logo
China has the US over a barrel in the rare earths market — Trump is fighting back

China has the US over a barrel in the rare earths market — Trump is fighting back

The Hill18-07-2025
While the media focus obsessively on the future of Fed Chairman Jay Powell, they all but ignore a major breakthrough engineered by the Trump administration that will ultimately reset our relations with China and free the U.S. from Beijing's blackmail.
The Biden presidency was pockmarked by sporadic kowtowing to China, as when he allowed a spy balloon to sail unimpeded over U.S. military installations; dismantled President Trump's 'China Initiative,' meant to counter Beijing's espionage and intellectual property theft in U.S.; and failed to impose secondary sanctions on the country most enabling Russia's war against Ukraine.
Why was Biden's White House so timid? Some speculated that the Biden family was worried China might reveal unsavory secrets about their business activities in the country. Perhaps, but they also knew that Beijing held U.S. national security in a death grip. At any moment, the Chinese Communist Party could withhold critical rare earths from our defense and electronics industries. Without the essential magnets produced by those elements, U.S. production of missile guidance systems, semiconductors and more pedestrian products like MRI scanners, cellphones and Teslas grinds to a halt.
Fast-forward to Trump moving to punish China for its illegal trade practices and President Xi Jinping playing his get-out-of-jail-free card, countering Trump's damaging tariffs by blocking exports of seven medium and heavy rare earth elements. The move caused the U.S. to stand down, but it also alerted the nation once again that Beijing's smart and dogged effort to corner the world's supply of rare earths has given China a potent weapon.
It isn't the first time China has used its dominance of rare earths strategically. In 2010, China retaliated against Japan in a fishing dispute by cutting off rare earths. Trump is, appropriately, moving to free the U.S. from this dangerous noose.
It is not the actual minerals that are in short supply; rare earths are everywhere, including in the U.S., though often found in small quantities that makes extraction costly. China, on the other hand, accounts for 60-70 percent of global rare earth production, and more than 90 percent of heavy rare earths. It has achieved that dominance by its usual practice of flooding the market, undercutting rival mining outfits on price and driving competitors out of business. China has also staked out a commanding position in rare-earths refining.
China accounts for 85-90 percent of rare earths processing, earned the old-fashioned way — by sacrificing its environment. The sifting out of particular elements from mined ore is nasty work, resulting in considerable toxic waste. China, never afraid of despoiling its lakes and rivers, chose to place strategic goals ahead of pollution concerns. Most western nations, including the U.S., would not make such a choice.
Keith Bradsher, Beijing bureau chief for The New York Times, recently described the environmental desecration of lands and lakes surrounding processing facilities in China where 'toxic sludge from rare earth processing has been dumped into a four-square-mile artificial lake' and 'rare earth mines have poisoned dozens of once-green valleys and left hillsides stripped to barren red clay.' Not only have the mining and processing efforts sickened local populations, they have contaminated water sources and poisoned livestock.
According to Bradsher, public outcry has inspired some clean-up efforts, but protests also resulted in harsh censorship. Mention of some of the worst environmental problems caused by the industry is nowhere to be found.
China paid a high price to capture leadership in rare earths mining and processing, but in the April trade battle, that dominance paid off. Faced with the possibility of industrial mayhem, Trump backed off his most aggressive tariff threats. But then he also set out to solve this problem.
One upshot is an unusual deal in which the Department of Defense will invest $400 million in a once-defunct mining company now called MP Materials in return for a 15 percent equity stake. In addition to the capital infusion, the Trump government is committing to buy MP's output for the next 10 years at double today's prevailing price.
According to the Financial Times, Mountain Pass, the predecessor firm to MP Materials, was 'the world's largest producer of rare earths in the 1970s and 80s.' China's aggressive tactics drove prices lower and shut down its operation in 2002, but our government's price supports should counter Beijing's tactics.
MP is not the only company scrambling to claw back America's participation in rare earth mining. Ramaco Resources recently opened a new coal mine in Wyoming, the first new U.S. mine in 70 years. The CEO claims the company will, in addition to coal, produce over 10 percent of U.S. demand for six of the 17 minerals that constitute 'rare earths.' Ramaco claims its reserves of some 'heavy earths' are sufficient to supply U.S. demand for more than 100 years.
These measures, even backed by a supportive government, are still inadequate. These mines will still rely heavily on China to process their ore. That stranglehold must also be broken.
Several projects are underway to do just that. MP has over the past year built out refining and separation plants that have apparently cracked the code on environmentally acceptable production, but output remains small — less than 1 percent of China's total. MP's prospects received some validation in recent days, when Apple agreed to buy $500 million of 'American-made' rare earth magnets from MP over the next four years.
Other companies, like Lynas USA, have entered the race, but they, too, remain small.
The U.S. and other countries will have to replicate China's processing capabilities to dismantle one of Beijing's most powerful strategic weapons. That will require an all-out effort to provide cleaner processing techniques and possibly price supports. Some have suggested, in addition, stockpiling a strategic reserve, as we have done with petroleum. That seems smart — like oil, rare earths are critical to our economy.
The Trump White House has made a good start, but the hard work has just begun.
Liz Peek is a former partner of major bracket Wall Street firm Wertheim and Company.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anita Dunn defends Biden's mental fitness in GOP House committee grilling
Anita Dunn defends Biden's mental fitness in GOP House committee grilling

