‘Capable of making our own decisions. No need for third person': Uddhav Thackeray on alliance with Raj
Speaking to reporters in Delhi during his ongoing visit for the INDIA bloc meeting, the former Maharashtra chief minister said, 'We… are capable of making our own decisions. Whatever we have to do, we will do. There is no need for any third person.'
Uddhav Thackeray's remarks came in response to questions about whether Raj Thackeray would attend the INDIA bloc meeting or meet Congress leader Rahul Gandhi during his stay in the capital. The comments have added fuel to the ongoing speculation about a Sena UBT-MNS alliance ahead of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections.
This comes weeks after Uddhav and Raj Thackeray shared a platform – their first in nearly two decades – where both leaders targeted the BJP-led governments at the Centre and in Maharashtra, particularly over issues related to the Marathi language.
While no formal announcement has been made, the possibility of an alliance between the Thackeray cousins has triggered debate about the future composition of the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) and whether the MNS might be integrated into the broader INDIA alliance.
Uddhav Thackeray also used the occasion to criticise the Narendra Modi government on several fronts. Referring to former US President Donald Trump's tariff hike on Indian goods, he said, 'Trump mocks India and imposes 50 per cent tariffs, yet Prime Minister Modi remains silent. Who is running the country?'
He also questioned Modi's upcoming visit to China, saying, 'After the Galwan clash, there was a campaign to boycott Chinese goods. Now the PM is visiting China – is this for the benefit of his industrialist friends?'
On ties with Pakistan, the Sena UBT chief took aim at continued cricket diplomacy, remarking, 'As long as terrorism continues, there should be no relations with Pakistan. Watching cricket in Dubai is not patriotism.' The comment was seen as a veiled dig at ICC chairman Jay Shah, son of Union Home Minister Amit Shah.
Responding to PM Modi's recent remarks that he is willing to pay a personal price to protect farmers' interests, Uddhav Thackeray said the statement was opportunistic. 'When farmers marched to Delhi, they were labelled Naxals. Some even died. Now, with elections approaching, they are being remembered,' he said.
He also recalled that his father, the late Bal Thackeray, was once stopped from coming to Delhi during a hunger strike. 'He was met with barricades, bullets, and was called a Naxal too,' Uddhav Thackeray said. 'But now the Centre's lies are slowly being exposed.'
Meanwhile, the INDIA bloc meeting, hosted at Rahul Gandhi's residence, is expected to focus on key poll issues, coordination for upcoming elections, and the Vice Presidential race.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
18 minutes ago
- India.com
Pakistan Suffers Rs 1,240 Crore Loss After Airspace Ban On Indian Flights: Report
After India suspended the Indus Water Treaty on April 23 in response to the gruesome Pahalgam terror attack, Pakistan closed its airspace to Indian-registered aircraft. However, according to a local media report, Islamabad has suffered massive financial losses after the shutdown as the Pakistan Airports Authority (PAA) lost over Rs. 1,240 crore (PKR 4.1 billion) in over two months. According to ANI, Dawn reported the figure of losses, citing a statement by the Pakistan Ministry of Defence in the National Assembly on Friday. Furthermore, as per the report, the closure came into effect from April 24, when Islamabad withdrew overflight permission for all Indian-registered aircraft and those operated, owned, or leased by Indian carriers. The closure of airspace has backfired on the Pakistani economy. According to the Dawn, the revenue of PAA from overflying charges plunged between April 24 and June 30, nearly affecting 100-150 Indian aircraft daily and slashing Pakistan's transit air traffic by almost 20 percent. Also Read: '6 Pak Aircraft Were Downed During Operation Sindoor': Air Force Chief Pakistani Ministry Admits Financial Losses The Pakistani Defence Ministry has admitted the financial losses but attempted to justify the decision to close airspace for all Indian aircraft and said, "Sovereignty and national defence take precedence over economic considerations." Meanwhile, the officials also claimed that the measures issued by Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs) were for "strategic and diplomatic" reasons. According to the ministry's data, PAA's average daily overflight revenue in 2019 was 508,000 dollars, compared to 760,000 dollars in 2025, meaning the ban is costing Pakistan far more now than during the previous standoff, Dawn reported. Pakistan Airspace Closure Pakistan's airspace is open to all except Indian airlines and aircraft, and the ban has been extended twice and is now set to last until the last week of August. Furthermore, Indian carriers continue unaffected on other international routes, while Pakistani airlines are still barred from entering Indian airspace. India-Pakistan Tensions On April 22, terrorists gunned down 25 Indian citizens and one Nepali citizen in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam. The incident sent shockwaves through the nation. The responsibility for the attack was claimed The Resistance Front (TRF), an offshoot of Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), however, later it distanced itself from the incident. After this, New Delhi took several diplomatic measures against Islamabad, and the airspace closure was a part of the same. India banned all Pakistani-operated, owned, or leased aircraft, including military flights, from entering Indian skies from April 30.
