‘He told me his wife is a relative': Woman says her 60 y/o coworker overshares and makes work awkward
Sharing her experience on Reddit's 'AskSingapore' forum on Thursday (July 17), she said the man is far too enthusiastic for her liking and seems oblivious to what's appropriate in a professional setting.
He has repeatedly asked her out for coffee during office hours, even though she has turned him down every single time. He also won't stop rambling about his personal life, including the rather unsettling detail that 'his wife is actually a relative.'
'Like why would I need to know that??' she said.
To make things worse, he once asked her to drive him to Johor Bahru (JB) and regularly sends her meme stickers that have nothing to do with work. He has also asked personal questions like 'whether she has a boyfriend or how much she weighs.' At one point, he even mocked her for 'supposedly never having been kissed or hugged.' See also Ivy League dreams: A path to prestige and prosperity
'I never actually answered his invasive questions, and he just jumped to his own conclusions. All this happens when it's just the two of us in the office,' she wrote.
'Most of the time, I just listen and react politely, and now I'm questioning if my reactions gave him the impression that I enjoy these conversations. This does not feel normal or appropriate to me. I don't think our relationship needs to go beyond professional boundaries,' she added.
To distance herself, she said she started acting colder toward him in hopes that he would get the hint. However, her coworker ended up confronting her and claimed that 'she was angry at him for no reason.'
'This is awkward and exhausting because the office is usually just the two of us while the others are out,' she said.
She added that she has always tried to carry herself with decency. Even though she is still relatively new to the workforce, she believed that staying kind and keeping clear boundaries would be enough to stay out of trouble, but she did not expect that some people could be so 'shameless in ways that aren't always obvious.'
'I've been trying to find excuses to leave the office whenever I can. Luckily, I'll only be here for less than a month more,' she wrote. 'What he's doing is already considered inappropriate.'
Under her post, one commenter said, 'Actually, I think this constitutes as harassment already…'
Another commented, 'Why he wants you to bring him to JB??? Something is sus about this already… I think just say you have a bf even if you don't.. If he still doesn't stop talking like that, collect evidence and report to HR.'
A third suggested, 'If he asks too personal questions, you can just say 'sorry I'm not comfortable answering that' and say you need to finish up some work or something. What he's doing is already considered inappropriate, but I guess it's a small company and there isn't any HR.' Dealing with workplace harassment
According to the Ministry of Manpower, victims of workplace harassment are advised to maintain a safe distance from individuals exhibiting inappropriate behaviour and, where possible, adopt a buddy system for safety.
If the victim is often alone with the harasser, they should report the matter to a supervisor, manager, human resources, or a designated neutral party within the organisation so that appropriate action can be taken.
Victims may also contact the Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP) for guidance or lodge a police report if necessary.
Read also: Tourist says foreigners often get 'pushed around' in Singapore, asks locals, 'Is this common?'
Featured image by freepik (for illustration purposes only)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
45:57 Min
About the show: Top stories of the day with 'live' reports and interviews to keep you up-to-date on what's happening in one of the most dynamic regions of the world. Daily at 8pm (SIN / HK)
CNA
7 hours ago
- CNA
From standalone sites to mall tenants: Is this the future of Singapore's libraries?
