FYJC admissions: Consider withdrawing decision on quota in minority institutions, HC tells Maharashtra govt
The Bombay High Court on Wednesday told the Maharashtra government to consider withdrawing the portion in its decision that applied SC/ST/OBC reservation in minority trust-run junior colleges for First Year Junior College (FYJC) or Class 11 admissions.
After the court's query, the state government lawyer submitted that it may be possible to withdraw the clause in the impugned May 6 Government Resolution (GR) and that she would take instructions from higher authorities and inform the court about the same on Thursday.
A bench of Justices Makarand S Karnik and Nitin R Borkar was hearing batch of by the Maharashtra Association of Minority Educational Institutions, two minority colleges in Solapur and those from South Mumbai, including Jai Hind, KC, HR and St Xavier's colleges, challenging the GRs concerned and terming them 'arbitrary' and 'imposed without any authority of law'.
The association cited various past judgements in similar cases and argued that the minority institutions are not required to maintain social reservations.
According to the established practice followed until the previous academic year, 45 per cent of the total intake in minority institutions was kept open to all students, regardless of category, after allocating 50 per cent for the respective minority community and 5 per cent for the management quota. However, from this year, the FYJC admission portal showed that SC/ST/OBC reservations are being applied to those 45 per cent seats, which led to confusion and controversy in FYJC admissions for the academic year 2025-26.
After Government Pleader Neha Bhide submitted that the GR was issued to bring uniformity in online FYJC admissions, the bench said that in 2019 similar GR was withdrawn by the government.
'Why did you (state government) bring minority institutions? It should not be difficult to withdraw. Why do you not talk to officers and withdraw this. Every time you do not need order from us when things are so apparent. It can be a bona fide mistake. Issue a corrigendum. Solve the problem. If not, we are here (to hear pleas and pass order),' Justice Karnik orally remarked.
Bhide said that while withdrawing the entire GR was not possible, 'it is possible that clause 11 can be removed'. The court asked her to take instructions from high-level officials and inform the decision on Thursday, when the matter will be heard next.
Clause 11 in the May 6 GR issued by state's school education department stated, 'If admissions are lower than the intake capacity in minority quota, admissions can be given as per interchanging between linguistic and religious minority groups. Even after that, if seats remain vacant, those surrendered vacant seats will be filled based on the centralised admission process where all social and parallel reservations are applicable.'
While colleges claimed that the GR pertained to left-over seats in minority quota, government officials said it implied that social reservation will be applicable to all open (non-minority) seats in minority-trust run colleges. Thereafter, as per state government, it issued corrective GR on June 2, which implied social reservation to all open seats in minority colleges.
The Association, through its writ plea, sought court's directive to authorities to take immediate steps to correct/update the online admission portal for class 11 admissions for the member institutions in Maharashtra. It said the same should be done by deleting/removing the social reservation quota (SC/ST/OBC Reservation quota) and updating/rectifying the in-house and management quota as per the May 6 Government Resolution (GR) like quota and seat distribution followed in Academic Year 2024-25. It sought that the concerned clause be declared arbitrary and unconstitutional and the same be set aside.
On June 10, the government issued a new corrective GR which brought back the same sentence along with additional inputs from the May 6 GR.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Mosques cut down on loudspeakers' decibel levels
Azaan, or the Islamic call to prayers, lasts for a few minutes. However, the use of loudspeakers for azaan by mosques has been in the crosshairs of some members of other faiths for a long time. The controversy keeps hitting the headlines, with courts, the Supreme Court, and different high courts laying down guidelines for the use of loudspeakers for religious functions and ordering penalties for violation of the rules. As the latest round of controversy over loudspeakers in mosques rages, several mosques in the city and suburbs have voluntarily brought down the decibel levels to the permissible limit. According to the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), the permissible noise levels in residential areas are 55 decibels for daytime and 45 decibels for the night. Much before BJP functionary and ex-MP Kirit Somaiya took it up and allegedly put pressure on the police stations to remove loudspeakers from mosques, in 2022, MNS chief Raj Thackeray aggressively opposed the use of loudspeakers for azaan. Jama Masjid Al Shams at Mira was among the first mosques in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR) to install the machine to keep the decibel levels of its loudspeakers under the permissible limit. "The machine hardly costs around Rs 1500. Our Masjid trust's office has kept the records of the decibel level of every azaan since the day we installed it in 2022. We were the first to follow the guidelines of the Supreme Court about the noise level. Many other mosques replicated the practice," informs Syed Muzaffar Husain, chief trustee of the Jama Masjid Al Shams and former MLC. Those opposing loudspeakers at religious places cite the January 2025 verdict of the Bombay High Court, which graded the punishment for violation of the guidelines. It mandated the cops to act against the violation in three stages: warning, penalty (Rs 5000 per day), and seizure of the loudspeakers. "Just the other day, the local police visited our mosque and asked us to remove the loudspeakers. We have told them we will follow the guidelines and are soon to set the decibel level to the permissible limit," says Abul Hassan Khan, trustee of Masjid Ajmeri and Madrasa Ali Hassan Ahle Sunnat at Sakinaka. It was at another meeting in Sakinaka again where former minister Arif Naseem Khan announced that a legal team headed by senior counsel Yusuf Muchchala will challenge the state Additional Director General of Police (ADGP) May 11, 2025, circular, which demands religious places to submit property cards and proof of the structures' registration with the Waqf board or charity commission while seeking permission to use the loudspeakers. Neither the Supreme Court nor the Bombay High Court has put this condition in its guidelines for granting permission for loudspeakers. Many have cautioned against the politicisation of the loudspeakers' issue and suggested pragmatism. Shoaib Khatib, trustee of the iconic Jama Masjid of Bombay near Crawford Market, says his mosque follows the permitted decibel level for its loudspeakers. "In any case, loudspeakers are used only for azaan four times a day as there is no use of loudspeakers between 10 pm and 6 am, and the morning azaan is given without the use of a loudspeaker," says Khatib. Businessman V R Sharif is against the use of loudspeakers. "I have told many mosque managements to avoid using loudspeakers, which are a nuisance. Today, everybody carries a mobile phone, which can be used to set the alarm for azaan. We live in a diverse society, and we should not do something which disturbs the peace of our neighbours," suggests Sharif. General Secretary of Mumbai Congress Asif Farooqui slams the tendency to add to the noise. "Everybody knows that loudspeakers add to noise pollution. Nowhere is it written that our prayers will not be accepted if azaan is not amplified through loudspeakers. Move ahead with the times and compete for education and employment, not in creating noise," says Farooqui. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
