logo
Do We Really Need a Protein Uncrustable?

Do We Really Need a Protein Uncrustable?

Eater15-07-2025
is a senior reporter at Eater.com, covering restaurant trends, home cooking advice, and all the food you can't escape on your TikTok FYP. Previously, she worked for Bon Appétit and VICE's Munchies.
Name a sandwich innovation more legitimately worthwhile than the Uncrustable — it's certainly not the invention of Kranch nor MayoMust. For this reason, Uncrustables are undefeated, on track to hit over $1 billion in sales in the current fiscal year. In 2021, J.M. Smucker Co. invested $1.1 billion to increase distribution to meet the unstoppable demand for Uncrustables alone.
Humans, of course, are known for our hubris, doomed to be struck down by the Gods. This, perhaps, is why a new brand seeks to disrupt Uncrustables' ubiquity in the 'sealed crustless sandwich' space. Jams is a professional athlete-backed Uncrustables dupe that's now in the process of hitting Walmart stores across the country, as CNBC Sport reported earlier this week. The packaged 'protein PB&J'comes in either strawberry or blueberry.
As founder Connor Blakely told CNBC, the biggest selling point of Jams is its lack of seed oils, dyes, artificial colors and flavors, and high fructose corn syrup, in addition to having the 'most protein per ounce of any peanut butter and jelly that's currently on the market.'
I do have to wonder: Do we really need a protein Uncrustable? Especially when peanut butter and jelly Uncrustables already have protein by virtue of having peanut butter? Sure, a Jams sandwich has 10 grams of protein to the six in an Uncrustable, but a Jams sandwich weighs in at 74 grams and an Uncrustable is only 58 grams. That's 13 percent protein to 10 percent protein — not a startlingly huge difference. Then again, it's true that I'm not an athlete. NFL teams, for whom macros likely matter much more than they do for me, go through at least 80,000 Uncrustables per year, as The Athletic uncovered last year.
What bothers me more than the protein marketing is the way this 'health-conscious' branding, employed by so many new food brands now, draws on our collective anxiety around food. While some of this anxiety is well-earned, it's also been exploited by brands whose positioning can often read like fearmongering. New oil companies deride the inflammatory potential of their competitors; probiotic sodas promise to solve problems we might never have had, had we not suddenly become inundated with 'gut health' content on TikTok.
This has contributed to the rise of the Make America Healthy Again movement, with both its accurate guidance, like eating more vegetables, and its more potentially worrying elements, like the rise of raw milk and the recent backlash against food dye. I was alive during the Atkins era and therefore know that none of this — the demonization of specific ingredients, the overemphasis on others — is anything new. But it's all starting to feel a little orthorexic, don't we think?
Despite Jams's branding, Uncrustables already don't have any artificial dyes, as CNBC notes, nor do they contain high fructose corn syrup; it removed the latter in favor of real sugar in 2017. That's the appeal of this kind of marketing, though: It taps into our anxieties, whether they're justified or not.
Sign up for Eater's newsletter
The freshest news from the food world every day Email (required)
Sign Up
By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘This market is pricing in perfection,' warns Verdence Capital CIO as tariff deadline looms
‘This market is pricing in perfection,' warns Verdence Capital CIO as tariff deadline looms

CNBC

time5 hours ago

  • CNBC

‘This market is pricing in perfection,' warns Verdence Capital CIO as tariff deadline looms

The market may be trading around record highs, but the Verdence Capital Advisors CIO is worried trouble is lurking. Megan Horneman, who oversees $4.1 billion in assets under management, thinks there's too much complacency around the Aug. 1 U.S. trade deadline. "This market is pricing in the perfect situation," she told CNBC's "Fast Money" on Monday. In addition to tariff concerns, she lists uncertainty regarding Federal Reserve policy and overbought conditions from a technical perspective as potential issues. "Once we see that [rate cuts] might be priced off the table, coinciding with the fact that we're not quite sure what's going to happen with the tariff perspective, I think you can see a bit of a valuation correction," said Horneman, who's a former Deutsche Bank senior investment strategist. Horneman is particularly concerned that technical levels are signaling overbought conditions in growth stocks — including Big Tech. "These are things that we think might upset the rally that we're seeing here," she said. Despite her short-term caution, Horneman considers herself a long-term bull and views pullbacks as opportunities. She lists international stocks among her top plays on market weakness. "I'd warn that right now, they're expensive from a valuation perspective [but] cheap compared to the U.S.," she said. "They've been underloved for way too long, and I think you're seeing some of that rotation just begin. I think that can continue." To navigate the uncertainty, her key advice to investors right now: Make sure you're allocated appropriately. "Fast Money" trader Guy Adami also sees concerns, citing the number of retail investors driving recent market gains."Just in terms of valuation, things have gotten a tad frothy here," he said on Monday's show. The S&P 500 closed at record highs every day last week. As of Friday's close, the index is 16% over the past three months while the tech-heavy Nasdaq is up 21% over the same period. The Nasdaq is also atDisclaimer

