Bill giving Arizona police drone-shooting immunity moves forward
A proposal that would give local law enforcement immunity when shooting down drones near the southern border passed out of committee Thursday despite concerns that it gives broad immunity to law enforcement.
House Bill 2733 by Rep. David Marshall, R-Snowflake, would give local law enforcement immunity from liability for damage to personal property if they are shooting down a drone they believe is engaged in criminal activity.
The bill comes amid an increase in drug cartel drones flying over the states' southern border, GOP lawmakers and the Democratic attorney general say that local police should be able to shoot them out of the sky without fear they'll be sued.
But even if state law is expanded to allow cops to shoot down drones, federal law still bans shooting at any aircraft — including drones.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Airspace around the borders of the United States is heavily controlled and monitored by the U.S. military and the Federal Aviation Administration. NORAD has previously reported that drone incursions at the southern border have seen a marked increase as inexpensive consumer drones have proliferated.
Rep. Alexander Kolodin, R-Scottsdale, voiced concerns that giving law enforcement immunity and not creating a carve out for larger cities such as Nogales that are on the state's southern border gave him concern.
'As I read that, all I need is reasonable suspicion…which is fairly easy to establish and I could go skeet shooting,' Kolodin said during a House Public Safety and Law Enforcement Committee hearing on the bill.
In one scenario proposed by Kolodin, a law enforcement officer could shoot down a drone over someone's residence in Nogales, the drone could cause damage to that person's house or other property and law enforcement would be shielded from any liability.
'It is an absolute immunity, as long as the conditions are satisfied,' Kolodin said. 'It just seems like an oversight to me.'
But Marshall disagreed with Kolodin, saying that the drones law enforcement are looking to take down are closer to the border and not in populated areas. He additionally dismissed concerns that the shooting down of a drone could lead to collateral damage.
'If you're out there at the border at ten o'clock or midnight, If a bb hits you in the head, put a bandaid on it,' Marshall said, suggesting that law enforcement would only use electronic anti-drone devices or 'bird shot' in shotguns to take down the drones. 'If you're out in the desert and you're flying these drones, you're probably up to no good.'
The bill initially allowed law enforcement to shoot down drones within 30 miles of the border, but an amendment by Rep. Kevin Volk, D-Tucson, changed that to 15 miles at the behest of the Attorney General's Office.
'We are literally the transportation superhighway for fentanyl that comes into the country,' Nick Debus, a lobbyist for Attorney General Kris Mayes, told the committee.
Debus, Marshall and Cochise County Sheriff Robert Watkins, whose county is along the border, all said the bill was necessary to combat the ongoing fentanyl crisis, as drug smugglers have been utilizing a variety of drones to bring fentanyl across the border.
Watkins conceded that the drones his deputies have found have not been carrying drugs. And he also dismissed concerns about officers firing weapons into the air.
'If a cop is dumb enough to pull out his 9mm handgun and start capping rounds at a drone…we have a bigger issue,' Watkins said, adding that law enforcement use of force policies would aid in preventing law enforcement from shooting drones out of the sky with rifles or pistols.
Kolodin disagreed, saying that as long as law enforcement acted within the confines of the law having reasonable suspicion, then they'd have complete immunity.
The ACLU of Arizona agreed with Kolodin, noting that journalists and private citizens often fly drones along the border, and that giving law enforcement the power to shoot them down could limit the ability of watchdog groups or journalists from seeing how the Trump administration is conducting border operations.
'You can certainly shoot drones down over Nogales in this bill,' Marilyn Rodriguez, a lobbyist representing the ACLU said to the committee. 'How can law enforcement even assess a violation of organized crime?'
Drones have long been a growing concern for both local and federal law enforcement at the border. Customs and Border Protection uses specialized 'drone jammers' to disable unmanned aircraft that are flying illegally.
And they have also been spotted at critical facilities, including an incursion involving a 'drone swarm' at the Palo Verde Nuclear Power plant in 2019.
