UK petrol prices poised to rise as Israel-Iran conflict pushes up cost of oil
Britons are braced for higher prices at the pumps, after a rise in oil prices caused by the conflict between Israel and Iran in recent days.
Oil prices rose again on Monday, as traders worried about the risks of a broader regional military conflict, which could disrupt oil supplies. Iran is a big oil producer, and accounts for about 3% of global supplies.
As the conflict entered its fourth day, Brent crude rose 0.5% on Monday morning to $74.60 (£54.91) a barrel, while US crude rose 0.7% to $73.42.
Crude prices jumped more than 13% on Friday to their highest levels since January, and closed 7% higher for both benchmarks, after Israel hit more than 100 targets in Iran including nuclear facilities and missile sites, and Iran responded with its own missile strikes on Israel.
Thomas Pugh, an economist at the consulting firm RSM UK, said: 'Just as tensions and uncertainty around global trade and tariffs seemed to be easing with a deal between the US and China on tariffs, the Israel-Iran escalation represents a new source of geopolitical tension.
'The main way this will impact UK businesses and the economy is through higher oil and natural gas prices.'
He noted that oil prices have risen by about $10 a barrel in the past week, which is likely to result in a 5p increase in petrol and diesel prices at the pump over the 'next couple of months'.
On Monday, petrol prices hovered between 128.9p and 131.9p a litre in the London area, and diesel about 134.9p a litre, according to Petrolprices.com.
However, there has not been a complete sell-off in oil markets. In London, the FTSE 100 share opened up 0.2%, and the oil companies BP and Shell's stocks were up just over 1%. Stock markets in Germany and France rose marginally on opening.
'The market currently anticipates a limited conflict, though there is little indication that hostilities will end quickly,' said Jochen Stanzl, the chief market analyst at CMC Markets. 'It is expected that fighting will continue unabated this week, albeit on a limited scale.'
James Hosie, an analyst at Shore Capital, said the spike in Brent crude to $75 a barrel could be temporary, if the direct impact on Iran's oil facilities remains limited.
Over the weekend, airstrikes by Israel targeted energy assets including the Shahran oil depot and Shahr Rey refinery close to Tehran, and the South Pars gas field. This raises the risk of a direct impact on Iran's 2m barrels of oil exports a day.
There are fears that Iran's next response could target regional energy supplies by disrupting tanker movements in the strait of Hormuz – the waterway off the south coast of the country through which 20% of global oil supplies and 20% of liquefied natural gas flow.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
This would mark a significant escalation of the conflict, as it would affect exports from Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern oil and LNG producers, along with their customers, particularly China, Hosie said.
However, he said other members of the Opec oil cartel and allies, notably Saudi Arabia, could raise oil production to offset any disruption to Iranian exports, and others such as US shale producers could also step in.
The price of oil had been well below the $80.53 a barrel average recorded last year before the conflict, with prices at the pump easing.
Rachel Reeves said over the weekend that the UK government would do 'everything in [its] power' to protect people in Britain from the knock-on economic effects.
The chancellor would not 'take anything off the table' to tackle the threat of rising energy costs, she told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme.
After Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, oil prices spiked to nearly $130 a barrel, raising prices for everything from transport to food.
'There is no complacency from myself or the Treasury,' Reeves told the BBC. In 2022, the Conservative government stepped in to help households with their energy bills, but the chancellor said 'we are not anywhere near that stage at the moment'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Labour cutting farming budget in England by £100m a year, figures shows
Labour is cutting the farming budget in England by £100m a year, spending review figures show. Despite the decrease, the budget has been cautiously welcomed by nature and farming groups, as there were fears the Treasury had wanted to reduce the funding further. Farmers have felt squeezed by the Labour government's policies over recent months, with mass protests over the introduction of inheritance tax on farms worth more than £1m. Extreme weather and rising input prices have increased financial pressures on the sector, which has meant that a cut to the budget could have serious impacts. Ministers have also indicated that larger farms could be ineligible for the nature-friendly farming fund in future. The Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs was recently forced to U-turn on a freeze to new applicants for the fund after the National Farmers' Union (NFU) threatened legal action. Previous research by the RSPB has found that a £100m a year cut would lead to 239,000 fewer hectares (590,580 acres) of nature-friendly farmland. Defra said the funding paid to farmers under of environment land management schemes (Elms) would 'skyrocket' from £800m in 2023-24 to £2bn in 2028-29. However, the NFU has called this 'misleading' because after Brexit, farmers were promised that their subsidies would be the same as they were under the EU and were promised a figure of £2.4bn a year. The Elms programme was devised by the conservatives after Brexit: the goal was that rather than being paid per acre, farmers should be paid for improving nature. While the programme was being put in place,the acreage payments known as basic payments schemes (BPS) were kept, and cut each year as Elms increased. BPS is due to be phased out entirely by 2028. Farmers currently get the £2.4bn a year in the two streams as well as a smaller amount of money in grants for things such as robotics trials. Going forward, the government has promised an average of £2.3bn a year up to 2028-29 for the farming budget. By the end of the spending period the budget will shrink to £2.25bn, with £2bn allocated for Elms and the rest paid in productivity grants. Sanjay Dhanda, the NFU's senior economist, has said Defra has been 'misleading' in its claims. He said: 'A key pillar of Defra's budget is the continued investment in Elms, with funding set to rise to £2bn by 2028-29, compared with the £1.8bn earmarked in the Autumn 2024 budget. While the government has framed this as a significant uplift from the £800m spent in 2023-24, this comparison is misleading as Elms was not fully operational at that point, and delinked payments [BPS] absorbed a large share of funding.' However, Defra sources pointed out that although the previous government allocated £2.4bn a year for Elms, the Tories in fact underspent it by about £100m a year. That government had, however, promised that by the end of the spending period, which was cut short by the general election, the full fund was ringfenced and would be allocated to farmers. Tom Bradshaw, the NFU president, said: 'While the Defra secretary of state has listened and managed to maintain the overall funding for farming and nature recovery, from what we can see so far, the £100 million cut to farming means farmers and growers will need to do more with less.' Mark Spencer, a former farming minister who was in charge of issuing the farming budget, said the amount spent on Elms would have been higher than £2bn at the end of the spending period, under the Tories. 'The 2.4bn was meant for Elms. It was always our intention and emphasis to reduce BPS and pour the money into Elms and for the vast majority of it to go to Elms,' he said. Reacting to the cut, Spencer added: 'A part of me is angry, a part of me is just so sad. We made such huge progress and now it is in jeopardy.' Nature groups have credited Steve Reed, the environment secretary, for protecting the majority of the budget. Hilary McGrady, the director general of the National Trust, said the chancellor Rachel Reeves had maintained the budget for nature-friendly farming, adding: 'Steve Reed deserves credit for securing this budget in challenging financial circumstances.' A Defra spokesperson said: 'Contrary to media reports that the farming budget would be slashed by £1.2bn over the next three years, the government is investing a record £5.9bn into nature friendly farming schemes.'
