logo
It's Time for Digital Justice

It's Time for Digital Justice

IOL News20-07-2025
The recent BRICS declaration on artificial intelligence marks a critical shift in the global digital agenda. In their joint statement, BRICS leaders reaffirmed each nation's sovereign right to develop and govern digital technologies, particularly AI, in alignment with domestic priorities and legal frameworks. They called for strengthened capacity-building, robust data governance, and technological autonomy, stating: 'We firmly support the right of all countries to harness the benefits of the digital economy… to develop capacities in AI research, foster technological autonomy and innovation, ensure data protection, and promote their own digital economy.'
This affirmation is welcome and timely. Yet, in the face of growing digital inequality, platform gatekeeping, and regulatory imbalance, should we not be thinking about how to move beyond high-level diplomacy toward more tangible, enforceable measures? Perhaps the time has come to complement vision with action and to consider what digital justice might truly look like in practice.
Across the Global South, from township entrepreneurs in South Africa to fintech innovators in Latin America, startup ecosystems remain stifled by structural imbalances in the digital economy. The current rules of engagement, largely dictated by dominant platform companies, are neither inclusive nor equitable. As a member of the SU20 Foundation and Alliance Task Force, I believe we must now reimagine global digital governance through a justice lens. This means embedding fairness, inclusion, and startup-led innovation at the core of every digital transformation policy and programme.
South Africa has an important role to play. Not only must we advance our domestic innovation ecosystem, but we must also advocate globally on behalf of underserved regions still waiting to be seen, heard, and funded. The SU20 Digital Transformation Workstream outlines a concrete path forward. It proposes that we fund the Startup Fund at scale to enable meaningful participation in the digital economy. Emerging innovators must have access to early-stage, patient capital that prioritises inclusion and impact. It also proposes that we enforce platform compliance through regulatory agencies, ensuring dominant platforms are held accountable through effective, transparent, and independent oversight. Furthermore, the workstream recommends embedding public-private startup labs within digital transformation programmes. These labs can serve as co-creation spaces that bring together government, entrepreneurs, and civil society to solve real-world problems using local insight and scalable technology.
Perhaps the most significant contribution of the SU20 agenda is the proposed Digital Competition Compact. This is a landmark framework that introduces new global standards for digital fairness. The Compact establishes that platforms must not be allowed to preference their products over third-party services. It affirms that fair and open API access must be guaranteed, ensuring interoperability and innovation. It further calls for digital procurement processes to be reformed so that startups and emerging market innovators are included as a matter of policy, not exception.
This is not an anti-technology stance. It is a pro-market, pro-competition, and pro-equity proposition. When civic technologies or early-stage startups are denied platform access or squeezed out of procurement processes by legacy players, we are no longer operating in a free and fair digital marketplace. We are reinforcing monopolistic behaviour.
South Africa has both the moral authority and institutional experience to lead this agenda. As a country that understands the long-term effects of systemic exclusion, we must ensure our voice is prominent in shaping global digital rules. We should be among the first to adopt and promote the Digital Competition Compact. We should build and scale our Startup Fund. And we should institutionalise startup labs as core elements of government-led digital reform. In doing so, we will not only empower our own entrepreneurs. We will inspire a shift in how the global economy values innovation from the Global South.
Diplomatic engagement has laid important foundations. But as digital inequalities deepen and platform control tightens, we must now choose justice. Not as an abstract ideal, but as a measurable, enforceable, and globally aligned principle. The digital economy must serve everyone, not just the privileged few. If the next billion internet users are to thrive, they must be empowered as creators, not just consumers.
The era of digital diplomacy has passed. This is the era of digital justice.
Prof. Eldrid Jordaan is the Founder of GovChat and Suppple PLC, a Professor of Practice at the Johannesburg Business School, and a member of the SU20 Foundation and Alliance Task Force.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BRICS and G20 poised to reshape geopolitical landscape
BRICS and G20 poised to reshape geopolitical landscape

