logo
Trump's Warm Embrace of India Turns Cold

Trump's Warm Embrace of India Turns Cold

WASHINGTON—In just a matter of months, President Trump has gone from praising India as a major strategic partner to saying he wouldn't care if its economy implodes.
The Trump administration still values the U.S.-India partnership, officials say. But ties between Washington and New Delhi have steadily soured over disputes about trade, Russia and whether Trump deserves credit for brokering a cease-fire following a four-day conflict in May between India and its rival Pakistan.
The standoff, fueled by the president's public broadsides against India, threatens to sink a key but complex geopolitical relationship and break the bonds Trump has forged with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The fractures have appeared as U.S. ties with Pakistan have grown in recent months, culminating in a White House meeting between Trump and the country's powerful army chief, Asim Munir, in June.
Modi 'must be very, very unhappy,' said Manoj Joshi, a distinguished fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, an Indian think tank.
India, viewed by the U.S. as a bulwark against China, has rankled Washington with its persistent relationship with Russia. New Delhi purchases Russian oil and weapons, propping up Russia's economy, and along with Moscow is part of a loose, five-nation grouping of nations known as the Brics.
As Trump has turned against Russian President Vladimir Putin for not ending the war in Ukraine, he has vowed to impose tariffs on countries that do business with Moscow. India, Trump said Wednesday, would incur a 'penalty' for its continued purchases of Russian goods.
'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care,' Trump added in another social-media post Thursday.
President Trump hosted Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the White House in February.
Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesman Randhir Jaiswal told reporters Friday that the U.S.-India relationship 'has weathered several transitions and challenges. We remain focused on the substantive agenda that our two countries have committed to and are confident that the relationship will continue to move forward.'
Still, Trump's comments are a stark shift from the early days of the administration, when officials in both Washington and New Delhi hoped to build on the Trump-Modi relationship established during the president's first term. Mike Waltz called ties between the two countries 'the most important relationship of the 21st century' before Trump tapped him as national security adviser.
Trump hosted Modi at the White House in February and praised him as a 'much better negotiator,' while Modi mirrored Trump's campaign catchphrase and said he wanted to 'make India great again.' High-profile visits to New Delhi by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and Vice President JD Vance followed.
Yet the warm glow faded in the following months, when efforts to swiftly clinch a bilateral trade deal foundered. Trump, current and former officials said, is deeply frustrated by the lack of progress with New Delhi.
A point of contention in tariff negotiations is the U.S.'s push to open India's agricultural markets, which employs over 40% of the country's workforce.
Opening up the sector, which has long been protected by New Delhi, would anger India's farmers, a powerful voting bloc. That presents a perilous political risk for Modi, who abandoned an effort in 2021 to deregulate the agricultural sector after facing nationwide protests from farmers.
Trump said the U.S. and India are still negotiating a trade deal even after the Aug. 1 deadline for an agreement.
A screen at the Bombay Stock Exchange building in Mumbai showed a news broadcast Thursday on Trump's tariffs.
Credit for a cease-fire
U.S.-India ties hit another snag in May when India and Pakistan, both nuclear powers, clashed over a four-day stretch. The conflict started after a militant attack in the Indian-administered Kashmir region that Modi's government blamed on Pakistan. Pakistan denied any role in the assault.
As the conflict raged, the U.S. received intelligence that India launched the Brahmos cruise missile to strike targets in Pakistan, according to Trump administration officials. The U.S. assesses that the weapon, produced in partnership with Russia, can carry nuclear warheads, current and former officials said, though India says it is solely a conventional missile.
Trump feared that India might decide to equip one of the missiles with a nuclear bomb if the crisis spiraled out of control, officials said, or that Pakistan could decide to launch a nuclear device of its own, leading Trump to encourage Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio to call their counterparts.
Trump posted on social media that his team brokered a deal that led to a cease-fire on May 10. Pakistan embraced the announcement, praising Trump and nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize.
India, by contrast, bristled at Trump's assertions and insisted no outside power dictated the cease-fire. India's insistence that the U.S. role was overblown has privately angered Trump, who has told aides he's upset with Modi for not thanking him.
A White House official said Trump leveraged his relationships with both India and Pakistan to secure a cease-fire that the administration insists could have gone nuclear without his involvement. The official wouldn't comment on India's use of the Brahmos missile as the reason for Trump's concerns.
Officials at the Indian Embassy in Washington said India has a no-first-use nuclear policy, so its use of the Brahmos missile should have caused no alarm in the U.S. about a nuclear escalation.
Trump strained ties even further by offering to mediate the longstanding Kashmir dispute between India and Pakistan.
'That was embarrassing for India. India has always rejected the idea of third-party mediation, something that Pakistan has always sought,' said Lisa Curtis, a former senior National Security Council official who oversaw South Asia policy in Trump's first term. 'If there had just been one or two tweets on May 10, the two sides could have recovered from it. However, Trump has talked multiple times about the U.S. bringing about the cease-fire.'
Russian ties
Trump's embrace of Pakistan and pressure on India over its ties with Russia and trade could backfire at just the moment when India was warming up to defense ties with the West.
'It's going to push India increasingly into the hands of Russia,' said Derek Grossman, a former U.S. intelligence official and professor on Indo-Pacific security affairs at the University of Southern California.
In recent years, India has sought to pivot away from relying on Russia for military equipment, especially after the Ukraine war cut off the ready flow of Russian-made weapons.
From 2020 to 2024, India imported 36% of its military hardware from Russia, its largest supplier, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. That was a shift from the 2006-10 period, when 82% of India's military equipment was imported from Russia.
The U.S. has previously targeted Indian businesses for allegedly helping Russia evade sanctions by selling dual-use technology that could bolster Moscow's military production.
In announcing that the U.S. would place 25% tariffs on Indian goods, Trump also criticized India for purchasing large quantities of Russian oil. India has taken advantage of discounted oil prices from Russia after many Western countries stopped buying or curbed their purchases. In the last quarter of 2024, India accounted for one-third of Russia's oil exports, according to ORF.
'It is most certainly a point of irritation in our relationship with India—not the only point of irritation,' Rubio said in a Fox News interview on Thursday. 'With so many other oil vendors available, India continues to buy so much from Russia, which in essence is helping to fund the war effort and allowing this war to continue in Ukraine.'
The newfound U.S. attention to the matter has put India in a bind.
'Abruptly dropping Russian oil will have consequences for the relationship. On the other hand, the promised U.S. sanctions will have their own impact,' said ORF's Joshi. 'Just how to square this circle is a tough one.'
Write to Alexander Ward at alex.ward@wsj.com, Robbie Gramer at robbie.gramer@wsj.com and Shan Li at shan.li@wsj.com
Trump's Warm Embrace of India Turns Cold
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PM Modi compliments Amit Shah for becoming longest-serving Union Home Minister
PM Modi compliments Amit Shah for becoming longest-serving Union Home Minister

