logo
Confront the CCP's Historical Lies and Seek Liberation

Confront the CCP's Historical Lies and Seek Liberation

Japan Forward26-05-2025

このページを 日本語 で読む
President Xi Jinping's Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is now rewriting history on a global scale. This manipulation was displayed during Russia's WWII Victory Day ceremony on May 9.
Let's take a closer look at China's historical fabrication, its serious implications for Japan, and potential countermeasures.
During his state visit to Russia, Xi became the first Chinese leader to order the People's Liberation Army to take part in Russia's victory parade. President Vladimir Putin praised the occasion, noting it featured the largest number of foreign troops ever to participate in the event.
In response, Xi said, "China and Russia will uphold the correct history." He went on to boast that the CCP led the Chinese people, fought alongside the Soviet Union to defeat Japan, and contributed to the global fight against fascism. In truth, however, the CCP's contribution to the "anti-Japan resistance" was virtually nonexistent. Haiying Yang is a cultural anthropologist and professor at Shizuoka University
The CCP, founded in 1921, shifted its strategy to armed struggle following intense internal disputes. It established bases in the mountainous regions of southern China and formed a regime known as the Chinese Soviet Republic.
When China's Kuomintang (KMT) forces overran these strongholds, the remnants of the CCP began a retreat in 1934. They attempted to flee westward through Sichuan and Tibet toward Soviet territory. Along the way, they engaged in looting and arson, even as they suffered casualties in clashes with Tibetan forces. Mao Zedong later admitted that he had "snatched a few supplies from the Tibetans."
Mao and his group initially characterized their escape to the north as a strategic withdrawal. However, they later rebranded it with the noble-sounding name of the Northward Resistance Against the Japanese.
In reality, the group had little knowledge of how far Japanese forces had advanced and lacked a clear understanding of Manchukuo, which had been established for over two years. Without accurate perception, they referred to Manchukuo simply as the Northeast. Therefore, when the Maoists settled in Yan'an, Shaanxi Province, in late autumn of 1935, they remained apprehensive about potential attacks from neighboring Inner Mongolia.
Mao issued the "Proclamation of the Chinese Soviet Republic" in 1931, publicly asserting that the Inner Mongolians had the same right to secession as the Ukrainians and the peoples of the Caucasus. He also declared that if the Mongolian people chose to remain within Chinese territory in the future, it would be under a federal system.
Mao's CCP forces did not advance eastward from Yan'an to confront the Japanese on the front lines. Instead, they focused on expanding their power and undermining the KMT forces. In northern Shaanxi and the Ordos Plateau of Inner Mongolia, they cultivated poppies and trafficked refined opium into KMT-controlled areas and Mongolia. This opium trade weakened the KMT's will to fight and brought poverty to Mongolian society.
The CCP forces ambushed retreating KMT troops from the front lines, treating them as if they were allies of the Japanese. In the territories the CCP occupied, they executed wealthy farmers, labeling them as "the exploiting class of landowners." The confiscated land was then handed over to hoodlums and vagrants to bolster the CCP's support base. By the time the eight-year war against Japan ended, much of the country had been turned into revolutionary bases for the party. This is the true extent of the CCP's so-called "anti-Japan resistance."
After the war, the CCP mobilized Japanese technicians from the Manchukuo Film Association to produce numerous anti-Japanese films. The titles, such as "Railway Guerrilla Unit," clearly reveal that the CCP forces were not engaged in large-scale, modern warfare against the Japanese.
Allied forces of the Soviet Union and the Mongolian People's Republic, which had advanced into Manchukuo and Inner Mongolia, were effectively aligned. The Soviet Union guided the CCP forces into Manchukuo and handed over the high-quality arms and ammunition left behind by the Japanese military. This enabled the CCP to gain the upper hand in the Chinese Civil War and ultimately brought Mao Zedong to power.
The Mongolian People's Republic sought to liberate its fellow Inner Mongolians, hoping to unify all of Mongolia north of the Great Wall. For Mongolia, this was a war of national liberation. Yet that aspiration was cut short, as Inner Mongolia was to be occupied by China under the secret terms of the Yalta Agreement, signed by the United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union in the spring of 1945.
Today, the Xi administration no longer acknowledges the southward advance of the Soviet Union and the Mongolian People's Republic, concealing the true nature of anti-fascist history.
At Xi's invitation, Putin is scheduled to visit Beijing this fall to attend China's Victory Day parade. Because the CCP played no real role in resisting Japan during the war, "anti-Japan" has instead become a national policy and a tool for preserving its grip on power today.
Japan is not only defenseless against the CCP's historical fabrications, but influential Diet members have taken a conciliatory stance, repeatedly visiting Beijing to beg for giant pandas. Even after these delegations returned, Chinese state vessels continued to intrude into the waters around the Senkaku Islands in Okinawa Prefecture, insisting they have a unilateral claim to the territory. The CCP's aim in targeting the Senkakus is to turn its historical distortions into reality.
Japan's current administration has failed to confront China's historical revisionism and its attempts to reshape the international order. Worse still, on the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, the government is again engaged in "re-examining the earlier war." It's a process that risks culminating in yet another apology, with no effort to break free from the spell of self-flagellation.
Such self-flagellation not only hinders Japan's healthy development but risks enabling the CCP's aggressive encroachment. Countermeasures must be urgently devised.
RELATED:
( Read this in Japanese .)
Author: Haiying Yang
このページを 日本語 で読む

