logo
Swear on your wife: UP minister to Samajwadi Party MLA claiming poor water supply

Swear on your wife: UP minister to Samajwadi Party MLA claiming poor water supply

India Todaya day ago
"Swear on your wife", Uttar Pradesh Minister Swantantra Dev Singh said to Samajwadi Party MP MLA Mohammad Fahim Irfan after the latter alleged irregularities and improper implementation of the Centre's Jal Jeevan Mission, during the Question Hour of the state Assembly on Tuesday.A heated exchange took place during the Question Hour between Jal Shakti Minister Swatantra Dev Singh and SP MLA Fahim Irfan.advertisementThe drama unfolded after Fahim Irfan alleged that the water supply scheme under the Jal Jeevan Mission was not being implemented properly in several villages.
He claimed that in many areas, water supply had not reached households and water tanks were in poor condition, with some even collapsing. He further accused the minister of providing false information about the department's work.Reacting sharply, Minister Swatantra Dev Singh rose from his seat and challenged the MLA to "swear on your wife" if no work had been done under the scheme.Singh asserted that water was indeed reaching villages as planned. His remarks sparked an immediate reaction in the House.Undeterred, Irfan reiterated his allegations, stating that there was no water supply in several districts, especially in western Uttar Pradesh. He told the minister to verify his claim by speaking directly to village sarpanchs (village heads). "Choose any district of western UP; you will see there is no water supply to the villages. If this is not true, I will resign," Irfan declared.The verbal duel highlighted the ongoing political tension between the ruling BJP and the Akhilesh Yadav-led SP over the pace and effectiveness of government schemes in rural areas.The Jal Jeevan Mission, launched by the central government, aims to provide tap water connections to every rural household by 2024. In UP, the state government has repeatedly claimed significant progress under the scheme.However, opposition parties, including the SP, have often accused the government of exaggerating achievements and failing to address ground realities. Tuesday's heated moment reflected the depth of disagreement on the issue, with both sides standing firm on their claims.- EndsMust Watch
IN THIS STORY#Uttarakhand
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Over 13 lakh houses sanctioned for poor in last three years: Uttar Pradesh minister
Over 13 lakh houses sanctioned for poor in last three years: Uttar Pradesh minister

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Over 13 lakh houses sanctioned for poor in last three years: Uttar Pradesh minister

LUCKNOW : More than 13 lakh houses have been sanctioned over the last three years for the poor, underprivileged, and destitute in Uttar Pradesh , Rural Development Minister Vijay Laxmi Gautam informed the state Assembly on Tuesday. She was replying to a question by Samajwadi Party member Arman Khan during Question Hour on the second day of the Monsoon Session. Gautam said that between 2022-23 and 2024-25, 10,44,876 houses were sanctioned under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana , while 2,62,594 houses were approved under the Mukhyamantri Awas Yojana . She said that a survey is underway and has covered 57.73 lakh people so far. The process of allotting houses will begin soon, she added.

Supreme Court To Hear Plea On J&K Statehood Restoration On August 14
Supreme Court To Hear Plea On J&K Statehood Restoration On August 14