Drones have proliferated in the past few years with multiple uses from law enforcement, fire fighting and even land surveying. It is unclear how the measure would account for drones operating legally within the border region.
The bill passed out of committee with bipartisan support, though Kolodin and two Democrats — Reps. Lorena Austin and Quantá Crews — voted present. The bill will head to the full House of Representatives for consideration next.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
18 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Susan Collins to get Hollywood treatment at fundraiser with Democrats
The fundraiser will be held at the home of Sherry Lansing, a former Paramount Pictures chair and prominent liberal donor, according to three people with knowledge of the fundraiser. Lansing's home in the Bel Air neighborhood is a mainstay on the philanthropy and Democratic fundraising circuit, hosting the likes of Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis of California on her patio, which opens to sweeping views of Los Angeles. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Lansing is set to co-host the event with Casey Wasserman, the sports and entertainment mogul and chair of the Los Angeles Olympics organizing committee, which is handling logistics for the Summer Games in 2028. Wasserman is a longtime Democratic giver as well, but he has taken steps to ingratiate himself with the right as of late, giving Olympic medals to President Donald Trump at the White House this month and donating to some Republicans during this election cycle. Advertisement Casey Wasserman, chairman of LA28, presented medals from the 1984 Olympics to President Trump in Washington on Aug. 5. Alex Brandon/Associated Press The Bel Air event has attracted some attention in Hollywood because Democrats will need to topple Republicans such as Collins if they have a chance at retaking the Senate. It is unclear how strong a candidate Democrats will field in Maine. On Tuesday, a political novice, Graham Platner, announced his entry into the Democratic primary. Advertisement Wasserman and Lansing decided to participate in the Southern California fundraiser because it was set up as a bipartisan host committee, with two Democrats and two Republicans, according to a person close to them. One of the Republicans is Harry E. Sloan, a former chair of MGM and a current member of the Lionsgate board. Sloan was once a prominent backer of moderate Republicans such as John McCain, but in recent years he has also made six-figure contributions to Democrats, including to back the 2024 presidential campaigns of Joe Biden and then Kamala Harris. Sloan's wife, Florence, a filmmaker with similar giving patterns to her husband, is also listed on the invitation. The other Republican hosting the event is Michael Burns, vice chair of the Lionsgate film and television studio. 'I'm proud to have supported my dear friend Senator Collins for many years,' Burns said in a text message. 'She remains a clear-thinking, bipartisan moderate in a world that, at least for the moment, is something far different.' Lansing, Wasserman and Sloan did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Collins' campaign had no comment. Tickets for the reception run from $3,500 to $10,000. Collins is also expected to attend finance events in Northern California around the time of the Bel Air fundraiser, according to a person with knowledge of the matter. This article originally appeared in
Boston Globe
18 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump administration revokes security clearances of 37 current and former government officials
Many of the officials who were targeted left the government years ago after serving in both senior national security positions and lower-profile roles far from the public eye. Some worked on matters that have long infuriated Trump, like the intelligence community assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election on his behalf. And several signaled their concerns about Trump by signing a critical letter in 2019 that was highlighted on social media last month by right-wing provocateur and close Trump ally Laura Loomer. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The action is part of a broader Trump administration campaign to wield the levers of government against perceived adversaries, and it reflects the president's continued distrust of career intelligence officials he has long seen as working against his interests. Advertisement The revocation of clearances has emerged as a go-to tactic for the administration, a strategy that critics say risks chilling dissenting voices from a national security community accustomed to drawing on a range of viewpoints before formulating an assessment. 'These are unlawful and unconstitutional decisions that deviate from well-settled, decades-old laws and policies that sought to protect against just this type of action,' Mark Zaid, a national security lawyer whose own clearance was revoked by the Trump administration, said in a statement. Advertisement He called it hypocritical for the administration to 'claim these individuals politicized or weaponized intelligence.' Gabbard on Tuesday defended the move, which she said had been directed by Trump. 'Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right,' she wrote on X. 