Global week ahead: Crunch time for trade talks as Trump's deadline nears
Global week ahead: Crunch time for trade talks as Trump's deadline nears

CNBC

time14 hours ago

  • CNBC

Global week ahead: Crunch time for trade talks as Trump's deadline nears

I think most would agree that the news cycle has been relentless for most of 2025, but certain stories do seem a little "Groundhog Day" at the moment. Earlier this month, I wrote about the conundrum facing the newsroom over how to approach President Donald Trump's then-trade talk deadline of July 9. Now, at the end of the month, we find ourselves in a similar position, but this time the date we are all watching is August 1. Why? Once again, it's another deadline for countries across the globe to try and agree a trade truce with the United States, with the European Union in particular focus this time round. Debate in the newsroom resurfaces … when is a deadline not a deadline? The week has become even trickier to predict, with talks between the U.S. and China now taking center stage in Stockholm on Monday and Tuesday — potentially further complicating the picture for Europe. A U.S. trade agreement with the European Union has seemed tantalizingly close, with CNBC's Silvia Amaro reporting that a 15% baseline tariff rate is the base-case scenario, according to an EU diplomat. These reports drove stock markets across Europe and the U.S. higher last week. On Friday, however, Trump told reporters there was only a "50-50 chance" of a deal. As CNBC's Holly Ellyatt explains, the EU is keeping its so-called "trade bazooka" — or Anti Coercion Instrument — warm in case an agreement is not reached by the August deadline. The corporate world is crying out for an agreement, piling pressure on the European Union to put an end to the uncertainty. Puma, VW, Michelin and other corporates across Europe have downgraded their outlooks citing the impact of tariffs and the ongoing pressure the restrictions are putting on these businesses. This week, all eyes will be on another raft of earnings from Europe, including banking giants UBS, Santander and Standard Chartered, drinks firm Heineken, pharma giant AstraZeneca and energy major Shell to name a few. On the data front, GDP growth rates for France, Spain, Germany and Italy will be released on Wednesday, providing insight into the wider impact of the market uncertainty. Last week, the tricky economic conditions saw the European Central Bank opt for a hawkish hold of the benchmark rate at 2%, with President Christine Lagarde saying the ECB is "in a good place to hold and watch how risks develop over the next few months." And so Friday August 1st will be a crucial date for market participants and corporates (and the newsroom)… until it isn't.

Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)'s CEO Says Tariffs Haven't Hurt Company, Says Jim Cramer
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)'s CEO Says Tariffs Haven't Hurt Company, Says Jim Cramer

Yahoo

time19 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)'s CEO Says Tariffs Haven't Hurt Company, Says Jim Cramer

We recently published . Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) is another stock that Cramer frequently discusses on his morning show. On several occasions, he has shared optimism about the firm's Alexa Pro service and also remarked on share price levels. One major aspect about Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) that Cramer has highlighted multiple times is how the firm's dominance in the retail industry means that consumer goods companies have to work with it no matter what the circumstances are. The debate around the retailer has shifted more recently to prices and inflation. According to Cramer, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) CEO Andy Jassy hasn't seen an impact from tariffs on the firm's prices yet: 'Right well, I do think that, you know it's gonna be inflationary and that's what Powell's worried about. But, Andy Jassy said so far the tariffs haven't hurt Amazon.' Previously, the CNBC TV host discussed a WSJ article claiming that Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) had increased prices: '[On WSJ piece saying they'll keep prices low but raising them instead]Look I think that Amazon is an overall piece and I don't know how much that includes Prime, where the prices were incredibly low. Amazon's assured me that that story, didn't say it's this story exactly, but anybody who thinks that the prices are up, will take a look at Prime and think that's not true.' While we acknowledge the potential of AMZN as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store