In the Fray of Divisive Elections, Young Voices Bring Hope
Several political parties and candidates in the House of Councillors (upper house) elections held on July 20 promoted slogans like "zero illegal foreigners" and "Japanese First."
It may well be the first time in Japan's modern national elections that such statements — seen by some as xenophobic — have been so widely and openly expressed.
As is well known, in many Western countries, conservative-leaning parties advocating "citizens first" policies have made major gains. Some nations have even begun enforcing the removal of undocumented foreign residents.
The rise of similar rhetoric in Japan may be part of a global trend that has gained momentum may be part of a longer global trend punctuated by the election of United States President Donald Trump and his "America First" doctrine.
At the time of writing this column, the results of the Upper House election were not yet known.
However, even before the vote, comments emerged from within the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) that could be interpreted as an apparent admission of defeat. Voters listen to a campaign street speech on July 5 in Saitama Prefecture. (©Sankei by Naoki Aikawa)
According to the Yomiuri Shimbun on July 16, LDP Public Relations Chairperson Takuya Hirai remarked that following the election, there would be "a National Diet that can't decide anything and an endless era of darkness."
While Hirai is free to express such views, one must ask: who was he trying to benefit with such pessimistic remarks? He sounded more like a detached political commentator than a key figure in the ruling party during an election campaign.
Even if Japan were to face a so-called "dark era" politically, that would not mean the value of Japan itself is lost in darkness. There is always hope. JAPAN Forward has consistently conveyed this sentiment in its reporting.
The following essay is from the first article in our new feature series, IGNITE, launched in June. The goal of the series is to share the voices of Japanese students with the world. Through this, we hope global readers will gain deeper insight into what Japan's next generation of leaders are thinking, hoping for, and striving toward in these times. IGNITE #1: Be a Global Catalyst for Communications
The first installment features winning entries from the Institute for International Business Communication (IIBC) high school English essay contest, held annually since 2009.
Leading the series is an essay by Tetsu Den, then a second-year student at Ashiya Gakuen Senior High School. He won the 2023 contest's top honors: the Grand Prize and the America-Japan Society President's Award.
Den, a Japanese student born to a Chinese father and a Korean mother, studied in Canada as part of a school project. He arrived in Canada feeling anxious and uncertain about his identity, but was warmly welcomed by his host father abroad. Through conversations with him, Den came to realize that what he once saw as inner conflict was actually a source of strength. Tetsu Den, winner of the Grand Prize and Japan-America Society President's Award for his English essay. Den wrote about what he learned from a homestay in Canada. (©IIBC)
He captured this experience in his English essay. Upon receiving his award, he commented: "When I wrote the essay, I seriously considered how I should be as an international person from now on, and was able to recognize once again the greatness of communication between different cultures."
JAPAN Forward's core readership includes Gen Z and millennial youth in Asia who are interested in Japan, as well as generations working at the center of society around the world.
In today's uncertain times, we hope Japanese youth will connect with their global peers and help shape a new future. This hope is at the heart of the IGNITE project.
Moving forward, IGNITE plans to feature not only IIBC participants but also students speaking out in a variety of other contexts.
As written in the Bible, the world's most widely read book, "The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it." (John 1:5).
Rather than lament or criticize the intensified rhetoric around immigration seen during the Upper House elections as a "dark age," JAPAN Forward aims to create platforms where the next generation can shine and engage in constructive dialogue. We seek to work alongside them to bring light to the future.
Watch for the next issue on August 18.
JAPAN Forward is a small media outlet driven by an unparalleled passion to advance the future of Japan and its role in the world. For inquiries on supporting students through our IGNITE project, please call 0570-033-433 (Sankei iD) or email us at info@japan-forward.com.