SINGAPORE: On a weekday morning at the Ang Mo Kio library, seats in the two-storey building are half-filled. Elderly patrons scroll on their phones, young adults work on laptops and others read quietly or nap in the cool air-conditioning. Despite the whir of nearby construction outside, calm prevails in the library. 'Here is very quiet, the ambience is very good,' said retiree Seak Teik Song, 72, who visits the library to borrow books, read e-newspapers or use the computer. 'When it goes to AMK Hub, it might not be so,' he added, comparing it to the Serangoon library at Nex shopping mall, which he also visits regularly. 'It becomes like a marketplace.' The Ang Mo Kio library will move to the nearby AMK Hub in 2026, the National Library Board (NLB) said on Jul 1. The current site the library stands on, along Avenue 6, is earmarked for a healthcare facility. The library is one of several standalone libraries that will be relocated to shopping malls or integrated complexes in the coming years. The Geylang East library will shift to Tanjong Katong Complex in 2030 and the Toa Payoh library will become part of a new integrated development expected to be completed the same year. Similarly, Jurong Regional Library is slated to move to an integrated transport hub in 2028. Currently, 13 of NLB's 28 public libraries are in malls, while a handful are housed in integrated complexes such as community centres. Once the relocations are complete, the conserved Queenstown library and the Bishan library will remain among the few standalone libraries in Singapore. IMPROVED ACCESS, HIGHER FOOTFALL In response to CNA's queries, NLB said library sites are selected in reference to the Urban Redevelopment Authority's land use plans, with easy access to MRT stations and bus interchanges. "By siting our libraries at convenient locations, at least 80 per cent of the resident population stays within 15 minutes (by public transport) of a public library. This allows Singapore residents to visit their favourite libraries 'at their doorstep'," an NLB spokesperson said. MP Tin Pei Ling, who appealed to NLB to reconsider its decision to relocate the Geylang East library, said the agency cited significantly higher visitorship for libraries located in malls. "This is because of the synergy with other activities in a shopping mall," said the Marine Parade-Braddell Heights MP in a Facebook post on Jul 2. "Therefore ... NLB's strategy is to move standalone libraries to shopping malls when the opportunities come about." Recently, it was announced that the Geylang East Public Library will be relocated to the Tanjong Katong Complex in 2030.... Posted by Tin Pei Ling 陈佩玲 on Wednesday, July 2, 2025 Experts generally agree that mall locations make libraries more accessible. Associate Professor of Sociology Daniel Goh from the National University of Singapore (NUS) said malls have become the go-to venue for families to do everything in one place. 'I see it as actually just keeping up with the times,' he said, adding that the function of a library – as a central space where people gather and read – has not changed. Instead, what has changed is our urban spaces, with the concept of a 'mall' shifting from traditional open-air town centres to the shopping centres we know today, he said. Associate Professor Loh Chin Ee, who researches literacy and equity at the National Institute of Education, said that while avid readers will still seek out libraries, mall locations can attract casual visitors who may develop reading habits. 'Maybe they are looking for a place to chill with their friends, but they might pick up books in the process,' she said. 'So in a sense, it is a strategy that will increase the number of library users.' Former president of the Library Association of Singapore Sadie-Jane Huff called the shift a "strategic pivot" to stay relevant amid rising digital consumption. In an era of e-books and shorter attention spans, having the convenience of a library in a mall reminds people that there are physical books to read. 'With each generation, you need to be relevant in different ways,' said Dr Huff. However, she acknowledged it is uncertain whether greater footfall will translate to higher borrowing rates. NLB said the Woodlands and Punggol libraries – both located in integrated hubs – were the most visited in 2024, drawing 1.38 million and 1.31 million visitors respectively. Libraries situated in shopping malls attract an average of over 700,000 visitors annually, the agency added. It did not provide data on changes in visitorship for standalone libraries that were relocated to malls. SYMBOLIC POWER OF LIBRARIES Beyond accessibility, practical considerations such as cost and land use are key factors. NLB said it evaluates several criteria before deciding whether to revamp a library in place or relocate it, such as the library's age and time since its last major renovation. For Geylang East library, Ms Tin said a revamp was considered but deemed cost-ineffective due to ageing infrastructure. Associate Professor Lee Kah-Wee from NUS' Department of Architecture described the relocations as part of the 'Singapore dilemma' – the ongoing need to optimise land use while preserving non-commercial institutions. 'It is fair to say that when a library moves into a mall, an economic calculation has taken place. (The) value released from vacating the original site exceeds the cost of renting a space in the mall,' he said. Still, concerns linger about what is lost in the shift. A standalone library has symbolic weight that a space in a mall cannot replicate, said Assoc Prof Lee. "It represents a commitment to certain values about public education and knowledge that trumps raw economic calculations.' Writer and literary critic Gwee Li Sui said libraries in integrated complexes feel 'less extreme' as they in relatively community-facing spaces, unlike malls, which are 'fundamentally commercial'. 'What such libraries gain in terms of footfall is easily offset by what they lose in terms of the values of a traditional library experience,' he said. Dr Gwee pointed out that mall libraries draw visitors whose primary interest may not be books. Even those who come specifically to read or study can become distracted or 'piggyback' their visit with errands, and consequently spend less time in the library. 'People are attached to standalone libraries because they feel distinctive, rooted and owned – whereas mall spaces are transient,' he said. Lawyer Shawn Ting, who frequents the Geylang East library with his three-year-old, said he is opposed to its relocation to Tanjong Katong Complex, about 1.3km away. 'To me, it is like a national treasure,' he said. 'You cannot find another library in Singapore that is like this.' FINDING A BALANCE Assistant Professor George Wong from Singapore Management University said standalone libraries evoke heritage and nostalgia for many. He linked current sentiment to memories of the former National Library at Stamford Road, which was demolished in 2004. 'Something that is very signature in the neighbourhood is being sort of disrupted, and people feel that disruption is something to be sad about,' said the sociology professor. The relocation of libraries to a mall may also feel like an 'over-commercialisation' of leisure, he added. Ultimately, the question is not whether standalone or mall libraries are superior, but how libraries can be designed to serve communities effectively, said Asst Prof Wong. NIE's Assoc Prof Loh agreed, emphasising the need for balance. 'It's a good strategy to have these different kinds of libraries, but I hope that there will be a balance between the different libraries, so that you can always find a space for yourself depending on what kind of user you are,' she said.
