Resolve Telangana-Andhra Pradesh river water issues: Irrigation Minister Uttam to Centre
In a letter to Jal Shakti Minister CR Patil, Uttam said that the Centre should also accord permissions to the pending irrigation projects.
The irrigation minister said that Telangana has not received clearances for the Palamuru-Rangareddy Lift Irrigation Scheme and Dindi Lift Irrigation Scheme. The Centre should also recommend environmental clearances for these two projects, he demanded.
Uttam said that due to the inordinate delay in construction of irrigation projects, the drought-hit farmers could not get the desired results on time. 'If these projects are accorded the required permissions, the state would get Union government grants, financial aid from NABARD and also loans from the financial institutions with lower interest rates,' Uttam explained in his letter.
'Telangana proposed to utilise 45 tmcft water, saved in minor irrigation components, for Palamuru-Rangareddy project,' Uttam said and added that another 45 tmcft was allocated to Palamuru, which Telangana got additionally above Nagarjunasagar, due to the diversion of Godavari waters to Krishna basin by AP.
He recalled that the undivided AP received approval for Dindi LIS in 2007 and it also sent a proposal to the Prime Minister's Office, seeking national project status as well as assistance to mitigate the fluorosis problem.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
17 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Opposition questions Centre on Trump's remarks, verbal attack on Colonel Qureshi
During a special discussion in the Rajya Sabha on Tuesday (July 29, 2025), on 'India's strong, successful and decisive 'Operation Sindoor' in response to terrorist attack in Pahalgam', Opposition MPs asked the Union government to explain why the country had accepted a ceasefire with Pakistan when Pakistan had been on the backfoot. Parliament Monsoon Session: Follow highlights from July 29, 2025 The 'political leadership' of the country had failed to defend the 'military leadership', and no effort had been made to expose the 'Pakistan-China nexus' at global forums, Opposition members alleged. They also questioned the silence of the BJP over a Madhya Pradesh Minister's controversial comments on Colonel Sofiya Qureshi, and the social media attack on Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri and his daughter. Ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA) members and Ministers countered the arguments. Operation Sindoor had proved that giving a befitting answer to terrorism was the 'new normal' for India, unlike in the past Congress governments that 'did not retaliate' even after the terrorist attack in November 2008, they said. India had accepted no third party intervention, and there had been no pressure from foreign powers to announce the ceasefire, Union Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, who initiated the debate, said. Also Read | Plea in Supreme Court seeks removal of MP Minister for 'nauseating' remarks against Colonel Sofiya Qureshi Three terrorists involved in the Pahalgam attack had been eliminated by defence forces, Mr. Singh told the House. India's action was in self-defence, and it was not expansionist, he said. 'India's forces are capable of taking effective action against terrorism this side of the border, as well as on the other side. Pakistan has already witnessed this during Operation Sindoor,' Mr. Singh said, adding that if Pakistan was linked to any terror incidents in future, India would relaunch Operation Sindoor without hesitation. Mr. Singh also condemned 'nuclear blackmail' by Pakistan. 'Some people think that since Pakistan has nuclear weapons, we must only negotiate with them. Because of this nuclear bluff, we have lost countless civilians. Our vision is that we will give a befitting reply,' he said, adding that Operation Sindoor displayed India's new policy against terrorism, and ended the perception that India was a 'soft state'. He said Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations had requested India to stop the attacks, and India had accepted it on the condition that the operation would be suspended, not terminated. The Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha and Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge posed four questions to the Union government, questioning why India accepted a ceasefire even when Pakistan was on the backfoot and what the terms of the ceasefire were. He asked the Centre whether the American government had intervened during Operation Sindoor and at whose behest. He demanded an answer on the allegation that the Operation Sindoor had been stopped against the backdrop of trade threats, as claimed by U.S President Donald Trump. 'Did the U.S. President broker this ceasefire as he is repeatedly claiming, and if so, isn't this against India's 'no third party mediation' policy?' Mr. Kharge said. Also Read | Opposition parties in Lok Sabha question the government on accountability for the Pahalgam terror attack, 'ineffective' foreign policy Mr. Kharge asked Union Home Minister Amit Shah to resign and taking moral responsibility for the 'security lapse' in Pahalgam. 'I would like to ask the Home Minister — who is responsible for this?...What did you do to rectify the mistake?...Vacate your post if you are [responsible]. If not, what action is the PM taking?' the Congress leader said. Mr. Kharge said Prime Minister Narendra Modi and senior BJP leaders had remained silent when BJP MPs and Ministers had insulted India's armed forces. Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) leader Tiruchi Siva and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MP Sanjay Singh also raised this issue, and said the Madhya Pradesh Minister had made insulting remarks about Ms. Qureshi. The silence of top leaders was an approval of the statement, Mr. Siva said. 'How was she being interpreted? She was likened to the sister of militants, the terrorists in Pakistan,' he added. The Supreme Court condemned such remarks, Mr. Siva said. 'Did your party condemn it? Did your Prime Minister, did the leader who leads the nation, condemn that? It should not be done,' he said. Mr. Siva urged the BJP not to communalise 'each and every thing'. The government has asked everyone to applaud our brave soldiers, Mr. Singh said. 'You asked us to bow to honour them and we bowed. What did you do? Your Minister of the BJP government in Madhya Pradesh says the Indian Army's brave daughter Colonel Sofiya Qureshi is the sister of terrorists!' Mr. Siva said. Also Read | In Lok Sabha, Amit Shah hits out at Chidambaram over terrorists' link to Pakistan The country's political leadership did not provide the needed support to the military leadership, senior Congress MP P. Chidambaram said. Many global financial institutions had supported Pakistan with loans after the Pahalgam attacks, and the Indian government had not opposed it, he said. 'Everyone condemned terrorism and sympathised with terror victims in India after the Pahalgam attack, but no country named and shamed Pakistan,' Mr. Chidambaram said, asking the government to take on the joint front of Pakistan, China, and some other players.
Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘One-sided monologue, no discussion': Harjot Bains terms Centre's NEP event in Delhi ‘disappointing'
Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan Tuesday virtually laid the foundation stone of infrastructure projects worth Rs 200.99 crore at the Central University of Punjab (CUP), Bathinda, an event that Punjab Education Minister Harjot Singh Bains said was 'disappointing' and a 'one-sided monologue'. Pradhan laid the stone during the Akhil Bharatiya Shiksha Samagam 2025 (ABSS-2025) in New Delhi, commemorating the fifth anniversary of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. Bains attended the event in Delhi along with CUP Vice-Chancellor Prof Raghavendra P Tiwari. The Union minister virtually laid the foundation stone for five infrastructure projects, funded through the Higher Education Financing Agency (HEFA). These include academic block, 600-seater boys hostel, 400-seater girls hostel, 100-seater international students hostel and V-C's residence. Several of these buildings are designed in compliance with GRIHA-IV norms, incorporating green, energy-efficient, and sustainable features such as sensor-based lighting, solar energy systems, aseismic structures, zero-waste water systems, and full accessibility for differently abled persons. Addressing the gathering virtually, Pradhan said, 'NEP 2020 has reached classrooms, campuses, and communities, ushering reforms in early childhood care, foundational literacy, and holistic education'. He lauded the proactive role of higher education institutions in implementing NEP 2020, particularly in advancing multidisciplinary education, digital inclusion, skill development, and inclusive learning. He highlighted the notable improvements in rural learning outcomes through initiatives like the NIPUN Bharat Mission and emphasized that this progress is the result of collective efforts by educators, students, institutions, and state governments. V-C Tiwari said that these developmental projects will propel CUP towards becoming a world-class institution with state-of-the-art facilities for teaching, research, and student well-being. Bains, however, said that as Punjab's education minister he was 'deeply disappointed' by the event held at Bharat Mandapam in Delhi. 'Education Ministers from across India were invited—but the entire event turned into a one-sided monologue. No discussion at all. This should have been a platform to address: attacks on regional languages like CBSE excluding Punjabi as a main subject (reversed only after Punjab's strong protest). NEP's deeper agenda of eroding states' rights. No national roadmap for AI, coding, data science in education,' Bains said in a post on X. Talking about the July 25 roof collapse at a school in Rajasthan's Jhalawar in which seven students were killed, Bains said it was 'most painful' that there neither was any mention of the incident nor any dialogue on preventing such incidents. 'Such events, without honest dialogue on education, remain ceremonial—not transformational,' he added.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
‘Not in Employees' Benefit': Karnataka Opposes Centre's 10-Hour Workday Proposal
Last Updated: The Karnataka government plans to reject the Centre's proposal to extend daily working hours from 9 to 10 The Karnataka government is all set to reject the Centre's proposal to amend the Karnataka Shops and Establishments Act of 1961, which would extend the daily working hours from 9 to 10, while maintaining the weekly cap at 48 hours. The state government asserts that the proposed change offers no discernible benefit to employees and is currently awaiting a formal decision from the Chief Minister and the Cabinet. Karnataka's Labour Minister, Santhosh Lad, highlighted the state's reservations, emphasising the potential hardship for workers. 'In a city like Bangalore, on average, you need 2 hours to commute, and if they spend 10 hours on the floor, it's 12 hours in a day," Lad stated. 'I don't see this benefiting the employees." He further noted the lack of positive reception to the idea among Human Resources professionals at a recent congregation, where a poll for support yielded no raised hands. The state's rejection of the proposal is grounded in two key arguments—first, labour is a subject under the Concurrent List, granting Karnataka equal policy-making authority and competence; and second, Karnataka's current labour framework already includes provisions for overtime work beyond the standard 9 hours daily and 48 hours weekly. Minister Lad indicated that while the state is open to dialogue if specific industries demand such a change, any discussion would involve careful consideration of employee sentiment and the presence of trade unions. He affirmed his intention to discuss the matter with the Chief Minister before a final government decision. Meanwhile, the Karnataka State IT/ITeS Employees Union (KITU) has claimed victory, attributing the government's current stance to their sustained agitation. KITU, the sole registered union for IT sector employees in Karnataka, stated that they have been leading extensive campaigns against the proposed amendment. In a strong statement, KITU asserted that the amendment was 'a direct attack on a worker's fundamental right to a personal life" and vowed to prevent its implementation under any circumstances. A formal decision on the matter is expected soon from the Chief Minister and the Cabinet. view comments First Published: July 29, 2025, 23:29 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
