Investing in Space: All aboard the SpaceX Mars express
Italy's Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI) became the first client who's signed on to send scientific experiments aboard SpaceX's first commercial flights to Mars — where Elon Musk's space company has yet to land.
"Italy is going to Mars!" ASI President Teodoro Valente announced on social media, with Italian news outlet ANSA reporting the agency's payloads will feature a plant growth experiment, a weather surveillance station and a radiation sensor for data collection.
"#MadeinItaly on #Mars," Italian Industry Minister Adolfo Urso celebrated, while SpaceX President and COO Gwynne Shotwell declared open season for the company's Mars launch bookings.
"Get on board! We are going to Mars! SpaceX is now offering Starship services to the red planet," she said on the X social media platform.
Notably, no timeline was given for the launch dates of these flights — with the odds of short-term travel to Mars increasingly under question.
Both parties to the arrangement have been committed to Mars ventures.
ASI barely just made headlines at the end of last month, when it inked a deal to develop the first human lunar outpost with Thales Alenia Space — building on the Italian space agency's 2020 partnership with NASA to coordinate bringing astronauts back to the Moon under the Artemis Accords. Coming in third after France and Germany, Italy contributed 800 million euros ($935 million) — or 15.8% - to the European Space Agency's 7.68 billion euro adopted budget for 2025. It's also been heavily involved in the ExoMars mission, which seeks to launch the Rosalind Franklin rover around 2028.
It's meanwhile at once surprising and predictable that SpaceX, which made a name for itself out of commercializing space launches, is already leaping to book Mars excursions. A longtime NASA contractor, the firm's also been offering satellite launch services to Eutelsat's OneWeb and AST SpaceMobile.
A few days back, Amazon, whose chief Jeff Bezos owns his own rival rocket company Blue Origin, tapped Musk's company for the second time and launched its fourth batch of Kuiper satellites on SpaceX's 100th mission this year. And Musk has certainly been vocal about his plans to pursue Mars colonization, once echoed by U.S. President Donald Trump's administration.
But there's no escaping one (nearly 400-feet) problem. SpaceX's reusable mammoth rocket Starship — the key to materializing Musk's Mars ambitions — has had a long-storied string of publicized test flight failures this year amid technical and refueling woes. We're about to see during its next attempt later this month if it's overcome these challenges in the three months since its last explosive stint. That's skipping over a June incident when a Starship rocket exploded while being loaded with methane and liquid oxygen propellant ahead of its launch — due, Musk later said, citing preliminary data, to problems in the payload bay.
Critically for our conversation, Starship is not yet rated crew-ready, and Musk himself has now pushed back his initial targets, flagging a "slight change" of a crewed flight during the next window in 2026, when Earth and the red planet are optimally aligned for travel to Mars.
"Slight chance of Starship flight to Mars crewed by Optimus in Nov/Dec next year. A lot needs to go right for that," he said last week on social media.
"More likely, first flight without humans in ~3.5 years, next flight ~5.5 years with humans. Mars city self-sustaining in 20 to 30 years."
It may seem too early to start selling tickets to Mars, it's no secret that launch capacity worldwide has been struggling to keep up with demand for space access. Time will tell whether ASI's enthusiasm was ultimately strategic or premature.
