Cabin crew lists two 'annoying' things passengers always do before take-off
A former cabin crew member has lifted the lid on the common behaviour of passengers who have just boarded a flight - and how it makes flight attendants feel.
In an Ask Me Anything thread on Reddit, a social platform, the poster who said she was a former Emirates worker, invited questions from the public on a range of issues. One person asked about the in-flight safety advice and how passengers sometimes disregard it.
They said: "While announcing the safety tips / regulations, do you guys get angry or irritated when someone doesn't look or pay attention? Or you just don't care?
Usually on many airlines, a short video is played to the cabin, while the crew demonstrate how to inflate a life jacket, use the attached whistle, and where the oxygen masks fall in the event of an emergency. They also point out the emergency exits and what to do if they need to be used.
But as many may have experienced, not everyone pays complete attention - and that includes reading the often-laminated safety cards tucked into seat pockets.
The unnamed air hostess said: "We have a safety video but of course we get annoyed when we are securing the cabin and the passengers still have their seats down or window blinds down."
Passengers are often reminded that their seats cannot be reclined nor can their tray tables be left down during take-off and landing. Additionally, they must ensure their seat belts are fastened and their window blinds open.
Window blinds must remain up with full visibility until the aircraft is in the air, or has touched down, so the crew can see any potential issues or obstructions and alert them to the pilot immediately. Blinds can of course be closed once the plane is in mid-air for passenger comfort.
Seats also cannot be reclined until the aircraft is in the air. According to HuffPost, reclined seats give less protection and can obstruct an aisle in the event of a quick evacuation.
As for tray tables, the reason is similar - if they are left down in the event of an emergency they can cause injury and make evacuation harder and slower. They could also cause injury if the aircraft is forced to stop abruptly.
While many people are getting themselves settled in their chairs as the safety demonstrations go ahead, the cabin crew often gives the rows a quick once over before take-off to check if these things have been done.
They may also ask to see your seatbelt if it's covered by a blanket or clothing to ensure everyone is strapped in.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
'Entitled neighbour hates my kids playing in the garden for ridiculous reason'
A woman has blasted her rude neighbour for her 'unreasonable' complaints about her children when they're simply 'running around laughing, doing normal kid stuff' A mum has slammed her 'entitled' neighbour for complaining about her children playing in the garden during the summer holidays. While she acknowledges her children can be loud at times, she says they're only "running around laughing, doing normal kid stuff". Not only this but she makes sure her children only make noise during reasonable hours because she doesn't want them to upset any neighbours - but it seems 10am is still too early for some. She said on Reddit: "I live in a quiet suburban neighbourhood where kids usually play outside during the day. My kids are 7 and 9 and every morning [at] around 10 AM they go out to play in our front yard running around laughing doing normal kid stuff. "My neighbour [...] apparently thinks 10am is some kind of ungodly hour to let kids be kids. She stormed over to my house the other day, full on Karen mode, and started complaining that my kids were making too much noise and disrupting her peace at 10am when birds are chirping and the sun is shining." The neighbour complained she was struggling to concentrate on her work because of the "racket" her children were making outside. However, she says her neighbour makes just as much noise at similar hours of the day - and she never goes over to complain about it. She added: "Meanwhile I can hear her vacuuming and blasting her TV through the walls but hey sure my innocent kids are the problem. "I tried to explain to her that kids playing outside is literally part of living in a neighbourhood and that 10am is not some kind of forbidden time for joy and laughter. She just scoffed and walked away like I was the unreasonable one. "Are we seriously going to let entitled neighbours police the sound of children playing? What is next, banning laughter?" Commenting on her post, one user said: "When I was growing up, one of my friends on our street had a trampoline. "We were outside after dinner on it and someone a couple doors down came to yell at us, it was about 5:30-6:00pm; sun was still shining. She wanted us to stop what we were doing because it was making her kids want to come outside too and that wasn't allowed in their household. "So we needed to also not be outside after dinner hours, as if her household rules applied to all houses on the street." Another user added: "If she complains again, tell her to call the police, and have THEM tell her there's nothing wrong with what your kids are doing." A third user said: "I told a kid who was shooting hoops outside my window to go home once. But it was summer in Alaska, and he was playing at 1 am. I think I was justified."