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Stormont MLA Remuneration Board Bill passes despite opposition
The Stormont Assembly have voted to pass a new independent board to determine their salaries despite opposition from the smallest parties. The Assembly Members (Independent Remuneration Board) Bill will establish a new independent board to determine salaries and pensions for MLAs. It will replace the previous Independent Financial Review Panel which has been defunct for a number of years. Currently, the basic salary for an MLA is £51,500, but this can rise with position including chairing some committees or serving as a minister, with the First and deputy First Ministers receiving a salary of £123,500. A report alongside the Bill showed MLA salaries are lower than those received by Members of the Scottish Parliament (£72,196), Assembly Members at the Welsh Assembly (£72,057) and Members of the Irish Parliament (113,679 euros/£94,537). The Bill, put forward by the Assembly Commission, was passed by an oral vote by MLAs on Monday, with the sole MLAs representing the TUV and People Before Profit both opposing the Bill. TUV MLA Timothy Gaston claimed it is 'nothing more than a vehicle to enable MLAs to award themselves a substantial pay rise', and objected to former MLAs being entitled to sit on the new board. People Before Profit MLA Gerry Carroll also criticised that former MLAs could sit on the board, and said that a pay rise for MLAs amid 'rising rates of poverty' would be 'completely tone deaf'. However UUP MLA Andy Allen, who sits on the Assembly Commission, described a 'technical Bill' to deal with the process of how salaries and pensions are set. Closing the debate Sinn Fein MLA Sinead Ennis slammed what she termed 'inaccuracies and misunderstandings' over the Bill. She also warned that if the Bill did not pass the Assembly 'will have failed' to ensure legal clarity and leave no structure in place to determine the salaries and pensions of MLAs. 'In passing this Bill today, future discussions and decisions around the salaries and pensions of members will shift to the independent remuneration board,' she told MLAs. 'That board has independence in deciding what factors it wants to consider before determining its view on the appropriate level of salaries and pensions for members. 'That is the appropriate way of dealing with these matters.'
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
JP Morgan's Europe chief leaves London for New York
The head of JP Morgan's European operations is set to quit London and move to New York as the UK capital battles an exodus of talent and wealth. Filippo Gori plans to relocate to the US after living in London for less than a year. He moved to Britain from Hong Kong in the middle of last year after being appointed chief executive of JP Morgan's Europe, Middle East and Africa business last May. The Italian banker's decision to move to New York will see him join a growing list of bankers, investors and business leaders who have announced plans to leave Britain in the wake of Labour's election last year. Richard Gnodde, Goldman Sachs' vice chairman, left London earlier this year for Milan, in one of the most high-profile exits from the UK's financial centre. He decided to relocate after Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, scrapped non-dom status and changed inheritance tax rules for foreign trusts. The billionaire property investors Ian and Richard Livingstone have also moved from London to Monaco in the wake of the tax raid, while steel tycoon Lakshmi Mittal is also preparing to leave the UK. A source close to Mr Gori said his decision to leave London was not related to Labour's tax hikes but reflected his role as co-head of JP Morgan's global banking business, a position he holds alongside his European role. Doug Petno, the other global banking co-head, is already based in New York and a source close to the bank said it was 'mutually agreed' that it 'makes sense' for Mr Gori to be based in the same city. He will be expected to spend at least half of his time in the Europe, Middle East, and Africa region and will travel to London regularly. London's fading lustre Regardless of the motives, Mr Gori's relocation is likely to fuel concerns that London is losing its status as a global financial hub. As well as suffering an exodus of talent, the London Stock Exchange has seen a steady stream of businesses quit the market to move to New York and has struggled to attract new listings. Mr Gori will be the latest executive to oversee a British bank from the US. C.S. Venkatakrishnan, Barclays' chief executive, splits his time between New York and the bank's Canary Wharf headquarters. Sir Mark Tucker, HSBC chairman, manages operations from his home in New York. Prior to moving to London, Mr Gori spent more than a decade in Hong Kong, where his family still live. His relocation to New York comes as JP Morgan's top executives are vying for the chance to succeed Jamie Dimon, the bank's long-time chief executive. Marianne Lake, a Briton, is one of the frontrunners in the race, as is Mr Petno.