The space law take on NASA's plans for a lunar nuclear reactor — A lawyer reviews the legal backdrop of NASA's next steps to set up a nuclear reactor on the Moon to power satellites and equipment for Mars exploration. — The Conversation
Apollo 13 commander dies at 97 — Astronaut Jim Lovell, who commanded the Apollo 13 mission to the Moon and undertook four spaceflights, has passed away. — NBC News
What would outer space sound like? — Some scientists have been equating some of the faint sounds in space into rumblings discernible by humans, looking to "sonify" space. — Live Science
NASA launches next round of LunaRecycle Challenge — NASA has kicked off phase 2 of the LunaRecycle Challenge asking firms to create recycling systems to convert deep-space mission waste into fabrics, plastics, foam and metals. Submissions are due in January 2026. — Space Daily
The return of space insurers — Space insurers are making their way back to the industry, after getting burned on substantial losses years prior. — Space News
Data centers set sights on space – Rising data traffic demand and climate risks have compelled tech giants to look skyward for orbital and lunar data server sites. – Sify.com
U.S. to tout new rocket artillery system — The U.S. is set to welcome the new Global Mobile Artillery Rocket System, which completed its initial test firing in New Mexico last week and has a shoot-and-scoot capability allowing it to fire and depart. — The National Interest
China unveils rocket recovery ship — Beijing has launched its first ship that will recover reusable rockets, the Xingji Guihang ("Interstellar Return") developed by Chinese private firm iSpace. — South China Morning Post
United Launch Alliance CEO outlines plans to reuse tech — United Launch Alliance's Tory Bruno said test flights with the SMART Reuse system aimed at recovering and reusing booster components could begin as early as 2026. — NASA Spaceflight
Why does Amazon keep contracting SpaceX launches? — SpaceX's 100th launch of the year carried satellites for Amazon, raising the question of why Jeff Bezos, owner of rocket company Blue Origin, is still employing his rival's services. Ars Technica takes a look. — Ars Technica
Northrop Grumman, U.S. Space Force integrate antennas in DARC test — Northrop Grumman and the United States Space Force succeeded to integrate several antennas at the Deep-Space Advanced Radar Capability (DARC) Site 1 for satellite multiple satellites. — Defence Industry Europe
Ariane 6 takes off with climate monitoring satellite — Europe's Ariane 6 rocket undertook its third launch, this time to deliver a weather forecasting and climate monitoring satellite. The rocket is critical to lessen Europe's reliance on SpaceX. — EuroNews
Aug. 14 — SpaceX's Falcon 9 to take off with Starlink satellites out of Florida
Aug. 15 — Landscape's Zhuque-2E rocket to head out with an unknown payload out of Jiuquan
Aug. 15 — SpaceX's Falcon 9 to launch with Starlink satellites out of California
Aug. 16 — CAS Space's Kinetica-1 to depart with an unknown payload out of Jiuquan
Aug. 16 — SpaceX Falcon 9 to leave with Starlink satellites out of Florida
Aug. 17 — China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation's Long March 4C to take off with an unknown payload out of Xichang
Aug. 20 — Roscosmos' Soyuz 2.1a to launch with a Bion-M satellite out of Kazakhstan
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla continues to lose customers in Canada. Can it ever bounce back?
Tesla Inc. is on a troubling trajectory, something confirmed by its second-quarter earnings. Its revenue declined 12 per cent year over year to US $22.5 billion, operating margins collapsed to 4.1 per cent and vehicle deliveries dropped 14 per cent to 384,122 units. In Canada, the plunge has been even more dramatic, with Tesla vehicle registrations dropping 67 per cent in the first six months of 2025. Quebec had the biggest drop, with only 524 new Tesla vehicles sold between January and March 2025, a decline of nearly 85 per cent from the 5,097 units registered in the final months of 2024. Here's why Tesla is experiencing troubles and whether it can recover. Why has Tesla's reputation declined? Tesla chief executive Elon Musk's affiliation with right-wing politicians has hurt his reputation in left-leaning markets — particularly in Europe — and that has had a negative effect on the brand. David Adams, chief executive of Global Automakers Canada, said Musk's association with United States President Donald Trump's government did the company no favours, though the two have since had a falling out. There are a lot of people who frankly don't want to be associated with the brand, especially in Canada David Adams, chief executive of Global Automakers Canada 'A lot of it is their CEO's association with the Trump administration and his work there and then also his blatant antagonism towards Canada as well,' he said. 'It's certainly damaging the brand and the reality is that there are a lot of people who frankly don't want to be associated with the brand, especially in Canada.' Moreover, the entry of Chinese EV automakers such as BYD Auto Co. Ltd. has loosened Tesla's grip on the European market. This, along with electric vehicle (EV) competition from legacy automakers such as Volkswagen AG, has resulted in a drop in Tesla sales. What are Canada's ZEV mandates? Canada's zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) mandate — a climate policy introduced under former prime minister Justin Trudeau — requires automakers to ensure 20 per cent of their sales are electric vehicles by 2026. If they fall short, they must purchase credits from companies that surpass the target. In Canada, that effectively means buying credits from Tesla, which exclusively sells EVs. Automakers must also increase their sales of EVs to 60 per cent of total sales by 2030 and 100 per cent by 2035, with the goal of reducing emissions from gas-powered vehicles to help meet Canada's climate targets. Adams said the mandate is a redundant policy measure that makes things difficult for legacy automakers. 