
Education reform or political expediency: BJP questions CPM's intentions
Rajeev Chandrasekhar is an Indian entrepreneur, politician, and technocrat serving as the state president of the BJP Kerala. He has over two decades of political experience. Chandrasekhar was a Minister of State for Electronics and IT, Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, and Jal Shakti in the Narendra Modi government. He served three terms as a Rajya Sabha MP from Karnataka and held positions as the BJP's national spokesperson and vice-chairman of the NDA's Kerala unit.
In an exclusive interview to The Hindu, Rajeev Chandrasekhar criticizes the CPM's sudden shift in supporting private universities in Kerala, labeling it as opportunistic and a compromise on ideological grounds. He highlights the party's history of opposing reforms, only to later adopt them. Mr. Chandrasekhar praises the National Education Policy (NEP) for modernising higher education and transforming India into a global knowledge superpower. He emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in university governance, suggesting the inclusion of Governor's nominees in university senates.
Excerpts from the interview
As the BJP State President, can you share your party's stance on the Private Universities Bill passed by the Kerala government? How do you perceive the LDF's sudden shift from opposing privatisation to embracing it with social regulation?
This sudden focus on education after presiding over nine years of neglect, apathy, and violence in campuses, while welcome, is too little, too late.
The Left in general, and the CPM in particular, have a long history of initially opposing reforms - be it the mechanisation of agriculture, technology, the Kochi International Airport, or the Vizhinjam Sea Port, only to embrace them once in power. The same pattern holds for private universities. History reminds us that they now quietly adopt what they once vehemently opposed.
So, the CPM's current support for private universities, after years of resistance, comes as no surprise. It was the SFI brigades, nurtured by the very same CPM, who attacked career diplomat-turned-educationist, T. P. Sreenivasan, accusing him of promoting the 'commercialisation of higher education.' This label, often thrown around by the Left, has long been their default response to any form of educational reform. Sreenivasan's only 'offense' was attempting, as Vice Chairman of the Kerala State Higher Education Council, to bring foreign universities to the state.
We've also witnessed the CPM's glaring insincerity: while ordinary SFI cadres were beaten on the streets across Kerala for staging strikes over baseless allegations of higher education privatization, the children of party leaders — including Pinarayi Vijayan — were comfortably pursuing degrees in private institutions outside the State.
The CPI(M)'s current, stark departure from its long-standing opposition to the privatization of education is nothing short of opportunistic, a clear case of sacrificing its own ideological principles for political convenience.
In contrast, the National Education Policy (NEP) envisioned by Prime Minister Narendra Modi represents a bold and forward-looking attempt to modernize higher education. Rooted in Indian ethos and aligned with global best practices, the NEP is designed to transform India into a global knowledge superpower. As the Prime Minister aptly said, NEP 2020 is 'the nation's intellectual renaissance, more than a reform.' It aims to build a self-reliant and globally competitive India through education and innovation — laying the foundation for a skilled, empowered nation as we move toward the vision of a Developed India by 2047, during the 'Amrit Kaal.'
In the meantime, it remains unclear how well the provisions outlined in the Kerala State Private Universities (Establishment and Regulation) Bill, 2025 align with or support the broader national vision set forth by the NEP.
Does this change in stance indicate a pragmatic approach or a compromise on ideological grounds? Furthermore, will the BJP support or contest this bill, and what are the key concerns or suggestions your party has regarding the implementation of private universities in Kerala?
It's quite clear that the CPM's shift in stance on private universities is nothing but a complete compromise of the very ideologies they had preached for years.
It indicates simply this - that they were wrong all this while and have now woken up. Meanwhile for several years students have fled to universities outside the state - which is why as one newspaper reported upto 30% of undergraduate seats are vacant
There are allegations that the implementation of the Four-Year Undergraduate Programme (FYUP) under the BJP's New Education Policy (NEP) compromise the quality of higher education in India due to inadequate groundwork and potential politicization of the education sector?
That is not an allegation - that's political misinformation and propaganda being pushed by some parties. The truth is this - NEP 2020 has introduced the Four-Year Undergraduate Program (FYUGP) as the new standard for bachelor's degrees, replacing the traditional three-year format. This transformative shift is designed to offer a more comprehensive and flexible education, allowing students to exit at various stages with recognized qualifications. For example, students can receive a certificate after one year, a diploma after two years, and a bachelor's degree after three years.
The four-year degree can also lead to a bachelor's degree with research. One of the most empowering aspects of FYUGP is the flexibility it offers: students can design their own degree by selecting subjects across different disciplines, tailoring their education to their interests and career goals and give them flexible and evolving career choice decision making.
Any program on its initial phase of implementation will have teething challenges which can be resolved, through determination and vision for the future and that is what will happen in the FYUGP also.
Does the University Amendment Bill passed by the Kerala Legislative Assembly strike a balance between accountability and autonomy, or does it undermine the independence of universities by significantly curtailing the powers of Vice-Chancellors and Chancellors, potentially jeopardizing academic freedom and institutional self-governance?