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Anita Dunn defends Biden's mental fitness in GOP House committee grilling

Anita Dunn, who was a senior adviser to former President Joe Biden, defended him during a five-hour closed-door deposition at the House Oversight Committee Thursday. Dunn told investigators that while she observed a "physical" decline in Biden during his four years in office, she maintained the belief that he was calling the shots and mentally engaged in decision-making at the White House. "From what I experienced and observed in the White House, President Biden made all of the important decisions expected of someone serving as the president of the United States," she told the committee, according to her prepared remarks obtained by ABC News. Dunn refused to answer any questions from reporters as she arrived and later left the deposition. But her statement indicates she believes Biden was fit to serve and West Wing staff did not usurp his power. "I did not observe White House staff making key decisions or exercising the powers of the presidency without President Biden's knowledge or consent," Dunn testified, according to the prepared remarks. "The President made it clear that decisions rested with him, and White House staff brought issues to him for him to decide." Her remarks continued, "Before scheduling a press interview or releasing statements under his name, we sought his approval, and he was an active participant in the preparation of his speeches and public statements. While I observed that President Biden aged physically during his time in office, which is something that happens to every President, he remained throughout my interactions with him fully engaged and clear in his directions and supervision. His ability to probe, to find the weakness in an argument, and to make well-informed decisions, did not change during my time in the White House." MORE: Former Biden adviser Mike Donilon testifies in House committee probe into Biden mental fitness House Republicans reacted to Dunn's closed-door interview, saying Dunn "revealed" that Biden's "inner circle" decided against a cognitive test, concluding it would offer no political benefit, a source familiar with her account told ABC News. Dunn confirmed that President Biden's team decided against doing a 2024 Super Bowl interview due to information contained in the special counsel Robert Hur's report that probed Biden's handing of sensitive documents and questioned his mental fitness. She is the latest Biden official to answer questions after several former senior officials invoked their Fifth Amendment right to not answer questions.

TLombard Says Growth Soft Patch, Not Recession(EDIT)
TLombard Says Growth Soft Patch, Not Recession(EDIT)

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

TLombard Says Growth Soft Patch, Not Recession(EDIT)

TS Lombard says the US is in a growth soft patch, not a looming recession. Despite weaker hiring data and policy jitters, the firm sees a low hiring, low firing regime rather than a downturn. They argue that last month's LNG holiday shock and erratic policymaking led to a temporary pause in hiring but won't tip the economy into recession in 2025. Analyst Daniel Ahlen walked through the details, noting private sector balance sheets look healthy and real income growth has only moderated, not collapsed. He expects payrolls to bounce back over the next couple of months and argues that ongoing AI-driven corporate profit growth gives risk assets a further boost. TS Lombard thinks the 10-year Treasury yield will finish the year above current levels even if it drifts lower in the short run, and that the dollar's slides could continue as markets price in softer job gains. This upbeat take suggests investors may want to lean into equities and bonds before the next Fed moves. Investors will be watching July's jobs report on August 8. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores

Air Force denies early retirement pay to some transgender service members
Air Force denies early retirement pay to some transgender service members

New York Post

time18 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Air Force denies early retirement pay to some transgender service members

The US Air Force announced Thursday that transgender service members who have served between 15 and 18 years will not be able to obtain early retirement benefits. Those transgender service members – forced out of the Air Force under President Trump's January executive order targeting 'gender radicalism' in the military – will instead have the option to take a lump-sum separation payment or be removed. The move follows President Trump's executive order banning transgender people from the military. AP The Air Force, however, approved early retirement for self-identifying transgender service members with 18-20 years of honorable service. 'Although service members with 15-18 years of honorable service were permitted to apply for an exception to policy, none of the exceptions to policy were approved,' an Air Force spokesperson said in a statement. 'Approximately a dozen service members between 15 and 18 years of service were prematurely notified that their [early retirement] applications under the gender dysphoria provision had been approved,' the spokesperson added, noting that a higher-level review was required. Voluntary separation pay at double the amount of involuntary separation pay will be offered to those with 15-18 years of service and 'remaining military service obligations, including service obligations incurred as a result of a bonus or transfer of post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to dependents will be waived.' Military officials indicated that it is rare for early retirement benefits to be granted to people with 15 to 18 years of service time, according to CBS News. Approximately 1,000 service members self-identify as being diagnosed with gender dysphoria, according to the Pentagon. There are roughly 1.3 million active duty troops. Transgender service members not granted early retirement will be eligible for a lump-sum payment if they leave voluntarily. SHAWN THEW/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock There are no current tallies of how many transgender service members are in the services, but a 2016 Defense Department survey estimated there were 8,980 active duty and 5,727 reserve troops who identified as transgender, according to a 2018 report by the Palm Center, a California-based think tank. That included '1,850 transgender men (who joined the military as women) and 7,129 transgender women (who joined the military as men),' the report said. The Pentagon moved forward with Trump's transgender troop ban after it was granted permission by the Supreme Court in May. 'TRANS is out at the DOD,' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth wrote on X at the time. 'This is the president's agenda,' Hegseth said in a separate video message. 'This is what the American people voted for, and we're going to continue to relentlessly pursue it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store