logo
Beijing, a longtime friend of Tehran, turns to cautious diplomacy in Iran's war with Israel

Beijing, a longtime friend of Tehran, turns to cautious diplomacy in Iran's war with Israel

Independent25-06-2025
When Israel attacked Iran nearly two weeks ago, the Chinese government, a longtime friend of Iran, jumped into action — at least, when it came to words. It condemned the attacks. Its leader, Xi Jinping, got on the phone with the Russian leader and urged a ceasefire. Its foreign minister spoke with his counterpart in Iran.
But that's where China stopped. The usual rhetoric was delivered. De-escalation and dialogue were trumpeted. Yet China offered no material support.
Despite Beijing 's clout as a near-peer rival to the United States and its ambition to play a bigger role on the world stage, Beijing refrained from offering military support to Iran, let alone getting directly involved in the conflict. The decision underscored the limitations it faces in the Middle East.
'Beijing lacks both the diplomatic capabilities and the risk appetite to quickly intervene in, and to think it can successfully navigate, this fast-moving and volatile situation," said Jude Blanchette, director of the China Research Center at RAND.
Given the tangled politics of the Middle East, where China holds substantial economic and energy stakes yet wields minimal military influence, Beijing 'isn't inclined to stick its neck out,' Blanchette added. Instead, the Chinese government opts to remain 'a measured, risk‑averse actor.'
China weighs commercial interests
Zhu Feng, dean of the School of International Relations at Nanjing University in eastern China, said volatility in the Middle East is not in China's interests.
'From China's point of view, the Israel-Iran conflicts challenge and impact China's business interests and economic security,' Zhu said. 'This is something China absolutely does not want to see."
After the Iranian parliament floated a plan to shut down the strategically located Strait of Hormuz over the weekend, China spoke against it. 'China calls on the international community to step up efforts to de-escalate conflicts and prevent regional turmoil from having a greater impact on global economic development,' said Guo Jiakun, a spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry.
On Tuesday, following the ceasefire announcement, U.S. President Donald Trump wrote in a social media post: 'China can now continue to purchase Oil from Iran,' suggesting the ceasefire would prevent the disruption of Iranian oil production.
A 2024 report by the U.S. Energy Information Administration contained estimates suggesting that roughly 80% to 90% of the oil exported by Iran went to China. The Chinese economy could struggle to preserve its industrial production without the roughly 1.2 million barrels of oil and other fossil fuels provided by Iran.
Craig Singleton, senior China fellow at the Washington-based think tank Foundation for Defense of Democracies, summed up Beijing's responses as 'steady oil buys and ritual calls for 'dialogue'.'
'That's about it," Singleton said. 'No drones or missile parts, no emergency credit line. Just words calibrated to placate Tehran without rattling Riyadh or inviting U.S. sanctions.'
Beijing's muted responses also expose the gap between China's great-power rhetoric and its real reach in the region. Said Singleton: 'China's Gulf footprint is commercial, not combat-ready. When missiles fly, its much-touted strategic partnership with Iran shrinks to statements. Beijing wants discounted Iranian oil and a 'peace-broker' headline, while letting Washington shoulder the hard-power risks.'
In statements, China sides with Iran and pledges to mediate
Since the onset of the war, Beijing — which brokered a diplomatic rapprochement between Iran and Saudi Arabia in 2023 — stood by Iran's side and urged talks.
At the United Nations, China, a permanent member of the Security Council, teamed up with Russia and Pakistan in putting forward a draft resolution condemning 'in the strongest terms' the attacks against peaceful nuclear sites and facilities in Iran. They called for 'an immediate and unconditional ceasefire" even though the United States, another permanent member on the council, is almost certain to veto the proposal.
Shortly after Israel attacked Iran, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi had a phone call with his Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi, and told him that 'China explicitly condemned Israel's violation of Iran's sovereignty, security and territorial integrity.' Wang, using common diplomatic language, said China was 'ready to maintain communication with Iran and other relevant parties to continue playing a constructive role in de-escalating the situation."
Wang later spoke with foreign ministers of Oman and Egypt; both nations are key mediators in the region. And late last week, before the U.S. got involved militarily, Xi spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin; the two agreed to stay in closer contact over Iran and work toward de-escalation. But China stayed away from any direct involvement, and Russia also had muted responses to the Israel-Iran conflict.
Iran is an important link in Xi's ambitious global project Belt and Road Initiative, and in 2023 joined the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, a security group by Russia and China to counter the U.S.-led NATO. It has conducted joint exercises with China, including this year's 'Maritime Security Belt 2025' in the Gulf of Oman, in which Russia also took part. On Wednesday, Beijing will convene a meeting of defense ministers of SCO member nations.
As important as Iran is to China, it is only part of Beijing's calculus, according to an analysis by the Soufan Center, a New York-based organization that focuses on global security challenges.
In an intel brief, the center said the conflict has revealed that Beijing's support for its partners, especially those in confrontation with the United States, 'is limited by a complex matrix of interests, including its desire to avoid alienating major economic partners and escalating tensions with the West."
___
AP researcher Yu Bing in Beijing and writers Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations and Josh Boak in Washington contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Palestinian diplomat urged media access to Gaza before deadly strike on reporters
Palestinian diplomat urged media access to Gaza before deadly strike on reporters

