
Will fewer corporate reporting obligations jeopardise the EU Green Deal?
"Competitiveness is the new motto of this Commission, just as the Green Deal was the motto of the previous mandate led by Ursula von der Leyen. The idea is to cut red tape by 25% for companies, with a target of 35% for SMEs. The Commission says it's not deregulation, it's just simplification," says Gregoire Lory, who covers Green Deal policies for Euronews.
The proposal also aims to exempt smaller companies from import tax to offset polluting emissions and to help mobilise more private investment. The EU executive says €6.3 billion in annual administrative costs would be saved and €50 billion in additional public-private investment would be mobilised.
However, unions and environmental organisations fear the consequences, as only one in five companies would be required to make environmental reports. Checks on supply chains would be limited to the largest 10,000 companies.
'The weakening of the due diligence requirement by imposing these requirements only on direct suppliers is really worrying because, in a very significant number of cases, the harm happens beyond the EU. Around 80% to 90% of environmental and human rights abuses actually happen outside the EU,' argued Anaïs Berthier, director of ClientEarth's Brussels office.
"The Commission wants to simplify, it is not advocating moving away from the Green Deal objectives. What they are doing is trying to align competitiveness with sustainability and the comprehensive growth strategy," said Levin Spiegel, policy adviser at Eurochambers.
The EU executive has asked co-legislators to treat this package as a priority, which will have to be negotiated with the governments of the 27 member states and the European Parliament.
This promises to be a heated political debate and will be an important test of Commission President Ursula von der Leyen's ability to forge alliances in the European Parliament.
"The centre-right EPP, which pushed for the Omnibus Package, holds the presidency of the Commission, has the largest group in Parliament and the support of many leaders in the European Council. However, the EPP will need to build a majority," says Gregoire Lory.
The centre-right may seek support from radical right parties, rather than the traditional coalition with the S&D (centre-left) and Renew Europe (liberal). The Green Party has been one of the most vocal parties against the proposal.
Some analysts point to the current geopolitical situation of major trade disruptions and a race for resources as justification for the EU to focus on reforms that boost business competitiveness.
Levin Spiegel agrees, adding that Eurochambers supports 'this important step' with the expectation of further legislative action to tackle high energy costs and skills shortages.
But environmental organizations like ClientEarth warn that "it is not at all strategic in the long term". "The climate, biodiversity and pollution crisis will not stop just because of the Trump administration (USA) and the EU must really stick to its values, its laws, its principles," said Anaïs Berthier.
Germany's parliament on Tuesday passed a historic bill unlocking a record level of state borrowing for defence and infrastructure through amending the country's constitutionally enshrined fiscal rules.
The vote made it through the parliament with 513 votes in favour — above the 489 votes required.
The law still needs a two-thirds majority in the Bundesrat, Germany's lower house representing the country's states, to become law.
The crucial vote in the Bundestag followed weeks of debate sparked when Merz's Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and would-be coalition partners Social Democrats (SPD) unveiled plans to unleash hundreds of billions in spending through loosening Germany's constitutionally-enshrined "debt brake."
Merz faced a tense race to push the proposal through ahead of the new parliament convening on 25 March, where the far-left Die Linke and far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) would have the ability to block the package.
The Greens were originally reluctant to offer their support of the bill until Merz last week gave the party guarantees that €100 billion of the special fund would be directed to supporting climate economic transformation measures.
The historic deal marks a shift away from decades of fiscal conservatism. Out of the proposals, defence spending above 1% of Germany's gross domestic product is effectively exempt from the country's "debt brake", which was written into the constitution in 2009.
A €500 billion special fund will also be created to finance infrastructure projects outside of the ordinary budget over the next decade, and give Germany's 16 states leeway to borrow the equivalent of around €15 billion.
Merz — who campaigned against reforming the debt brake throughout his career — has framed his U-turn necessary in response to a changing security landscape.
"Our friends in the EU are looking to us just as much as our adversaries and the enemies of our democratic and rules-based order," Merz said on Tuesday ahead of the vote.
Defence Minister Boris Pistorius defended the decision to lift fiscal rules to invest in Germany's defence, including its woefully underfunded army.
"Our security must not be jeopardized by budgetary constraints," Pistorius said, adding that "anyone who hesitates today is denying reality."
