logo
Consumed by Epstein, Trump Has Lost Ground on the Economy and Immigration

Consumed by Epstein, Trump Has Lost Ground on the Economy and Immigration

Yomiuri Shimbun21-07-2025
President Donald Trump spent much of last week trying to fend off a revolt in his base over the Jeffrey Epstein case, but he has more than just problems within his own MAGA followers. He has lost ground with the broader public on issues that once were among his strongest attributes.
A year ago, voters saw Trump as a better steward of the economy than Vice President Kamala Harris. His tough talk on immigration appealed to many voters who saw the southern border as out of control and who blamed the Biden administration for the huge influx of undocumented migrants. Now he's getting negative reviews on both.
A new Gallup poll shows a remarkable turnaround in public sentiment about aspects of immigration policy. Other recent surveys find significant dissatisfaction with Trump's handling of the economy. When he was sworn in, Trump promised a new 'Golden Age.' It's clear that, six months into his presidency, the public isn't buying all the hype.
Trump would like nothing better than to point to successes in his second term, and he has had some. The swirling Epstein controversy makes that difficult. Trump has tried to dismiss the controversy as Democratic-manufactured fakery, though this was always an issue generated by conspiracy theorists in the president's base.
He wants Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek the release of pertinent grand jury testimony, a dodge that doesn't address demands for full transparency. For now, he seems stuck, unless his threatened lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal over a story that says he sent a risqué 50th birthday note to Epstein (which he denies) consolidates his base.
The White House would like to change the subject, but when press secretary Karoline Leavitt tried to do that at the top of her Thursday briefing, her lengthy opening statement helped to highlight apparent concerns about public sentiment on both the economy and immigration.
Leavitt reeled off statistics trying to make the case that the economy is working for people. She provided citations of arrests as evidence that Trump is ridding the country of migrants with violent criminal records. It will take more than that to drown out the Epstein controversy and change public opinion about his other policies.
This comes at a moment when the president has notched some clear successes. Congress approved the big tax cut and immigration bill. The Supreme Court has given him some victories, including a green light to fire thousands of federal workers. The airstrike on Iran's nuclear facilities has brought a ceasefire between Iran and Israel and set back Iran's nuclear program. NATO nations have agreed to increase defense spending.
This past week Trump agreed to send Patriot air defense systems to Ukraine, paid for by the Europeans. That decision came after his public complaints about Russian President Vladimir Putin's continued assault on Ukraine and public perceptions that the Russian leader has played the American president on the issue of a ceasefire and settlement of the war.
Trump also has delivered on his campaign promise to tighten security at the U.S.-Mexico border. Illegal crossings are at a low point. His problem is that people don't like other aspects of his immigration policy: the aggressive roundups of undocumented and sometimes legal migrants, the deployment of U.S. military forces to Los Angeles to quell protests, numerous legal battles over the deportations that have pitted the administration against the courts.
All have contributed to the reshaping of public opinion. The result is something Trump could never have imagined when he was sworn in: The public now sees the value of immigration more positively and widespread deportations and the administration's enforcement tactics less positively.
Last year, 55 percent of Americans said they wanted a reduction in immigration, according to Gallup. Today, that's dropped to 30 percent. Gallup also notes that a record 79 percent of Americans say immigration is a good thing for the country. That's a 15-point jump in the past year.
Meanwhile, support for hiring more border agents, which is supposed to happen under the new 'big, beautiful bill' the president signed on July 4, has declined by 17 points in the past year. Support for deporting all undocumented immigrants has dropped nine points, to 38 percent.
In the Gallup poll, support for allowing undocumented immigrants to become U.S. citizens has risen eight points to 78 percent – though that's a bit lower than the 84 percent in 2016. The percentage of Republicans who support a path to citizenship has risen from 46 percent a year ago to 59 percent today.
The Post's average of high-quality polls shows a clear deterioration in Trump's approval rating on immigration. In May, the average showed Americans evenly divided. The average so far in July shows 42 percent saying they approve and 54 percent disapproving.
The protests that erupted in early June appear to be the catalyst for a reappraisal of Trump on immigration. Before the protests, his immigration approval rating was 49 percent positive, 49 percent negative. Since then, the average of the post-protests polls shows his standing at 42 percent positive, 54 percent negative.
Before he was sworn in, public expectations for Trump were highest on the economy and immigration, according to a Washington Post-Schar School poll of swing state voters. In that survey, 62 percent said they expected Trump to do an 'excellent' or 'good' job on the economy and 59 percent said they thought he would do an 'excellent' or 'good' job on immigration. Also, 46 percent said they thought his presidency would help their finances, with 31 percent saying it would hurt them financially.
Until the pandemic took hold in the spring of 2020, Trump enjoyed relatively strong ratings on the economy. Things deteriorated during the pandemic and judgments were about evenly divided just before the 2020 election. Today the public is dissatisfied with his economic performance. An Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs survey last week showed that 38 percent approved of his economic management and 60 percent disapproved. A Quinnipiac University poll put his economic approval numbers only slightly better: 43 percent approving, 55 percent disapproving.
In the AP-NORC poll, nearly half (49 percent) said his policies have done more to hurt them than help them. About 1 in 4 (27 percent) said they have done more to help them. The rest said the policies have not made a difference. A majority said the new tax bill will do more to help the wealthy and that it will hurt people with lower incomes. In the Quinnipiac poll, 40 percent said they approved of his handling of trade, with 56 percent disapproving.
Predictions that Trump's tariffs will trigger a major new bout of inflation have not been borne out, though all the tariffs are not in place. The Federal Reserve has been cautious about cutting interest rates because of the uncertainty around the tariffs.
Trump continues to badger Federal Reserve Chair Jerome H. Powell, whom he would like replaced, to cut those rates substantially. Many economists say a cut of the size Trump wants would risk an inflationary spike. There's history to buttress those concerns. In 1972, President Richard M. Nixon pressured Fed Chair Arthur F. Burns, and the subsequent loosening of monetary policy helped unleash an inflationary rise.
Trump continues to accumulate power in the presidency and exercise it to change government and major institutions. He plays a dominant role in the world. But his six-month report card provides indications that the public hasn't fully bought into his program, warnings that he can't easily ignore.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