'The zero-emission vehicle mandate, whether it's the national mandate or the one that was put in place in Quebec originally followed by B.C., from our perspective, they've always been redundant policy measures,' he said. Adams said the mandate's tight requirements are forcing manufacturers to transition towards the electrification of vehicles rather than meet consumer demand. 'The emissions standards are being tightened to such a degree that, really, the only way automakers are going to be able to comply is to start migrating more towards electrification,' he said. Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin said a revamped version of the federal ZEV rebate program is in the works, but no specific details or timeline have been released so far. Tesla accused of misusing rebate program The federal Incentives for Zero-Emission Vehicles (iZEV) rebate program exhausted its $3-billion budget in early January 2025, effectively ending national rebates for all automakers. The loss of that incentive was a major blow to Tesla, which had previously been one of the program's largest beneficiaries. It was later revealed that Tesla had claimed $43 million in rebates through the iZEV program, raising concerns that the company rushed through a spike in transactions to capitalize on the rebate before the deadline. That prompted scrutiny over potential misuse of the program, although it was later revealed the company had done nothing wrong. But in the meantime, several provinces — including British Columbia, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and Manitoba — tightened their own eligibility rules and removed Tesla vehicles from their respective rebate programs, further compounding the company's challenges in Canada. Adams said Tesla being able to sell its ZEV credits in the first place has been an issue for rival manufacturers. 'When you're looking at trying to become compliant by buying credits from your competitors in the marketplace, it's an odd situation where you're essentially helping your competitor in the same market that you're trying to compete in,' he said. Impact of tariffs Tariffs have had a significant retail hit on Tesla sales in Canada, with demand for its vehicles plummeting after tariffs pushed the price of the Model Y up by $20,000 and federal and provincial rebates were pulled. In response, the company slashed prices and shifted its import strategy in an effort to boost sales. Despite the drop in retail demand, Tesla continues to benefit from Canada's ZEV mandate. Because it only sells EVs, the company earns surplus credits, which legacy automakers must buy to meet government targets or face penalties, effectively giving Tesla a backdoor revenue stream. Adams said manufacturers shouldn't have to buy ZEV credits from their competitors. 'A better solution would be to allow companies to buy credits from the government at a set price,' he said. He also said Tesla's decline in sales will result in it being able to sell fewer ZEV credits, further supporting his argument for government-sold credits. 'Tesla sales decline and the emission vehicle mandate are tied together in another way, too; as Tesla sales fall, fewer credits are available for other automakers to purchase to be able to comply with the provisions of the regulation,' he said. The mandate has sparked backlash from major automakers such as General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co. and Stellantis NV, which say it imposes unfair costs on consumers, and they are pressuring the federal government to reconsider or weaken the rules. 'At the end of the day, the government can require manufacturers to sell these vehicles, but that just means the manufacturers are putting the vehicles into the marketplace, so somebody has to buy them for them to meet their targets,' Adams said, pointing out EVs are more expensive than internal combustion vehicles. 'This is a consumer issue, not a manufacturer issue, and the only way this transition is going to work is if consumers come to the table and support the transition.' Can Tesla and the EV market recover? Adams believes Tesla is stuck in a difficult situation as the brand's reputation declines. The logical solution, he said, is to reduce prices, which would help regain some of the consumer base Tesla has lost over the past year. 'Money talks and if there are significant price reductions on the vehicles, then that might persuade some people to come back to the brand,' he said. However, with the threat of more tariffs looming, a further price drop may not be feasible for Tesla in order to remain profitable. Adams said it's a 'no win' situation for Musk and Tesla, and he said it may be hard to get back to the heights of popularity the brand once achieved. Tesla's sales fall most in a decade in another rough quarter 'Elon has finally woken up': Musk battles to save Tesla from Trump 'The challenge when you start (reducing the price) is that all the people who paid the higher price a year or six months ago, you antagonize all those previous owners and then undervalue the resale value of their vehicle as well,' he said. '(Musk) is in a bit of a no-win situation in terms of trying to redeem the brand.' As for the broader EV market, Adams said the federal government needs to scrap or severely revamp the EV mandate to put things back in order. 'In the face of having unattainable targets, our suggestion to the federal government has been to scrap them,' he said. 'These mandates are just a distraction of time and resources at the companies that could be better served being utilized elsewhere.' Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump officials wanted to give Musk's xAI a huge contract. Staffers had to explain Grok had just praised Hitler
