Analysis - Hindi Row: D Fadnavis' Masterstroke Or Thackeray Brothers' Win?
The withdrawal of the government resolution regarding the teaching of Hindi in Maharashtra's primary schools is being viewed differently across the state's political spectrum. For over two weeks, political opposition to the resolution had been gathering momentum, with protests set to culminate in a march in South Mumbai.
However, the Devendra Fadnavis government appears to have defanged the opposition by withdrawing the resolution a week before the planned march.
For the uninitiated, the controversy erupted last month when the Maharashtra government issued a resolution to comply with the Three-Language Formula as per the Union government's new education policy.
According to the resolution, students from classes one to four would have to study Hindi as the default third language if there were not enough students to study other languages.
Raj Thackeray, the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief, was the first to object, alleging that it was a subtle ploy to impose Hindi on Maharashtra. Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena (UBT) also announced its opposition. Last week, both Raj and Uddhav Thackeray announced separate events to protest; however, they later decided to participate in a single protest march from Girgaon to Azad Maidan.
On Sunday, Mr Fadnavis announced that the resolution had been withdrawn and a committee would be formed to devise a new formula.
Many political pundits believe this is a masterstroke by Mr Fadnavis, as he has robbed the opposition of a key issue ahead of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) polls.
Had the government not softened its stance, say critics, the MNS and Shiv Sena (UBT) could have capitalised on the issue significantly.
However, Raj and Uddhav Thackeray portray the decision as their victory. Their supporters claim that the Fadnavis government's adamant approach could have alienated Marathi voters.
There are also whispers in Maharashtra's political corridors that the entire protest was a "fixed match" between the BJP and the MNS. This suspicion arose because, before the MNS announced its protest, a closed-door meeting took place between Fadnavis and Raj Thackeray at Hotel Taj Lands End in Mumbai. Some suspect the resolution was deliberately issued to allow the MNS to revive its political relevance by protesting against it.
A revived MNS could dent Shiv Sena (UBT)'s vote bank if a truce between the Thackeray cousins does not materialise.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Court denies interim relief to Samajwadi MLA over remarks praising Aurangzeb
The Bombay High Court on Monday declined to grant interim relief to Samajwadi Party MLA Abu Azmi in connection with FIRs filed over his remarks praising Mughal ruler Aurangzeb. The court, however, issued notices to the Maharashtra government and the complainants who had lodged the case stems from comments made by Azmi during the last Budget session of the Maharashtra Assembly, where he praised Aurangzeb at a time when actor Vicky Kaushal's film Chhava was in the spotlight. Azmi was later suspended from the session following a political two FIRs were filed against him—one by Naresh Mhaske, a first-time Shiv Sena (Eknath Shinde faction) MP from Thane, and the other by Kiran Nakti, Vibhag Pramukh of Shiv Sena in Navpada, Thane. The complainants cited an interview in which Azmi had allegedly praised Aurangzeb, saying he was a good administrator under whose rule India was known as the 'Golden Sparrow' and that India's GDP was 24 per cent, attracting British interest in the further claimed that Azmi had said the Indian borders extended to Burma and Afghanistan during Aurangzeb's reign and that people had gold in their homes, prompting the British to come to complaints also mentioned that Azmi said Aurangzeb's army had Hindu commanders and that the battles he fought were not between Hindus and Muslims. Azmi allegedly added that the current ruling political party in India aimed to destroy Muslims, which, the complainants argued, created communal tension and hurt Hindu religious for Azmi, advocate Mubin Solkar informed the bench that two FIRs had been registered against his client. 'The FIRs have been filed by Azmi's political opponents with respect to certain comments made by him. Both the FIRs are identical, not even a word is different. Only complainants' names are different,' Solkar reviewing the FIRs, the bench comprising Justices AS Gadkari and Rajesh S Patil directed the issuance of further requested the court to stay the filing of a chargesheet against Azmi as an interim measure. However, the bench responded, 'Then what will happen?' and refused to grant such relief. The court has scheduled the next hearing on Azmi's plea after four weeks.- EndsMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Maharashtra
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
MyVoice: Views of our readers 1st July 2025
Language matters a lot, Mr Modi The new three-language policy was scrapped by the Devendra Fadnavis government because the pushback from the people of Maharashtra was so strong. This, in effect, means that learning Hindi is now not compulsory in the primarily Marathi-speaking State. Learning a third language stipulated in the new education policy, for all practical purposes, means learning Hindi despite all the obfuscation. The three-language policy is a ploy to introduce Hindi in a subtle manner. Mindful of the fact that language is a highly emotive issue and a political minefield, the central government ought not to have attempted to bring in Hindi through the back door. People are intelligent enough to see through its game. It is a fallacy to say that uniformity is a sine qua non for unity. The worst of it all is that the government is testing the non-Hindi speaking people's love of their mother tongue and culture and their will to resist by imposing Hindi on them and attempting a sort of insidious cultural invasion. Hindi is only one of the many Indian languages and knowing or speaking it is no determinant of one's Indianness. The attempt to substitute English with Hindi as the lingua franca is bound to flounder and fail in the pluralist India with space for all languages, religions, ethnicities and cultures. The Narendra Modi government should change its world view and its language policy. G David Milton, Maruthancode (TN) Only the nameless suffer during stampedes Stampedes have become a tragic ritual in India. Successive governments, be it the BJP or Congress, follow the same tired script. 