week denied the administration's request to unseal records from grand jury probes in 2005 and 2007 in that state into Epstein. The judge said the request did not fall into any of the limited exceptions that may allow for the release of such material.
Epstein pleaded guilty in 2008 to a prostitution charge brought under Florida law and was given a 13-month sentence in a deal with prosecutors now widely regarded as too lenient.
Deputy US attorney-general Todd Blanche, Trump's former personal lawyer, last week met with Maxwell to see if she had any information about others who had committed crimes. Maxwell's lawyer, David Markus, and Blanche have not provided detailed accounts of their discussions.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UPL lawyers fight NPA prosecution decision on Durban chemical blaze
UPL lawyers fight NPA prosecution decision on Durban chemical blaze

Daily Maverick

time18 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

UPL lawyers fight NPA prosecution decision on Durban chemical blaze

The National Prosecuting Authority has finally reached a decision on prosecuting the Indian UPL agrochemicals group — more than four years after thousands of tons of poisonous chemicals went up in flames at a warehouse north of Durban. A tide of farm chemicals poured into the environment north of Durban in July 2021, killing more than four tons of fish and other aquatic life. It also led to the prolonged closure of several swimming beaches north of the city, while thick clouds of poisonous black smoke swirled around parts of the city for several days, sparking concern about the long-term health impact on people exposed to the fumes. Now, in response to questions from the Daily Maverick, the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has confirmed that KwaZulu-Natal's director of public prosecutions (DPP) has reached a decision on laying criminal charges against UPL in criminal case docket CAS 06/09/2021. While the NPA did not state explicitly what the decision was, or the exact nature of the charges, a spokesperson confirmed that UPL had been notified of the provincial director of public prosecutions' decision, and that the company was now 'requesting a review of the decision' — strongly indicating that representatives of the Mumbai-based agrochemicals group will end up in the dock shortly if their latest legal representations to the national director of public prosecutions are rejected. UPL has consistently argued that, as one of the many companies whose premises were looted or set alight by arsonists during the July 2021 unrest, it was not responsible for the consequent chemical spill, which led to ecological damage to large sections of the uMhlanga River lagoon, the closure of beaches and widespread air pollution. UPL, the fifth largest agrochemicals company in the world after Bayer, Corteva, Syngenta and BASF, has also claimed that the security measures and 'state-of-the-art safety features' at its brand-new Cornubia chemical warehouse were overwhelmed during the riots. However, it later emerged that UPL had rented space in a newly built goods warehouse (shared with a clothing retailer), apparently without any specific environmental impact studies or detailed assessments on public health impacts while storing hazardous compounds at Cornubia, a mixed-use commercial, residential and light industrial development at Umhlanga. Health risks Roughly three months after the incident, a preliminary compliance report by the Green Scorpions environmental inspectorate noted that the National Water Act and National Environmental Management Act recognised that 'any unlawful, intentional or negligent conduct' that results in serious pollution or degradation of the environment or water resources was considered to be criminal conduct. At the time, the inspectorate said that: 'Further investigation is required to determine whether UPL, as a result of its failure to comply with specific legal requirements (either in terms of the National Environmental Management Act or other relevant legislation), acted negligently by creating a point source of pollution which resulted in significant environmental impacts, despite the fact that the fire was started by other individuals… 'Had the relevant licences been applied for, the environmental assessment processes that would have been required may have identified risks that could have been avoided, or could have been guarded against,' read the report. 'The desirability of storing large quantities of agricultural chemicals in close proximity to people and sensitive environments would have been evaluated. Bypassing these processes, no doubt, contributed to the seriousness of the pollution that resulted.' According to the compliance report: 'It is the view of the investigative team that UPL may not have undertaken the necessary (Major Hazardous Installation risk) assessment.' Since then, a human health risk assessment commissioned by UPL has suggested that residents living in the immediate vicinity now face increased risks of cancer, heart disease and other health impacts due to the toxic dust particles they inhaled while the warehouse burnt or smouldered. UPL responds In a statement at the weekend, UPL said it 'cannot comment on an ongoing investigation and open case'. However, it continued to engage with all relevant authorities and governmental departments. 'Despite suffering substantial damage from the riots, UPL South Africa has made extensive efforts to contain the aftereffects of the incident and has committed enormous resources to this effort. 'In the immediate aftermath of the event, UPL South Africa instituted an extensive and ongoing rehabilitation and remediation plan of the affected area under the direction of a team of independent experts and a Rehabilitation Action Plan approved by the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE).' Last week, a public meeting of the Cornubia Multi-Stakeholder Forum was held at the Grace Family Church in uMhlanga to discuss the ongoing treatment of chemically polluted water that is still being stored in a dam close to the fire site. At this meeting, the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment was scheduled to provide an update on the status of the proposed criminal charges against UPL. Department officials were not present to provide this update, but UPL attorney Norman Brauteseth told the meeting that he understood that criminal charges were still being investigated against UPL — as well as the Fortress property group (which developed the Cornubia warehouse) and Tongaat Hulett and eThekwini Municipality (joint landowners of the Cornubia development). Limited charges Significantly, however, the NPA said it was not aware of charges against Fortress, Tongaat Hulett or eThekwini. A spokesperson said: 'The NPA received one docket addressing a criminal complaint against UPL. We are not aware of the other matters you mention. 'The matter is at an advanced stage, and we can confirm that the NPA is addressing legal representation from UPL. 'A decision was taken by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) KwaZulu-Natal (KZN), and this was brought to the attention of UPL through their legal representation. UPL has now written to the National Director of Public Prosecution, requesting for a review of the director of public prosecutions KZN's decision.' A spokesperson for Tongaat Hulett Limited said: 'We don't have any knowledge of a criminal investigation against Tongaat Hulett Limited on this matter. Since the incident, as an impacted party we continue to actively engage with the authorities and UPL on the remediation work undertaken by them as land owned by Tongaat Hulett Limited surrounds the UPL warehouse.' A Fortress spokesperson said: 'No — we are not aware of any criminal investigation (against Fortress).' The eThekwini Municipality said: 'We are not aware of the matter in question.' Regarding Brauteseth's comments at the Grace Family Church last week, UPL said: 'In 2021 the findings of a governmental joint preliminary investigation into the incident recommended that the role that all parties played should be investigated, including not only UPL but also Tongaat Hulett, Fortress, and the relevant authorities.' DM