The Hindu

time24 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

PM Modi compliments Amit Shah for becoming longest-serving Union Home Minister

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday (August 5, 2025) praised Union Home Minister Amit Shah for becoming the longest-serving incumbent in his Ministry. In his address to the National Democratic Alliance's parliamentary party group, Mr. Modi noted that Mr. Shah has become the longest serving Home Minister, overtaking Bharatiya Janata Party veteran L. K. Advani, a co-founder of the group in 1998. 'It is just the beginning,' he said, adding that there was a long way to go. Mr. Shah has been at the helm since the Modi government took over for the second time in 2019, and his stint so far is of six years and 65 days. His tenure has been marked by several key decisions, such as the abrogation of Article 370, and actions on the internal security front, including a series of successful anti-Maoist operations. The Union Home Minister also received compliments from his Cabinet and party colleagues. Congratulating him, Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan said: '...you have achieved a historic milestone. This historic achievement was recorded today, on August 5. On a similar historic day, August 5, 2019, you announced the abrogation of Article 370 in Parliament, adding a new chapter to India's history.' 'Under your leadership, India has dealt a decisive blow to Maoism and taken historic decisions like the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). Your unwavering commitment to national security has further strengthened the confidence and pride of the nation's people. Your foresight, determination, and decisions taken in the interest of the nation are commendable. Wishing you abundant success, glory, and a long-lasting public life filled with numerous achievements,' he said through his X handle. Speaking with the media, BJP MP Jagdambika Pal said Mr. Shah had taken historic decisions, including the abrogation of Article 370 and Article 35A, under the leadership of Prime Minister Modi. Via his X handle, the party's IT cell in-charge Amit Malviya said: 'Union Home Minister Amit Shah's tenure has been marked by bold, historic decisions -- from the abrogation of Article 370 to a firm crackdown on terrorism and strengthening of internal security.'