'Arrangements were perfect, but the crowd was larger than expected.' Then come the token gestures: suspend a few junior officials, announce compensation, and move on. Religion is now a hyper-commercialised spectacle. Even Lord Jagannath might struggle to make sense of it. Ironically, it's never the VIPs or organizers who suffer—only the nameless, faceless devotees. N Nagarajan, Hyderabad Prioritise public safety No celebration should end in tragedy. The Puri Mahaprabhu Jagannath Rath Yatra stampede, which claimed three lives and injured 50, highlights the need for effective crowd management. This tragic incident was a result of negligence, mismanagement and the alarming absence of police personnel at the time of the stampede. Despite advanced technology, crowd safety remains a concern. Authorities must prioritise public safety and implement strategies to prevent such tragedies, as seen in devastating religious congregation incidents like Hathras (121 lives), Kumbh Mela (36), and other similar incidents. To prevent such incidents, thorough risk assessments and crowd management plans must be put in place. Emergency response teams should be deployed, and communication systems should be established. The government and event organizers must work together to ensure public safety. Ultimately, safety of the people should be the top priority. Ganti Venkata Sudhir, Secunderabad Punish officials for stampedes The gross neglect of security arrangements and administrative supervision over the proceedings has become a common factor when it comes to stampedes and deaths in India! The Puri incident on Sunday is the second major stampede this month with Bengaluru accounting for the first on June 4. Overall, from the six major stampedes this year the officially declared deaths stand at 80, including during the Maha Kumbh mela and at New Delhi railway station. All incidents occurred because of poor security arrangements and lack of proper plans for crowd control/management. Whenever such incidents occur, the concerned state governments announce ex-gratia to the bereaved families and wash their hands off the responsibility for the incident. Additionally, the concerned officials are suspended and/or transferred pending enquiry. What exactly happens afterwards is never made public and even if a report is made from the inquiry, no specific action takes place against the erring officials, or the administration concerned. This decadent system should change once and for all. Govardhana Myneedu, Vijayawada
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Uddhav Thackeray calls for Opposition's unity against public security bill
Mumbai: After opposing the Mahayuti government's order to make Hindi the third language in schools, which was eventually revoked on Sunday, Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray has turned his focus towards the controversial Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, accusing the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of branding anyone who opposes it as 'anti-national' and 'urban naxal'. Mumbai, India. June 30, 2025: Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray participated in the rally to oppose the public security act at Azad Maidan in Mumbai. MUmbai, India. June 30, 2025. (Photo by HT) The Shiv Sena (UBT) chief on Monday participated in a protest against the bill at Azad Maidan, organised by left-wing parties such as the Peasants and Workers Party of India (PWP), the Communist Party of India (CPI), and the CPI (Marxist). Addressing a crowd of hundreds of people, he said that the draft of the bill has provisions for stringent action to suppress dissident voices, and urged the Opposition to maintain unity in its fight against the proposed law. The Maharashtra government is likely to present the controversial Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, 2024, in the monsoon session of the state legislature, which began on Monday. A joint select committee of the state legislature has finalised a revised draft of the bill after amending key provisions following strong criticism from civil society and watchdog bodies, who claimed it could be misused by the state to silence dissent and target entities critical of the government. The statement of objectives of the revised draft now states that the bill aims to curb 'urban naxal' activities, specifically 'unlawful activities by radical leftist organisations', rather than the earlier 'unlawful activities', by any person or organisation. At Monday's rally, Thackeray slammed the BJP for calling anyone who criticised its policy anti-national or urban naxal. 'For the BJP, the leaders whom it accuses of corruption or having relations with anti-nationals suddenly become patriotic once they join the BJP. But if someone speaks against the BJP, they call them anti-national and urban naxal,' he said. Thackeray also announced that his party would vote against the bill in the state legislature and expressed the need for the Opposition to be united while opposing the BJP despite its huge majority in the state legislature. 'Unity of all is important. We saw [on Sunday] how the BJP government was forced to revoke the order regarding making Hindi compulsory [in schools] due to the unity of the Marathi manoos (people). Though the Opposition parties will oppose the bill in the legislature, with the help of a huge majority, the BJP government will pass it. Even after that, we need to unite against the government to fight the battle against the bill,' he said. Also present at the rally were Nationalist Congress Party (SP) MP Supriya Sule, state president Jayant Patil, and MLA Jitendra Awhad, who announced their opposition to the bill as well. Sule concurred with Thackeray that the Opposition should unite and be ready to oppose the proposed law, adding that she would be on the forefront if there's a need to go to jail over it. NCP (SP) state president Jayant Patil, who was in the committee that revised the draft for the bill, said the panel had suggested important changes. However, whether or not the Mahayuti government has accepted the changes will be revealed only after it presents the bill in the state legislature, he added.
