Draconian, direct assault on democracy: Left parties on bills to remove PM, CMs over criminal charges
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Left parties on Wednesday said the new bills that provide for the removal of the prime minister or chief ministers arrested on serious criminal charges, are a direct "assault" on democracy and the federal framework, and vowed to oppose it "tooth and nail".The government plans to introduce three bills in Parliament on Wednesday for the removal of the prime minister, a Union minister, a chief minister or a minister of a state or Union Territory when arrested or detained on serious criminal charges for 30 days in a rowFlaying the move, CPI(M) general secretary MA Baby said on X that "Modi Govt's 3 bills to oust PM, CMs, Ministers after 30 days in custody expose its neo-fascist characteristics. This direct assault on our democracy will be opposed by CPIM tooth and nail. We urge all democratic forces to unite against this draconian move"."These bills, cloaked as tackling crime in high office, reveal their true intent given the RSS-controlled Modi govt's history of undermining elected state govts. With SIR, they mark a blatant move to subvert our democracy. All democratic forces must resist," he said on X.CPI(M) Rajya Sabha MP John Brittas called the bills "draconian"."The new bill by Union Home Minister Shri Amit Shah, purportedly in the name of 'public interest, welfare, and good governance,' is, in reality, draconian and designed to destabilize opposition-led state governments while undermining India's federal structure," Brittas said in a post on X."In an era marked by vindictive politics, where central agencies are deployed against opposition leaders, the provisions will be misused for ulterior motives," he said.The CPI(M) leader said the bill's reference to "constitutional morality" contradicts its spirit, as it deviates from the established principle that disqualification and punishment should be tied to convictions by courts, not merely charges or arrests."This principle is clearly enshrined in Section 8 of the Representation of the People Act (RPA). In today's pernicious political climate, where individuals can be easily charged, arrested, and detained for extended periods, this legislation will be weaponised to target political opponents and erode democratic norms," he said.CPI(ML) Liberation general secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya said the bills will sound the "death knell" for federalism."Viewed together with the ongoing systematic subversion of the electoral system starting with the appointment of Election Commissioners to the relentless push for 'One Nation, One Election' system, this amendment will sound the death knell for federalism and parliamentary democracy in India," Bhattacharya said."Every state government opposed to the BJP's politics and policies will henceforth be rendered permanently destabilised and dysfunctional. Every NDA ally will be on tenterhooks to fall in line with the BJP," he said in a statement."The weaponisation of central agencies like ED, CBI, IT, NIA and the abuse of the Constitutional office of Governors in narrow partisan interest, a trend which has been seriously condemned on several occasions even by the Supreme Court, will now gain legal validity with the enactment of this bill," he added.The three bills were approved by the Cabinet on Tuesday.These bills are the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill 2025; the Constitution (One Hundred And Thirtieth Amendment) Bill 2025; and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill 2025. The Bills are likely to be referred to a committee of Parliament
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Online gaming bill gets LS approval within 7 minutes
The Lok Sabha on Wednesday passed legislation completely prohibiting online money gaming in India, seven minutes after the Union minister for electronics and information technology (Meity) introduced the bill. Online gaming bill gets LS approval within 7 minutes Cleared by the Union cabinet only a day earlier, the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025 cleared its first legislative hurdle amid criticism from people in the gaming industry, who cited thousands of crores in revenues and investments involving the sector. The government, however, believes the benefits of banning online money games outweighs the costs, a senior government official requesting anonymity said. In Lok Sabha, where the bill sailed through amid opposition parliamentarian's protests, minister Ashwini Vaishnaw said the legislation was necessary to tackle a segment of gaming that is of significant concern. 'Over the last 11 years, digital technology has expanded on a massive scale, giving India a new identity. One sector closely tied to this growth is online gaming, which has three key segments,' Vaishnaw told Parliament. 'The first is e-sports, an emerging field that promotes strategic thinking, teamwork, and cultural exchange. The second is online social games like solitaire, chess, and sudoku that many of us have played. The third, however, is online money games — a segment that has become a serious concern for society today.' The law bans all online money games, from fantasy sports to poker, rummy and online lotteries. Facilitators face up to three years imprisonment, fines of ₹1 crore, or both. Advertising such platforms carries penalties of two years imprisonment and fines up to ₹50 lakh. Government estimates suggest 450 million Indians play online money games, with approximately ₹20,000 crore lost annually. The industry generates ₹31,000 crore in annual revenues, has attracted ₹25,000 crore in foreign investment since June 2022, and supports around 400 startups, according to the letter floated by the industry body to Amit Shah. 'Many families suffer because people in their families get addicted to online money games, and life-long savings are lost to these money games,' Vaishnaw said. The senior government official cited above added the bill was kept under wraps as it was considered too sensitive to publicise. Online gaming encompasses a broad spectrum, from casual mobile games to money-based platforms. Several states have targeted the latter, citing constitutional authority to regulate gambling. However, this approach has created legal confusion over skill versus chance games, with courts delivering conflicting rulings on platforms like rummy and fantasy cricket. At present, India has no federal regulation on online gaming. A patchwork of laws exists, with states like Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh banning online money gaming outright, whilst Sikkim and Nagaland require licensing for operators. Industry bodies were not consulted before Tuesday's Cabinet approval, HT has learnt, though the government had held multiple rounds of conversations with stakeholders over the last three to four years. The All India Gaming Federation, E-Gaming Federation, and Federation of Indian Fantasy Sports have written to Home Minister Amit Shah calling the ban a 'death knell' for the industry. The organisations said the sector contributes over ₹20,000 crore in annual taxes and employs more than 200,000 people, with projections to double by 2028. The government official cited above added that there was recognition the industry will be affected but said companies should look at other ways to turn their platforms towards recreational games. The bill still has a long way to go before being fully operational – it needs to next be approved by the Rajya Sabha, before rules are framed for its implementation. IT secretary S Krishnan told HT the government would hold consultations with stakeholders before drafting implementation rules. 'All ministries supported the bill. The finance ministry raised concerns over payment transactions, and the Financial Intelligence Unit will keep a close watch on them,' he added. Critics argued the ban abandons a more measured regulatory approach and would benefit offshore operators while harming compliant domestic companies. The legislation effectively scraps proposed amendments to IT Rules 2023 that would have created a system where self-regulatory bodies vetted online real-money games and provided consumer complaint channels. 'The IT Rules amendment was a proportionate framework that adequately addressed consumer welfare concerns and would have created a way to signal to consumers which platforms can be trusted and which cannot. Most importantly, it gave them an opportunity for recourse,' said Megha Bal, director at Esya Centre, a tech policy think tank. 'The government has, in one fell swoop, wiped out companies that were onshore and willing to comply with a regulatory framework,' Bal added. The legislation comes amid an Enforcement Directorate investigation into celebrities promoting betting platforms, with the agency questioning film stars, cricketers and influencers over money laundering concerns. The bill, however, promotes e-Sports as legitimate competition while banning money-based gaming, marking one of the world's strictest regulatory approaches to digital gambling. Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla urged MPs to back the bill, calling it a 'good bill,' even as opposition protests disrupted proceedings. 'I request members to return to their seats and discuss the matter. I am ready to allow a debate. Do you not want to debate this issue?' he asked amid the uproar.
