Radhakrishnan named NDA's V-P candidate
BJP president J P Nadda made the announcement following a meeting of the party's parliamentary board, which included Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and consulting the party's allies. Nadda appealed for unanimous election of Radhakrishnan (67), an OBC leader and two-time former member of Lok Sabha, to the constitutional position, saying the BJP leaders had spoken to the Opposition parties last week and will continue to do so.
The Opposition leaders had told the BJP interlocutors that they can make up their mind only after being told of the ruling alliance's nominee, Nadda said, adding that his party will reach out to them again.
Due to the comfortable majority of the BJP and its allies in the electoral college, comprising Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha members, Radhakrishnan's election is all but certain, and the party hopes that his elevation will help it make fresh inroads in Tamil Nadu, where elections are due next year. Radhakrishnan belongs to the influential Gounder caste, an OBC community, in Tamil Nadu.
Nadda emphasised on his nearly 40 years in public life, noting that he is well regarded in different parties and commands respect among various sections of society. "He is considered a statesman," Nadda said of the former Coimbatore MP who was made the Jharkhand governor in 2023 and then shifted to Maharashtra in July 2024.
Unlike his predecessor Jagdeep Dhankhar, who was also a governor like him before being named as the NDA's vice-presidential nominee in 2022, Radhakrishnan has refrained from cultivating a public profile on political issues and skirted any controversy.
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, sources said, will oversee the vice-presidential election, while Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju will be the polling agent. The last date for filing nomination is August 21. Chief ministers and deputy chief ministers of the BJP-led alliance will to be part of Radhakrishnan's nomination-filing exercise, besides the prime minister and Union ministers. If the Opposition alsonames its candidate, the election will be held on September 9.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
What are mail-in ballots? Here are the countries that use this voting method
When Donald Trump posted on social media this week vowing to 'get rid of mail-in ballots,' he lit up an argument that has been following him since the last election cycle. CNN notes the former president went so far as to claim the US is 'the only country' that uses mail-in voting, blaming the system for what he called 'massive voter fraud.' Donald Trump has claimed that the US is the only country to use mail-in ballots.(AFP) What is a mail-in ballot? Voters receive a ballot at home, fill it out, and then return it by mail or drop it off at a secure location. The process is often used by Americans overseas, members of the military, seniors, or anyone who cannot make it to a polling station. Also read: No voting machines, no mail-in ballots: Donald Trump plans US election revamp Mail-in ballots: Where else are they used? Plenty of other democracies use the same method. Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, and Switzerland all allow their citizens to vote by mail. The rules are not identical - in some places you have to request a ballot, in others it is sent automatically - but the principle is the same. Far from being abandoned, mail-in ballots are part of normal election practice around the world. Even inside the US, it is not a partisan thing. Utah, a Republican-led state, has mailed ballots to its voters for years. Its elections, like those in other states that lean heavily on mail voting, have not been rocked by widespread fraud. That undercuts Trump's line that 'all others gave it up.' Also read: What do 'skibidi', 'delulu', and 'tradwife' mean? Gen Z slang added to Cambridge Dictionary Fraud concerns and security issues surrounding mail-in ballots Election experts say there is always a sliver of risk, but the scale matters. Out of millions of ballots cast in federal elections, cases of fraud are rare. David Becker, who runs the nonpartisan Center for Election Innovation & Research, told CNN, 'Our elections are more secure, transparent, and verified than ever before in American history, thanks to the thousands of professional election officials of both parties, at the state and local level, that oversee them.' Trump also argued that states must run elections the way the president directs. This runs counter to the US Constitution. Article I, Section 4 makes clear that states control how elections are conducted unless Congress steps in. Richard Hasen, an election law professor at UCLA, called Trump's view 'wrong and dangerous,' adding that any executive order to ban mail-in voting would be tossed out in court. For now, the facts stand: mail-in ballots are legitimate, widely used, and firmly embedded in both US and global elections. FAQs: 1. What is a mail-in ballot? It's a ballot sent to a voter by mail, filled out at home, and returned by post or drop box. 2. Which countries use mail-in voting? Countries like Canada, the UK, Germany, Australia, and Switzerland allow it. 3. Does mail-in voting cause widespread fraud? No, experts say cases exist but are extremely rare. 4. Can the US president ban mail-in ballots? No, election rules are set by states and Congress, not the president. 5. Why is mail-in voting important? It gives access to voters who cannot get to polling places, such as overseas citizens and the elderly.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Owaisi seeks govt clarity on China's support to Pak during Op Sindoor
Hyderabad: AIMIM president and Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi on Monday alleged that China supplied weapons, fighter jets, and satellite intelligence to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor , and demanded that the Centre clarify its position before Prime Minister Narendra Modi's scheduled visit to China later this month. With Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi currently in India on a two-day visit, Owaisi questioned why the govt has remained silent on Beijing's actions. In a post on X, he wrote: "Why are we not strongly raising these issues with China? This is unacceptable. Beijing had even criticised the PM for wishing the Dalai Lama, yet our govt stayed quiet. Is this not a matter of national honour and dignity?" Separately, in the Lok Sabha, Owaisi raised a question on language policy. Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan in a written reply said the National Education Policy 2020 emphasises multilingualism, and wherever possible, the medium of instruction till at least class V — and preferably up to class VIII — will be in the home or regional language. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad | Gold Rates Today in Hyderabad | Silver Rates Today in Hyderabad Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Indus Waters Treaty was a Himalayan blunder by Nehru: JP Nadda
New Delhi: In a thread of posts on X on Monday, BJP national president JP Nadda has once again raised the issue of Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) signed by former PM Jawaharlal Nehru in 1960, calling the move "Nehru's Himalayan blunder". He accused Nehru of sidelining national interest for personal ambitions -- toeing the BJP's oft-repeated stance that the treaty was an unfair deal for the country. "Even today, India would have continued to pay the price for one man's misplaced idealism, if not for Prime Minister Modi's bold leadership and his commitment to 'Nation First'. By putting the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance, PM Modi has corrected yet another grave historical wrong committed by Congress ," he posted on X. Talking about the agreement, Nadda mentioned a discussion on IWT in Parliament in November 1960 where, he said, Congress MPs had also spoken against the IWT. "The most appalling aspect was that he (Nehru) did it without consulting Parliament. The treaty was signed in September 1960. However, it was placed before Parliament only two months later, in November, and that too, for a token discussion of a mere two hours," he wrote.