LDP, Komeito Eye Steps Against Election Interference; Foreign Bots Said to Spread Misinformation Online
LDP, Komeito Eye Steps Against Election Interference; Foreign Bots Said to Spread Misinformation Online

Yomiuri Shimbun

time11 minutes ago

  • Yomiuri Shimbun

LDP, Komeito Eye Steps Against Election Interference; Foreign Bots Said to Spread Misinformation Online

The ruling coalition on Tuesday agreed to consider strengthening regulations to prevent foreign interference in elections through social media, including possible legal reforms, following the appearance of suspicious posts that spread during the campaign for the July 20 House of Councilors government is also considering strengthening its information-gathering system. The secretaries general of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party and Komeito held talks in Tokyo and reached the agreement. 'Preventing foreign interference in elections is one of the most important issues,' said Komeito Secretary General Makoto Nishida at a press conference following the meeting. False information and misinformation could distort election results. The LDP and Komeito plan to discuss the issue with the opposition parties, eyeing steps including possible revisions to the Information Distribution Platform Law.'We will continue to discuss specific measures in the future,' LDP Secretary General Hiroshi Moriyama said at the press conference. In the upper house election, cases of anomalous dissemination of social media posts were reported to the government by private data analysis companies and others. According to government officials, it is believed that an automated posting program called a bot was used, and posts critical of the government were widely disseminated through a large number of 'likes' and repeated reposts. In Europe and the United States, Russian interference in elections has become an issue. The Japanese government suspects that foreigners were involved in the case of the upper house election.'Our country is also a target of such operations,' said Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Kazuhiko Aoki at a press conference on July 16. The Cabinet Intelligence and Research Office and the National Security Secretariat collect and analyze data related to the spread of false and misleading information believed to be from foreign forces, and not only during elections. However, the system is considered weak compared to that of other countries. 'The government does not have a department specifically assigned to this issue. We need to strengthen our system,' digital minister Masaaki Taira said at a press conference on Tuesday. Within the government, there is a plan to establish a system to tackle the issue centered on the Cabinet Secretariat. The government will consider effective measures in the future. The government plans to strengthen its ability to respond to election interference in cooperation with like-minded countries such as other members of the Group of Seven advanced nations. The government is considering plans to establish a specialized department for 'countering interference in domestic affairs' to share information with like-minded countries and to conduct analyses in collaboration with universities while respecting the 'freedom of expression' guaranteed by the Constitution. 'We aim to further strengthen our response capabilities by collaborating with countries that share the same concerns,' Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya said at a press conference on the same day. 'We will work closely with relevant government agencies to take necessary measures.'

Fed keeps rates steady despite Trump pressure, with two governors dissenting
Fed keeps rates steady despite Trump pressure, with two governors dissenting