IOL News

timea day ago

  • IOL News

BRICS and G20 poised to reshape geopolitical landscape

President Cyril Ramaphosa addressing the G20 High Level Opening Session on the margins of the 79th Session of the General Assembly in New York. South Africa assumed the G20 Presidency this year under the theme 'Solidarity, Equality and Sustainable Development'. Image: Kopano Tlape| GCIS Ashraf Patel In 2025, the scale, scope, and velocity of Trumpism are so disruptive that new forms of partnerships are evolving in ensuring the global governance consensus and saving UN Multilateralism. The Global South nations, especially G77, desperately need multilateralism to function and for fair WTO and WHO to work in order to broaden the benefits of trade, financial reforms and any hope for the UN SDGs. The BRICS Rio communique in July is significant. The 130-point plus final declaration, not only thoroughly detailing every major issue, with calculated moderation, but resolutely setting a trademark BRICS tone – and a clear set of humanistic values – focused in three strategic pillars: economy-finance; designing a new global security framework; and cultural and people-to-people exchanges, the over-arching umbrella of inclusiveness and mutual respect. The following week, the G20 Finance Ministers (minus the US ) meeting in Zimbali was unable to reach a consensus statement on key issues of global minimum tax and African debt relief. While both the BRICS and G7 core are members of these groupings, prioritising different themes and modalities is proving illusory. Saving Multilateralism Both G20 and BRICS blocs are converging out of necessity at this moment in time. The BRICS Rio July 2025 declaration is groundbreaking in its scope and depth and committee clarity in saving the UN system and reforming multilateral institutions for common development and humanity, adopting the Leaders framework, declaration on Climate Finance, AI Governance and Partnership on Elimination of Diseases. (BRICS Rio Declaration ) In an age where AI is leading to deepening inequalities and disruptions, the BRICS commitment to AI Governance shows a deep commitment to multilateralism. Aligned to the UN Pact for the Future, the BRICS declaration is rooted in UN principles that balance both Digital Industrialisation, AI inclusion and privacy safeguards. There is good alignment with both G7 and G20 and the new EU AI Act. Ruptures in peace, security and climate pathways Despite these new alignments between both Global North and South formations in saving multilateralism, it is in the area of Peace and Security where major real geopolitics come into play. The BRICS plus is anchored in the Non-Aligned movement, while the core G7 is still committed to preserving Western hegemony. Indeed, the announcement by NATO and EU core states in increasing defence budgets to 5% of GDP - and the drastic cuts in development aid is sobering and will negatively impact the UN Development agenda. Here, realpolitik rooted in geo-political fractures is laid bare in the grave conflicts of Gaza, Ukraine, Sudan, DRC, Libya and numerous war zones. Here, the UN SC have so far failed to find consensus. Groups such as the Hague Group, which are examples of responsible nations committed to international law, are converging to confront the Genocide in Gaza, and such formations can catalyse new UN reforms and preserve the UN Charter. Finance reform and the African Debt crisis Last week's G20 Finance ministers meeting and the lack of any concrete agreement on Africa's debt crisis or global minimum tax expose the lack of coherence in the G20 model. The G20 Common Framework is essential in committing nations to financial reforms. So far, ministers are engaged in merely the 'MDB Roadmaps', essentially talks about talks, a painful road that does not guarantee a global finance and tax deal. Sadly, given that the G20 in 2025 is billed as the African Union's year, its core development agenda relevant to Africa is still elusive, and unlikely to bear fruit. SA is now 'treading lightly 'as we hand over our G20 baton to the Trump administration later this year, which has stated it will ignore most of our G20 agenda. The EU's Climate Moment of Truth arrives. Another area that is unravelling is the pathways to climate change mitigation. The EU, which has been the standard bearer of climate and the 'Just Energy Transition JET agenda, faces its moment of Truth. The scale of scope of Europe's Big Oil scouring Africa is a throwback to the early 20th-century colonialisation of Africa. Today, it's Oil giants - BP, Total, Shell, ENI - are making a big play for oil and gas in African states like Angola, Mozambique and Nigeria. This is akin to the early 20th century great oil frontier. In South Africa, Shell Oil is embroiled in yet another controversial exploration in the Karoo and Northern Cape. Meanwhile, South Africa's leading coal export destination are EU nations including Germany and the UK that are supposedly at the forefront of the Just Energy Transition (JET). The EU and G7's signature JET project is riddled with contradiction and will make the UN COP 30 deal much more difficult, as the EU wants 'Green cake and Oil'. The EU's CBAM program further raises trade barriers for Africa, leading to further deindustrialisation and job losses, thus fuelling the migration crisis northwards. Its glaring contradictions are no longer tenable as the EU is no different from the Trump administration's stated policy- 'Drill Baby Drill'. The EU is drilling for oil in Africa and globally, but not in their backyards. As the Trump 2.0 trade wars and economic nationalism deepens, an unlikely alliance of G20, BRICS and G77 can play a central role in saving multilateralism, the UN and global governance- but each with a vastly different focus and modalities. Will a new consensus emerge and the centre hold or rupture? * Ashraf Patel is a Senior Research Associate at the Institute for Global Dialogue, UNISA. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.