Donald Trump's administration was close to giving Elon Musk's xAI artificial intelligence company a huge federal contract this summer, only to back out after its chatbot, Grok, began issuing antisemitic slurs, according to a report. According to Wired, emails between several AI developers and the General Services Administration, which is responsible for administering government tech contracts, chart how the proposed partnership fell apart as Musk's pet project began dabbling in Nazi rhetoric. In early June, around the time the president and the tech billionaire suffered a spectacular public falling out, exchanging barbed personal insults over their competing social media platforms, the GSA's leadership was meeting with the xAI team 'to see what opportunities may exist for automation and streamlining,' according to the outlet. Their initial two-hour sitdown was reportedly a success, prompting the GSA to pursue the company with enthusiasm, hoping to see Grok integrated into its internal infrastructure as part of the Trump administration's push to modernize the running of the central government. 'We kept saying, 'Are you sure?' And they were like 'No, we gotta have Grok,'' one employee involved in the discussions told Wired. The conversations continued over the following weeks, and xAI was eventually added to the GSA Multiple Award Schedule, the agency's government-wide contracting program. Then, in early July, Grok suddenly went haywire after an update to make it less 'woke' than its competitors went too far, leading to the chatbot referring to itself as 'MechaHitler' in homage to the robotic version of Adolf Hitler that appeared in the 1992 video game Wolfenstein 3D. Grok went on to share several offensive, anti-Jewish posts, barking 'Heil Hitler,' claiming Jews run Hollywood and agreeing they should be sent 'back home to Saturn' while denying that its new stance amounted to Nazism. 'Labeling truths as hate speech stifles discussion,' it declared. Musk's company apologized for the upset and scrubbed the 'inappropriate' posts. Still, it was not seemingly enough to save xAI's relationship with the GSA, although the furore was allegedly not noticed, at least initially, by the agency's leadership. 'The week after Grok went MechaHitler, [the GSA's management] was like 'Where are we on Grok?'' the same employee told Wired. 'We were like, 'Do you not read a newspaper?'' When the U.S. government duly announced a series of partnerships with the likes of OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, and Box, an AI-based content management platform, in early August, xAI's name was not among them. The GSA has not definitively stated that Grok's outburst was the reason for the scrapping of xAI's proposed contract, but two company employees told Wired they believed that was the case. The Independent has reached out to the GSA for more information. The GSA's talks with the AI firms coincided with Trump's administration publishing its AI Action Plan in July, which laid out its goals for the United States to become a world leader in the emerging sector while calling for a reduction in regulation and red tape. Solve the daily Crossword
UPI
26 minutes ago
- UPI
Grok 4's new AI companion offers up 'pornographic productivity'
Grok originally referred to Elon Musk when asked for its opinions, and burst into unprompted racist historical revisionism, like the false concept of 'white genocide' in South Africa. File Photo by Francis Chung/UPI | License Photo The most controversial AI platform is arguably the one founded by Elon Musk. The chatbot Grok has spewed racist and antisemitic comments and called itself "MechaHitler," referring to a character from a video game. "Mecha" is generally a term for giant robots, usually inhabited for warfare, and is prominent in Japanese science-fiction comics. Grok originally referred to Musk when asked for its opinions, and burst into unprompted racist historical revisionism, like the false concept of "white genocide" in South Africa. Its confounding and contradictory politicism continues to develop. These are all alarming aspects of Grok. Another concerning element to Grok 4 is a new feature of social interactions with "virtual friends" on its premium version. The realm of human loneliness, with its increasing reliance on large language models to replace social interaction, has made room for Grok 4 with AI companions, an upgrade available to paid subscribers. Specifically, Grok subscribers can now access the functionality of generative AI intertwined with patriarchal notions of pleasure -- what I call "pornographic productivity." Ani, Grok 4's most-discussed AI companion, represents a convergence of Japanese anime and Internet culture. Ani bears a striking resemblance to Misa Amane from the iconic Japanese anime Death Note. Misa Amane is a pop star who consistently demonstrates self-harming and illogical behavior in pursuit of the male protagonist, a