The CPM government in Kerala is infamously known for its ongoing tussle with the Governor, who, as per the Statutes, serves as the Chancellor of universities. Clearly, its reputation is not to improve the quality of the State's higher education and research sectors. Instead, it is marked by a tendency to appoint party loyalists, often with questionable competencies, in key academic positions, including vice chancellors, members of the senate, and other academic bodies. There are numerous instances where close relatives of political leaders have been 'gifted' positions at universities, ranging from assistant professors to researchers.
In this context, I fail to see how the current amendments will lead to any significant improvements in the quality of education.
Should the Governor's nominees be included in the university senate to ensure transparency and accountability in the university's functioning, given the Governor's role as Chancellor and the potential for disputes with the state's political executive?
Yes, including the Governor's nominees in the university senate can enhance transparency and accountability, especially considering the Governor's constitutional role as Chancellor of state universities.
The inclusion acts as a counterweight to potential political interference by the state executive. It ensures that university governance doesn't become monopolized by any single political ideology. His/her nominees can offer a more balanced, non-partisan view in academic decision-making. Governor's nominees, often academics, educationists, or experienced professionals, can bring diverse expertise, helping improve institutional standards and integrity.
Ironically, while state governments often claim to protect university autonomy, we know much that CPM in particular has politicized universities, campuses and education. Having Governor-nominated members helps restore equilibrium and protects academic spaces from becoming political or violence battlegrounds.
As the former Minister of State for Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, you've played an important role in India's skill development landscape. Kerala faces a unique challenge in bridging the gap between education and employability. What strategies would you propose to address this issue, and how do you plan to leverage your experience to promote entrepreneurship and skill development in the state?
The future will look very different from today. Countries, including India, see their youth as their most valuable assets. I often say, Investments will go to where skills are, and youth with skills will go to where opportunities are. So skills and talent aren't outlier issues. These are core to a state's competitiveness and capability to attract investments and for growth.
Skill development and upskilling of youth in India are crucial for enhancing employability and preparing them for the digital age. The Narendra Modi government is committed to equipping our young people with the necessary skills, particularly in light of India's demographic dividend and the opportunities presented by digital transformation.
The Future Ready, Job Ready Skills program, under the Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY), aligns with the visionary goal of Viksit Bharat by 2047, as outlined by PM Narendra Modi. The initiative targets 4 lakh youth in Kerala over the next three to four years, ensuring they are equipped with the relevant skills.
Kerala has the highest unemployment rates among all states. After decades of Congress and Left government rule, this is the legacy left for generations of Kerala's youth. According to the Periodic Labour Force Survey, an alarming 47.1% of females and 19.3% of males in the prime working-age group are unemployed.
This is the current situation: a lack of investment has led to a shortage of employment opportunities, causing many young people to migrate from Kerala to other states and countries—often to work in risky and sometimes unsafe conditions.
It is time for the youth of Kerala to shine with future-ready skills. Kerala should progress along with other parts of India, and a better future must be created for our youth. Investors should be encouraged to come here; this will be the immediate mission for BJP in Kerala.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
4 minutes ago
- Time of India
Air India plane crash: US Secretary of State Marco Rubio 'heartbroken' over fatal tragedy that left over 200 dead
A London-bound Air India plane carrying 242 passengers and crew crashed in a residential area in Ahmedabad minutes after taking off. The aircraft, carrying 242 people, from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick crashed immediately after takeoff on Thursday afternoon. More than 200 people are feared killed. There were 169 Indians, 53 British, one Canadian and seven Portuguese nationals onboard apart from 12 crew members. Police said there appeared to be no survivors, according to news agency AFP. Several videos posted online showed an aircraft rapidly losing altitude -- with its nose up -- before it hit a building and exploded into an orange ball of fire. Authorities said it went down outside the airport perimeter, in a crowded residential area while an AFP reporter in the city said the plane crashed between a hospital and the city's Ghoda Camp neighbourhood. ALSO READ: Air India plane crash: What is Mayday call that pilot issued before fatal tragedy in Ahmedabad? Marco Rubio on Air India plane crash UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio were among scores of world leaders who offered condolences to the people of India in wake of the plane crash in Ahmedabad on Thursday. "Heartbroken to hear the news of a tragic plane crash in Ahmedabad, India. My prayers are with all who lost their loved ones in this horrible incident." Live Events — SecRubio (@SecRubio) Investigators with the US National Transportation Safety Board will travel to assist Indian counterparts probing the brutal Air India crash, the agency announced Thursday. "The NTSB will be leading a team of US investigators travelling to India to assist... with (the) investigation into the crash of an Air India Boeing 787 in Ahmedabad, India," the agency said on X, adding that under international protocols, "all information on the investigation will be provided by the Government of India." ALSO READ: 2024 US Presidential election is under scrutiny as lawsuit claims discrepancies in Rockland County, New York Meanwhile, the UK government said it was sending a team to support the investigation into the Air India crash in Ahmedabad that has killed more than 200 people. "The UK Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) has formally offered its assistance to the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, India. We are deploying a multidisciplinary investigation team to India to support the Indian led investigation," the AAIB said in a statement. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
4 minutes ago
- Business Standard
We are exploring path to reset ties: MEA on India-Canada relations
Describing Indian and Canada as "vibrant democracies", the external affairs ministry on Thursday said New Delhi believes the forthcoming meeting between the prime ministers of the two countries on the sidelines of the G7 Summit will offer an important opportunity to exchange views and explore pathways to reset bilateral ties. Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said this in response to a query during his weekly media briefing. "Our Prime Minister had received a call from the Canadian Prime Minister last week. During the call, Prime Minister Mark Carney invited Prime Minister (Modi) to attend G7 (meeting), and as you are aware the invitation has been accepted," he said. The call was also an occasion for the two prime ministers to reflect or talk about India-Canada relations, and how it can be taken forward, the MEA spokesperson said. Canada will be hosting the crucial G7 meeting later this month. "India and Canada are vibrant democracies, which are bound by shared democratic values and steadfast commitment to the rule of law. And, of course, very vibrant people to people ties," Jaiswal said. "We believe that the forthcoming meeting between the two leaders on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in Canada will offer an important opportunity for them to exchange views on bilateral and global issues, and explore pathways to set or reset the relationship, based on mutual respect, shared interests and sensitivity to each other's concerns," he said.