NDTV
18 minutes ago
- NDTV
BJP Shreds Rahul Gandhi After Air Force Chief Rejects 'Hands Tied' Charge
New Delhi: With Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh rejecting the Opposition's charge that 'Air Force's hands were tied' during Operation Sindoor, the BJP has launched a scathing attack on senior Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, accusing him of lying and damaging India's reputation. Addressing the Parliament during the Operation Sindoor debate, Mr Gandhi, Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha, had alleged that the Centre had asked the Indian Air Force not to attack Pakistan's air defence system. "You told our pilots, go and attack and face the air defence system of Pakistan. Meaning, you tied their hands behind their back," he had said. In his address yesterday, the Air Force Chief said political will was one of the key reasons for the success of Operation Sindoor, launched to avenge the cold-blooded murder of 26 innocents in a terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam. "I am being very, very candid here, very open here, because I hear various versions of it. I think, if I tell you something, people will have to believe. Because I was there listening to everybody, attending every meeting. There was very clear political will, very clear directions, which were given to us. And there were no kind of restrictions which were put on us," the Air Force Chief said in a lecture yesterday, during which he also confirmed that six Pakistani aircraft were downed during the operation. "Many people have spoken somewhere. Unfortunately, you know, everybody is speaking about it. So, there have been talks about: Was there any restriction? Were you kept constrained? If there were any constraints, they were self-made. We, the forces, decided what will be our rules of engagement. We, the forces, decided what will be the escalation ladder that we want to ride on. We decided how we want to control the escalation. So, I want to make it very clear, there were no, I repeat, no restrictions on us. Full freedom was given to us to plan and execute," Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh said. The Air Force Chief's remarks prompted the BJP to launch a scathing attack on Mr Gandhi. I request Rahul Gandhi ji to maintain the decorum of India's Parliament. Why do you keep lying all the time? I have witnessed many Leaders of Opposition who had maintained Parliamentary standards. You have not only lowered your stature but damaged India's high reputation! — Kiren Rijiju (@KirenRijiju) August 9, 2025 Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju urged Mr Gandhi to maintain the decorum of the Parliament. "Why do you keep lying all the time? I have witnessed many Leaders of Opposition who had maintained Parliamentary standards. You have not only lowered your stature but damaged India's high reputation," he said. Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said the Air Chief Marshal's remarks should "put the Congress party to shame". "First, their leaders peddled lies on India's losses whereas we now have quantifiable, detailed and irrefutable proof on the wrath inflicted upon the enemy. Second, they ran another Pak-originated disinfo campaign claiming the Modi Govt put restrictions on the operational capability of our forces. This, too, has been debunked comprehensively," he said. Mr Gandhi had claimed that India lost fighter aircraft because the government did not give a free hand to the forces. Following the Air Force Chief's remarks, senior BJP leader Amit Malviya said there is a "deathly silence" in the Congress and Pakistan media. "With this disclosure, whatever little credibility the Leader of Opposition had is now in tatters, if he had any to begin with," he said.
Mint
18 minutes ago
- Mint
Man resigns soon after first pay; HR calls it ‘unethical', netizens says ‘nothing wrong'
An Instagram post by an Indian HR professional has sparked debate online after they claimed an employee resigned just minutes after receiving their first salary. 'Salary credited at 10:00 AM, resignation emailed at 10:05 AM,' the post read. The HR professional said the company's HR team had spent hours on the employee's onboarding, while their team had invested weeks in training them. 'Let's talk about professional ethics. The company welcomed you, trusted you, and gave you a platform to grow. And then—five minutes after your first salary hit your account—you walked away. Was that fair? Was it ethical?' she wrote. Criticising the sudden resignation, the HR professional said such behaviour reflected 'a lack of intent, maturity, and accountability,' and urged workers to be honest if they feel a role or company is not the right fit. 'If something didn't feel right: You could've spoken up. You could've asked for clarity or help. You could've made a conscious exit, not a convenient one. No job is 'easy'. Every role takes commitment, patience, and effort. Growth doesn't come with your first paycheck — it comes with perseverance,' the post read. 'So before pointing fingers at 'culture' or 'role mismatch,' Pause. Reflect. Communicate. Because in the end, your professionalism is defined not by your post — but by your actions.' The post drew mixed responses. Some supported the employee, arguing that salaries are payment for work already completed. 'Could not disagree more. When corporations start putting their employees first, the employees will start putting their companies first,' one LinkedIn user wrote. Another commented: 'Ethics? Let's be clear: salaries are paid for work already done — not for charity, not in advance. If someone resigns after getting paid, it means they fulfilled their obligation for that month.' Others compared the case to sudden layoffs. 'How is it justified to terminate employees in the middle of the month without proper notice or explanation?' one user asked. Another wrote: 'Nothing wrong'