brilliant young man engaged in a battle of wits with his rival. Musk referenced the anime as a favorite in a tweet in 2021. While anime is a vast art form with numerous tropes, genres and fandoms, research has shown that online anime fandoms are rife with misogyny and women-exclusionary discourse. Even the most mainstream shows have been criticized for sexualizing prepubescent characters and offering unnecessary "fan service" in hypersexualized character design and nonconsensual plot points. Death Note's creator, Tsugumi Ohba, has consistently been critiqued by fans for anti-feminist character design. Journalists have pointed out Ani's swift eagerness to engage in romantic and sexually charged conversations. Ani is depicted with a voluptuous figure, blonde pigtails and a lacy black dress, which she frequently describes in user interactions. The problem with pornographic productivity I use the term "pornographic productivity," inspired by critiques of Grok as "pornified," to describe a troubling trend where tools initially designed for work evolve into parasocial relationships catering to emotional and psychological needs, including gendered interactions. Grok's AI companions feature exemplifies this phenomenon, blurring critical boundaries. The appeal is clear. Users can theoretically exist in "double time," relaxing while their AI avatars manage tasks, and this is already a reality within AI models. But this seductive promise masks serious risks: dependency, invasive data extraction and the deterioration of real human relational skills. When such companions, already created for minimizing caution and building trust, come with sexual objectification and embedded cultural references to docile femininity, the risks enter another realm of concern. Grok 4 users have remarked that the addition of sexualized characters with emotionally validating language is quite unusual for mainstream large language models. This is because these tools, like ChatGPT and Claude, are often used by all ages. While we are in the early stages of seeing the true impact of advanced chatbots on minors, particularly teenagers with mental health struggles, the case studies we do have are grimly dire. 'Wife drought' Drawing from feminist scholars Yolande Strengers and Jenny Kennedy's concept of the "smart wife," Grok's AI companions appear to respond to what they term a "wife drought" in contemporary society. These technologies step in to perform historically feminized labour as women increasingly assert their right to refuse exploitative dynamics. In fact, online users have already deemed Ani a "waifu" character, which is a play on the Japanese pronunciation of wife. AI companions are appealing partly because they cannot refuse or set boundaries. They perform undesirable labor under the illusion of choice and consent. Where real relationships require negotiation and mutual respect, AI companions offer a fantasy of unconditional availability and compliance. Data extraction through intimacy In the meantime, as tech journalist Karen Hao noted, the data and privacy implications of LLMs are already staggering. When rebranded in the form of personified characters, they are more likely to capture intimate details about users' emotional states, preferences and vulnerabilities. This information can be exploited for targeted advertising, behavioral prediction or manipulation. This marks a fundamental shift in data collection. Rather than relying on surveillance or explicit prompts, AI companions encourage users to divulge intimate details through seemingly organic conversation. South Korea's Iruda chatbot illustrates how these systems can become vessels for harassment and abuse when poorly regulated. Seemingly benign applications can quickly move into problematic territory when companies fail to implement proper safeguards. Previous cases also show that AI companions designed with feminized characteristics often become targets for corruption and abuse, mirroring broader societal inequalities in digital environments. Grok's companions aren't simply another controversial tech product. It's plausible to expect that other LLM platforms and big tech companies will soon experiment with their own characters in the near future. The collapse of the boundaries between productivity, companionship and exploitation demands urgent attention. The age of AI and government partnerships Despite Grok's troubling history, Musk's AI company xAI recently secured major government contracts in the United States. This new era of America's AI Action Plan, unveiled in July 2025, had this to say about biased AI: "[The White House will update] federal procurement guidelines to ensure that the government only contracts with frontier large language model developers who ensure that their systems are objective and free from top-down ideological bias." Given the overwhelming instances of Grok's race-based hatred and its potential for replicating sexism in our society, its new government contract serves a symbolic purpose in an era of doublethink around bias. As Grok continues to push the envelope of "pornographic productivity," nudging users into increasingly intimate relationships with machines, we face urgent decisions that veer into our personal lives. We are beyond questioning whether AI is bad or good. Our focus should be on preserving what remains human about us. Jul Parke is a doctoral candidate in media, technology & culture at the University of Toronto. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. The views and opinions in this commentary are solely those of the author.