The Independent

time16 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Palestinian diplomat urged media access to Gaza before deadly strike on reporters

In a speech on 10 August, Palestine 's UN Ambassador Riyad Mansour urged the Security Council to send 100 journalists to Gaza to observe the situation. During an emergency meeting, Ambassador Mansour challenged Benjamin Netanyahu 's claims of a 'global conspiracy' regarding events in Gaza. Hours after his address, an Israeli airstrike targeted a tent housing journalists outside al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City. The strike resulted in the deaths of five Al Jazeera reporters, including 28-year-old correspondent Anas al-Sharif. Watch the video in full above.

FTSE 100 boosted by US-China trade extension
FTSE 100 boosted by US-China trade extension

The Independent

time16 minutes ago

  • The Independent

FTSE 100 boosted by US-China trade extension

The FTSE 100 made steady progress on Tuesday, boosted by a US- China trade extension and broadly as expected US inflation figures. The FTSE 100 index closed up 18.10 points, 0.2%, at 9,147.81. The FTSE 250 ended 46.80 points lower, 0.2%, at 21,842.69, while the AIM All-Share finished up 1.06 points, 0.1%, at 759.27. In Europe, the CAC 40 in Paris rose 0.7%, while the DAX 40 in Frankfurt eased 0.2%. In New York, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 1.0%, the S&P 500 was 0.8% higher, hitting an all-time high, and the Nasdaq Composite advanced 1.0%. Annual consumer price index inflation in the US was a notch lower than expected, while core CPI was higher than anticipated in July, data published by the US Bureau of Labour Statistics showed. The country's annual CPI inflation rate was unchanged at 2.7% in July. This was the same as in June but lower than the FXStreet-cited market consensus of an uptick to 2.8%. The monthly inflation rate slowed to 0.2% in July from 0.3% in June. The deceleration was as expected. However, core annual CPI inflation increased to 3.1% in July from 2.9% in June, higher than the expected increase to 3.0%. Monthly core inflation edged up to 0.3% in July, in line with market consensus, from 0.2% in June. James Knightley at ING said: 'Inflation was broadly in line with expectations as tariffs continue to be largely absorbed within US corporate profit margins. This gives the Fed the room to respond to the weaker jobs backdrop and cut interest rates from September.' The CME FedWatch tool on Tuesday put a 90% chance of a 25 basis points interest rate cut at the September Federal Reserve meeting compared to 86% on Monday. The pound jumped to 1.3509 dollars late on Tuesday afternoon in London, compared to 1.3402 dollars at the equities close on Monday. The euro climbed to 1.1682 dollars, higher against 1.1591 dollars. Against the yen, the dollar was trading lower at 147.83 yen compared to 148.09 yen. Blue chips in London had earlier opened brightly as investors breathed a sigh of relief after a trade truce extension between the US and China. As part of their May truce, fresh US tariffs targeting China were reduced to 30% and the corresponding level from China was cut to 10%. Those rates will now hold until November – or whenever a deal is agreed before then. The yield on the US 10-year Treasury was at 4.30%, stretched from 4.28%. The yield on the US 30-year Treasury was 4.89%, widened from 4.84%. Back in London, investors assessed the latest data on jobs and average earnings. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said the rate of unemployment in the three months to June remained at 4.7%, where it also had stood in the three months to May. Compared with the three months to March, however, the unemployment rate picked up from 4.5%. The latest figure was in line with the FXStreet-cited market forecast. Average weekly earnings, including bonuses in the three months to June eased to 4.6% from 5.0% in the period to May. Growth of 4.7% had been expected, according to FXStreet. Regular pay growth remained at 5.0%, in line with expectations. The ONS said an estimate showed payrolled employees fell by 149,000 on-year in June, and by 26,000 on-month. 