Commentary: Why do we put up with Netflix's endless price hikes?
When Netflix increased its premium tier pricing from S$25.98 to S$29.98 last week, I felt annoyed, then quickly consoled myself: 'It's just S$4 – less than what a bowl of noodles costs.' Never mind that Netflix content can be considered 'empty calories' too. Or that the company had just raised its prices last year, in February 2024.
Over the past decade, my monthly Netflix bill has gone up 77 per cent. When the streaming service first launched here in 2016, I paid S$16.98 for the premium tier. A basic subscription ran S$10.98 in 2016 and is now S$15.98, a 46 per cent increase.
Netflix's pricing behaviour is at odds with a world where people are cutting expenses in the face of tariffs and large-scale employment disruptions induced by artificial intelligence. Yet, the company appears confident that millions will swallow the latest price hike like I did.
Maybe they're right. After all, a Singapore Management University study in 2024 revealed that about 38 per cent of respondents now consider streaming services to be a 'basic essential so that a person can lead a normal life in Singapore'.
All the same, how much longer can Netflix keep raising prices without losing customers?
CONTENT IS KING
A combination of shrewd planning, massive spending, competitor missteps and lifestyle changes has made Netflix wildly successful and – more importantly – the clear winner of the streaming wars.
From October to December 2024, despite a wave of complaints about its rising prices and crackdowns on account sharing, Netflix added a record 18.9 million global subscribers. Its subscriber base numbers over 300 million today, far outstripping Amazon Prime (about 200 million), Disney (125 million), Max (117 million) and Apple TV (25 million).
Netflix keeps viewers captive by serving up a non-stop flow of varied, high-quality content. In 2025, the company plans to spend US$18 billion on content, up from US$16 billion in 2024.
In the next few months, subscribers will get to watch the final seasons of hit shows Stranger Things, Squid Game and the second season of Addams Family spinoff Wednesday. I'm not a fan of these, but I just binge-watched the new season of Black Mirror, and am eagerly awaiting the return of Love, Death And Robots.
Thanks to the massive amount of viewership data feeding its algorithms, Netflix has become a pro at pandering to a wide range of tastes. Even viewers hankering for local fare have more than just Emerald Hill to satisfy them in its growing Southeast Asian catalogue.
Netflix chief financial officer Spencer Neumann in March said that 'we're not anywhere near a ceiling' in terms of content spend. The streamer is in about 40 per cent of connected TV households but has only captured 6 per cent of the addressable market, he shared.
This explains why, starting this year, subscribers are seeing John Cena and other World Wrestling Entertainment stars appearing on Netflix in a US$5 billion deal. I haven't watched Wrestlemania in over 30 years – but since I've technically already paid for it, why not?
WHAT IS VALUE?
Meanwhile, Netflix's competitors are struggling to justify their value to consumers.
In late 2024, Disney+ increased its subscription prices and lost over 700,000 global subscribers in the same quarter – myself included. In Singapore, the cost of its standard monthly subscription went up from S$12.98 to S$15.98, and the premium tier went from S$15.98 to S$18.98.
Why did I cancel my subscription? Compared to Netflix, Disney+ seemed to offer little new content, flogging the tired Star Wars and Marvel catalogue on repeat. I now subscribe to Disney+ on an ad-hoc basis to binge-watch select series such as Daredevil: Born Again, or whenever I get a good offer. For example, I recently recontracted my Singtel mobile line, a deal that came with six free months of Disney+.
HBO used to be the king of cable TV with blockbuster hits like Game of Thrones and Westworld, but its rocky rebranding as Max has confused viewers. Perhaps current hits The White Lotus and The Last of Us can convince some to pay S$14.48 a month – but that's not a lot of options to bank on.
I keep paying for Amazon Prime Video simply because it's a no-brainer at S$4.99 a month. Its catalogue may be spotty in quality, ranging from stellar offerings like The Expanse, to a weak prequel series to The Lord of The Rings and forgotten 1980s B-movies – but the non-streaming perks make up for it, including free shipping on Amazon Prime Singapore and free PC games each month.
But this is something Netflix is also making moves on: Just download the Netflix mobile app and you can install games featuring famous IP such as Street Fighter, Sonic the Hedgehog, Grand Theft Auto and Squid Game.
CINEMAS CANNOT FIGHT BACK
Also helping Netflix to win the long game is the stubborn refusal of cinema operators to change with the times.
I used to love the cinema – I brought my family to watch every Marvel superhero movie until Avengers: Endgame in 2019. But while ticket prices kept going up (now costing about S$15 for a weekend ticket), the actual experience only seemed to be getting worse.
For instance, the last few movies I watched at Golden Village Bishan were marred by blurry projection, poor colour definition or deafeningly loud audio. (Recent Google reviews reflect similar experiences from other patrons.)
When the same movies were released on streaming, I watched them again at home and found each time to be a much better viewing experience, thanks to the excellent colour reproduction of my 4K OLED television – a feature shared by most TVs sold today. I could also adjust the volume as needed.