Egypt marks 73rd Revolution anniversary
Egypt marks 73rd Revolution anniversary

Mail & Guardian

time3 days ago

  • Mail & Guardian

Egypt marks 73rd Revolution anniversary

Ties: Egypt's ambassador, Ahmad Sharief (centre) and South Africa's deputy minister Pinky Kekana (centre right) addressed the gathering at the Egyptian embassy. Photos: Marion Smith The Embassy of Egypt in Pretoria commemorated 73 years since the Egyptian Revolution which took place on 23 July 1952. Ahmad Sharief, Egypt's ambassador to South Africa reviewed the historical and symbolic dimension of the revolution, and how it was a major turning point in the path of national liberation, not only in Egypt but also in various parts of the African continent. Sharief condemned the violations of humanitarian law in the ongoing conflict in Palestine. 'On the humanitarian front, Egypt has led the global response to the Gaza crisis,' he said. 'Over the past two years Egypt has been the one country that contributed the most to humanitarian aid getting into Gaza, hosting hundreds of conveys and field hospitals on its territory.' Addressing the audience in isiZulu for a portion of his speech, Sharief stressed the depth of the strategic partnership between Egypt and South Africa, as well as the history of solidarity. Although located at the northern and southern most points of Africa, the two countries share a historical and good relationship based on upholding the principles of liberation, human dignity and the fight against injustice. 'We look to the future, Egypt and South Africa today stand shoulder to shoulder in a new struggle for economic liberation, sustainable development and continental integration.' He said Egypt and South Africa are committed to building a strategic partnership that serves both countries' aspirations of the continent and the Global South. High-level engagements have intensified, the joint committee has been revived and convened (twice in 2022) and preparations are under way for its 11th session in 2026. 'We aim to accelerate the African Continental Free Trade Area, complete the Cairo to Cape Town highway and deepen cooperation under the Brics framework,' the ambassador said. 'We are deeply grateful for South Africa, for supporting Egypt's accession to Brics and for inviting Egypt to this year's G20 deliberations and ensuring Africa's voice is heard.' South Africa's deputy minister of public service and administration, Pinky Kekana, gave an address on behalf of the government and people of South Africa. Reflecting on the longstanding relationship between the two countries, Kekana said: 'Our two countries therefore acknowledge that it is important to further translate the existing good political relations into concrete trade and investment ties between South Africa and Egypt.' She went on to say that more emphasis would be put on expanding cooperation in various sectors including defence, security, law enforcement, energy, mining, petrochemicals, infrastructure and industrial development, pharmaceuticals, information, communication and technology, science and research, as well as agriculture. This decision to expand cooperation came in the aftermath of the 10th Joint Commission for Cooperation held in Pretoria in April 2024 at ministerial level. This year coincides with the 31st anniversary of the resumption of diplomatic relations between Egypt and South Africa after the end of apartheid in 1994. In closing Ambassador Sharief said that the two countries 'are brought together by one spirit — the spirit of liberation, dignity and ubuntu'.