Indian Express
10 hours ago
- Indian Express
Even with delay, 11th admission process on same timeline as last year: Dada Bhuse
Maharashtra School Education and Sports Minister Dada Bhuse on Saturday said that even with the delay in the Class 11 First Year Junior College (FYJC) admissions due to technical reasons this year, the admission process was being conducted on a similar timeline as last year. The junior college admission process this time around is being conducted through a Central Application Process (CAP) in an online mode throughout the state for the first time. This process has seen multiple delays. Originally, the first round CAP allotment of junior colleges was to be announced on June 10. However, it has now been pushed to June 26. Responding to a question by the Indian Express about the inconvenience caused to students due to this delay after an event at Ganesh Kala Krida in Pune, Bhuse said, 'The delay has happened due to some technical reasons. But if you compare with the previous year, then the admission process is happening at the same time.' This raises a question about the effectiveness of implementing an online admissions system across the state. With the state board results being declared early to facilitate early admissions, technical faults with the application website has led to the progress being reset to a timeline similar to previous years. Applicants have been left hanging due to the delay. According to data shared in a notice by the Directorate of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education, a total of 60,487 students have been admitted from June 12-14 under the various quotas available for Class 11 admissions out of 1,13,078 applicants. These are the final admission numbers under the quota admissions, which takes place before the normal merit list admissions. Of the total, 26521 students have been admitted under the in-house quota, 7,756 students have been admitted under the management quota, 26,210 students have been admitted under the minority quota. Soham is a Correspondent with the Indian Express in Pune. A journalism graduate, he was a fact-checker before joining the Express. Soham currently covers education and is also interested in civic issues, health, human rights, and politics. ... Read More
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
'Before it's too late': HC orders Thane commissioner to survey and take actions against illegal constructions across wards
Expressing 'shock' over proliferation of illegal constructions and delay in actions, the Bombay High Court has directed the Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC) Commissioner to conduct a survey of all illegal structures across its wards including developing areas and green zones and act against them 'before it is too late.' The HC on Thursday warned the civic body that if illegalities continue and it is unable to take action against the same, the court will have to consider whether the TMC would be required to be governed by a 'different/separate machinery' under Municipal laws. A bench of Justices Girish S Kulkarni and Arif S Doctor ordered immediate inspection of seventeen unauthorised structures/buildings in TMC area by the court-appointed officer and separate inquiry into the role of errant municipal officers in aiding such constructions. 'The situation is so serious that it would be difficult to believe that there is at all any rule of law when it comes to illegal constructions and whether the TMC is at all alive to what is happening under its feet and under the blessings of its officers,' the HC noted. The HC was hearing a plea by one Subhadra Ramchandra Takle, a senior citizen, who, through advocates A H Modi and Shafik Ahmed, claimed that her nearly five-and-half acre land in Mumbra area was grabbed by 'land mafia or sharks' without any permission from planning authority and 17 unauthorised structures were erected on it. 'Such construction could not have come up except with the blessings of the government and municipal officers. It is also shocking that the persons who have rampantly undertaken such construction could spend such huge amounts in undertaking such brazen illegal construction and ultimately to defraud innocent flat purchasers to purchase flats/tenements in such construction,' the bench noted. 'We may observe that those who purchase tenements in illegal construction are greedy purchasers, who are a different category of citizens as opposed to those citizens who would purchase tenements which are lawfully constructed, they cannot assert rights in regard to illegal construction,' the HC added. The court expressed 'shock' over TMC's reply and questioned why the civic body was delaying action despite being aware of illegalities on petitioner's land. The bench said the matter was 'serious' as it was 'clear case of land grabbing' with complaints 'having fallen to the deaf ears of municipal officers.' The court said it 'cannot overlook complete abdication of petitioner to the rule of law, at the hands of municipal authorities and citizens taking law into their hands' to put up illegal constructions. The HC directed the court-appointed officer to conduct immediate inspection of petitioner's land in presence of TMC commissioner with police protection and submit a report before next hearing on June 19. The bench further ordered a senior judicial officer to inquire into the role of all municipal officers responsible for such constructions and an inquiry report be produced before the court within six weeks. The court will pass orders on the outcome of both the reports. It added that the green zones and areas within which no construction is permissible ought to be safeguarded and if illegal structures come up on such lands, the same should be immediately removed as per law. The bench sounded a 'note of caution' that if 'gross illegality wantonly persists,' it will have to consider whether the corporation is functioning as per law. In such event, if TMC fails to follow its duties and obligations, the HC went on to note, 'the TMC would be required to be governed by a different/separate machinery which has also been provided under the provisions of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, for which the state government would be required to be directed to take appropriate steps if the need so arises.'
