BJP bringing up Katchatheevu issue to divert attention from Centre's failure to secure T.N. fishermen's rights: TNCC chief
Tamil Nadu Congress Committee (TNCC) president K. Selvaperunthagai on Saturday said the BJP was raking up the 50-year-old Katchatheevu issue to divert attention away from the Union government's failure to ensure Tamil fishermen don't face violence and harrassment from the Sri Lankan Navy.
In a statement, Mr. Selvaperunthagai said External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar was trying to cover-up the actions of the Sri Lankan Navy against Tamil Nadu fishermen over the last 11 years of BJP rule at the Centre.
He also clarified that Katchatheevu was not ceded to Sri Lanka during Emergency. 'The External Affairs Minister has made factually incorrect statements. Emergency was not in effect when the agreement [to cede the island] was signed on June 26, 1974. On July 23, 1974, the then External Affairs Minister Swaran Singh tabled a report in the Lok Sabha and addressed Parliament. All political parties, including the BJP, participated and voiced their opinions,' he said.
'After the Congress government, did Prime Minister Vajpayee, during his six-year tenure, or Prime Minister Modi, during his 11-year rule, ever hold talks with the Sri Lankan Prime Minister about reclaiming Katchatheevu? If Katchatheevu was truly the root cause of the fishermen's problems, the Indian government should have raised this with Sri Lanka,' Mr. Selvaperunthagai added.
He said: 'Tamil Nadu fishermen are not arrested near Katchatheevu. Instead, they are arrested when they unintentionally cross the maritime boundary into Sri Lankan waters, especially during nighttime fishing. Therefore, the BJP government must hold talks with Sri Lanka to secure fishing rights in those waters based on the livelihoods of Tamil Nadu's fishermen.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Marathi Sahitya Mahamandal to join protest against language imposition
The Akhil Bharatiya Marathi Sahitya Mahamandal on Saturday announced its participation in a protest rally scheduled for July 5 in Mumbai, opposing the government's decision to introduce Hindi or other Indian languages as compulsory subjects from Class 1 onwards. The announcement was made by the Mahamandal president, Prof Milind Joshi. Joshi pointed out that although the education minister had earlier announced a pause on implementing the language policy, the State government later issued an official notice reaffirming its April 16 decision. Joshi noted that this was done without consulting education experts, language advocacy organisations, or the state's own language advisory committee. (REPRESENTATIVE PHOTO) Joshi, however, clarified that the rally is not affiliated with any political party. 'The Mahamandal has no political interest. Our sole objective is to protect the Marathi language and ensure it continues to thrive with pride. We are not against any language, but we oppose the imposition of any language,' he said. He also pointed out that although the education minister had earlier announced a pause on implementing the language policy, the State government later issued an official notice reaffirming its April 16 decision. Joshi noted that this was done without consulting education experts, language advocacy organisations, or the state's own language advisory committee. 'This disregard for expert opinion and scientific research on language learning highlights the government's insensitivity towards Marathi-speaking citizens,' he said. He further stressed that introducing a third language at the primary level adds a cognitive burden on children, who already struggle with Marathi and English. 'At such a young age, students perceive any non-native language as foreign, and it hinders learning. Child psychology supports this view,' he explained. 'Even though Marathi and English are mandatory up to Class 10, many students in Class 8 still struggle with reading in their second language,' Joshi said.