NDTV

timean hour ago

  • NDTV

Supreme Court To Hear Plea On J&K Statehood Restoration On August 14

New Delhi: The Supreme Court would on Thursday hear a plea for the restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir. A bench of Chief Justice of India B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran is likely to hear the matter, according to the causelist. On December 11, 2023, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld the revocation of Article 370, even as it ordered that assembly elections be held in Jammu and Kashmir by September 2024 and its statehood be restored "at the earliest". Last year, a plea was filed in the top court seeking directions to the Centre for the restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir within two months. The application was filed by Zahoor Ahmad Bhat, an academician, and Khurshaid Ahmad Malik, a socio-political activist. "It is submitted that the delay in the restoration of statehood would cause serious reduction of democratically elected government in Jammu and Kashmir, causing a grave violation of the idea of federalism which forms part of the basic structure of the Constitution of India," the application said. The assembly elections and the Lok Sabha polls were conducted peacefully in Jammu and Kashmir without any incident of violence, disturbance or any security concerns being reported, it said. "Therefore, there is no impediment of security concerns, violence or any other disturbances which would hinder or prevent the grant/restoration of the status of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir as had been assured by the Union of India in the present proceedings," the plea said. The non-restoration of the status of statehood of Jammu and Kashmir, the plea said, would result in a lesser form of elected democratic government to the state, particularly given legislative assembly results were declared on October 8, 2024. Despite the supreme court's directions for the restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir "at the earliest and as soon as possible", no steps have been taken by the Centre to provide any timeline for the implementation of such directions, it claimed. "Jammu and Kashmir is being operated as a Union Territory for a period of almost five years now, which has caused many impediments and grave losses to the development of Jammu and Kashmir and has affected the democratic rights of its citizens," the plea added. In its December 2023 verdict, the supreme court held that Article 370, which was incorporated in the Indian Constitution in 1949 to grant special status to Jammu and Kashmir, was a temporary provision. The President of India was empowered to revoke the measure in the absence of the Constituent Assembly of the erstwhile state whose term expired in 1957, the court said.

No arrest yet in Fatehpur mausoleum case; locals barred from talking to outsiders
No arrest yet in Fatehpur mausoleum case; locals barred from talking to outsiders

The Print

timean hour ago

  • The Print

No arrest yet in Fatehpur mausoleum case; locals barred from talking to outsiders

Media entry has been banned in the area, and locals have been barred from speaking to outsiders. A one-kilometre radius around the mausoleum has been cordoned off with eight barricades, an officer said on Wednesday. Kanpur (UP) Aug 13 (PTI) Police were yet to arrest anyone booked in connection with vandalism of a mausoleum in Fatehpur's Abu Nagar locality, where plainclothesmen roamed the streets talking to the locals to prevent a communal flare-up. Members of Hindu right-wing outfits vandalised a mausoleum in Fatehpur district on Monday, claiming it to be a temple site where they had the right to pray. On Tuesday, police booked more than 150 people, 10 of them named, for damaging public property and disturbing the peace. The 10 named in the FIR are Dharmendra Singh (Bajrang Dal), Abhishek Shukla (BJP), Ajay Singh (district panchayat member), Devnath Dhakad (BJP), Vinay Tiwari (municipal councillor), Pushpraj Patel, Rithik Pal (BJP), Prasoon Tiwari (BJP), Ashish Trivedi, and Pappu Chauhan (Samajwadi Party). An officer said searches are on to locate those named in the FIR and the 150 unidentified. Police, however, arrested the Congress's city president, Arif alias Gudda, along with his several supporters, for holding a protest, demanding the arrest of the vandals. Congress's district president, Mahesh Dwivedi, was also placed under house arrest early in the morning when a party delegation comprising two former MLAs planned to visit the site, another senior officer said. Dwivedi condemned the action as 'dictatorial' and accused the administration of acting as a 'silent spectator' while the mausoleum vandalism happened. Samajwadi Party MP Naresh Uttam Patel condemned the incident and said he had sent a letter to Union Home Minister Amit Shah, seeking an investigation by an independent agency into the matter. Police in plainclothes are roaming sensitive areas near the mausoleum, interacting with locals and monitoring the activities of both communities, an officer said. Tensions flared briefly administration denied the burial of Wahidul Nisa, a local woman, near the site. She was buried later at a different place under police supervision. Vijay Shankar Shukla, head of the Tameshwar Temple Mela Committee, has claimed that the mausoleum was 'Thakur Siddhpeeth Temple.' He warned of a large-scale protest if members of the Hindu community are arrested. Inspector General of police (Prayagraj) Ajay Mishra has also begun an inquiry into possible lapses in police response, recording the force members' statements, an officer said. The mausoleum's caretaker (Mutawalli), Mohammad Nafis, said that the structure is nearly 500 years old and was built by Emperor Akbar's grandson. PTI COR ABN VN VN This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store