New 'Khalistan embassy' in Canada threatens India-Canada ties again
New 'Khalistan embassy' in Canada threatens India-Canada ties again

Business Standard

time24 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

New 'Khalistan embassy' in Canada threatens India-Canada ties again

Just as India and Canada were making cautious moves to improve strained ties, visuals of an 'Embassy of the Republic of Khalistan' on Canadian soil have risked derailing hard-earned diplomatic progress. Radical Sikh groups in British Columbia have established what they describe as the 'Embassy of the Republic of Khalistan'. Photographs accessed by India Today show that the self-proclaimed embassy is located inside a section of the Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara in Surrey. The same gurdwara was once led by Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a pro-Khalistan figure whom Indian authorities had labelled a terrorist. Nijjar was shot dead in 2023 in the gurdwara's car park, setting off a chain of events that pushed India-Canada relations into a deep freeze. The announcement of the so-called 'embassy' coincides with preparations for a 'Khalistan referendum' organised by Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), a group banned in India. According to reports, Indian security agencies are keeping a close watch. Diplomatic thaw under threat The development comes at a time when ties between the two countries had shown tentative signs of a thaw. Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Canada's newly-elected Prime Minister Mark Carney met face-to-face during the G7 summit earlier this year — their first such meeting since tensions escalated. Both sides had indicated a willingness to move beyond the fallout from Nijjar's killing and the allegations made by former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who had accused the Indian government of involvement in the murder — a charge New Delhi has firmly denied. Canadian intelligence backs India's security concerns India has long raised concerns about Khalistani groups using Canadian soil as a safe haven for promoting separatist ideology, fundraising, and plotting acts of violence. It has consistently criticised Canadian authorities for alleged inaction. In a notable shift, Canadian authorities have acknowledged these concerns. In June 2025, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) officially recognised the threat posed by Khalistani extremists operating within Canada. Its annual report stated: 'Khalistani extremists continue to use Canada as a base for the promotion, fundraising or planning of violence primarily in India.' While no attacks linked to Canada-based Khalistani extremists (CBKEs) occurred in 2024, CSIS warned that such actors remain active in global financing and operational planning. This marked the first time the Canadian government has officially used the term 'extremism' in the context of the Khalistan movement. CSIS described Canada-based Khalistani extremists as a core element of the country's politically motivated violent extremism (PMVE) threat. According to the agency, PMVE groups aim to use violence to create new political systems or structures, often through cross-border efforts. Khalistani actors, the agency warned, continue to engage in 'planning, financing and facilitating attacks globally' in pursuit of a separate Khalistan state, primarily carved out of India's Punjab region.

Britannia Q1 profit misses estimates, sees early signs of urban recovery
Britannia Q1 profit misses estimates, sees early signs of urban recovery

Business Standard

time24 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Britannia Q1 profit misses estimates, sees early signs of urban recovery

Britannia Industries posted first-quarter profit below estimates on Tuesday, but the Indian biscuit maker said urban consumption - dull for a few quarters - is picking up. The seller of 'Marie Gold' and 'Bourbon' biscuits joins other domestic consumer goods makers such as Hindustan Unilever and ITC in forecasting early signs of a recovery in urban demand, aided by easing local inflation. India's annual retail inflation slowed every month in the quarter, easing to a six-year low in June at 2.1 per cent. That helped spur a "marginal uptick in consumption across both urban and rural markets," said Varun Berry, managing director and chief executive. Britannia's quarterly sales grew 9.8 per cent to ₹4,535 crore ($516.5 million). The firm had previously flagged rise in popular demand for packaged food and confectionery items such as croissants, wafers and flavoured shakes - usually more likely to be bought on impulse. But total spends rose 10.4 per cent, led by a 15 per cent jump in raw material costs. Britannia has been hiking prices to partly offset the higher costs of raw materials such as cocoa, flour and palm oil. Profits in the reported quarter came in at ₹521 crore, up 3 per cent on-year, but below analysts' average estimate of ₹570 crore rupees, according to data compiled by LSEG.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store