'The early estimate of payrolled employees for July 2025 decreased by 164,000 on the year, and by 8,000 on the month,' the ONS added. ING said while the UK jobs market is undoubtedly cooling, a more modest fall in payroll employment suggests that the worst may be behind us. Better news on wage growth suggests the Bank of England can still afford to cut rates in November, though after 'last week's hawkish meeting, this call has become less clear-cut', the broker added. On the FTSE 100, half-year results from Spirax Group were seen as 'very reassuring', following a difficult period marked by significant headwinds, analysts on Tuesday said. Shares in the Cheltenham-based industrial engineering company specialising in thermal energy management and fluid technology solutions soared 13% as it reiterated full year guidance and reported six-month results ahead of expectations. Analysts at Citi said while guidance has been retained, 'the beat in H1 combined with commentary on an expected H2 organic sales acceleration could lead to expectations that there is some upside potential to consensus expectations for the year, especially on margins'. Panmure Liberum said the 'strong results are a step back in the right direction'. Spirax expects second-half organic sales growth to accelerate while organic margin progress is also expected to be greater than in the first half. But Entain fell back 1.9%. The Isle of Man-based gambling firm posted a £96.0 million pre-tax loss for the six months that ended on June 30, compared with a profit of £13.7 million the year prior. This was partly due to a civil penalty imposed by the Australian Transaction Reports & Analysis Centre to which Entain allocated £47.7 million in the first half of 2025. Despite this, Entain raised its full-year outlook for online net gaming revenue to be 7% higher on a constant currency basis, compared with the previous 'mid-single-digit' growth range. New guidance was added for Ebitda between £1.10 billion and £1.15 billion. Bank of America said while the upgraded guidance may seem 'modest', it looks 'well underpinned'. Housebuilder Bellway climbed 1.6% as it predicted further growth in the financial year ahead, despite 'softer' market conditions in recent months, and reported new home production ahead of guidance. The Newcastle upon Tyne housebuilder said total housing completions increased by 14% to 8,749 homes in the financial year that ended July 31 from 7,654 a year prior, at an overall average selling price of around £316,000, up year-on-year from £307,909, both slightly ahead of previous guidance. In June, the FTSE 250 listing had said it expected volume output in financial 2025 to be between 8,600 and 8,700 homes, raised from 'at least 8,500' before. Average selling prices were anticipated at £315,000. Chief executive Jason Honeyman said it was a 'solid' performance despite 'ongoing headwinds for our industry'. But Genuit fell 3.4% as it warned that the business environment remains challenging and market volumes are not expected to increase this year. Brent oil was quoted at 66.29 dollars a barrel in London on Tuesday, down from 66.49 dollars late on Monday. Gold advanced to 3,355.98 dollars an ounce against 3,347.03 dollars. The biggest risers on the FTSE 100 were Spirax, up 795.0 pence at 6,855.0p, Ashtead Group, up 168.0 pence at 5,164.0p, International Consolidated Airlines, up 11.2p at 385.1p, Airtel Africa, up 5.6p at 217.6p and Intercontinental Hotels, up 224.0p at 8,826.0p. The biggest fallers on the FTSE 100 were Sage Group, down 55.5p at 1,095.5p, London Stock Exchange, down 468.0p at 9,434.0p, Entain, down 20.4p at 916.0p, United Utilities, down 23.5p at 1,113.0p and National Grid, down 21.5p at 1,035.0p. Wednesday's local corporate calendar has half-year results from Lloyd's of London insurer Beazley, William Hill owner Evoke, and housebuilder Persimmon. The global economic calendar on Wednesday has inflation figures in Germany and Spain. – Contributed by Alliance News

On Gaza's killing fields, journalism faces its darkest hour – but that won't stop us reporting
On Gaza's killing fields, journalism faces its darkest hour – but that won't stop us reporting

The Guardian

time16 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

On Gaza's killing fields, journalism faces its darkest hour – but that won't stop us reporting

