Is there a post-credit scene in Fantastic Four: First Steps?
The movie is already "certified fresh" on Rotten Tomatoes with an 89% from critics, joining the recent run of superhero successes like Marvel's Thunderbolts* (88%) and the new James Gunn DCU Superman (84%). After a run of underwhelming comic book movie performances, audiences and critics are seemingly responding to this new-and-improved output from both studios.
For those wondering whether or not they need to stick around after the action rolls in The Fantastic Four: First Steps, the answer is a resounding yes.
FYI! NO SPOILERS AHEAD!
There are two post-credit scenes, with one in the mid-credits and one at the end. Much like the Fantastic Four-centered post-credit scene in Thunderbolts*, one of the bonus scenes in this movie was filmed by Joe and Anthony Russo. This makes sense as the brotherly director duo is at the helm for Avengers: Doomsday, which is set to release in December of 2026.
The Fantastic 4: First Steps hits theaters nationwide on Friday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
2 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Marvel Might Finally Be Moving on From One of Its Most Hated Characters
Spider-Man might be one of the most beloved heroes of all time, but his comics haven't exactly been at the top of fans' adulation in the past few years—or rather, at least Spidey's primary book, Amazing Spider-Man, hasn't. Mired in controversy for myriad reasons, even as the book has changed hands and moved into new storytelling eras, disgruntled webheads have spent ages pinning what ails the book on a singular character: Paul Rabin, who might make a pretty decent case for the most unpopular character at Marvel Comics right back in 2022 as a shock twist on Peter Parker and Mary Jane Watson's rekindling of their romantic relationship—something that had broadly remained off-limits in mainline Marvel continuity ever since the aforementioned 'One More Day' storyline in 2007 that saw Mephisto supernaturally erase their marriage from existence in exchange for Aunt May's life—Paul was the son of a mysterious villain called the Emissary from the alternate world of Earth-23321. Hopping through the multiverse battling their version of the Emissary, Mary Jane was forced to send Peter back to Earth-616 without her—only to find when they reunited that multiversal time dilation had led to MJ and Paul spending four years together, adopting two children and falling in love, bringing to an end once more Peter and MJ's relationship. Much to the furor of fans, Paul made his way back to Earth-616 and has continued to be a prominent part of MJ's life ever since. Meanwhile, MJ's life has gotten increasingly hectic recently—after a few issues of mystery, it was confirmed earlier this year that she is the latest host of the Venom symbiote and the star of Al Ewing, Carlos Gomez, and Frank D'Armata's All-New Venom ongoing after months of speculation over who the new Venom could be. Speculation that fans dreaded could include Paul taking on the mantle, despite the fact he's not really had much of a plotline beyond his romantic connection to MJ since the end of the Emissary arc (you know, the one that killed Ms. Marvel so she could immediately get better and be retconned as a mutant to match her MCU iteration—like we said, a series that has been mired in controversy these past few years!). Irritation with Paul's arc remained at a fever pitch: if he could be the new Venom, then he was going to stick around for the foreseeable future and become even more important in the tangled web of Spider-friends, foes, and frenemies. And if he wasn't, he wasn't really being given much to do narratively other than, in the eyes of fans yearning to see MJ and Peter back together again, exist as a human-shaped doorstop preventing that from happening. All that brings us to today's All-New Venom #9, which climaxes with a conversation between MJ and Paul that has been brewing for a long time in the background of the series. Stressed by both MJ's current life as Venom and the rigors of acting as guardians for Eddie Brock's estranged son, Dylan, Paul attempts to apologize to MJ for being part of the reason she bonded with the symbiote in the first place and the resentment they've both felt at the situation (especially, in Paul's case, MJ hiding her identity as Venom from him for a while). Wanting to commit to their relationship, Paul tells her he loves her… only for MJ to tell him that she's done with trying to make their struggling relationship work, ending the issue by breaking up with him. There'll be no popping bottles for Spider-Man fans just yet, however. Even if Paul and MJ's relationship really is over and the final pages of All-New Venom #9 aren't a cliffhanger fakeout, things are not exactly peachy between MJ and Peter Parker right now, either. Amazing Spider-Man #9, also out this week from Joe Kelly, Michael Dowling, and Marte Gracia, picks up a few weeks after the prior issue saw Peter get his ass handed to him by a mysterious armored entity known only as Hellgate. Nursing an injured leg, the issue details that Peter has grown distant from those in his life and his duties as Spider-Man, focusing on his work at Rand Enterprises rather than crime-fighting or even talking to Aunty May and his current girlfriend, Shay Marken. Just as All-New Venom #9 did this week, the issue climaxes with MJ having an awkward, long-awaited conversation. Appearing outside Peter's apartment on Aunt May's behalf, the tone is frosty between her and Peter, even before MJ finally reveals to him that she is the new host of Venom. Instead of being shocked or surprised, or even reacting much at all, Peter turns his back on her and slams his door shut, telling MJ that she and Venom deserve each other. Womp womp. Spider-Man may not be getting an MJ and Peter romance again any time soon, it seems. Well, outside of the pages of Ultimate Spider-Man… well, until that ends with its 24th issue at the end of this year. Regardless of where Paul goes now in terms of either MJ's or Peter's stories, the relationship drama that has defined much of Peter's messy social circles over and over throughout his long comics history is going to stay messy for now… whether fans want it to be or not. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what's next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.