Hindustan Times
30 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
RS approves bill to set up IIM in Guwahati
The Rajya Sabha on Wednesday passed a bill to set up an Indian Institute of Management (IIM) in Guwahati, Assam, only the second IIM in the Northeast after the one in Shillong and overall 22nd premier management institution across the country. RS approves bill to set up IIM in Guwahati The Indian Institutes of Management (Amendment) Bill, 2025, was passed by the Lok Sabha on Tuesday. '...We want to assure the countrymen and especially the people of Assam that IIM Guwahati will admit students from this academic session. Faculties will be appointed and academic activities will also start,' Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan said in the Rajya Sabha while introducing the bill. As soon as the bill was introduced after the House reconvened at 2pm following multiple adjournments earlier in the day, the Opposition staged a walkout in protest over their demand for a debate on the ongoing special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar. Despite the Opposition walkout, several lawmakers from the ruling BJP, its allies AIADMK and NCP, as well as parties such as BJP, BSP, YSRCP and BRS took part in the discussion over the IIM bill and extended their support. Replying to the discussion on the bill, Pradhan said IIM have been functioning as premier management institutions since 1961. 'The 22nd IIM in the country will be set up in Guwahati at an investment of ₹555 crore,' the minister said. 'In the 53 years from 1961 to 2014, only 13 IIMs were set up. With the addition of IIM Guwahati, the number of IIMs set up under the Modi government in 11 years will rise to nine.' The bill was passed by a voice vote in the Rajya Sabha. With the establishment of an IIM in Guwahati as an institution of national importance, the Assam city — which also has an Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) and National Law University (NLU) — will emerge as an education hub.
NDTV
30 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Draconian Act": Congress Slams Centre Over Constitution Amendment Bill
New Delhi: Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury on Wednesday criticised the 130th Constitution Amendment Bill that sought to allow the removal of the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, and ministers if they were held on serious criminal charges. The Congress leader accused the ruling BJP of using its majority in Parliament to push through the bill with the intention of targeting the opposition. He called the move "draconian" and politically motivated. The 130th Constitution Amendment Bill seeks to remove the Prime Minister or Chief Ministers who are facing allegations of corruption or serious offences and have been detained for 30 consecutive days. Speaking to ANI, the Congress leader called the bill a political weapon and said, "The intention of the ruling side to pass this bill using its majority is not right. This will be used as a tool to target the opposition. This is a draconian act." He further questioned the timing of the bill, linking it to ongoing debates over the allegation on the Election Commission of 'vote theft'. "At a time when questions are rising against the Election Commission, there is panic in the ruling party, and this issue has now been raised to divert attention from it?" Adhir Ranjan told ANI. Earlier in the day, slamming the BJP government over the introduction of the 130th Constitution Amendment Bill in Lok Sabha, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin said that legislation, if passed, will allow the ruling party at the Centre to register false cases against Chief Ministers of the opposition parties and it will shake the democratic foundations of the country. In a post on X, Mr Stalin said that the BJP Government has decided to "defile" the Constitution."The 130th Constitutional Amendment is not reform -- this is a Black Day and this is a Black Bill. 30-day arrest = Removal of an elected CM. No trial, no conviction -- just BJP's DIKTAT. This is how DICTATORSHIPS begin: Steal votes, Silence rivals and Crush States," wrote Mr Stalin while condemning the bill. The Tamil Nadu CM pointed out that the introduction of the said bill is the BJP's government diversion tactic to bring the bill at a time when it is facing allegations over "vote theft". "After the expose of #VoteTheft, the very mandate on which the Union BJP Government was formed is in serious question. Its legitimacy is doubtful. Having stolen the mandate of the people through fraud, the BJP is now desperate to distract public attention from this expose. To do that, they have brought in the 130th Constitutional Amendment Bill," he said. Expressing faith in the judiciary, CM Stalin said that the Constitution Amendment bill will be struck down by the courts. Union Home Minister Amit Shah introduced the Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025, to further amend the Constitution of India and the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025, apart from the bill to amend the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019. He also proposed sending the bllls to a joint committee of Parliament.