Some of the strongest criticism in parliament on Tuesday came from the AfD and the liberal Free Democratic Party (FDP), the latter who tried to derail the package by suggesting a last-minute change.
The German stock market and the euro reacted positively ahead of the vote, which experts have said has the power to bring Germany out of its two years of poor economic growth.
Most economists are in favour of incurring debt to finance additional security and defence needs, but have repeatedly noted that the infrastructure package should be accompanied, or replaced, by strong reforms in other areas according to economic thinktank Ifo.
Reforms in bureaucracy, pension, energy, as well as addressing the country's dire workforce shortage are desperately needed, experts say.
President of the Berlin-based economic research institute DIW Berlin, Marcel Fratzscher, reiterated to Euronews that, "We need reforms in bureaucracy and the workforce in other areas so that such investments can be implemented at all."
"The package would be a very important step in the right direction, but that alone will not be enough. We need a reform of the debt brake, to bring investments in infrastructure, education, defence permanently into the federal budget."
The law still needs a two-thirds majority in the Bundestag, Germany's lower house.
Here, the CDU, SPD, and the Greens need the backing of another party to ratify the legislation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
9 hours ago
- Euronews
European leaders to support trilateral meeting following Alaska summit
European leaders have said they are "ready to work with US President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelenskyy towards a trilateral summit with European support," in a statement issued by the European Commission on Saturday. "It will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory. International borders must not be changed by force," the statement read, which was released a few hours after the conclusion of a meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The statement was signed by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk and European Council President António Costa. They said they "welcomed President Trump's efforts to stop the killing in Ukraine, end Russia's war of aggression, and achieve just and lasting peace," following the US President's meeting with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska. The leaders insisted on "ironclad security guarantees" for Ukraine, with "no limitations" on Ukraine's armed forces. "Russia cannot have a veto against Ukraine's pathway to EU and NATO." The statement also reiterated a pledge to continue to impose sanctions on Russia "as long as the killing in Ukraine continues". Zelenskyy calls for 'real peace' Zelenskyy echoed the European statement in a post on X, calling for "real peace" and "not just another pause between Russian invasions." He added that he told Trump "sanctions should be strengthened if there is no trilateral meeting or if Russia tries to evade an honest end to the war." He also reiterated the importance of involving European leaders, who also were not present at the summit. Other European leaders responded more fiercely to the outcome of Friday's summit in Alaska. Norwegian Foreign Minister Espend Barth Eide told reporters in Oslo Putin's talking points were "code for the Russian justification for the illegal invasion of Ukraine." Czech Prime Minister Petr Fiala said in a statement that "Putin is still only interested in the greatest possible territorial gains and the restoration of the Soviet empire." EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said 'the harsh reality is that Russia has no intention of ending this war anytime soon,' noting that Moscow's forces launched new attacks on Ukraine even as the delegations met. 'Putin continues to drag out negotiations and hopes he gets away with it. He left Anchorage without making any commitments to end the killing,' she said.