BRICS+ Series: Cuban Tourism Set Back as United Airlines Ends Direct Flights, Brazil steps in
BRICS+ Series: Cuban Tourism Set Back as United Airlines Ends Direct Flights, Brazil steps in

IOL News

time4 days ago

  • IOL News

BRICS+ Series: Cuban Tourism Set Back as United Airlines Ends Direct Flights, Brazil steps in

Brazilian and Cuban flag Image: TV BRICS Cuba's tourism sector, already contending with external pressures and regulatory complexities, faces a new challenge as United Airlines prepares to suspend its only direct flight between Houston and Havana. This development threatens to weaken a key transport link for American travellers outside Florida and could further strain Cuba's tourism-dependent economy. As Cuba navigates this loss, it is simultaneously pursuing alternative partnerships, notably with Brazil through BRICS, to safeguard its visitor numbers and sustain the sector's economic contribution. Cuban Tourism Challenge Cuba's tourism sector is facing a significant challenge following United Airlines' decision to discontinue its nonstop service between Houston's George Bush Intercontinental Airport and Havana's José Martí International Airport. The route, scheduled to cease on 2 September 2025, was the only direct flight to Cuba operated by a U.S. airline based outside Florida. This move comes amid fluctuating demand and ongoing changes in U.S. travel regulations related to Cuba. The cancellation is expected to have a notable impact on travel between the U.S. and Cuba, particularly for tourists from Texas and neighbouring states who have relied on the Houston-Havana route as a key link to the island. Cuba's economy, especially in Havana and surrounding areas, has long depended on American tourism. Visitors from the U.S. contribute substantially to sectors such as hospitality, local transport, and cultural services. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Destinations Impacted Cuban destinations like Old Havana, Varadero, and Trinidad—known for their historical, cultural, and natural attractions—may suffer economically as a result of decreased tourist access. With fewer direct flight options, American visitors may find it more difficult to reach these popular sites, potentially leading to a decline in visitor numbers during off-peak periods. Tourism in Cuba typically peaks during the U.S. winter, when favourable weather encourages travel to the Caribbean. However, in the low season, decreased demand makes certain routes harder for airlines to sustain. United's suspension reflects how seasonal variations and unpredictable market conditions can undermine route viability. Although Cuba has made efforts to attract a broader international audience, American travellers remain among its most important markets. Reduced accessibility from the U.S. could hurt Cuban-owned businesses that rely on foreign spending. At the same time, uncertainty surrounding U.S. policy on Cuba has made it difficult for airlines to plan long-term routes, as travel permissions and restrictions continue to shift under different administrations. With fewer direct links, some U.S. travellers may opt for alternative Caribbean destinations that are easier to access and face fewer regulatory hurdles. This could see Cuba losing ground to regional competitors in terms of tourism numbers. The suspension of the Houston-Havana service reflects wider trends in international travel, where airline decisions are increasingly influenced by political shifts, profitability concerns, and seasonal changes in demand. For Cuba, maintaining its tourism industry may now require expanding ties beyond the U.S. market and forging new partnerships to support its economic recovery. Brazil's Cuban Agreement Brazil and Cuba have taken steps to reinforce their cooperation in the tourism sector during a meeting in Rio de Janeiro, where their respective tourism ministers discussed new strategies to boost mutual visitor numbers, according to an official statement from the Brazilian government. A key item on the agenda was the introduction of a weekly direct flight linking São Paulo and Havana, intended to ease travel between the two nations, which currently often requires layovers in other Latin American countries. The talks also considered reopening a Brazilian branch of Cuba's national tourism agency. This office would not only help promote travel packages but also provide support on trade matters, particularly those involving the supply of products and services vital to the Cuban tourism industry. Brazil's Tourism Minister, Celso Sabino, emphasised the strong historical ties between the two countries and reaffirmed their joint commitment to restoring direct air links. The meeting, attended by representatives from Embratur and the UN Tourism Office for the Americas and the Caribbean, reflected a shared ambition to enhance regional travel connectivity and deepen cooperation in the tourism domain. The termination of the Houston-Havana route highlights the fragility of Cuba's reliance on U.S. tourism amid shifting policy and market dynamics. However, renewed collaboration with countries like Brazil and BRICS offers a potential path forward. By strengthening regional partnerships and diversifying its source markets, Cuba may be able to mitigate the impact of U.S. travel constraints and build greater resilience within its tourism industry. Written by: *Dr Iqbal Survé Past chairman of the BRICS Business Council and co-chairman of the BRICS Media Forum and the BRNN *Cole Jackson Lead Associate at BRICS+ Consulting Group Chinese & South American Specialist **The Views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Independent Media or IOL. ** MORE ARTICLES ON OUR WEBSITE ** Follow @brics_daily on X/Twitter & @brics_daily on Instagram for daily BRICS+ updates

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store