Geek Tyrant
2 hours ago
- Geek Tyrant
Mr. Fantastic and His Powers Were Underutilized in THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS; He Deserved Better — GeekTyrant
The Fantastic Four: First Steps missed a huge opportunity with one of Marvel's most visually creative superheroes. Reed Richards, aka Mister Fantastic, is supposed to be a stretchy powerhouse with abilities that defy the laws of physics. In the film, though, those powers are barely touched. What should've been a display of inventive, wild, and over-the-top visuals turned into a muted, limited showcase that felt more like an afterthought than a highlight. Now, credit where it's due, the film did a decent job of portraying Reed's intellect and leadership. He's thoughtful, composed, and clearly the brain of the group. But that's only half the picture. In the comics, Reed has a subtle charm and awkward charisma that makes him both relatable and admirable. That side of his personality was barely explored. He didn't need to crack jokes or go full Tony Stark, but a bit more emotional depth and nuance would've made him feel more alive. The biggest letdown, though, was how the film's creative team handled his powers. Mr. Fantastic can stretch, mold, twist, flatten, inflate… you name it. There are comic book moments where he's used his body as a net, wrapped himself around massive cosmic entities like Galactus, and turned into practically any shape needed to solve a problem. But in the film, his powers a very underutilized and limiting. At one point in the film we are watching Galactus strech Mr. Fantastic like a rubber band and he's screaming in pain. When you see how far is stretching ability goes in the comics, Galactus stretching him like that shouldn't have been an issue for him because it was nothing compared to what we've seen him do in the comics! We barely see any of those cool visuals from the comics in this film. His action moments are stiff and uninspired. Instead of showing Reed's resilience, it just made him look weak. The movie ignored everything fans know about how cool and versatile his powers really are. The creativity behind Reed's abilities is what makes him stand out in the superhero landscape. His power set should be a director's playground. You can do so much with the elasticity and adaptability of his body, yet the movie seemed afraid to go there. We didn't see him shape-shift in creative ways, use his body as a shield or slingshot, or even do something as simple as multitask with extended limbs in a high-stakes moment. They kept his abilities small, which is the opposite of what Mr. Fantastic should be. At the end of the day, The Fantastic Four: First Steps didn't give Mister Fantastic the treatment he deserved. His powers were underused, his moments of brilliance were too few, and his potential was left on the table. Reed Richards is a genius, yes, but he's also a one-man Swiss Army knife of superpowers. Hopefully, future film will fully embrace what makes Mister Fantastic truly fantastic.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
'The Worst Movie Of 2025': Ice Cube's War Of The Worlds Hits 0% On Rotten Tomatoes
We may receive a commission on purchases made from links. It's rare for a piece of entertainment to bring the entire internet together anymore. Usually, there's some contrarian corner of the web ready to defend even the most maligned release — or to tear apart something that's being widely praised. But when it comes to the new "War of the Worlds" adaptation (did we even need another one?) that's now available on Prime Video and starring Ice Cube, let's just say that it's uniting critics and audiences in a way that you hardly ever see anymore, with most agreeing that this is easily the worst movie of 2025. Where to even begin with this one: Much of it consists of Ice Cube reacting to disaster scenes playing out on a computer screen. The Amazon product placement in the movie, from delivery drivers to drones to gift cards, is so overt it's cringe-worthy. The movie's tagline ("It's worse than you think") works on multiple levels, and the bottom line is that there's no mystery at all as to why this "War of the Worlds" version is currently sitting on a 17% Rotten Tomatoes audience score and a 0% critics' score. Obviously, it begs the question: How did this get made? Read more: 59 New Movies Are Now Streaming On Prime Video - Here Are 3 Worth Watching Amazon's War Of The Worlds Is The Alien Disaster Nobody Asked For From its early-2000s Syfy Channel visuals to its Amazon-heavy plot, this "War of the Worlds" is being described by Rotten Tomatoes reviewers as "psychotic," "pointless," and "a career low" for everyone involved. Needless to say, Ice Cube isn't able to salvage what one Letterboxd user has described as a "screenlife fever dream that feels like it was written by someone featured on 'Doomsday Preppers'." It's not just bad. It's bad in a way that arguably ought to offend audiences, that a company would think so little of you it assumes you'll make time to watch this. As one YouTube commenter summed up perfectly: "When the star of 'Hunger Games' hates your movie, you know you messed up." Prime Video may have banked on star power (the cast also includes Eva Longoria and Clark Gregg) and a nostalgic title, but instead, they've unleashed a cultural event so bad that the internet can't stop talking about it. Audiences on Rotten Tomatoes have torn into it with ferocity: "Possibly the worst film I've ever tried to watch, did they just call it in whilst sat at home on a rainy Sunday?" "Were the actors paid in free Prime memberships?" "Nothing makes sense... You need an IQ below potato to not start laughing at every attempt made by the writers." My favorite zinger, though, comes from this YouTube commenter: "It's rare I miss the logic and clear thinking of the 'Sharknado' movies." Because, obviously — when a movie manages to make people nostalgic for "Sharknado," you know something's gone so wrong. Read the original article on BGR.
