&w=3840&q=100)
Repeated failures have pushed Rahul Gandhi into ideological vacuum: Pradhan
In a post on social media X, Pradhan wrote that the Congress leader just needed an "excuse" to tarnish the country's dignity and had often made remarks in favour of Pakistan and sometimes promoted the narratives of other countries.
"Continuous failure has plunged Rahul Gandhi into an abyss of ideological emptiness. In opposing the BJP, he has reached the point of opposing India itself. He just needs an excuse to tarnish the country's dignity. Sometimes he speaks in favour of Pakistan, and sometimes he promotes the narratives of other countries," Pradhan posted.
Referring to Rahul Gandhi as the "most unsuccessful leader in the country's history," the Union Minister said his frustration had turned into criticism of the nation.
He further wrote that the best proverb that fit Rahul Gandhi was a "frustrated cat" that scratched the pole.
"The frustration of being the most unsuccessful leader in India's history is vented by speaking against the nation. A proverb fits Rahul Gandhi perfectly: "A frustrated cat scratches the pole," the post further reads.
Further in his post, Pradhan wrote that the Congress leader "eagerly" waited for an opportunity to seize a "baseless issue" to demean the country.
"Waking up in the morning, Rahul Gandhi eagerly waits for an opportunity to seize any baseless issue to demean India," the post read.
The remarks came a day after Rahul Gandhi, in a post on X on July 19, questioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi regarding Trump's claims of having defused an escalation between India and Pakistan, during which "five ships were shot down."
The post read, "Modi ji, what is the truth about the 5 ships? The country has the right to know!"
This comes after Donald Trump once again claimed to have halted the escalation of the India-Pakistan conflict on Saturday.
Joining the attack, senior Congress leader P Chidambaram questioned the government's silence and credibility. "After President Trump's latest statement, what does the government of India have to say? Silence is no answer," he wrote in a post on X.
.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
20 minutes ago
- First Post
India, Israel vow stronger strategic defence cooperation, condemn terrorism in joint statement
This visit by the DG of Israel's Ministry of Defence marks a 'pivotal step in India-Israel defence relations and reinforces both sides' commitment to enhance their strategic partnership', the statement added. read more India and Israel on Wednesday concurred to work towards developing an 'institutional framework' for further deepening their defence ties. Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh held a bilateral meeting with Director General, Israel's Ministry of Defence, Major General (Res) Amir Baram in New Delhi during which the two sides agreed to further strengthen the bilateral defence cooperation with a 'long-term perspective', officials said. 'They concurred to work towards developing an institutional framework for further deepening of defence ties,' the Indian defence ministry said in a statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Israel DG condemned the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam and conveyed 'full support for India's fight against terrorism', it said. Singh reiterated India's zero-tolerance approach to terrorism, condemned the October 7, 2023 terror attacks on Israel and called for the release of all hostages. The two sides also reviewed the progress of the ongoing defence collaboration activities since the last Joint Working Group meeting held in India in July 2024. This visit by the DG of Israel's Ministry of Defence marks a 'pivotal step in India-Israel defence relations and reinforces both sides' commitment to enhance their strategic partnership', the statement added.
The Hindu
20 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Danger of thought: on the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill
The Maharashtra Special Public Security (MSPS) Bill, 2024 follows the disturbing pattern of executive overreach in the name of security. Existing laws are often misused against political opponents and critics of the ruling party, including commentators. Charges are often vague and sweeping, and the process itself becomes the punishment in many of these cases. Given this pattern, the move by Maharashtra's Mahayuti government led by the BJP to create an entire law to criminalise a certain kind of thought portends danger to freedom and democracy. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has said that the new law would only target those who try to undermine the constitutional order, but the possibility — indeed the probability — of its misuse is apparent. The State says that it is seeking to prevent Maoists from brainwashing youth, professionals, and civil servants through front organisations. As in the proposed law, which is now awaiting the assent of the Governor before coming into force, the State government can declare any suspect 'organisation' as an 'unlawful organisation'. Offences under the proposed law include membership of such organisations, fundraising on their behalf, managing or assisting them, and committing unlawful activities. The Bill's focus is on people and organisations that act as a front for Maoists, and what is unlawful is so broadly defined that anyone can be its target. Among other things, according to the Bill, 'unlawful' is 'any action taken by an individual or organization whether by committing an act or by words either spoken or written or by sign or by visible representation or otherwise, which constitute a danger or menace to public order, peace and tranquility'. Offences are cognisable and the accused can be arrested without a warrant. Punishment includes jail terms of two years to seven years, along with fines ranging from ₹2 lakh to ₹5 lakh. The State argues that Chhattisgarh, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh and Odisha have enacted Public Security Acts and banned 48 Naxal frontal organisations. The Opposition parties offered feeble resistance to the Bill and raised some broad concerns regarding its misuse but it was passed in the Assembly through a voice vote. As an afterthought, the Congress and the Shiv Sena (UBT) protested on the floor when it was taken up in the Legislative Council. The Bill had gone through a long deliberative process, but as it turns out, all parties appeared to be in agreement, barring the lone CPI (M) MLA who protested against it on the floor of the Assembly. The idea that thought and speech, howsoever unpalatable they might be to the ruling establishment, should be policed poses a grave danger for India as an open society.
India Today
28 minutes ago
- India Today
Why chase someone who won't fight: Smriti Irani's 'tone shift' on Rahul Gandhi
Union Minister Smriti Irani, once known for her fierce criticism of Rahul Gandhi, now appears markedly more conciliatory toward the Congress leader. In an exclusive interview with India Today Group's Anjana Om Kashyap, Irani was asked why she no longer takes an aggressive stance against Gandhi. Her response was direct and pointed: 'Because the Gandhi family refused to fight me in 2024.'advertisementIrani, who famously defeated Rahul Gandhi in 2019 in his long-held Amethi constituency, said that with Gandhi opting out of contesting from Amethi in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, there was no political battle to engage in.'If they aren't even stepping into the battlefield, what am I supposed to say? I can't go chasing after them,' Smriti Irani said. During the interview, Smriti Irani also pointed out that the Gandhi family moved to contest from Wayanad due to its favourable social demographics.'No intelligent leader willingly chooses a seat where defeat is certain,' she said. 'If a seat like that is given, it's only out of duty to the party. But in 2019, I turned the impossible into possible.'Irani also reflected on her journey and recalled her defeat in Amethi in 2014. She said that she spent the next five years working tirelessly on the ground.'I cleaned drains myself, brought electricity to villages, built over a lakh homes, set up a medical college, a 200 bed hospital, a collector's office, a police line and even a fire station,' she Anjana Om Kashyap asked whether Irani could have defeated Rahul Gandhi again if he had contested in 2024, Irani responded with a smile, 'Absolutely, that's why he didn't contest.'Irani also spoke about the emotional toll of being removed from Amethi, calling it a place she is deeply connected with. 'If I had not worked and people had said I did not deliver on my promises, that would have hurt more. But I did everything I could,' she asked why she lost, Irani responded, 'Because there's a diference between work and political equations. Those who are in politics understand this – electoral politics isn't the same as national service.'When asked whether stepping away from Amethi and the government left her feeling uprooted, she admitted, 'Maybe.''Because I defeated the national president of Congress, I had to tolerate a few barbs,' she Irani clarified that her return to television does not signal a retirement from politics. Dismissing speculation, she said, 'Who retires at 49? At 49, most people's careers are just beginning and I have already been a Member of Parliament three times,' she added with a Irani is making her comeback on the screen with the same show that made her a household name 25 years ago, Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi.- EndsMust Watch