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Bride left in shock after receiving HR complaint from colleague for leaving her out of her wedding
A woman was left reeling when a colleague lodged an HR complaint after she didn't receive an invitation to her wedding. The anonymous Reddit user, who appears to be from the UK, described the situation as 'one of the weirdest work things' she's ever had to deal with on the Subreddit 'EntitledPeople'. While she was 'friendly' with her co-worker and exchanged 'small talk' in the office, the woman said they had never had lunch together or seen each other outside of work. She was therefore shocked when her colleague presumptuously asked if she was going to be invited to her upcoming wedding. The woman tried to play it down, telling her associate that it was to be a 'small' wedding with 'just close friends and family', but that didn't close the matter. In a separate post, she confirmed that she had invited two other colleagues - but that they had been close friends 'way before we even worked together'. The bride-to-be noticed her colleague's behaviour had begun to change, becoming 'quiet and a little cold', after their exchange, but she was genuinely surprised by what happened next. 'Fast forward a few days later, I get a meeting invite from HR,' she recalled in the Reddit post. 'Turns out she filed a complaint saying I was being "exclusive" and "creating a hostile environment by leaving people out".' The woman couldn't understand why her co-worker had expected an invitation to her wedding - noting that it wasn't a 'even work-related' event - and irritated that she had been called before HR. She said: 'I had to sit in this HR meeting and explain that I'm not required to invite co-workers I barely know to my literal wedding. 'That it's a personal event. That it has nothing to do with work or who's in the office.' The HR representative, she said, 'looked just as confused' as she did and swiftly closed the case. However, she aaded, her colleague now behaves in a 'super passive-aggressive' way. She elaborated: 'Like side-eyes, little digs when I walk by. Still bringing it up in these weird sarcastic comments like, 'Some people are so inclusive these days.' She added, 'I can't believe she actually thought HR could… What, make me invite her?' Fellow Reddit users were quick to weigh in with their opinions on the unusual case. One person advised: 'I would report her to HR for creating an uncomfortable environment now. ' Another added: 'That is one of the strangest things I've read. Your coworker is odd. Who thinks like that? 'What's next? Does she expect you to have her along on the honeymoon?' While a third said: 'This is the type of guest that comes without a gift, eats a lot of food, makes others uncomfortable, takes home a shit load of leftovers and a centerpiece.' A fourth agreed with this analysis, adding: 'And wears a white dress.' Someone else had a firm response, writing: 'File a counterclaim to HR about her creating a hostile work environment and the passive-aggressive comments. 'That is a workplace issue unlike your wedding. ' While a sixth person quipped, 'Imagine thinking HR handles wedding guest lists? The delusion is wild.' It comes after a bride-to-be was left frustrated after her fiancé insisted his parents should be allowed to tag along on their honeymoon. Taking to Reddit, the 22-year-old woman - believed to be from the US - revealed she is due to marry her long-term boyfriend, 24, and lives with him on a sprawling 40-acre property. She said the couple are close to his parents and often go over to their house for dinner and games nights. However, her fiancé's parents have taken their relationship with their son and daughter-in-law a step too far after they insisted on joining them on their honeymoon. The couple, who are due to marry in November, have already planned a low-key wedding on a separate family-owned estate and decided to stay an extra week after the ceremony to enjoy some alone time. But when she discovered her future in-laws were quietly planning to crash her honeymoon, she was stunned. She wrote: 'When we go on vacation, his parents come with us. Lately it seems excessive, but I keep it to myself. 'We're getting married in November on another property that my boyfriend, his sister, and their parents own together. 'There's plenty of space for both our families and friends, and everyone is leaving the day after the wedding so we can honeymoon for a week there. That is, everyone except his parents.' While the young bride revealed she loves her future in-laws 'like her own parents', she expressed her concern to her future husband and requested him to ask his parents to leave after the wedding. But rather than supporting her, the groom-to-be shut her down entirely, saying 'it wasn't a big deal'. The bride said: 'I told him it was weird and I wanted it to just be us. He suggested we could honeymoon somewhere else at a later date, but still spend the week after the wedding with his parents. 'I told him no because I have limited PTO (Paid Time Off), we planned on honeymooning there ALONE, we're trying to save money, and I don't want to be the couple that never ends up having a honeymoon cause they keep saying they'll have it later.' Her husband-to-be claimed he will not be asking his parents to leave as they are 'part owners of the estate'. The bride claimed she wanted to start 'setting boundaries' with his parents and family.
Daily Mirror
10 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'I'm naming my baby after an animal but people say it sounds irritating'
A mum has been urged to reconsider the name she's chosen for her son, as not only is she naming him after an animal, but people also say it sounds 'irritating' Everyone has different tastes when it comes to baby names, and no matter what name you choose for your little one, you're bound to find some people who don't think you've made the right decision. Not only is there a divide in preference when it comes to classic names versus unique ones, but there are also differences in opinion over what syllables sound nice together and whether a given name "fits" with the baby's surname. One mum is finding out the hard way that it's sometimes best to keep your chosen baby name to yourself, as she's been told to reconsider naming her child after an animal. The mum believes the moniker is perfect for her baby boy due in January, but said one person in her family has even "begged" her to change her mind. In a post on Reddit, the mum claimed she and her husband were planning on naming their child "Badger". She said her husband's initials are "BAJ", and she initially wanted to give her son the same name, making him "BAJ Jr". The couple would then call him "Badger" for short, but the dad isn't keen on naming his son after him, so wants to just call him "Badger" as his legal first name. The mum wrote: "Why are boy names so hard? I had my girl names picked out already, and they're old-fashioned and very pretty. But the only boy's name my husband and I can agree on is Badger. Hear me out. "My husband's initials are BAJ (he's also named after his great-grandfather). I just wanted to name the baby BAJ Jr. and call him Badger as a nickname, but my husband thinks it's weird to name a baby after himself. He just wants the baby's name to be Badger." Since telling some of her friends and family about it, the mum has received some "mixed reactions". Some don't mind the name at all, but one person in particular has said they hate it so much that they have "begged" her to change it. She added: "I have gotten mixed reactions to this. Some people love it, but one person in particular hated it and begged us not to name our child Badger. I don't think it's as crazy as naming a kid Fox or Bear (which I have seen happen!) "Tell me! Is Badger too weird? Let me know now before it's too late!" Commenters on the post were quick to tell the mum that they weren't keen on Badger as a name. Many pointed out that not only is a badger a mammal, but it's also a verb meaning "to pester" someone. One person stated: "I wouldn't do it. The verb 'to badger' means to pester or harass someone persistently. It implies a relentless and annoying effort to persuade or convince someone, often to the point of irritation." Another added: "Badger is a very, very weird choice. I suppose it will be easy to pronounce and spell but in addition to the animal, it means 'to pester'. Cannot recommend." While a third posted: "I am SHOCKED that you've received mixed reactions and not 100% negative." One commenter also noted that the "old English" for badger is "Brock", which several people suggested would be a better name than Badger. Someone replied: "Brock Andrew for a legal name and Badger as a nickname for now. He can decide what he wants when he's older."