News18
6 minutes ago
- News18
Vijay Rupani Killed In Air India Crash: Which Other Indian Leaders Died In Aviation Mishaps?
Last Updated: Several tragic aviation accidents have claimed the lives of notable Indian leaders, including sitting and former chief ministers, union ministers, and key political figures Among the confirmed fatalities of Thursday's tragic Air India crash is Bharatiya Janata Party leader Vijay Rupani. Rupani, who served as the 16th chief minister of Gujarat from 2016 to 2021, was reportedly en route to London. His demise marks the second time Gujarat has lost a former CM in an aviation tragedy. Several tragic aviation accidents have claimed the lives of notable Indian leaders, including sitting and former chief ministers, union ministers, and key political figures. Balwantrai Mehta (1965): The second chief minister of Gujarat, Balwantrai Gopalji Mehta, tragically died in September 1965 during the Indo-Pakistani War. His civilian Beechcraft aircraft, flying from Mithapur to the Kutch border, was mistakenly shot down by a Pakistan Air Force pilot. He died along with his wife, staff members, a journalist, and the crew. Mohan Kumaramangalam (1973): An influential parliamentarian and former union minister, S Mohan Kumaramangalam, died when Indian Airlines Flight 440 crashed near Delhi on May 31, 1973. His body was identified only by his Parker pen and a hearing aid. Sanjay Gandhi (1980): The younger son of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and a rising star in the Congress party, Sanjay Gandhi, died in a plane crash on June 23, 1980. He was piloting a Pitts S-2A aircraft, reportedly performing aerial acrobatics near Safdarjung Airport in Delhi, when the aircraft lost control and crashed. His untimely death brought a sudden end to what many believed was the political heir apparent to the Gandhi dynasty. Surendra Nath (1994): The then governor of Punjab and acting governor of Himachal Pradesh, Surendra Nath, along with nine members of his family, died when the government's Super-King aircraft crashed into high mountains in bad weather on July 9, 1994, in Himachal Pradesh. Madhavrao Scindia (2001): A towering Congress figure and a nine-term Member of Parliament, Madhavrao Scindia, then a former union minister, was travelling to a political rally in Kanpur on September 30, 2001, when his private Beechcraft aircraft crashed in Uttar Pradesh's Mainpuri district. The fire-engulfed wreckage left all eight on board dead. GMC Balayogi (2002): The then Speaker of the Lok Sabha, GMC Balayogi, died on March 3, 2002, when the Bell 206 helicopter carrying him crashed into a pond near Kovvadalanka village in Andhra Pradesh's Krishna district. Poor visibility was cited as a contributing factor. OP Jindal and Surender Singh (2005): Industrialist and then Haryana power minister OP Jindal, along with the state's agriculture minister Surender Singh, perished when their King Cobra helicopter crashed near Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, on March 31, 2005. They were en route to Chandigarh from Delhi. YS Rajasekhara Reddy (2009): Popularly known as YSR, the then chief minister of Andhra Pradesh, YS Rajasekhara Reddy, died on September 2, 2009, when his Bell 430 helicopter crashed in the dense Nallamala forest due to bad weather. His body was traced 27 hours after the helicopter went missing. Dorjee Khandu (2011): The then chief minister of Arunachal Pradesh, Dorjee Khandu, died in a helicopter crash on April 30, 2011, while flying from Tawang to Itanagar. After a five-day frantic search across dense West Kameng forests, his wrecked Pawan Hans chopper was discovered. Poor aircraft conditions and challenging terrain were believed to have contributed to the fatal incident.