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Japan just recorded its fewest annual births since it started keeping records
Japan just recorded its fewest annual births since it started keeping records

CBC

time2 hours ago

  • CBC

Japan just recorded its fewest annual births since it started keeping records

Social Sharing The number of newborns in Japan is decreasing faster than projected, with the number of annual births falling to a record low last year, according to government data released Wednesday. The Health Ministry said 686,061 babies were born in Japan in 2024, a drop of 5.7 per cent from the previous year and the first time the number of newborns has fallen below 700,000 since records began in 1899. The decline comes about 15 years faster than the government's prediction. Last year's figure is about one-quarter of the peak of 2.7 million births in 1949 during the postwar baby boom. The data in a country with a rapidly aging and shrinking population adds to concern about the sustainability of the economy and national security at a time the government seeks to increase defence spending. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has described the situation as "a silent emergency" and promised to promote a more flexible working environment and other measures that would help married couples balance work and parenting, especially in rural areas, where family values tend to be more conservative and harder on women. A global problem Japan is far from alone. Canada recorded its lowest-ever fertility rate for the second year in a row in 2023, according to Statistics Canada data released last fall, at 1.26 children born per woman. It joined the ranks of "lowest-low" fertility countries, including South Korea, Spain, Italy and Japan. WATCH | Why Canadians are having fewer children: Canadians are having fewer kids than ever 8 months ago Duration 0:59 For the second year in a row, Statistics Canada says the country recorded its lowest-ever fertility rate. We break down the stats, including which province is the lowest. Experts have linked a range of factors with reproductive decision-making, including the rising cost of living, eco-anxiety and shifting social norms around family size. More people are also delaying parenthood until later in life, which can shorten their reproductive window. In the United States, births and birth rates have been falling for years. They dropped most years after the 2008-09 recession, aside from a 2014 uptick. The Trump administration is reportedly mulling incentives that could include a $5,000 US "baby bonus," reserving scholarship placements for applicants who are married or have children, and motherhood medals for women who have six or more children, according to multiple media outlets. South Korea has implemented various measures to encourage young people to get married and have children, including tax cuts and subsidies, but it also expanded parental leave, increased paternity leave and added more flexible work schedules for parents. Last year, its fertility rate rose for the first time in nine years, from 0.72 to 0.75. Population projected to fall The Health Ministry's latest data showed that Japan's fertility rate — the average number of babies a woman is expected to have in her lifetime — also fell to a new low of 1.15 in 2024, from 1.2 a year earlier. Marriage was up slightly, to 485,063 couples, but the downtrend since the 1970s remains unchanged. Experts say the government measures have not addressed a growing number of young people reluctant to marry, while focusing largely on couples already married and planning to have a family, or those who already have children. The younger generation is increasingly reluctant to marry or have children due to bleak job prospects, a high cost of living and a gender-biased corporate culture that adds an extra burden on women and working mothers, experts say. A growing number of women also cite pressure to change their surnames to that of their husband as part of their reluctance to marry. Under civil law, couples must choose either surname to legally marry, a rule that traditionally has caused women to abandon their maiden names. Japan's population of about 124 million people is projected to fall to 87 million by 2070, when 40 per cent of the population will be over 65.