Euronews
2 days ago
- Euronews
Plastic pollution treaty talks end without an agreement
Negotiators working on a treaty to address the global crisis of plastic pollution won't reach an agreement in Geneva on Friday. They were meeting for the 11th day at the United Nations office in Geneva to try to complete a landmark treaty to end the plastic pollution crisis but remained deadlocked over whether the treaty should reduce the exponential growth of plastic production and put global, legally binding controls on toxic chemicals used to make plastics. This round of negotiations was meant to be the last, producing the first legally binding treaty on plastic pollution. But now delegates are leaving without a treaty after talks collapsed, just like they did at the meeting in South Korea last year. Nations deeply disappointed to leave Geneva without a treaty Representatives of Norway, Australia, Tuvalu and other nations said they were deeply disappointed to be leaving Geneva without a treaty. "We came to Geneva to secure a global plastics treaty because we know the stakes could not be higher," European Commissioner for Environment, Water Resilience and Competitive Circular Economy, Jessika Roswall said in a post on social media. "While the latest text on the table does not yet meet all our ambitions, it is a step forward—and the perfect must not be the enemy of the good." Roswall added that the EU will continue to push for a stronger, binding agreement. Saudi Arabia said both drafts lacked balance, and Saudi and Kuwaiti negotiators said the latest proposal takes other states' views more into account and addresses plastic production, which they consider outside the scope of the treaty. No further action on the latest draft text Luis Vayas Valdivieso, the chair of the negotiating committee, wrote and presented two drafts of treaty text in Geneva based on the views expressed by nations at the talks. That draft, released early Friday, did not include a limit on plastic production but recognised that current levels of production and consumption are 'unsustainable' and global action is needed. New language had been added to say these levels exceed current waste management capacities and are projected to increase further, 'thereby necessitating a coordinated global response to halt and reverse such trends.' The representatives from 184 countries did not agree to use either one as the basis for their negotiations. Valdivieso said Friday morning, as the delegates reconvened in the assembly hall, that no further action is being proposed at this stage on the latest draft. Talks in Geneva have been an "abject failure", David Azoulay, health programme director and head of the delegation for the Center for International Environmental Law, said in a statement. "In the final days of the negotiations, we have clearly seen what many of us have known for some time - some countries did not come here to finalise a text, they came here to do the opposite: block any attempt at advancing a viable treaty. "It's impossible to find a common ground between those who are interested in protecting the status quo and the majority who are looking for a functional treaty that can be strengthened over time." What happens now? Delegates are still meeting and have not decided on the next steps yet. Azoulay said that, while negotiations will continue, they will fail again if solutions aren't identified and the process doesn't change. "We need a restart, not a repeat performance. Countries that want a treaty must now leave this process and form a treaty of the willing. And that process must include options for voting that deny the tyranny of consensus we have watched play out here."


Local France
2 days ago
- Local France
'Neglected or ignored': Brits in Europe urged to back campaign for overseas MPs
Campaigners say there's growing recognition in the UK parliament of the need for an MP whose main role is representing Brits living abroad and the 'unique issues' they face – with a similar system already used in several EU countries. And while MPs get countless emails, a coalition of international citizens' rights groups has asked voters to send a postcard about the issue instead. READ ALSO: Campaign group for British overseas voters to hold first European meeting in Italy 'As MPs take a well deserved break, they should spare a thought for the millions of UK citizens abroad,' said Tom Brake, CEO of campaign group Unlock Democracy. 'Their views and priorities are often neglected or completely ignored. Establishing overseas constituencies is the best way to ensure their views are no longer marginalised.' The postcard campaign was 'a way to show MPs who and where we are – although we don't all live in picture postcard tourist spots,' said Clarissa Killwick, representing pan-European citizens' rights group Brexpats - Hear Our Voice. 'I live in Italy which has overseas MPs. They've helped bring about important changes such as improved consular services,' 'It is also a two-way street – for example, reducing over-punitive taxes has made Italians abroad more inclined to pay them.' Campaigner Clasissa Killwick sends her postcard from Italy. to her MP in the UK Photo courtesy of Clarissa Killwick. Under the proposed system, UK citizens abroad would elect MPs who represent their part of the world in the UK parliament, rather than voting for the MP in the UK constituency they might have left years ago. Italian citizens living abroad elect a total of 12 overseas parliamentarians - eight MPs and four senators. That accounts for two percent of the total number of seats in parliament. In France, 11 MPs are elected to the Assemblée nationale whose role is to represent the interests of French citizens living overseas - they each represent a 'constituency' such as French people in northern Europe. This type of representation often results in higher voter turnout and more focus on issues affecting overseas voters, according to the groups backing the campaign. Advertisement Terence Champion, Chair of Liberal Democrats Overseas, said: 'The more than 5,500,000 British citizens living overseas need their own MPs to represent their very specific concerns, which largely differ from those of domestic UK voters. 'Living overseas means facing some unique issues including frozen pensions, higher education fees, problems with UK bank accounts. spouse visas and complicated voting procedures, amongst others.' The issue of overseas constituencies was also among several topics to be discussed by the British Overseas Voters Forum (BOVF) at its inaugural meeting set to be held in Milan on September 9th . Organisations backing the campaign include: Unlock Democracy, New Europeans UK, British Overseas Voters Forum, Bremain in Spain, Liberal Democrats Abroad, Labour International, Brexpats - Hear Our Voice, and Liberal Democrats Overseas.