Indian Express
31 minutes ago
- Indian Express
After video with ‘second wife', Uttarakhand's ex-BJP MLA suspended by party for ‘indecent conduct'
Former BJP MLA from Jwalapur, Suresh Rathore, has been expelled from the party for six years for alleged 'indecent conduct'. According to the state media in charge of the BJP, Manveer Singh Chauhan, the party had taken cognizance of a viral video on social media showing Rathore with his second wife, without having divorced his first wife. Calling it 'indecent conduct', he said the party had issued him a show-cause notice, seeking an explanation for his conduct. The video of the former MLA went viral on social media, wherein he is with the Saharanpur-based actress Urmila Sanawar, introducing her as his second wife. This had led to objections from the Congress after they called it a violation of the Uniform Civil Code. The code prohibits polygamy. Chauhan said that the response submitted by Rathore was not satisfactory to the organisation. 'He was found guilty of repeatedly violating the party's code of conduct and social decorum. Acting on the directions of state president Mahendra Bhatt, he has been expelled from the party for six years,' Chauhan said. After his video had stirred controversy, Rathore backtracked from his statement and said that it was part of a film. The Congress spokesperson, Garima Dasauni, said that this was an example of the BJP's immoral politics and double standards. 'If it was truly an act, then should we now believe that every public behaviour of BJP leaders is scripted like a film? And if it was real, then was the party's show-cause notice nothing but a farce?' Dasauni had said earlier this week. She added that the BJP initially remained silent, and only when public outrage grew over the former ruling party MLA's violation of the Uniform Civil Code did the party issue a notice. 'This once again exposes the BJP's opportunistic politics and its pretense of seriousness towards women's dignity,' she added. Aiswarya Raj is a correspondent with The Indian Express who covers South Haryana. An alumna of Asian College of Journalism and the University of Kerala, she started her career at The Indian Express as a sub-editor in the Delhi city team. In her current position, she reports from Gurgaon and covers the neighbouring districts. She likes to tell stories of people and hopes to find moorings in narrative journalism. ... Read More
Indian Express
35 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Tavleen Singh writes: In praise of Democracy
In the week gone by, this newspaper has paid special attention to the Emergency. Long articles have been written by politicians and journalists who remembered what happened during those 19 months 50 years ago, when democracy was replaced by dictatorship. As someone who got my first job in an Indian newspaper barely a month before Indira Gandhi imposed press censorship, I value those 'dark days of the Emergency' because it was that time that taught me to revere democracy. It disturbed me last week that so many Congress leaders tried to defend the indefensible, in their puzzling compulsion to please their ruling family. What this revealed for everyone to see was the pathetic sycophancy of senior Congress party leaders. They should be ashamed. The Emergency cannot and must not be defended because it caused lasting damage to our democracy. The pillars that are supposed to hold up democracy were all weakened, and it was then that the practice of turning political parties into family businesses began. This very bad idea has flourished since then and the more it has flourished, the weaker it has made our political parties and Parliament. As a country we should have achieved a lot more than we have in our 75 years of existence as a modern nation. We have failed to provide our citizens with such basic things as clean water to drink and clean air to breathe. Our cities look like filthy, sprawling slums and our villages look worse. We have failed to build halfway decent schools and hospitals for those who cannot afford to pay for private services. But what shines amid these many failures is that we have managed against all odds to keep democracy alive in a neighbourhood of military dictatorships and theocracies. Speaking of theocracies, it saddens me that the United States and Israel ended their war in Iran without a regime change. Since he became Supreme Leader in 1989, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has presided over a ruthless theocracy that has spread jihadist terrorism across the world and terrorised Iran's own people. The Ayatollah's regime has tortured thousands of women for the crime of not wearing a hijab 'properly' and his prisons are filled with thousands of people who have raised their voices against his brutal policies. Some have languished in jail cells for decades. Others have been hanged. In between our borders and Iran is a country that is like Iran but led by military men instead of priests, and unlike Iran already has nuclear weapons. The Generals who are Pakistan's real rulers crush dissidence with violence and have used their army to spread jihadist terrorism, with India being the main target of their evil efforts. When you look at India on this wider canvas, you see how good we look and the reason for this is our democracy. This is why it is worrying that there are so many politicians, both on the Left and the Right, who believe that democracy is what has held India back. In the 40 years that this column has existed, I have had the dubious pleasure of interviewing many political leaders. Conversations with Leftist Congress leaders have gone something like this — 'You see we cannot develop our infrastructure and our services in the way China can because we are a democracy, and this has often been a stumbling block.' On the Right, there are voices in the BJP that express similar misgivings about democracy and many secretly admire Indira Gandhi, whatever they might say publicly about the Emergency. As for ordinary Indians, it shames me to admit that I have talked to far too many people who believe that what we need is a 'benevolent dictator'. This is nonsense but I am willing to bet that you have met as many Indians who believe this as I have. By an odd coincidence, on the day that I was writing this column, I happened to see on social media a clip of the famous 'Ich bin ein Berliner' speech by John F Kennedy on June 26, 1963, in West Berlin. This was nearly two years after the Berlin Wall was built by the Soviet Union to make sure that the people of East Berlin did not flee to the West. It is one of the finest speeches about democracy that any politician ever made. Kennedy says, 'Freedom has many difficulties and democracy is not perfect, but we have never had to put a wall up to keep our people in, to prevent them from leaving.' It is a speech that should be compulsory reading for Indian politicians. As for me, if there is one thing that I truly believe, it is that if India had not been a democracy, however flawed our institutions have become because of the Emergency, we may not have survived as a nation. If we have not fragmented in the way the Islamist Republic next door has long hoped we would, it is because democracy has been the glue that has held us together. Far from being the obstacle to progress that some of our politicians believe it has been, it is because of our democracy that India exists. We may not be the 'Mother of democracy' as our Prime Minister likes to tell the world, but in modern times, we have been a democratic republic, and this is something we should all be proud of. Democracy is something that we must cherish.