Trump's tariffs would cut US deficits by $2.8T over 10 years and shrink the economy, CBO says
Trump's tariffs would cut US deficits by $2.8T over 10 years and shrink the economy, CBO says

Winnipeg Free Press

time3 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Trump's tariffs would cut US deficits by $2.8T over 10 years and shrink the economy, CBO says

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump's sweeping tariff plan would cut deficits by $2.8 trillion over a 10-year period while shrinking the economy, raising the inflation rate and reducing the purchasing power of households overall, according to an analysis released Wednesday by the Congressional Budget Office. The numbers were revealed in a letter sent to Democratic congressional leadership outlining how the Trump administration's plan to impose wide-ranging tariffs on countries around the world will affect American households. Baked into the CBO analysis is a prediction that households would ultimately buy less from the countries hit with added tariffs. The budget office estimates that the tariffs would increase the average annual rate of inflation by 0.4 percentage points in 2025 and 2026. The budget office's model also assumes that the tariffs, announced through executive action between January and May, will be in place permanently. Since the analysis was conducted, a federal court struck down sweeping tariffs that Trump invoked under an emergency-powers law. An appeals court allowed the Trump administration to continue collecting the tariffs while the case goes through appeals. Largely confirming what other economic models have predicted, the CBO's estimations show that the tradeoff for a $2.8 trillion deficit reduction over 10 years would be an overall reduction in household wealth. In addition, the tariffs would shrink the economy, or reduce the rate of the gross domestic product by 0.06 percentage points per year. The Penn-Wharton Budget Model's April report predicted that the Republican president's tariffs would reduce long-run GDP by about 6% and wages by 5%. A major caveat of the CBO's estimates is written into the report — its estimates are 'subject to significant uncertainty, in part because the Administration could change how the tariff policies are administered.' Trump has often announced changes and pauses to his tariff plans on his social media platform. In April, he posted that he was backing off his tariffs on most nations for 90 days and jacking up the tax rate on Chinese imports to 125%. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Last week, he announced plans to hike the tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to a punishing 50%, a move that's set to hammer businesses and likely push up prices for consumers even further. The 50% tariffs went into effect Wednesday. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development forecast Tuesday that the U.S. economy, the world's largest, will slow growth to just 1.5% in 2026. A representative from the White House did not respond to an Associated Press request for comment ___ Associated Press writer Paul Wiseman in Washington contributed to this report.

Trump once floated a plan to attract more foreign students. Now they feel targeted on all fronts
Trump once floated a plan to attract more foreign students. Now they feel targeted on all fronts

Toronto Star

time4 hours ago

  • Toronto Star

Trump once floated a plan to attract more foreign students. Now they feel targeted on all fronts