Independent Singapore
16 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Maid says, 'My employer wants me to wake up early and work on time, but she never lets me sleep on time'
And just like that, many other helpers who read her post had an instant case of been-there-done-that. 'They're expecting me to be honest about money, while they don't even want to pay me [the] 15 days home paid holiday (which is S$300 we both agreed to pay in the contract),' the helper continued. 'She only paid me S$100.' It was less of a rant and more of a reflection on the lopsided power dynamics between domestic helpers and their employers — especially when it comes to sleep and salary. 'We helpers come from a very poor family. But here the employers who [are] 10 times richer than us always try to take advantage of it… This ain't fair at all,' she lamented. 'The fact that 8 billion humans in the world, but only a few people show humanity is crazy 😢' And the comments came pouring in like spilled kopi on a Monday morning. One helper echoed, 'True, employers want helpers to work on time, but for us helpers, we wake up early, but our rest time is not on time… They don't care.' Another chimed in: 'Same here.' And their grievances didn't end just there. The number of maids replying 'Same here,' and 'it's true' is rather concerning, as if they were all replying from a collective sleep-deprived consciousness. But perhaps the most eye-opening account came from a helper whose boss ended her contract early — just because her helper declined to renew it. 'When I told Madam I don't want to renew my contract, she said, 'Ok lah, then I end your contract early.' So on July 15, 2025, she ended it — when it was supposed to end on October 31, 2025.' Talk about notice period… wait, what notice period? 'So unfair, but I have no regret also. Even [though] she did it, I'm much thankful coz finally I can leave her, which I wish I had done a long time ago, but I just endured and put up with her bad behavior,' the helper expressed her relief. Some replies, however, were less empathetic and more stoic, bordering on tough love. 'So don't renew your contract and find new employer lah,' one group member offered pragmatically. Another didn't mince words: 'Suck it up. Not happy, just leave and find new employer.' But while some helpers shared horror stories, others dropped comments like golden tickets — stories of employers who actually honoured their helpers' holidays with full salary plus bonus pocket money. 'Me, 2 weeks holiday, my employer [gave] full salary with S$600 pocket money.' Another flexed: 'My employer, even [though] my holiday is 3 weeks, they gave me one month full salary.' Not all employers are villains, it seems — some are the fairy godmothers of the maid world. Meanwhile, one employer who saw the drama in the comments used the opportunity for recruitment. 'I am looking for a transfer helper. Pls pm me if you are available,' she commented — casually turning the post into a job ad. Now that's recruitment efficiency. Humanity starts with bedtime If this Facebook thread proves anything, it's that sleep isn't just a luxury for foreign domestic workers — it's a basic human need. And paying someone less than agreed while expecting robotic punctuality isn't just bad employer behaviour. It's poor leadership, plain and simple. For now, the original poster's reflections continue to ripple across the group, as helpers exchange stories, support, and a healthy mix of reality checks and resilience. One can only hope that humanity — and fair wages — eventually catch up. 'Singapore is known for its world-class standards, but beneath the surface of this clean, modern society lies a silent injustice — the daily mistreatment of foreign domestic workers (FDWs) who leave their families behind, only to be treated without basic dignity,' wrote Eryana Eryan. Her post in the Facebook group Direct Hire Transfer Singapore Maid / Domestic Helper recently offered a searing commentary that cracked open this often-muted reality — a post that's now resonating with many who know the system needs fixing. Her voice, equal parts heartfelt and heartbreaking, sheds light on the day-to-day indignities suffered by helpers at the hands of employers who blur the line between firm supervision and outright cruelty. You can read her full post and plight on behalf of all maids in Singapore over here: Domestic helpers in Singapore: We left our own children behind to raise yours, but you treat us like second-class citizens, without even basic dignity