'Those in the Intelligence Community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold.' The security clearance suspension comes amid a broader effort by Gabbard and other Trump administration officials to revisit the intelligence community's assessment on Russian election interference, including by declassifying a series of years-old documents meant to cast doubt on the legitimacy of its findings. Multiple government investigations have reached the same conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election in sweeping fashion, including through a hack-and-leak operation of Democratic emails and a social media campaign aimed at sowing discord and swaying public opinion. But Trump has long resisted the assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin interfered in his favor, and his Justice Department has authorized a grand jury investigation that could bring fresh scrutiny to Obama-era officials. Security clearances are important not only for current government workers but also former ones whose private-sector jobs require them to retain access to sensitive information. Stripping clearances from such employees could make it hard for them to do their jobs. On his first day of office, Trump said he would revoke the security clearances of the more than four dozen former intelligence officials who signed a 2020 letter saying that the Hunter Biden laptop saga bore the hallmarks of a 'Russian information operation.' Advertisement He's also revoked the clearances of former President Joe Biden and former Vice President Kamala Harris, and he attempted to do the same for lawyers at a spate of prominent law firms but was rebuffed by federal judges. Some of those who were targeted in the latest action were part of Biden's national security team. Many only learned of the Gabbard action from news reports Tuesday, said two former government officials who were on the list. Both spoke on the condition of anonymity as they ponder whether to take legal action.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
More Texas Democrats plan to spend the night in the state Capitol in protest amid redistricting fight
A group of Texas Democrats are returning to the state House in Austin where they will spend the night — the latest step in a broader protest over Republican plans to redraw congressional districts in the state. The state House Democratic caucus said in a news release that eight of its members will return to the floor Tuesday evening, 'publicly tearing up the permission slips required by Republicans for members to leave the chamber.' The Democrats will join state Rep. Nicole Collier, their colleague who has remained locked in the state House chamber since Monday afternoon after she refused the condition of a security escort to leave the chamber. After Democratic lawmakers fled the state for two weeks, denying the House a quorum to move forward with redistricting legislation, Republican leaders have demanded that Democrats agree to around-the-clock security escorts to ensure they would return to the chamber Wednesday for the redistricting vote. Collier didn't agree, so she has remained on the floor, while her party has livestreamed her protest for more than a day. Tuesday night, though, she'll have company ahead of passage of the redistricting plan in the House, which could happen as soon as Wednesday. The legislation is meant to pad the GOP majority in Washington. Collier has framed her decision to remain in the Capitol as an act of defiance, telling NBC News she wouldn't sign the de facto permission slip House GOP leaders presented to Democrats outlining the conditions that allowed them to leave the chamber. Those conditions are in effect because the House approved civil arrest warrants for the dozens of Democrats who left Texas this month. Rep. Mihaela Plesa, a Dallas-area Democrat, said during a press conference Tuesday that former Vice President Kamala Harris was among the "history makers" who called Collier to send their support for her protest. Rep. Penny Morales Shaw, a Houston-area Democrat, told NBC News that she decided to return to stand with Collier because she didn't want to be seen as 'validating' the GOP's 'narrative that we were derelict.' 'Nicole was right. We should not have submitted to this,' she added. 'I cannot support this very low and bad precedent for all future legislators.' Rep. Rhetta Andrews Bowers told reporters that she also believed the decision to have law enforcement follow Democrats was a waste of taxpayer dollars, evoking last month's floods in the Hill Country that killed more than 100 people. "Families in the Hill Country who lost everything to the devastating floods need our help. Yet instead of providing relief, those dollars are being spent on constant [Department of Public Safety] patrol," she said. Now that dozens of Democrats have returned to the state, there's little else they can do to prevent the GOP-controlled Legislature from passing their maps, which could help Republicans flip up to five U.S. House seats in next year's midterm elections. This article was originally published on