このページを 日本語 で読む
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada News.Net
an hour ago
- Canada News.Net
After Ukraine, is this country the Wests next project
Moldova one of the most volatile countries in the post-Soviet space in recent years now risks becoming Europes next front line The current Moldovan government has embraced a pro-NATO course and openly casts Moscow as the country's primary national security threat. At the same time, it is working to sever all remaining ties with Russia and fully align itself with the Western bloc. Moscow, for its part, has repeatedly warned - as it did with Ukraine - that NATO's eastward expansion crosses a red line. The Transnistria dilemma Parliamentary elections are scheduled for late September, and the pro-Western PAS party, led by President Maia Sandu, will do everything in its power to retain control of the government. If they succeed, Moldova is likely to see further militarization and escalating tensions with Russia - potentially leading to open conflict. Even more alarming is the possibility that Sandu might attempt to 'reintegrate' Transnistria - a breakaway region with a population of around 220,000, the majority of whom hold Russian passports. Roughly 10,000 Russian troops are stationed in the region, which borders Ukraine's Odessa oblast, making it a flashpoint not only for Chisinau and Moscow, but also for Kiev. Ukrainian journalist Dmitry Gordon, a close associate of Vladimir Zelensky, recently spoke openly about resolving the "Transnistria issue" by military means. A Greek supply route? Any military move by Moldova against Transnistria would, in effect, trigger a direct confrontation with Russia. In that case, Greek ports like Alexandroupolis and Thessaloniki are expected to become key NATO logistics hubs - much like they are today in support of Ukraine. According to credible reports, NATO already has contingency plans in place to turn Greece into the primary weapons transit point for Moldova in Southeastern and Eastern Europe. This deepening involvement could also make Greek infrastructure a target. Moscow has previously issued veiled but pointed threats to Athens over its role in supplying Ukraine. A similar scenario could unfold again. Such developments would undoubtedly intensify the NATO-Russia standoff. So far, despite Ukraine receiving a significant portion of Western military aid via Greek territory, Moscow has refrained from direct strikes on Greek soil. But that restraint may not last forever. Over time, Greece has become a strategic NATO hub for operations on the alliance's eastern flank and within Ukraine. The port of Alexandroupolis, in particular, plays a pivotal role thanks to its position on the Balkans and its overland connections to Bulgaria, Romania, and Central and Northern Europe. Since early 2022, it has served as a vital artery for the flow of US and NATO equipment to Ukraine. Rising tensions across Europe Any new confrontation layered on top of the ongoing war in Ukraine dramatically increases the risk of destabilizing the entire European continent. A second front would likely bring a new wave of hybrid threats - cyberattacks, sabotage, strikes on critical energy and transport infrastructure - and fuel yet another migration crisis, especially in Southern Europe, which is already struggling with refugee flows. Most crucially, a war in Transnistria could reignite other frozen conflicts across the Balkans - in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, North Macedonia, and even Cyprus. Some analysts believe Türkiye might seize the opportunity to push its revisionist agenda, particularly in Cyprus. Moldova's NATO ambitions The West has had its eye on Moldova for some time. Since 2022, the EU has been supporting Chisinau through the European Peace Facility. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas recently announced a €60 million military aid package that includes short-range air defense systems, radar equipment, armored vehicles, drones, personal protective gear, and communications systems. According to Moldova's 2034 defense strategy, the country plans to deepen NATO cooperation and raise defense spending to 1% of GDP by 2030. In the past two years, Chisinau has adopted a series of national security and defense policies based on the assumption that Russia poses the greatest threat. President Sandu, a vocal supporter of Ukraine and close ally of Zelensky, has adopted an overtly anti-Russian stance. From 2023 to 2024, Moldova doubled its defense budget and launched a sweeping modernization of its armed forces. Western media report that EU countries have delivered eight air defense batteries, German armored vehicles, French artillery systems, and large quantities of ammunition. Joint exercises with NATO militaries have also surged - all signs of accelerated militarization. Last year, reports emerged that the US, France, and Germany had provided Moldova with $1.5 billion worth of weapons and supplies, including Piranha armored personnel carriers, tactical vehicles, light and heavy weaponry, sniper systems, ammunition, and Polish-made Piorun MANPADS (portable air defense systems). Military aid is expected to increase by another 50% in 2025. NATO is also preparing to ramp up its use of the Greek defense industry - particularly Hellenic Defense Systems, which is effectively controlled by the Czech holding company CSG, a major supplier to the Ukrainian military. This text was originally published by the Greek media has been translated and edited by the RT team.