To attract the brightest minds to America, President Donald Trump proposed a novel idea while campaigning: If elected, he would grant green cards to all foreign students who graduate from U.S. colleges. 'It's so sad when we lose people from Harvard, MIT, from the greatest schools,' Trump said during a podcast interview last June. 'That is going to end on Day One.' That promise never came to pass. Trump's stance on welcoming foreign students has shifted dramatically. International students have found themselves at the center of an escalating campaign to kick them out or keep them from coming as his administration merges a crackdown on immigration with an effort to reshape higher education. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW An avalanche of policies from the Trump administration — such as terminating students' ability to study in the U.S., halting all new student visa interviews, moving to block foreign enrollment at Harvard — have triggered lawsuits, countersuits and confusion for international students who say they feel targeted on multiple fronts. In interviews, students from around the world described how it feels to be an international student today in America. Their accounts highlight pervasive feelings of fear, anxiety and insecurity that have made them more cautious in their daily lives, distracted them from schoolwork and prompted many to cancel trips home because they fear not being allowed to return. For many, the last few months have forced them to rethink their dreams of building a life in America. A standout student from Latvia feels 'expendable' Markuss Saule, a freshman at Brigham Young University-Idaho, took a recent trip home to Latvia and spent the entire flight back to the U.S. in a state of panic. For hours, he scrubbed his phone, uninstalling all social media, deleting anything that touched on politics or could be construed as anti-Trump. 'That whole 10-hour flight, where I was debating, 'Will they let me in?' — it definitely killed me a little bit,' said Saule, a business analytics major. 'It was terrifying.' ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Saule is the type of international student the U.S. has coveted. As a high schooler in Latvia, he qualified for a competitive, merit-based exchange program funded by the U.S. State Department. He spent a year of high school in Minnesota, falling in love with America and a classmate who is now his fiancee. He just ended his freshman year in college with a 4.0 GPA. But the alarm he felt on that flight crushed what was left of his American dream. 'If you had asked me at the end of 2024 what my plans were, it was to get married, find a great job here in the U.S. and start a family,' said Saule, who hopes to work as a business data analyst. 'Those plans are not applicable anymore. Ask me now, and the plan to leave this place as soon as possible.' Saule and his fiancee plan to marry this summer, graduate a year early and move to Europe. This spring the Trump administration abruptly revoked permission to study in the U.S. for thousands of international students before reversing itself. A federal judge has blocked further status terminations, but for many, the damage is done. Saule has a constant fear he could be next. As a student in Minnesota just three years ago, he felt like a proud ambassador for his country. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW 'Now I feel a sense of inferiority. I feel that I am expendable, that I am purely an appendage that is maybe getting cut off soon,' he said. Trump's policies carry a clear subtext. 'The policies, what they tell me is simple. It is one word: Leave.' From dreaming of working at NASA to 'doomscrolling' job listings in India A concern for attracting the world's top students was raised in the interview Trump gave last June on the podcast 'All-In.' Can you promise, Trump was asked, to give companies more ability 'to import the best and brightest' students? 'I do promise,' Trump answered. Green cards, he said, would be handed out with diplomas to any foreign student who gets a college or graduate degree. Trump said he knew stories of 'brilliant' graduates who wanted to stay in the U.S. to work but couldn't. 'They go back to India, they go back to China' and become multi-billionaires, employing thousands of people. 'That is going to end on Day One.' Had Trump followed through with that pledge, a 24-year-old Indian physics major named Avi would not be afraid of losing everything he has worked toward. After six years in Arizona, where Avi attended college and is now working as an engineer, the U.S. feels like a second home. He dreams of working at NASA or in a national lab and staying in America where he has several relatives. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW But now he is too afraid to fly to Chicago to see them, rattled by news of foreigners being harassed at immigration centers and airports. 'Do I risk seeing my family or risk deportation?' said Avi, who asked to be identified by his first name, fearing retribution. Avi is one of about 240,000 people on student visas in the U.S. on Optional Practical Training — a postgraduation period where students are authorized to work in fields related to their degrees for up to three years. A key Trump nominee has said he would like to see an end to postgraduate work authorization for international students. Avi's visa is valid until next year but he feels 'a massive amount of uncertainty.' He wonders if he can sign a lease on a new apartment. Even his daily commute feels different. 'I drive to work every morning, 10 miles an hour under speed limit to avoid getting pulled over,' said Avi, who hopes to stay in the U.S. but is casting a wider net. 'I spend a lot of time doomscrolling job listings in India and other places.' ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW A Ukrainian chose college in America over joining the fight at home — for now Vladyslav Plyaka came to the U.S. from Ukraine as an exchange student in high school. As war broke out at home, he stayed to attend the University of Wisconsin. He was planning to visit Poland to see his mother but if he leaves the U.S., he would need to reapply for a visa. He doesn't know when that will be possible now that visa appointments are suspended, and he doesn't feel safe leaving the country anyway. He feels grateful for the education, but without renewing his visa, he'll be stuck in the U.S. at least two more years while he finishes his degree. He sometimes wonders if he would be willing to risk leaving his education in the United States — something he worked for years to achieve — if something happened to his family. 'It's hard because every day I have to think about my family, if everything is going to be all right,' he said. It took him three tries to win a scholarship to study in the U.S. Having that cut short because of visa problems would undermine the sacrifice he made to be here. He sometimes feels guilty that he isn't at home fighting for his country, but he knows there's value in gaining an education in America. 'I decided to stay here just because of how good the college education is,' he said. 'If it was not good, I probably would be on the front lines.' ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ___ AP Education Writer Collin Binkley contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store