Epstein partner Ghislaine Maxwell's grand jury records to remain sealed
Epstein partner Ghislaine Maxwell's grand jury records to remain sealed

TimesLIVE

timea day ago

  • TimesLIVE

Epstein partner Ghislaine Maxwell's grand jury records to remain sealed

A US judge denied on Monday the justice department's bid to unseal records from the grand jury that indicted the late financier Jeffrey Epstein's partner Ghislaine Maxwell on sex trafficking charges, writing that the records did not answer lingering questions from the public about their crimes or Epstein's death. Manhattan-based US district judge Paul Engelmayer, who reviewed the transcripts of the witness testimony heard by the grand jury and other evidence the panel saw, wrote the government's assertion that the materials would reveal meaningful new information about Epstein's and Maxwell's crimes was 'demonstrably false'. 'A member of the public familiar with the Maxwell trial record who reviewed the grand jury materials the government proposes to unseal would learn next to nothing new,' Engelmayer wrote. 'Insofar as the motion to unseal implies that the grand jury materials are an untapped mine lode of undisclosed information about Epstein or Maxwell or confederates, they are definitely not that,' the judge wrote.

Infrastructure, governance failures limit growth of agriculture and development in rural areas
Infrastructure, governance failures limit growth of agriculture and development in rural areas

Mail & Guardian

timea day ago

  • Mail & Guardian

Infrastructure, governance failures limit growth of agriculture and development in rural areas

The rural economy depends on resource-based industries such as agriculture, mining, fishing, tourism and forestry. Photo: File On 6 August, I had an opportunity to deliver the Among other things, I emphasised that the rural economy should not be forgotten in South Africa's economic growth agenda, where there tends to be a strong urban bias in policy discussions. The rural areas are still a significant segment of society and the economy, though 68% of the population now lives in urban areas. Apart from the rural areas' reliance on remittances and social transfer payments, the one outstanding characteristic of the rural economy is its dependence on a few key industries, all of which are typically resource-based, such as agriculture, mining, fishing, tourism and forestry. With rising unemployment and low economic activity, policymakers are searching for areas of growth and job creation. For many rural areas, agriculture and tourism are the only industries that still have the potential to generate livelihoods and employment. But, for these industries to perform better, we must address the various infrastructure and governance constraints that have limited the development and growth of agriculture to its potential levels. Indeed, the sector has more than doubled since 1994, but it is not yet at capacity. We have detailed many growth-constraining issues in our latest joint work with Professor Johann Kirsten, These include: Market failures (high transaction costs, remote location); Government failures (inefficiencies, poor service delivery and corruption); Community failures (poor local institutions, vested interests of traditional leaders); and Poor land governance (lack of secure tenure). These constraints cause many rural communities to be caught in a poverty trap from which they cannot escape. What's worse, rural areas have less access to public services and infrastructure than urban areas due, partly, to the higher per-unit cost of infrastructure investment and service delivery in rural areas. This extends to 'soft' infrastructure such as healthcare centres as well as 'hard' infrastructure such as road networks, rail, silos, irrigation systems, water and electricity. This leads to low agricultural productivity and poor linkages to markets for farmers. What should be done differently to address these problems so that economic activity and employment can take off in rural areas? To an extent, these problems are well understood and were highlighted in The lack of implementation of agricultural government policy and infrastructure-related constraints comes down to the following reasons: Weak coordination and misalignment of functions and priorities between different government departments and different spheres of government. A misallocation of the budget by the national and provincial governments; and Poor coordination between the government and the private sector has led to a misalignment of transformation programmes, incentives and in some cases, vision. I won't delve into further details, especially as my book, This is a challenge that the government and the private sector should address, and refocusing on the Wandile Sihlobo is the chief economist of the Agricultural Business Chamber of South Africa. You can watch the lecture . I speak at 1:10:10 minutes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store