Even if the movie isn't available on Netflix, it's much better value to me to rent the 4K versions for about S$5 off the Apple TV Store. I don't have to sit through up to 20 minutes of inane ads; nor do I have to endure stuffy or freezing temperatures. (And I can press pause when I need to run to the bathroom!)
A good cinema can still offer an immersive viewing experience, but nowadays, the home experience isn't that shabby. Thus, I'm not surprised that cinema attendance has yet to return to pre-COVID levels; nor did I shed a tear when mm2 shuttered more Cathay cinemas.
CAN NETFLIX BE STOPPED?
As long as consumers continue to demonstrate a willingness to spend on digital entertainment even during periods of economic uncertainty, Netflix – and its price hikes – seems likely to remain unstoppable for now.
In truth, the company's biggest competitor is not Disney+ or Amazon, but YouTube, which is just slightly behind Netflix in audience size (270 million paying subscribers versus Netflix's 300 million) and boasts similar revenue (about US$10 billion in the last quarter of 2024).
YouTube's advantage is that it's driven by user-generated content; it doesn't need to invest in original content production like Netflix. I already watch YouTube more than Netflix, tolerating the annoying ads to avoid paying the S$13.98 subscription fee.
More lightweight fare on TikTok and Instagram appeals to shorter attention spans. For gamers, there's no shortage of cheap mobile games and affordable PC gaming subscription services like Microsoft's Game Pass (S$11.99 a month) to satisfy one's entertainment needs.
So should Netflix breach the S$30 barrier for its premium tier, I do have alternatives ready.
Unfortunately, even with all these much cheaper options, Netflix's grip on me may still remain iron-clad – simply for the fact that before I can cancel my subscription, I'll first need to survive negotiations with my wife and children.
Fine. You win, Netflix. Again.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
31 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Tesla board awards ‘good faith' shares worth $37 billion to CEO Elon Musk
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Tesla has granted CEO Elon Musk shares worth about US$29 billion (S$37 billion) in a new pay deal aimed at keeping the billionaire entrepreneur at the helm during a crucial pivot from its struggling core auto business to robotaxis and humanoid robots. The company described the 'interim award' of the 96 million new shares as a first step, 'good faith' payment to honour Mr Musk's more than US$50 billion pay package from 2018 that was struck down by a Delaware court in 2024. Mr Musk can claim the new award if he remains in a top executive role for another two years and a court does not reinstate the 2018 package currently on appeal. He has to hold the shares for five years and can buy them for US$23.34 per share, the same as the exercise price of the 2018 award. Tesla will also put to vote a longer-term CEO compensation plan at its annual investor meeting on Nov 6. The move is meant to keep Mr Musk, the public face of Tesla and architect of its robotaxi strategy, focused on the electric-vehicle maker as it navigates a shift to cybercabs and robotics from its mainstay auto business. It also seems to quell any speculation that the board's patience with Mr Musk could be wearing thin because of the recent tumultuous months, including the CEO's foray into politics. The move to give Mr Musk greater control of the company suggests that directors still see him as best-suited to tackle Tesla's growing list of challenges in the years ahead. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Singapore launches review of economic strategy to stay ahead of global shifts Singapore A look at the five committees reviewing Singapore's economic strategy World Trump says he will 'substantially' raise tariffs on India over Russian oil purchases Singapore Strong S'pore-Australia ties underpinned by bonds that are continually renewed: President Tharman Singapore All recruits at BMTC will be trained to fly drones and counter them: Chan Chun Sing Sport Singaporean swimmer Gan Ching Hwee at 'crossroads' after World Aquatics C'ships display Singapore Ong Beng Seng to be sentenced on Aug 15, prosecution does not object to fine due to his poor health Singapore Pritam Singh had hoped WP would 'tip one or two more constituencies' at GE2025 Sales have been falling at the company due to its ageing vehicle line-up, tough competition and Mr Musk's right-wing political stances that have tarnished its brand. S&P Global Mobility data shared exclusively with Reuters showed on Aug 4 that Tesla's brand loyalty had plunged since Mr Musk endorsed US President Donald Trump last summer. Mr Musk's involvement in politics and his wider business empire, including AI startup xAI, have also sparked concerns about his devotion to Tesla, the main source of his wealth. Mr Musk has threatened to leave unless he gets more control over Tesla. The new stock award will take his Tesla stake, already the largest, to more than 15 per cent from the 12.7 per cent currently, according to Reuters calculations based on data compiled by LSEG. Before Aug 4's grant, Mr Musk had no active compensation plan and Tesla said he had not received meaningful pay since 2017. With the legal fight over his 2018 package expected to continue, the board said it moved to retain Mr Musk's 'extraordinary talent.' Talent magnet 'While we recognise Elon's business ventures, interests and other potential demands on his time and attention are extensive and wide-ranging... we are confident this award will incentivize Elon to remain at Tesla,' said a special committee Tesla formed this year to consider Mr Musk's compensation. It consists of chair Robyn Denholm and independent director Kathleen Wilson-Thompson. The company said it would not record compensation expense for the award as it does not currently expect the performance condition to be 'probable of being met.' It will re-evaluate and recognise the expense if it determines the award is likely to be met, including after the two-year vesting period. The new shares will also be forfeited or offset if the Delaware courts fully reinstate the 2018 stock award, ensuring there is no 'double dip,' the special committee said. Investors and analysts welcomed the news, with Tesla shares rising nearly 2 per cent in early trading. The stock has lost a quarter of its value this year, as of last close. 