As the world witnesses the horrors unfolding in Gaza, a related tragedy continues with chilling regularity: the systematic targeting and killing of journalists. Just as the Gaza journalistic community thought matters could not get any worse, Benjamin Netanyahu's brutal occupying forces carried out yet another cold-blooded murder on Sunday, this time of the Al Jazeera journalists Anas al-Sharif and Mohammed Qraiqea, along with videographers Ibrahim Thaher, Mohammed Nofal and their colleagues. They were sheltering in a media tent near al-Shifa hospital, and were killed by a direct strike. The Israeli war machine, accelerating its stated goal of occupying Gaza, showed no restraint in targeting journalists, in violation of international conventions. So far in this war it has killed 238 of us. The war on Gaza has become the deadliest conflict for journalists and media workers in living memory, with 2024 recording the highest number of journalists killed, the vast majority at the hands of Israeli forces. The systematic targeting and elimination of journalists is not merely a local or regional tragedy; it is a catastrophic breach of international norms regarding the protection of journalists in conflict zones, signalling a global collapse of the moral responsibility in safeguarding those who risk everything to shed light on the realities of war. Gaza is not the only place where journalists are under siege. Threats, intimidation and murderous violence against journalists are on the rise in countries including Sudan, Pakistan and Myanmar. However, what differentiates Israeli crimes is the impunity with which the occupation forces murder journalists and the indifference shown by leaders of the so-called free world. What is especially shocking is when some media organisations repeat the Israeli regime's false allegations against targeted journalists without verification. By any measure, it is the most dangerous time to be a journalist in recent history. Reporters are threatened, harassed and killed merely for fulfilling their public duty of bearing witness and reporting the truth. Worldwide, the dangers faced by journalists in conflict zones have intensified. In 2023, a journalist or media worker was killed, on average, every four days. In 2024, this grim statistic worsened to once every three days, most of those by Israeli forces. The journalists in Gaza are not parachuted-in international correspondents but local journalists – those who know the land, the people and the stories best. These journalists are not just reporting on Gaza's tragedy; they are living it. This surge in violence against journalists is neither accidental nor isolated. It is part of a broader, deeply worrying trend: the systematic silencing of the media, often orchestrated by autocrats and regimes who seek to conceal their crimes in darkness. This should horrify us all. It is an assault not only on individual reporters but on the entire global public's right to know, to understand the depth of human suffering, and to hold the powerful to account. Beyond the killings of more than 230 journalists, Israel now employs starvation as a tool, with journalists pushed to the brink, collapsing from hunger while reporting. At Al Jazeera, we have lost colleagues and their family members in Gaza, with the latest killing of Anas al-Sharif and his colleagues bringing the total number of the network's journalists killed to nine. Our colleagues have been forced to report not just on the atrocities happening to civilians, but on the direct attacks against those whose only weapon is a microphone or a camera. Despite this, we insist on continuing in our professional duty. We remain committed to reporting unfolding genocide, despite Israeli efforts to blind us and the world. We will tirelessly work to strengthen the teams and to remain faithful to our global audience, who have a right to be informed. But this requires international solidarity, and the exertion of full pressure on Israel to stop targeting and killing journalists and to allow international media access and freedom of operation in the Gaza Strip. The international community must act, urgently and decisively, to safeguard journalists and to protect those who risk everything to inform the world about the continuing humanitarian catastrophe and genocide in Gaza. Journalists must be allowed to perform their duties without fear of violence. Anything less is a betrayal of the most fundamental principles of free expression. We owe it to the courageous journalists in Gaza to amplify their voices. Their work is not merely documentation; it is the first draft of history, whereby future historians will study the horrors of the 21st century's most televised genocide. Access to reliable information about wars and conflicts is not a luxury; it is essential for the wellbeing of global populations, the protection of human rights and the global effort to hold perpetrators of war crimes accountable. When journalists are silenced, we all become more vulnerable to disinformation, propaganda and the unchecked abuse of power. We are at a crossroads. If the world continues to tolerate the murder, starvation and persecution of journalists, it is not only journalism that will suffer, but also accountability, democracy and the possibility of a more just future. The international legal framework for the protection of journalists in war must be urgently strengthened and enforced, and governments must be held to account for violations. The international journalistic community, and indeed the world, bears an immense responsibility. The courage, commitment and sacrifice of journalists in Gaza demand nothing less than our full support and unrelenting advocacy. Our inaction will be recorded by history as a monumental failure to protect those who stood at the frontlines of truth. Asef Hamidi is the director of news, Al Jazeera Channel Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store