Nikkei Asia

time41 minutes ago

  • Nikkei Asia

Fed keeps rates steady despite Trump pressure, with two governors dissenting

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The Federal Reserve held interest rates steady on Wednesday in a split decision that gave little indication of when borrowing costs might be lowered and drew dissents from two of the U.S. central bank's governors, both appointees of President Donald Trump who agree with him that monetary policy is too tight. "The unemployment rate remains low, and labor market conditions remain solid. Inflation remains somewhat elevated," the central bank said in a policy statement after the Federal Open Market Committee voted 9-2 to keep its benchmark overnight interest rate steady in the 4.25%-4.50% range for the fifth consecutive meeting. The statement noted that economic growth "moderated in the first half of the year," possibly bolstering the case to lower rates at a future meeting should that trend continue. But it also said "uncertainty about the economic outlook remains elevated," with risks to both the Fed's inflation and employment goals, language that has anchored its reluctance to cut rates until the path of inflation and jobs becomes clearer. Fed Chair Jerome Powell was careful to keep his options open on monetary policy. "We have made no decisions about September" and have time to take in a wide range of data before the central bank next meets in mid-September, he said in a press conference after the end of the two-day policy meeting. Powell noted current monetary policy is appropriately set at "modestly restrictive" levels, as some risks to the outlook have risen. This week's meeting marks the first time in more than 30 years that two members of the Fed's seven-person Washington-based Board of Governors voted against a rate decision at the consensus-driven central bank, and it will likely stoke debate about how Trump's public pressure to cut rates is playing out at an institution designed to set monetary policy independent of demands from elected officials. Both Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman and Governor Christopher Waller, who has been mentioned as a possible nominee to replace Fed Chair Jerome Powell when his term expires next May, were appointed to the board by Trump and "preferred to lower the target range for the federal funds rate by one quarter of a percentage point at this meeting," the Fed's policy statement said. Powell, a bipartisan figure who was appointed to the Fed's board by former President Barack Obama and later promoted to the top job by Trump, voted to hold rates steady, as did three other governors and the five Fed regional bank presidents who currently hold a vote on the rate-setting FOMC. The Fed's regional bank presidents are hired by local boards of directors who oversee the Fed's 12 regional institutions. Governor Adriana Kugler was absent and did not vote. Dissenting members of the FOMC often release statements explaining their vote on the Friday following Fed meetings. Treasury yields were up in late-afternoon trading after the Fed's policy decision while stocks were on track to close the session down. Futures markets lowered the odds of a rate cut at the central bank's September 16-17 policy meeting. The data since the Fed's June 17-18 meeting has given policymakers little reason to shift from the "wait-and-see" approach they have taken on interest rates since Trump's January 20 inauguration raised the possibility that new import tariffs and other policy shifts could put upward pressure on prices. The unemployment rate is still low at 4.1%, and recent inflation data showed faster increases for some heavily imported goods -- a development policymakers will watch in the coming weeks. The Commerce Department earlier on Wednesday reported that U.S. growth rebounded more than expected in the second quarter, but declining imports accounted for the bulk of the improvement and domestic demand rose at its slowest pace in 2-1/2 years. Trump has berated Powell in particular for not cutting rates to try to lower the government's borrowing costs, a concern outside the Fed's congressionally-mandated goals of maintaining stable inflation and maximum employment.

US imposes 50% tariff on copper pipes and wiring, Trump says
US imposes 50% tariff on copper pipes and wiring, Trump says

Nikkei Asia

timean hour ago

  • Nikkei Asia

US imposes 50% tariff on copper pipes and wiring, Trump says

(Reuters) -- The United States will impose a 50% tariff on copper pipes and wiring, President Donald Trump said on Wednesday, but details of the levy fell short of the sweeping restrictions expected and left out copper input materials such as ores, concentrates and cathodes. U.S. Comex copper futures plunged 19.5% after the announcement, quickly unwinding a premium over the London global benchmark that had grown in recent weeks as traders had assumed U.S. copper mines would see a financial benefit from the tariff. Trump first teased the tariff in early July, implying that it would apply to all types of the red metal, ranging from cathodes produced by mines and smelters to wiring and other finished products. Yet in a proclamation released by the White House, the administration said the tariff will apply only to semifinished copper products and other products that copper is heavily used to manufacture, starting on Friday. "Copper is being imported into the United States in such quantities and under such circumstances as to threaten to impair the national security of the United States," Trump said in his proclamation. The tariffs will exclude copper scrap and copper concentrates, mattes, cathodes and anodes, some of the main products of copper mines and smelters. The move is essentially a boost to Chile and Peru, two of the world's largest copper miners. "The newly announced copper tariffs are far from universal tariffs that markets were concerned about," said Gracelin Baskaran, director of the critical minerals security program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "It's less punitive than markets initially expected." The measure came after a U.S. investigation under Section 232, which Trump ordered in February. The report was delivered to the White House on June 30 by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, according to the proclamation. Trump said he may still impose further tariffs, and has asked Lutnick to provide an update on the domestic copper market by June 2026. At that point, Trump will evaluate whether to impose a phased universal import duty on refined copper of 15% starting in 2027, and of 30% starting in 2028, he said. Along with tariffs, the order calls for steps to support the domestic copper industry, including requiring 25% of high-quality scrap produced in the U.S. to also be sold within the country. Freeport-McMoRan, the largest U.S. copper producer, said it would comment after it reviewed Trump's order in detail. Chile's Codelco, the world's biggest copper producer, praised the exclusion of cathodes as a positive for the company and for Chile, which is the top supplier of refined copper to the U.S. BHP, which operates the world's largest copper mine in Chile, and Antofagasta, which ships copper from Chile to the U.S. and wants to build a U.S. copper mine, did not immediately reply to requests for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store