'Under normal circumstances, a compensation package in the billions would raise some eyebrows. (But) clearly investors have benefited from Musk's stewardship of Tesla,' said Camelthorn Investments adviser Shawn Campbell, who owns Tesla shares. 'This stock grant will bind Musk to Tesla for the next two years.' Battle for pay The Delaware ruling on Mr Musk's 2018 pay package, the largest in Corporate America, had cited flaws in the board's approval process and unfairness to investors. Mr Musk kicked off an appeal against the order in March, claiming a lower court judge made multiple legal errors in rescinding the record compensation. He has argued that the package resulted in spectacular growth for Tesla and yet was determined by the lower Court of Chancery to be unfair to shareholders, who voted twice to approve the plan. Tesla shares have risen nearly 2,000 per cent over the past decade, far outperforming the around 200 per cent rise in the benchmark S&P 500 index in the same period. 'This is simply a repackaged version of what was done years ago and was ruled improper by a judge. It renders the Delaware court decision effectively meaningless,' said Mr Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Centre for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware. 'You don't have to incentivise him to stay. If he leaves, he throws away 13 per cent of the company, which is still a huge part of his net worth, said Mr Elson, who had filed amicus briefs supporting the court's decision to void Mr Musk's 2018 award. REUTERS
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
US links $2.4 billion in state disaster funds to Israel boycott stance
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A resident enters a Fema's improvised station following the passing of Hurricane Helene, in Marion, North Carolina, on Oct 5, 2024. WASHINGTON - The Trump administration said states and cities will not receive funding to prepare for natural disasters if they choose to boycott Israeli companies, according to an agency statement. States must certify that they will not cut off 'commercial relations specifically with Israeli companies' to receive the money from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (Fema), according to the agency's terms for grantees. The condition applies to at least US$1.9 billion (S$2.4 billion) that states rely on to cover search and rescue equipment, emergency manager salaries and backup power systems, among other expenses, according to 11 agency grant notices reviewed by Reuters. It is the latest example of the Trump administration making use of routine federal funding to advance its political message at the state level. Fema said in July that US states will be required to spend part of their federal terrorism prevention funds on helping the government arrest migrants, an administration priority. The Israel requirement takes aim at the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, a campaign designed to put economic pressure on Israel to end occupation of Palestinian territories. The campaign's supporters grew more vocal in 2023, after Hamas attacked southern Israel and Israel invaded Gaza in response. 'DHS will enforce all anti-discrimination laws and policies, including as it relates to the BDS movement, which is expressly grounded in antisemitism,' a spokesperson for Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem said in a statement. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Singapore launches review of economic strategy to stay ahead of global shifts Singapore A look at the five committees reviewing Singapore's economic strategy Business More support for sectors and workers vulnerable to tech disruptions, global competition World Trump says he will 'substantially' raise tariffs on India over Russian oil purchases Singapore Strong S'pore-Australia ties underpinned by bonds that are continually renewed: President Tharman Singapore All recruits at BMTC will be trained to fly drones and counter them: Chan Chun Sing Singapore Ong Beng Seng to be sentenced on Aug 15, prosecution does not object to fine due to his poor health Singapore Pritam Singh had hoped WP would 'tip one or two more constituencies' at GE2025 The requirement is largely symbolic. At least 34 states already have anti-BDS laws or policies, according to a University of Pennsylvania law journal. Fema will require major cities to agree to the Israel policy to receive a cut of US$553.5 million set aside to prevent terrorism in dense areas, according to a grant notice posted on Aug 1. New York City is slated to receive US$92.2 million from the programme, the most of all the recipients. Allocations are based on the agency's analysis of 'relative risk of terrorism,' according to the notice. REUTERS
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Satellite firm SES wins $90 million contract to support US Army
SES has won an $89.6 million contract to provide its commercial satellite communications (COMSATCOM) services to the U.S. army, the European satellite company said on Monday. Its SES Space & Defense subsidiary has been awarded the five-year deal, the company said. It will supply its strategic transport and communications network to Combat Service Support, Department of Defense (DoD) programmes, as well as additional U.S. government agencies. In May this year, the European group was selected by the U.S. DoD to deliver space-based network for improved data transmission. In July, it announced a partnership with the government of Luxembourg to develop and launch a new defence satellite.