Canada News.Net
an hour ago
- Canada News.Net
India's garments sector faces tariff challenge, country needs bold reforms: GTRI's Ajay Srivastava
New Delhi [India], August 1 (ANI): With the US administration under President Donald Trump imposing 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods plus an unspecified 'penalty', India's textile and garment sector is likely to face stiff competition from Bangladesh and Vietnam, who have been hit with comparatively lower tariffs, Ajay Srivastava, founder of trade think tank Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), has said. 'Bangladesh and Vietnam are big players in garment exports and have a better tariff position than India. This puts our textile and garment industry at a disadvantage. The same concern extends to leather goods,' Srivastava told ANI in a product-wise analysis of the US tariff impact. While labour-intensive sectors like textiles and leather are expected to feel the heat, India's auto components, steel, and aluminium industries are likely to remain relatively unaffected, as the tariff levels on these items are broadly comparable across competing nations, he argued further. Critical sectors such as pharmaceuticals, electronics (including smartphones), and petroleum products have been kept exempt from the fresh tariff measures, he claimed. Overall, India has a 6-8 per cent disadvantage in comparison to other key Asian countries competing for market share in the US, according to Srivastava. To deal with this challenge, Srivastava argued that India must move beyond tariff negotiations and trade agreements, and instead focus on bold domestic reforms. 'If we manufacture good quality products at competitive prices, they will sell -- with or without a trade deal. Look at China, it exports massively without relying on trade agreements,' he said. He recommended a strong focus on reducing the cost of manufacturing and improving ease of doing business. 'Internal reforms are now essential. It's time for serious measures,' he added. Srivastava also cited the European Union's upcoming Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), effective from 2026, as an example of growing global protectionism. He suggested India diversify revenue sources by boosting tourism, which he said could offset tariff-related export losses. 'Tourism has the potential to generate double the revenue we may lose from US tariffs,' he said. Over the past few months, India and the US have been negotiating for an interim trade deal, but there were some reservations from the Indian side on the US demand for opening up the agricultural and dairy sectors. Agriculture and dairy are critical for India as these two sectors provide livelihood opportunities to a large section of people. On Wednesday, President Trump announced the imposition of 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods plus an unspecified penalty, even as there were hopes of an interim India-US trade deal that would have otherwise helped avoid elevated tariffs. India and the US initiated talks for a just, balanced, and mutually beneficial Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) in March this year, aiming to complete the first stage of the Agreement by October-November 2025. On April 2, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order for reciprocal tariffs on various trade partners, imposing varied tariffs in the range of 10-50 per cent. He subsequently kept the tariffs in abeyance for 90 days, while imposing a 10 per cent baseline tariff. The deadline was to end on July 9, and the US administration later pushed it to August 1. US President Donald Trump had imposed reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries with which the US has a trade deficit. Since assuming office for his second term, President Trump has reiterated his stance on tariff reciprocity, emphasising that the United States will match tariffs imposed by other countries, including India, to 'ensure fair trade'. On Thursday evening, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal made a statement in both houses of the Parliament, stating that the government is examining the impact of tariffs and will take all necessary steps to safeguard the national interest. (ANI)
Canada News.Net
an hour ago
- Canada News.Net
India refutes Trumps claim it stopped buying Russia oil
New Delhi has stated that its energy purchases are driven by market dynamics and national interest India's foreign ministry has rejected US President Donald Trump's claim that New Delhi has halted purchases of Russian oil. The Indian government is unaware of any specific developments regarding Indian oil companies pausing Russian imports, the ministry stated, noting that the country's energy purchases are guided by market dynamics and national interests. "The government is committed to prioritizing the welfare of Indian consumers. Our energy purchases will be based on price, availability and market conditions," the ministry added. The remarks came hours after Trump claimed India had stopped purchasing Russian oil. "I understand that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard, I don't know if that's right or not. That is a good step. We will see what happens," he told reporters in Washington, DC. Washington on Thursday imposed a 25% tariff on goods imported from India, as well as an additional penalty for purchasing crude oil and military equipment from Russia. Trump and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio criticized India for continuing to import the discounted oil despite Western sanctions, claiming New Delhi was "helping to sustain the Russian war effort." RubiocalledIndia's energy trade with Russia "most certainly a point of irritation" in Washington's relationship with New Delhi. India's position has long been that its energy trade is guided by its national interest and the need to sustain the rapid economic growth of its 1.4 billion people. New Delhi officials have on many occasions stated that by ramping up purchases of Russian oil despite enormous pressure from the West, India has helped global markets avoid sharp increases in crude prices.
